Posted: June 29th, 2022

Rubric Assessment – PSYC 436 7380 Introduction to Clinical

4/29/22, 12:42 PM Rubric Assessment – PSYC 436 7380 Introduction to Clinical Psychology (2222) – UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=632950&evalObjectId=1227606&evalObjectType=1&userId=67816&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=1373139&groupId=… 1/8
Applied Final Project
Course: PSYC 436 7380 Introduction to Clinical Psychology (2222)
Criteria Exceptional
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Meets Some
Expectations
Meets Minimal
Expectation
Not Done Criterion Score
Reason for
Referral is
clearly
articulated
and the
source of the
referral is
indicated.
5 points / 5
Excellent
details;
structure of
statement
demonstrate a
keen
awareness and
understanding
of referral
details’
relevance.
4.25 points
Good details;
structure of
statement
demonstrate a
awareness and
understanding
of referral
details’
relevance.
3.5 points
Details limited
but
demonstrate
awareness and
understanding
of referral
details’
relevance.
2.75 points
Details
limited;
awareness and
understanding
of referral
details’
relevance not
clear.
2 points
Minimal
details;
awareness and
understanding
of referral
details’
relevance not
demonstrated.
0 points
Not addressed.
4/29/22, 12:42 PM Rubric Assessment – PSYC 436 7380 Introduction to Clinical Psychology (2222) – UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=632950&evalObjectId=1227606&evalObjectType=1&userId=67816&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=1373139&groupId=… 2/8
Criteria Exceptional
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Meets Some
Expectations
Meets Minimal
Expectation
Not Done Criterion Score
Summary of
Background
Information
including all
pieces of
pertinent
information
and written in
your own
words
15 points / 15
Provides an
insightful,
accurate,
detailed
summary of
the person’s
background
information
(age, culture,
gender,
history…)
Discusses
relevant sociocultural
influences
with a focus
on etiology.
12 points
Provides a
clear, accurate,
summary of
the person’s
background
information
(age, culture,
gender,
history…)
Discusses
relevant sociocultural
influences
with a focus
on etiology.
Room for
additional /
missed
details.
10.5 points
Summary
lightly
addresses
person’s
background
information
(age, culture,
gender,
history…) and
relevant sociocultural
influences.
May include
some points of
etiology.
Some
information
may be
inaccurate.
Room for
additional /
missed details.
8 points
Summary
tentatively
addresses
person’s
background
information
(age, culture,
gender,
history…) and
socio-cultural
influences.
May include
some points of
etiology.
Some
information
may be
inaccurate.
Room for
additional /
missed details.
6 points
Summary
missing key
information
relevant to
person’s
background
information
(age, culture,
gender,
history…),
socio-cultural
influences,
and/or
etiology. Some
information is
inaccurate.
0 points
Background
information
missing or is
inaccurate.
4/29/22, 12:42 PM Rubric Assessment – PSYC 436 7380 Introduction to Clinical Psychology (2222) – UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=632950&evalObjectId=1227606&evalObjectType=1&userId=67816&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=1373139&groupId=… 3/8
Criteria Exceptional
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Meets Some
Expectations
Meets Minimal
Expectation
Not Done Criterion Score
Assessment
Data including
what
assessments
are required
to make a
diagnosis and
specific tools
10 points / 10
Provides an
insightful,
accurate,
detailed
summary of
the
assessment
data including
what
assessments
are required to
make a
diagnosis and
specific tools.
8 points
Provides a
clear, accurate,
summary of
the
assessment
data including
what
assessments
are required to
make a
diagnosis and
specific tools.
Room for
additional
detail.
7 points
Summary
lightly
addresses the
assessment
data including
what
assessments
are required to
make a
diagnosis and
specific tools.
Some
information
may be
inaccurate.
Room for
additional /
missed details.
6 points
Summary
tentatively
addresses the
assessment
data including
what
assessments
are required to
make a
diagnosis and
specific tools.
Some
information
may be
inaccurate.
Room for
additional /
missed details.
4 points
Summary
missing key
information
relevant, or
information
presented is
mostly
inaccurate to
the
assessment
data including
what
assessments
are required to
make a
diagnosis and
specific tools.
