Posted: October 1st, 2022

Assessment 1: Laboratory Report

1. Assessment Overview

Module title Assessment & Interpretation of Medical Information
Assessment title Assessment 1: Laboratory Report
Assessment weighting 75%
Assessment abstract A written report analysing and deciphering the information collected from laboratory-based sensible work (ELISA, Western blot, PCR)
Studying outcomes assessed • Grasp advanced knowledge Assessment, together with performing statistical Assessment and knowledge interpretation
• Deploy high-quality educational writing abilities to report outcomes of laboratory investigations in a concise and applicable scientific method
• Critically analyse the significance of assay growth and high quality management in laboratory testing
Phrase depend 3000 phrases

(in-text citations are included within the phrase depend)

(references within the reference record, phrases in tables, desk titles, figures, determine legends or the appendix should not included within the phrase depend)

The penalty for exceeding the phrase depend shall be 5 marks per 1000 phrases extra.
Referencing APA seventh model
Assessment Deadline 30th September, 2022
Assessment deadline Work submitted after the deadline shall be recorded as late, except an extension or deferral has been obtained. The penalty for late work is 5 marks for work submitted as much as 24 hours after a deadline, and 5 marks per day after this, together with weekends
Submission particulars You will need to submit a single PDF file.

Formative suggestions You have got the chance to obtain particular person suggestions on as much as 500 phrases as follows:
• You will need to select one set of knowledge:
– ELISA normal curve and affected person outcomes
– ELISA normal curve and high quality management outcomes
– Western blot knowledge
– PCR knowledge
• It’s best to present a short description of the important thing outcomes for the chosen knowledge set below a outcomes subheading
• It’s best to current the information with an accompanying determine legend/desk title (not included in phrase depend)
• It’s best to write your interpretation of the chosen knowledge set below a dialogue subheading

You’ll obtain suggestions on knowledge presentation, your description of key outcomes and your interpretation of the information.

In the event you want to obtain suggestions on this formative job, please submit your job to the submission hyperlink ‘Assessment 1 – formative suggestions’ by 9am on 4th November 2022. Any drafts submitted to the inbox after this deadline is not going to obtain suggestions

Marking standards The Assessment shall be assessed in keeping with the marking standards on pages 5-9. The move mark is 50%.

2. Assessment Steerage

• You may be analysing and deciphering the ELISA, Western blot and PCR – all three units of knowledge have to be included inside the report.
• Please state your Assessment quantity and phrase depend on the primary web page of the report.
• Use a proper educational writing model and use scientific language all through.
• The report must be written within the third particular person
• The report ought to embrace the next sections: introduction, outcomes, dialogue, reference record and appendix. Please be aware a strategies part is just not required for this report. Additional steering is given beneath with steered phrase counts:

Introduction (~ 200 phrases)
The introduction ought to present context to the report. You have to to offer wider background data and briefly summarise the situation in your individual phrases and introduce the aim/purpose(s) of the report. It’s best to keep away from repeating the knowledge supplied within the tips. The introduction must be supported by reference to related literature.

Outcomes (~ 200 phrases)
Within the outcomes part it’s best to use applicable scientific conventions to speak the outcomes that you simply obtained – it’s best to merely current and describe the outcomes on this part, don’t interpret the information right here. No references must be wanted within the outcomes part. Figures and tables must be labelled appropriately and totally.
To Help you with this, there are three guides which it’s best to consult with on MD7002 Moodle web site below ‘ASSESSMENT 1’  ASSESSMENT 1 RESOURCES:
– Information to writing scientific reviews
– Information to figures & determine legends
– Information to tables & desk titles

The outcomes part must be structured as follows:
ELISA outcomes
• A concise description of the important thing outcomes for the ELISA knowledge (affected person samples and QC samples)
• Normal curve for the creatinine ELISA
• Tabulated outcomes of the creatinine focus for the 2 sufferers (Observe: this must be a abstract desk – the desk of uncooked knowledge must be included within the appendix)
• Tabulated outcomes of the QC knowledge together with key outcomes of applicable statistical checks (Observe: this must be a abstract desk – the finished desk supplied within the tips must be included within the appendix)

