Posted: February 15th, 2022

Rehabilitation, Treatment, and the Management of Offenders: Can Punishment Cure?

Study Bay Coursework Assignment Writing Help

Summary

This paper will focus on how the authors of three specific articles, Megan Consolation, Mona Lynch, Kelly Hannah-Moffat and Paula Maurutto, interpret the rehabilitative processes for prison offenders. The authors’ arguments of who’s chargeable for this rehabilitation fluctuate broadly. There can be a quick abstract of every creator’s argument and the essay will conclude in clarify which authors argument is most complete in explaining who the accountability of rehabilitation falls on.

Key phrases: Punishment, Rehabilitation, Rhetoric, Duty

]

The Greatest Seven Years I May’a Executed: The Reconstruction of Imprisonment as Rehabilitation

By Megan Consolation

The Greatest Seven Years I May’a Executed by Megan Consolation is about the rehabilitation course of skilled by many low-income males in the United States. Rehabilitation is outlined as restoring somebody to a helpful position in society (“Rehabilitation,” 2009). Consolation says that the males who’re incarcerated in California flip to jail as a method to obtain more healthy relationships and to enhance themselves. Since rehabilitation packages are scarce, the particular person turns into chargeable for their very own enchancment. We are able to see that folks report making the finest of their scenario even when there are usually not adequate packages accessible to Help them get clear. Nevertheless we will see that the lack of these packages could be a threat in the direction of reoffending. Despite the fact that there are some packages accessible, the offenders declare that these packages lack anomity and would slightly spend their time behind bars as a result of they can set up objectives that they need to obtain as soon as they’re launched. Thus, the accountability of rehabilitation is shifted on to the particular person, and we will Question Assignment if the position that parole brokers play is of any significance in any respect. Consolation additionally finds that these males have interaction in a interval of appearing as if their expertise in the penitentiary is efficient in getting ready them for re-entry into society. Nevertheless, after these males are in reality launched from the penitentiary, they understand the damaging repercussion of not successfully being rehabilitated. In distinction, rehabilitative therapy in the types of remedy, job coaching, and schooling can present rather more beneficial outcomes for a person being reintegrated again into society.

Rehabilitation as Rhetoric: The Preferrred of Reformation in Up to date Parole Discourse and Practices

By Mona Lynch

Mona Lynch talks about the shifts in the function of parole all through historical past. She marks three sturdy adjustments in parole historical past by which every period has a special view on who’s accountable to enhance the parolee. The three eras of parole are marked thus; the disciplinary period, scientific period, and the managerial period. Lynch discusses the first two as being a mixed accountability of the state, group, and the particular person to Help them change into normalized into society. In the third period, she states that the accountability is shifted on to the parole agent and the offender to Help him enhance. We are able to see that there’s a shared accountability. Lynch goes on to say that there’s little funding put into rehabilitative measures and packages to help the parolee to enhance. In conclusion we will see that the points that the agent would Help the particular person with are literally being addressed as the poor decisions of the particular person, and whereas there are packages in place to Help repair the poor decisions the particular person has made, they’re truly used as coercive instruments in opposition to the parolee. We are able to see that the rhetoric of rehabilitation is expressed as inserting unrealistic calls for on the particular person to normalize themselves, and if he doesn’t succeed it’s thought-about their very own fault, and the brokers are in a position to make use of coercion once they consider it’s essential to guard society from deviant habits.

Shifting and Focused Kinds of Penal Governance: Bail, Punishment and Shifting and Specialised Courts

By Kelly Hannah-Moffatt and Paula Maurutto

Shifting and Focused Kinds of Penal Governance by Hanna Moffat and Paula Maurutto discusses rehabilitation in Canadian specialised courts. They state that rehabilitation right now is far totally different from the previous. All through the historical past of the prison justice system, rehabilitation took on the function of offering remedy to the particular person offender, however right now it operates on two ranges. The primary is to supply remedy to the offender by job coaching and counselling and the second function of rehabilitation is to train management. The latter function might be seen as being intrusive. The prison justice system is combining rehabilitation and punishment as a punitive measure. They argue that rehabilitation doesn’t serve a single function however it’s binary. In conclusion we will see that rehabilitation could be very messy as a result of it’s each a mixture of punishment and remedy and additionally takes the position of being coercive and controlling.

