Posted: December 20th, 2021

OSHA’s Voluntary Safety and Health Program Management

1. OSHA’s Voluntary Safety and Health Program Management Guidelines and the S&H Management Systems e-tool tend to get into the nitty-gritty of how to manage a safety program from a management systems perspective. Discuss whether you believe OSHA should be in the business of offering management suggestions.
Your response must be at least 150 words in length.

2. Discuss how OSHA’s Field Operations Manual could be used by an organization’s management to improve the management of its safety and health program.
Your response must be at least 150 words in length.

3. Describe a situation involving workplace violence that could be cited as a violation of the General Duty Clause. Explain where you would locate the four elements needed to prove such a violation and how your situation meets those four elements.

Your response must be at least 300 words in length.

4. Describe a situation involving ergonomics that could be cited as a violation of the General Duty Clause. Explain where you would locate the four elements needed to prove such a violation and how your situation meets those four elements.

OSHA Management System
Question 1
I believe that OSHA should be in the business of offering management suggestions because it will make the employees enjoy the right of working in a safe environment, a requirement by law from employers to provide working conditions that are free from any kind of danger to the employees. Additionally, OSHA has a great information deal of helping workers to adhere to their obligations under OSHA law. The laws also bar the employers from taking advantage of the workers when they exercise their rights in the workplace for instance when they raise a safety and health concern such as an injury. Further, OSHA is helpful in answering workplace questions on health and safety or other concerns from workers and employees. OSHA can also be of help to small business organizations employees in consultation of the probable hazards on their work sites and help them correct them if identified. Employees can also file their complaints to OSHA to inspect their place of work if they feel OSHA laid standards are not observed by their employees or if they identify hazards at their workplace.
Question 2
The field of operation manual can be used by organization management to improve the management of health and safety program through offering them with guidance on conducting and scheduling inspections, regulations enforcement, and encouraging constant improvement of health and safety in the workplace for all employees. The manual can also be used to guide compliance officers on the procedure of notifying the employers about cooperative programs, for example, Voluntary Protection Program, Strategic Partnership, On-Site Consultation to Help them to eliminate existing or potential hazards at the workplace. Additionally, compliance officers can use it as an important guide to implementing the balanced approach of OSHA to workplace health and safety in training, education, and Cooperative and programs enforcement. Also, it is a good resource for employers in giving them a consolidated reference on OSHA workplace expectations in regard to how it should be made safe and healthy, thus the improvement of the health and safety program within the organization.
Question 3
By first looking at the General Clause, the Act expects an employer to provide to their employees a workplace and employment which is free from all known hazards that are probable to result a serious physical harm or death among the workers. The employers are said to have violated the this clause if; the employer refuses to keep the working environment free of hazard exposing his workers to the danger, when he or she recognizes the danger but chooses to ignore, the hazard was likely to cause physical damage or death of the employees and when there was a useful or feasible method of correcting the damage (OSHA, 2016).
An example of workplace violence that violated the clause is in the case of Getty gas and Convenience Store at Stuyvesant Avenue in Irvington offered less security than optimal to the employees. In between the year 2010 and 2015, there cases of theft were more than 20 which were associated with armed robbery, fights in the store. However, at the end of the year 2015 on October 26, a 57-year-old clerk by name Ashwin Patel was shot dead at the store. From this scenario, it is clear that the type of danger that the employees were exposed to was known from the 20 incidents of theft but the employer chose not to act in response. Also, the prior attacks resulting from fights were likely to cause physical damage to the employees and on top, they caused the death of Ashwin Patel. The employer had a solution to what was being experienced in this gas store which is providing employees with enough security since it was evident that there was not enough security, but he ignored to take action. Therefore, he committed a serious violation of General Duty Clause for not protecting his employees from violence exposure.
Question four
It is the responsibilities of managers to protect workers from any form of risk at workplace even when norms General Duty Clause are missing. It is also the obligation of every business to have an environment that is free from perceived dangers that threaten the well being of every employee, as well as agreeing to all requests, controls, and principles and wellbeing of rule of law. However, a time comes when organizations ignore this, forcing OSHA under the General Duty Clause come in and gives guidelines to be observed.
An example of a situation involving ergonomics violation is in Kingsmill organization that provides a center of distribution administrations to oat farmers; they used a line of transport to transmit the sacks to their two stockrooms that separated 2 years before they started to use human labor to transport the oat sacks in and out of the stockroom. This exposed the workers to a repetitive task in uncomfortable and unnatural position causing undue strain on their bodies for doing the same thing over and over again. The General Duty Clause was not observed in this organization because protect the employees from the dangers that were susceptible to (wounds and being overworked). The four components meet the reference in FOM by, first there was a danger since workers were forced to endure back and shoulder wounds from the heavy work of carrying the sucks but the employer failed to protect them.
Secondly, the hazard was known since the organization was aware of the danger the act was posing to the workers which they could not deny. In this situation, the wellbeing guidelines did not exist for transporting the sacks and the organization was aware there are records documenting the danger which consist of specialists pay report and restorative records. In addition, the organization should have actualized protective measures associated with the danger. The hazard was likely to cause permanent injuries or death, which could lead to body impedance, and maybe affect workers for the rest of their working life, as well as their physical well being. Finally, the hazard was correctable which means there was a way of reducing or eliminating the hazard. In this situation, the employer ought to have provided a solution to the wound damage experience or even bought a conveyor belt to transport the sacks. Therefore the employer had violated the General Duty Clause.

REFERENCES
OSHA. (2016).Safety and Health Management Systems eTool | Home Page. Retrieved November 9, 2017, from https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/safetyhealth/

Order | Check Discount

Tags: #1 Assignment Help Online Service for Students in the USA, AI Plagiarism free essay writing tool, Australian best tutors, best trans tutors, buy essay uk