Western blot outcomes
• A concise description of the important thing outcomes for the Western blot knowledge
• Absolutely annotated Western blot picture PCR outcomes
• A concise description of the important thing outcomes for the PCR knowledge
• Absolutely annotated agarose gel picture

Dialogue (~2600 phrases)
The next components must be addressed in your dialogue:
• Mix all the parameters examined and focus on what the outcomes imply in context with the affected person – it’s best to consult with each your outcomes and first literature to Help your dialogue
• On the subject of your knowledge and related literature, focus on the optimisation of Western blotting (in an effort to obtain the depth required at degree 7, it’s best to focus intimately on a restricted variety of key factors that are related to your knowledge)
• On the subject of your QC knowledge for the ELISA and related literature, focus on the significance of high quality management in laboratory testing
• You also needs to embrace a concise conclusion which brings the report collectively -it anticipated you’ll refer again to the purpose(s) of the report.

You’re inspired to make use of related subheadings to construction the dialogue.

Appendix
This part ought to include supplementary materials that isn’t important in the principle outcomes part however will present a extra complete understanding of the outcomes supplied.
The appendix must be labelled alphabetically and embrace:
• A desk of the uncooked knowledge used to supply the usual curve for the creatinine ELISA
• A desk of the uncooked knowledge used to calculate the creatinine focus within the sufferers
• A replica of the finished desk for QC knowledge for the ELISA (from the rules)
• Screenshots of key statistical outputs

three. Marking Standards

You may be assessed for MD7002 Assessment 1 utilizing the next marking standards which relies on the generic marking standards for degree 7. You may be assessed on 4 predominant standards:
• Data – information and understanding of the educational self-discipline
• Sources – Studying and use of applicable sources
• Assessment – Crucial Assessment and interpretation
• Communication – Communication abilities, written and offered

Distinction
90–100%
Proof
of… Distinction
80-89%
Proof of… Distinction
70-79%
Proof of… Advantage
60-69%
Proof
of… Move
50-59%
Proof
of… Fail
40-49% Proof
of… Fail
30-39%
Proof of… Fail
20-29%
Proof
of… Fail
10-19%
Proof
of… Fail
Zero-9%
Proof of…
Data

Data and understanding of the educational self-discipline, subject of examine, or space of professional apply.

SCOPE: essential engagement with the first and secondary sources used to reply the
Question Assignment. Response is acceptable and addresses the vary of studying outcomes;

Insightful and complicated engagement with related analysis materials;

Demonstration and utility of information pertaining to knowledge and statistical Assessment, assay growth and high quality management;

A classy diploma of synthesis, fairly probably of advanced and disparate materials. Response is acceptable and addresses the vary of studying outcomes;

Superior engagement with related analysis materials;

Achieved demonstration of information pertaining to knowledge and statistical Assessment, assay growth and high quality management;

Extraordinarily excessive diploma of synthesis of analysis materials. Response is acceptable and addresses the vary of studying outcomes;

A excessive diploma of synthesis relating related analysis materials;

Glorious demonstration of information and understanding pertaining to knowledge and statistical Assessment, assay growth and high quality management;

Crucial Assessment evident with the potential for brand spanking new insights. Response is acceptable and addresses the vary of studying outcomes;

An assured understanding of key points pertaining to knowledge and statistical Assessment, assay growth and high quality management, supported by essential Assessment with the potential for brand spanking new insights;

A sustained utility and depth of analysis materials and accuracy intimately. Response is acceptable and addresses the vary of studying outcomes; the place the information is correct. Work could lack sustained depth;

Engagement with related information pertaining to knowledge and statistical Assessment, assay growth and high quality management;

Passable conceptual consciousness enabling essential Assessment. Response doesn’t handle the complete vary of studying outcomes, inaccurate and/or lacking information at occasions;

Inadequate engagement with related analysis materials;