0 points
Was not
discussed.
4/29/22, 12:42 PM Rubric Assessment – PSYC 436 7380 Introduction to Clinical Psychology (2222) – UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=632950&evalObjectId=1227606&evalObjectType=1&userId=67816&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=1373139&groupId=… 4/8
Criteria Exceptional
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Meets Some
Expectations
Meets Minimal
Expectation
Not Done Criterion Score
Diagnosis is
clearly stated.
Evidence from
the case is
provided to
support the
diagnosis.
/ 15
Treatment
Plan is clearly
/ 15
15 points
Provides a
possible
diagnosis,
framed against
diagnostic
possibilities.
Accurately
explains in
great detail
appropriate
signs/sympto
ms identified
and their
coherency
with person’s
context
(physiology,
risk factors).
Skillfully
discusses
assumptions,
confounds, etc.
12 points
Provides a
possible
diagnosis,
framed against
diagnostic
possibilities.
Accurately,
with some
detail, explains
appropriate
signs/sympto
ms identified
and their
coherency
with person’s
context
(physiology,
risk factors). Is
mostly
accurate in
discussion of
assumptions,
confounds, etc.
10 points
Provides a
possible
diagnosis,
framed against
diagnostic
possibilities.
With mixed
accuracy,
explains
signs/sympto
ms identified
and their
coherency
with person’s
context
(physiology,
risk factors). Is
mostly
accurate in
discussion of
assumptions,
confounds,
etc.
8 points
Provides a
diagnosis.
With mixed
accuracy,
explains
signs/symptom
s identified.
May mention
coherency
with person’s
context
(physiology,
risk factors). Is
occasionally
accurate in
discussion of
assumptions,
confounds, etc.
6 points
Provides a
diagnosis.
With mixed
accuracy,
mentions
signs/symptom
s identified.
May mention
coherency
with person’s
context
(physiology,
risk factors). Is
mostly
inaccurate, or
does not
provide,
discussion of
assumptions,
confounds, etc.
0 points
Fails to present
diagnostic
information or
diagnostic
information is
not
appropriate
and/or
inaccurate
15 points 12 points 10 points 8 points 6 points 0 points
4/29/22, 12:42 PM Rubric Assessment – PSYC 436 7380 Introduction to Clinical Psychology (2222) – UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=632950&evalObjectId=1227606&evalObjectType=1&userId=67816&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=1373139&groupId=… 5/8
Criteria Exceptional
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Meets Some
Expectations
Meets Minimal
Expectation
Not Done Criterion Score
articulated
and
connections
are made
between
recommendati
ons with
course or
outside
resources.
Treatment plan
is masterfully
articulated.
Identifies
empirical
support for
treatment plan
given.
Evidence
comes from
course or
outside
scholarly
resources.
Accurately
explains, and
insightfully
analyzes,
details in
relation to the
treatment.
Treatment plan
is clearly
articulated.
Identifies
empirical
support for
treatment plan
given.
Evidence
comes from
course or
outside
scholarly
resources.
Accurately
explains, and
clearly
analyzes,
details in
relation to the
treatment.
Meaning not
significantly
impacted by
small
omissions.
Treatment plan
articulated in a
straightforwar
d manner.
Identifies
empirical
support for
treatment plan
given.
Evidence may
come from
course or
outside
scholarly
resources.
Explains and
analyzes
details in
relation to the
treatment.
Accuracy may
be impacted
by relevant
detail
omissions.
Treatment
plan
tangentially
discussed.
May or may
not identifies
support for
treatment plan
given.
Evidence may
not come from
course or
outside
scholarly
resources.
Missing key
information in
analysis of the
recommended
treatment
plan.
Treatment
plan
tangentially
discussed.
Minimal
support for
treatment plan
given.
Evidence and
use of
appropriate
resources
lacking.
Missing key
information in
analysis of the
recommended
treatment
plan.
Did not
address.
4/29/22, 12:42 PM Rubric Assessment – PSYC 436 7380 Introduction to Clinical Psychology (2222) – UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=632950&evalObjectId=1227606&evalObjectType=1&userId=67816&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=1373139&groupId=… 6/8
Criteria Exceptional
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Meets Some
Expectations
Meets Minimal
Expectation
Not Done Criterion Score
Consideration
s include a
discussion of
developmenta
l , cultural and
ethical
implications.