The Duty of Rehabilitation

Rehabilitation has shifted in type all through historical past and has gone from being therapeutic to taking over a controlling and coercive look. Many individuals argue about which type of rehabilitation is handiest however the function of rehabilitation is to determine why a person dedicated a criminal offense, and deal with these points to foster a everlasting change. It’s half of a bigger modernity. There are numerous articles about who ought to tackle the accountability of rehabilitation and by this Assessment I’ll define how the authors Megan Consolation, Mona Lynch, Hanna Moffatt and Paula Maurutto write about the topic. Then I’ll conclude with which creator presents the most complete argument for who ought to tackle rehabilitation accountability.

To start with, Mona Consolation says that jail fails to rehabilitate a person again into society as a result of the jail system doesn’t have packages in place which may help the offenders in changing into normalized into society. She says that the jail solely serves the function of being a “major means of service entry” the place these males who’re denied social welfare are actually in a position to get a maintain of it inside the penitentiary (Consolation, 2008). These males act as if the jail will Help them re-enter society as a result of they can set up objectives that they need to obtain. Nevertheless, Comforts research present that tens of 1000’s of launched prisoners who relapse and reoffend are a blunt testimony that the California Division of Correction or Rehabilitation is sporting only a few rehabilitative garments” (Consolation, 2008). Despite the fact that males consider that the jail will make them “clear”, research show that they most of the time will reoffend as a result of the packages to Help them change into “normalized” in jail have been non-existent or insufficient.

In distinction, Mona Lynch writes that rehabilitation is extra current in penitentiaries than Consolation would argue. She states that though rehabilitation has become being extra “managerial”, it nonetheless holds onto some previous ideologies so we will take a look at it as merely re-invented. It’s holding the previous rhetoric however doing it in several or trendy methods. In the previous it took on a therapeutic type however right now it’s binary in being each therapeutic and coercive. In her opinion, rehabilitation is a mixed accountability of each the offender and the parole agent, however there may be extra emphasis on the offender “wanting” to enhance. She additionally writes that rehabilitation seems essential for the company to painting to a quantity of audiences, together with the public, the purchasers, and the brokers chargeable for placing objectives into actions. The dedication nonetheless doesn’t prolong previous this rhetoric (Lynch, 2000).

Lastly, Hannah-Moffat and Maurutto see rehabilitation in a special type than Consolation, however considerably just like Lynch. They see rehabilitation motivated by therapeutic and preventative aim and they depend on relationships with group teams to create a variety of interactions with the court docket and the offender (Hannah-Moffat & Maurutto, 2012). The way in which that rehabilitation has shifted from being simply therapeutic, then to coercive, and then right into a meshing of the two, is a brand new characteristic of the Canadian prison justice system. They write that rehabilitation is a shared accountability, and it extends past the jail. It takes the mixed efforts of professionals and the group to work collectively to re-integrate a person again into society. One can even argue that this kind of rehabilitation can be fairer in phrases of searching for the finest program to deal with the particular wants of the offender, and can be extra profitable in reintegrating them into society in consequence. In Maurutto and Moffatt’s argument, rehabilitation is ready to be a life-changing expertise slightly than simply an effort to alter an individual’s deviant character.

In conclusion we see there’s a variation in the arguments offered by Consolation, Lynch and Maurutto and Moffat. Nevertheless, in my view I consider that the latter two authors who argue that the state and group ought to work collectively to make the particular person extra accountable is extra understandable than the different two arguments. Though Consolation states that the accountability falls on the offender, research present that they may threat reoffending if left to their very own gadgets. This doesn’t then appear lifelike to make the particular person chargeable for their very own rehabilitation, as a result of the function of punishment is to discourage an motion that deviates from the societal norms. She additionally argues that the jail doesn’t supply packages and even once they try this they’re relying on you to not use them (Consolation, 2008). As a substitute the state decides to spend $35, 587 a yr to imprison an offender, forgetting that they may use these funds to re-integrate the offender. The person is made accountable and they go away the jail with “no extra abilities or info to Help him enter society (Consolation, 2008). It’s subsequently not efficient to not make the state accountable as a result of the particular person can not discover a job on his personal and he’s left searching for the prison justice system to Help him get clear, however this solely gives him with non permanent entry to social welfare.