Unsatisfactory engagement with related information and inadequate understanding of key points regarding knowledge and statistical Assessment, assay growth and high quality management;

Inadequate conceptual consciousness and missing in essential Assessment. Response doesn’t handle studying outcomes, inaccurate and lacking information;

Insufficient engagement with related analysis materials;

Insufficient protection of related points regarding knowledge and statistical Assessment, assay growth and high quality management;

Inconsistent understanding proven and Assessment is weak and underdeveloped. Response doesn’t handle studying outcomes;

Lack of related analysis and little understanding proven;

Very weak understanding of key points regarding knowledge and statistical Assessment, assay growth and high quality management, work lacks essential oversight. Response doesn’t handle studying outcomes;

Severely missing in related analysis and underpinning information;

Slight understanding of key points regarding knowledge and statistical Assessment, assay growth and high quality management, little try at essential Assessment. Response doesn’t handle studying outcomes;

No engagement with related analysis materials;

Negligible understanding of key points regarding knowledge and statistical Assessment, assay growth and high quality management, which is more likely to present no essential Assessment or engagement with the training transient.

Distinction
90–100%
Proof
of… Distinction
80-89%
Proof of… Distinction
70-79%
Proof of… Advantage
60-69%
Proof
of… Move
50-59%
Proof of… Fail
40-49% Proof
of… Fail
30-39%
Proof of… Fail
20-29%
Proof
of… Fail
10-19%
Proof
of… Fail
Zero-9%
Proof of…
Sources

Studying and use of applicable sources.

SCOPE: correct and constant acknowledgment and referencing of sources. In depth vary and complicated use of applicable sources;

Unparalleled normal of analysis each in breadth and depth, which demonstrates a really excessive mental engagement and rigor;

Sources acknowledged appropriately in keeping with APA seventh model. In depth vary and use of applicable sources;

Extraordinarily properly referenced analysis each in breadth and depth, which demonstrates excessive mental engagement and rigor;

Sources acknowledged appropriately in keeping with APA seventh model. Substantial vary and complicated use of sources;

Effectively referenced analysis each in breadth and depth, which demonstrates clear mental rigor;

Sources acknowledged appropriately in keeping with APA seventh model. An assured vary of studying, with sustained reference to key and core texts. The work could embrace present analysis at the vanguard of the self-discipline;

Superb referencing in breadth and/or depth, which reveals an excellent degree of mental rigor;

Sources acknowledged appropriately in keeping with APA seventh model. A passable vary of core and fundamental texts, which references present analysis within the self-discipline;

Sources acknowledged appropriately in keeping with APA seventh model;

The work could include minor errors and be restricted in breadth, depth and mental rigor. Inadequate vary of supply studying of core and fundamental texts;

Sources not acknowledged in step with APA seventh model. Studying materials is Insufficient and should not embrace core and fundamental texts;

Sources inaccurately referenced. Very weak engagement with supply studying;

Inconsistent and/or restricted
referencing of sources. Severely missing supply
studying;

Sources both not current
and/or not referenced. Negligible try to determine supply materials;

No indication of supply studying.

Distinction
90–100%
Proof of… Distinction
80-89%
Proof of… Distinction
70-79%
Proof of… Advantage
60-69%
Proof of… Move
50-59%
Proof of… Fail
40-49% Proof of… Fail
30-39%
Proof of… Fail
20-29%
Proof of… Fail
10-19%
Proof of… Fail
Zero-9%
Proof of…
Assessment

Crucial Assessment and interpretation.

