Posted: November 24th, 2023

PSY 101 Case Study 2 Smarter Decision Making through Psychology

Type Your Name Here
Smarter Decision Making through Psychology
March 13, 2020

Using your problem solving and self and social awareness skills and what you have learned about personality traits and emotions, answer the questions below to help Gloria calm her anxiety and find a solution to her problem.
For each question, you should write a paragraph-length response (5–7 sentences) to receive credit for this assignment. You may use your Soomo webtext as a resource.

Question 1: From Chapter 3 in the webtext, what did you learn about the Big 5 personality traits? (Hint: Page 3.12 helps you learn about the Big 5 traits.)

Question 2: Consider Gloria and Lakeisha’s different approaches to the project. On which one of the Big 5 personality traits do they most differ? How do they differ?

Question 3: Chapter 6 in the webtext focused on emotions. Using what you learned, give advice to Gloria on how she can identify and regulate her own emotions so that she can stick with this project and be successful. (Hint: Pages 6.4 and 6.11 have resources to help with this question.)

Question 4: If you were in the situation that Gloria faces, how confident are you that you could successfully resolve this workplace conflict? What past experiences or knowledge influence your answer?
 
Sources
1. D. G. Myers & C. N. DeWall. 2019. Psychology (6th ed.). Soomo Learning. http://www.webtexts.com

Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the dilemma?

Dr. Vaji’s evaluation of Leo should remain independent of other graduate opinions, adhering to principles such as respect, competency, integrity, and responsibility (Knapp et al., 2012). Assessing Leo based on others’ remarks compromises these principles, risking Leo’s future integrity as a therapist.
Who are the stakeholders and how will they be affected by how Dr. Vaji resolves this dilemma?

Stakeholders include Leo, his supervisors, the institution, and current/future clients. Resolving the dilemma improperly risks Leo’s extern program failure or unqualified practice. Dr. Vaji’s integrity is compromised. Unaddressed issues may lead to Leo practicing without competency or integrity, affecting clients negatively.
What additional information might Dr. Vaji collect to provide him with a more accurate picture of Leo’s multicultural attitudes and professional skills? What are the reasons for and against contacting Leo’s supervisor for more information? Should he request that Leo’s sessions with clients be electronically recorded or observed?

Dr. Vaji should consult Leo’s clients and on-site supervisor for insight. Electronic recording is an option, ensuring a comprehensive review without involving other students. However, consulting the on-site supervisor may influence future reports.
Is Dr. Vaji in a potentially unethical multiple relationship as both Leo’s externship supervisor and his teacher in the Health Disparate class? Why or why not?

Dr. Vaji’s dual roles provide valuable insight, aiding ethical evaluation. Without this multi-relationship, Leo’s harmful behavior might go unaddressed, impacting his future as a therapist.
To what extent, if any, should Dr. Vaji consider Leo’s own ethnicity in his deliberations? Would the dilemma be addressed differently if Leo self-identified as non-Hispanic white, Hispanic, or non-Hispanic black?

Dr. Vaji should consider Leo’s ethnicity to understand potential influences. However, a therapist should not be biased by ethnicity (Knapp et al., 2012), ensuring fair and unbiased resolution regardless of Leo’s background.
Once the dilemma is resolved, should Dr. Vaji have a follow-up meeting with the students who complained?

A follow-up meeting with students is essential to assess Leo’s behavioral improvement outside class. However, it should focus on behavioral changes and not academic assessment.
How are APA Ethical Standards 1.08, 3.04, 3.05, 3.09, 7.04, 7.05, and 7.06 and the Hot Topics “Ethical Supervision of Trainees” (Chapter 10) and “Multicultural Ethical Competence” (Chapter 5) relevant to this case? Which other standards might apply?

APA standards related to supervision, multicultural competence, accountability, and professional skills are crucial. Standard 4.03 (recording) and 2.03 (maintain competence) may also be applicable, addressing Leo’s lack of competence.
What are Dr. Vaji’s ethical alternatives for resolving this dilemma? Which alternatives best reflect the Ethics Code aspirational principles and enforceable standards, legal standards, and obligations to stakeholders? Can you identify the ethical theory (discussed in Chapter 3) guiding your decision?

Ethical alternatives include stopping role-play and assessing Leo’s behavior for potential personality disorders or lack of integrity. Emphasizing APA ethical principles aligns with legal standards and enforces fairness. A deontological ethical theory, emphasizing duty and principles, guides this decision.
What steps should Dr. Vaji take to implement his decision and monitor its effect?

Dr. Vaji should arrange more sessions for Leo with ethnic minority clients, using increased cases to evaluate improvement in multicultural attitudes and professional skills. Monitoring client session attendance will gauge Leo’s progress.

_________________________
Question 1: From Chapter 3 in the webtext, what did you learn about the Big 5 personality traits? (Hint: Page 3.12 helps you learn about the Big 5 traits.)
The Big 5 personality traits refer to the five broad domains used to describe human personality: openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. Each person can be assessed on these traits to understand tendencies and preferences.
Question 2: Consider Gloria and Lakeisha’s different approaches to the project. On which one of the Big 5 personality traits do they most differ? How do they differ?
For question 2, Gloria and Lakeisha seem to differ most on conscientiousness. Gloria appears less organized and more anxious, while Lakeisha takes a more methodical approach. Both traits can be beneficial depending on the situation.
Question 3: Chapter 6 in the webtext focused on emotions. Using what you learned, give advice to Gloria on how she can identify and regulate her own emotions so that she can stick with this project and be successful. (Hint: Pages 6.4 and 6.11 have resources to help with this question.)
Question 3 touches on an important part of emotional intelligence – identifying and regulating emotions. Gloria would benefit from mindfulness techniques to notice feelings without judgment, as well as stress management strategies like deep breathing, exercise or social support when anxiety arises. Reframing negative thoughts can also help shift perspective.
Question 4: If you were in the situation that Gloria faces, how confident are you that you could successfully resolve this workplace conflict? What past experiences or knowledge influence your answer?
Regarding question 4, everyone handles conflict differently based on past experiences. While conflict causes me some discomfort, focusing on mutual understanding and compromise usually helps resolve issues. With open communication and consideration of different viewpoints, most problems can be worked through.

Order | Check Discount

Tags: PSY 101 Case Study 2, Smarter Decision Making through Psychology