On the different hand, Lynch’s argument that there’s a shared accountability between the parole agent and the offender is extra complete and doubtlessly efficient than Comforts as a result of there may be an exterior help system set as much as rehabilitate the offender. There’s additionally the implementation of punitive punishments. The rationale why Consolation’s argument in making the particular person accountable doesn’t bode properly is since you can not count on somebody who’s deviant to be accountable. Nevertheless with parole brokers taking over half accountability, it appears extra possible that rehabilitation could have a larger success fee. Lynch argues that in the previous, parole served the function of being therapeutic and right now it takes on each therapeutic and coercive roles. That is extra of an efficient argument as a result of the function of jail is to punish in addition to to Help them get again into society. The brand new period of parole is more practical as a result of the state is defending society from dangerous offenders whereas serving to them get again to being regular and productive in society. In conclusion, this mannequin isn’t fully putting off a section of the inhabitants, slightly crime punishment and disciplinary motion are working collectively to make mixed efforts to Help make the offender accountable (Lynch, 2000).

Nevertheless, the argument made my Hannah-Moffat and Maurutto presents an much more complete argument for who ought to maintain the accountability to rehabilitate the particular person. They argue that rehabilitation occurs the second you’re charged, and since there are specialised group teams working with the offender, they can deal with the underlying holistic wants of the offender in an effort to guarantee profitable completion of a therapy program (Hannah-Moffat & Maurutto, 2012). Typical courts are criticized for failing to handle successfully continual social packages which is why if the specialised courts take the responsibly they’re higher outfitted to focus on particular wants (Hannah-Moffat & Maurutto, 2012). The entire course of of how finest to rehabilitate particular circumstances and people would start the second the charged individual entered the courtroom and wouldn’t wait till they entered jail itself. Every technique begins rehabilitation at a special time in the people interplay with the prison justice system, however in the third one it begins from the starting; the second the particular person is charged. That is nearly extra of a preventative type of rehabilitation and a hybrid.

In conclusion, utilizing Hannah-Moffat & Maurutto’s concepts on the accountability to rehabilitate an offender being shared between specialised courts, group packages and the particular person is best as a result of it takes on preventative therapeutic practices however they haven’t eroded the conventional type of punishment (Hannah-Moffat & Maurutto, 2012). The chance to take part in these packages is helpful for the parolee as a result of “their fees could also be withdrawn, or they might get an absolute or conditional discharge” (Hannah-Moffat & Maurutto, 2012). This appears more practical as a result of the courts are working collectively to normalize the offender and this enables them to not have the stigma of being a prison. The offender can discover a job with out the hassle of their document following them. Subsequently having specialised courts and therapeutic packages, and the particular person work collectively to Help rehabilitation is extra complete in comparison with having a person tackle full accountability or having the state tackle sole accountability. Working individually, neither occasion might be trusted to make the proper or rational decisions for the prisoners, thus a binary response is required for joint legal responsibility and oversight.

References

Megan Consolation (2008). “The Greatest Seven Years I May’a Executed: The Reconstruction of Imprisonment as Rehabilitation.” In Pat Carlen, Imaginary Penalties, Cullompton, Devon: Willan. Pp. 252-274. Coursepack.

Mona Lynch (2000). “Rehabilitation as Rhetoric: The Preferrred of Reformation in Up to date Parole Discourse and Practices.” Punishment & Society 2(1): 40-65. Stable URL.

Kelly Hannah-Moffat and Paula Maurutto (2012). “Shifting and Focused Kinds of Penal Governance: Bail, Punishment, and Specialised Courts.” Theoretical Criminology 16(2): 201-219. Stable URL.

Rehabilitation. (2009). Retrieved from https://nursingstudybay.com/write-my-essay/thefreedictionary.com/rehabilitation