SCOPE:
applicable analytical dialogue and interpretation of supply materials. A classy
skill to carry out knowledge and statistical Assessment and interpret laboratory outcomes;

An unparalleled degree of study and analysis;

A classy cogent argument providing new and authentic contributions to information. Superior skill to
carry out knowledge and statistical Assessment and interpret laboratory outcomes;

Achieved degree of study;

A extremely developed cogent argument with the potential to deliver new and authentic contributions to information. A superb skill
to carry out knowledge and statistical Assessment and interpret laboratory outcomes;

A excessive diploma of study and analysis;

A sustained argument with the chance for brand spanking new insights to information. A convincing skill
to carry out knowledge and statistical Assessment and interpret laboratory outcomes;

A developed conceptual understanding that permits the scholar to search out new meanings in established hypotheses;

A developed and sustained argument with the chance for brand spanking new insights to information. A capability to
carry out knowledge and statistical Assessment and interpret laboratory outcomes;

A passable analysis of related, present analysis;

Means to plan a coherent essential/ analytical argument is supported with proof. An absence of skill to
carry out knowledge and statistical Assessment and interpret laboratory outcomes;

Judgements not totally substantiated and understood;

The power to assemble an argument is underdeveloped and never supported totally with proof. An absence of skill to
carry out knowledge and statistical Assessment and interpret laboratory outcomes;

Judgements should not substantiated or understood and the essential place is just not made clear;

Weak interpretation of analysis and work is just not supported with proof. Very weak
Assessment, probably restricted to a single perspective.

Substandard argument, work skill to carry out knowledge and statistical Assessment and interpret laboratory outcomes;

Episodes of self- contradiction and/or confusion. Slight indication of
skill to carry out knowledge and statistical Assessment and interpret laboratory outcomes;

Slight analytical engagement and work lacks criticality all through;

Lacks proof, work reveals self- contradiction and confusion. No try to
interpret laboratory knowledge or analysis materials.;

No proof of essential Assessment.

Distinction
90–100%
Proof
of… Distinction
80-89%
Proof of… Distinction
70-79%
Proof of… Advantage
60-69%
Proof
of… Move
50-59%
Proof
of… Fail
40-49% Proof
of… Fail
30-39%
Proof of… Fail
20-29%
Proof
of… Fail
10-19%
Proof
of… Fail
Zero-9%
Proof of…
Communication

Communication abilities: artistic, written and offered.

SCOPE: communication of intent, adherence to educational
topic self-discipline protocols. A classy response, the educational type matches that anticipated;

Mastery and command of specialist abilities pertaining to writing a laboratory report;

Idiomatic and extremely coherent, scholarly expression. Persuasive articulation, the place the educational type, largely matches that anticipated;

Achieved command of specialist abilities pertaining to writing a laboratory report. A excessive diploma of ability, the educational type reveals distinctive requirements;

A excessive command of specialist abilities pertaining to writing a laboratory report. Safe and sustained expression, observing applicable educational type;

Superb demonstration of key abilities associated to writing a laboratory report;

Fluent and persuasive expression of concepts, work reveals aptitude;

Assured interpretation of the model and style, content material, type and approach for specialist viewers. Good expression, observing applicable educational type;

An excellent demonstration of key abilities associated to writing a laboratory report;

Predominantly correct in spelling and grammar, concepts communicated appropriately and satisfactorily;

Passable utility of specialist abilities with efficient technical management. Unsatisfactory demonstration and utility of key communication abilities anticipated for an instructional laboratory report;

Recurring errors in spelling and grammar, concepts restricted and underdeveloped, probably poor paraphrasing;

Abilities demonstrated are inadequate for the duty and work could lack technical judgement. Vital errors evident within the educational type;

Weak demonstration of key abilities associated to writing a laboratory report;

Weaknesses in spelling and grammar, lacks coherence and construction, probably poor paraphrasing;

Work lacks technical judgement. Very weak commentary of educational conventions;

Very weak demonstration of key abilities associated to writing a laboratory report;

Extreme deficiencies in spelling and grammar and expression undermines that means, probably poor paraphrasing;

Substandard relationship between content material, type and approach. Slight commentary of educational conventions;

Slight demonstration of key abilities associated to writing a laboratory report;

Weak expression, largely incoherent and fails to safe that means, poor paraphrasing;

Slight engagement with the work. Negligible commentary of educational conventions;

Incoherent and confused expression, poor paraphrasing;

No discernible demonstration of key abilities associated to writing a laboratory report;

No engagement with the work.

Order | Check Discount

Tags: Assessment 1: Laboratory Report