Posted: November 18th, 2022

Assignment #4 Identify a current health care policy

Assignment #4 DUE DATE NOVEMBER 18th
Political Activism

Assessment Description
Many careers are influenced by government regulations. Health care is one of those careers, similar to education, in which workers are hesitant to be involved in the political process. In order to advance the cause of quality patient care, it is very important that doctorally prepared advanced practice nurses get involved in the political process. By creating an objective policy brief, you will be able to determine which policies you want to be involved in changing. A policy brief is a brief summary of a specific issue, policy options for dealing with it, and recommendations for the best option. This assignment is divided into two parts.
This assignment will prepare you to determine what policy you may want to be involved in changing by creating an objective policy brief. A policy brief is a concise summary of a particular issue, the policy options to deal with it, and some recommendations on the best option. This assignment consists of two parts.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic (sample nursing essay examples by the best nursing assignment writing service) and at least one in-text citation from each source.
• This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need Helpance.
• Upload both parts of the assignment to the assignment drobox.
• Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.
Directions:
Part 1: In 500-750 words, address the following:
1. Identify a current health care policy in your community or state You can any states in USA.
2. Research the issue and determine your personal stance based on the current evidence.
Part 2:
1. Locate the contact information for a state, local, or federal official for your area.
2. Locate information regarding the official’s stance on the issue.
3. Send the official a letter or email that explains your position and offers suggestions on how the official should move forward with the agenda from your policy brief.

Rubric Criteria
Collapse All Rubric CriteriaCollapse All
Current Health Care Policy – Community or State
25 points
Criteria Description

5. Target
25 points
Discussion of a current health care policy in the community or state is thoroughly presented. Application to practice is identified with comprehensive discussion of barriers and support to advance health care delivery or practice.
4. Acceptable
23 points
Discussion of a current health care policy in the community or state is clearly present but not as complete as expected. Application to practice is identified with a detailed discussion of barriers and support to advance health care delivery or practice.
3. Approaching
22 points
Discussion of a current health care policy in the community or state is present but rendered at an inadequate level. Application to practice is identified with discussion at an inadequate level.
2. Insufficient
20 points
Discussion of a current health care policy in the community or state are present but incomplete. Application to practice is identified but is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of a current health care policy in the community or state is not present. Application to practice is not present.
Personal Stance
25 points
Criteria Description
Personal Stance
5. Target
25 points
Discussion of personal stance is comprehensive with an evidence-based approach and supported by current evidence.
4. Acceptable
23 points
Discussion of personal stance is well developed with an evidence-based approach and supported by current evidence.
3. Approaching
22 points
Discussion of personal stance is present with an evidence-based approach and is supported by current evidence, but only at an inadequate level.
2. Insufficient
20 points
Discussion of personal stance is incomplete and does not establish an evidence-based approach or is not supported by current evidence.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of personal stance is not present.
Policymaker or Influencer Identification
10 points
Criteria Description
Policymaker or Influencer Identification
5. Target
10 points
Identification of a policymaker or influencer is present with contact information and a robust overview of the stance on the identified policy.
4. Acceptable
9.2 points
N/A
3. Approaching
8.8 points
Identification of a policymaker or influencer is present with contact information and an inadequate overview of the stance on the identified policy.
2. Insufficient
8 points
N/A
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Identification of a policymaker or influencer is not present; or an overview of the stance on the identified policy is not provided.
Letter to Policymaker or Influencer
10 points
Criteria Description
Letter to Policymaker or Influencer
5. Target
10 points
Implications and recommendations offered are convincing, insightful, and forward-thinking. Information presented is supported by evidence.
4. Acceptable
9.2 points
Implications and recommendations offered are convincing, insightful, and forward-thinking.
3. Approaching
8.8 points
Implications and recommendations offered are presented at an inadequate level.
2. Insufficient
8 points
Implications and recommendations offered are incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Implications and recommendations offered are not offered.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose
7 points
Criteria Description
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience
5. Target
7 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.
4. Acceptable
6.44 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
3. Approaching
6.16 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
2. Insufficient
5.6 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
8 points
Criteria Description
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
5. Target
8 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
4. Acceptable
7.36 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
3. Approaching
7.04 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
2. Insufficient
6.4 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
Mechanics of Writing
5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Target
5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable
4.6 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
3. Approaching
4.4 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient
4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
Format/Documentation
10 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
5. Target
10 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
4. Acceptable
9.2 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching
8.8 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
2. Insufficient
8 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Order | Check Discount

Tags: Assignment #4 Identify a current health care policy