Posted: July 14th, 2022

Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Review

Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Review
A literature review provides a concise comparison of the literature for the reader and explains how the research demonstrates support for your PICOT.
In a paper of 1,250-1,500, select eight of the ten articles you evaluated that demonstrate clear support for your evidence-based practice and complete the
following for each article:
1. Introduction – Describe the clinical issue or problem you are addressing. Present your PICOT statement.
2. Search methods – Describe your search strategy and the criteria that you used in choosing and searching for your articles.
3. Synthesis of the literature – For each article, write a paragraph discussing the main components (subjects, methods, key findings) and provide rationale for
how the article supports your PICOT.
4. Comparison of articles – Compare the articles (similarities and differences, themes, methods, conclusions, limitations, controversies).
5. Suggestions for future research: Based on your analysis of the literature, discuss identified gaps and which areas require further research.
6. Conclusion – Provide a summary statement of what you found in the literature.
7. Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing.
Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.
Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal
assignments.
You are required to cite eight peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the
assignment criteria and nursing content.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite
Literature Assessment Table
Student Name:
Change Topic (2-3 sentences): PICOT Analysis. Generally, a high level of patient satisfaction for the clients in the emergency department (ED) is vital, especially at this
time when the healthcare system is shifting towards patient-centered care. Utilization of RTLS in the hospital’s ED, compared to manually-entered status updates to tract
patients, help decrease the rate of LWBT and to raise revenue collection within 6 months, for ED patients with decreasing satisfaction levels with the provided healthcare
services. This is as from the articles discussed below.
Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3
Author, Journal (PeerReviewed), and
Permalink or Working
Link to Access Article
Asamrew, N., Endris, A. A., & Tadesse, M.
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jeph/2020/2473469/
sheim, A., Nilsen, S. M., Carlsen, F., NæssPleym, L. E., Uleberg, O., Dale, J., et al.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31135613/
Boehm, L., & Petty, K.
https://vocera.com/sites/default/files/resour
Article Title and Year
Published Level of Patient Satisfaction with Inpatient Services
and Its Determinants: A Study of a Specialized
Hospital in Ethiopia. (2020)
The Effect Of Emergency Department
Delays On 30-Day Mortality in Central
Norway. (2019)
The Rise of the Healthcare Chief Experienc
(2016)
Research Questions
(Qualitative)/Hypothesis
(Quantitative)
The level of patient satisfaction is a determinant for
quality of care.
Is prolonged ED stay associated with
increased risk of death?
Focus on human experience of care support
 
6/3/22, 4:47 PM Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature – Top Notch Nursing Papers | Top Notch Nursing Papers
https://topnotchnursingpapers.com/2022/05/21/evidence-based-practice-project-literature/ 2/6
Purposes/Aim of Study Measuring the level of patient satisfaction and its
determinants.
To assess whether prolonged length of stay
in ED was associated with risk of death. To examine whether the chief experience of
Design (Type of
Quantitative, or Type of
Qualitative) Quantitative Experimental Mixed research
Setting/Sample
In hospital out of hospital out of hospital
Methods:
Intervention/Instruments Facility-related domain, general facility amenities, and
provider interaction.
Indicators on risk of death, discharge, and
hospitalization length. Leader experience in achieving quality, safe
Analysis
Increasing needs and demands of the patients influence
suitability of satisfaction levels. Assessing patient
satisfaction through various inpatient services can lead
to measurement of care quality. Increased engagements
with the healthcare provider can shape perceptions
impacting satisfaction.
Patients arriving and been admitted in
hospitals ED have expectations of staying
longer in the hospital after admission. This
can have an impact on their satisfaction and
confidence depending on the length of
hospitalization.
Priorities established by the leader demonst
through performance improvement. Experie
support, and support technologies enabling
Key Findings Determinants/ predictors used ought to create
perceptions on satisfaction levels. Interactions with the
care provider as well as facility amenities (toilet
cleanliness, accommodation, and dietary service) are
key predictors in satisfaction levels.
Prolonged stays in the ED were associated
with discharges from the hospital. This
reduced the association between increased
risk of death and hospitalization.
Building a sense of community and satisfac
strategies are highly facilitated by humaniz
Recommendations
Periodic assessments to be carried out.
Improvement and job-training of health providers

Order | Check Discount

Tags: 150-200 words discussion with a scholarly reference, 200-300 words response to classmate discussion question, 250 word analysis essay, bachelor of nursing assignments, case study