10 points / 10
Considerations
appropriately
include
relevant
developmental
, cultural and
ethical
implications.
8 points
Considerations
appropriately
include
relevant
developmental
, cultural and
ethical
implications.
Discussion not
significantly
impacted by
small
omissions.
7 points
Considerations
appropriately
include
relevant
developmental
and/or cultural
and/or ethical
implications,
but may be
missing one of
these three.
Discussion
slightly
impacted by
omissions or
inaccuracies.
6 points
Tangentially,
considers
developmental
and/or cultural
and/or ethical
implications,
but may be
missing one of
the three. Is
frequently
inaccurate in
considerations
made.
4 points
Missing key
information.
Developmental
and/or cultural
and/or ethical
considerations
vaguely
discussed. Is
frequently
inaccurate in
considerations
made.
0 points
Did not
present
considerations.
4/29/22, 12:42 PM Rubric Assessment – PSYC 436 7380 Introduction to Clinical Psychology (2222) – UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=632950&evalObjectId=1227606&evalObjectType=1&userId=67816&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=1373139&groupId=… 7/8
Criteria Exceptional
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Meets Some
Expectations
Meets Minimal
Expectation
Not Done Criterion Score
Conclusion is
a clearly
written
summary of
findings.
20 points / 20
Provides a
targeted,
accurate
synthesis of
data;
conclusions
are based on
close analysis
of the case.
17 points
Provides a
brief, accurate
synthesis of
data;
conclusions
are based on
good analysis
of the case.
Most points
made are
relevant/accur
ate.
14 points
Provides a
synthesis of
data, with
mixed
accuracy;
conclusions
are based on
surface-level
analysis of the
case.
Inaccuracies
are noted.
11 points
Provides a
closing
statement that
does not
synthesize the
data, and/or is
inaccurate;
conclusions
tangentially
link to the
case;
inaccuracies
are
numerous.
8 points
Closing
statement
missing and/or
does not
clearly relate
to the case;
inaccuracies
are numerous.
0 points
Closing
statement not
provided, or is
not relevant to
the case.
4/29/22, 12:42 PM Rubric Assessment – PSYC 436 7380 Introduction to Clinical Psychology (2222) – UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=632950&evalObjectId=1227606&evalObjectType=1&userId=67816&viewTypeId=3&rubricId=1373139&groupId=… 8/8
Total / 100
Overall Score
Criteria Exceptional
Exceeds
Expectations
Meets
Expectations
Meets Some
Expectations
Meets Minimal
Expectation
Not Done Criterion Score
Paper
includes a
properly
formatted
title page, is
free of
mechanical
errors, is
grammatically
sound, and
citations and
references are
in APA style.
10 points / 10
Uses graceful
language that
skillfully
communicates
meaning with
clarity and
fluency;
writing
mechanics and
APA
formatting
are virtually
error-free
8 points
Uses
straightforwar
d language
that generally
conveys
meaning;
writing
mechanics and
APA
formatting has
minor errors
7 points
Uses language
that generally
conveys
meaning but
lacks clarity;
writing
mechanics and
APA
formatting
includes
consistent
errors.
6 points
Uses language
that
sometimes
impedes
meaning
because of
errors in
usage; writing
mechanics and
APA
formatting
includes
pervasive
errors.
4 points
Uses language
that impedes
meaning
because of
significant
errors in
usage; writing
mechanics
poor, and
missing key
components of
APA style
0 points
Paper
presented for
grading was in
a state that
prevented
meaningful
expression of
the assignment
requirements
(outline, bullet
points); or was
not submitted.
Exceptional
90 points
minimum
Exceeds
Expectations
80 points minimum
Meets
Expectations
70 points minimum
Meets Some
Expectations
60 points minimum
Meets Minimal
Expectations
50 points minimum
Not
Submitted
0 points
minimum

Order | Check Discount

Tags: apps that write essays for you free, assignment writing services in usa, bes, best dissertation writing services, best essay writing service