Posted: October 12th, 2023

HCM4003 Communication and Interprofessional CollaborationReport

HCM4003 Communication and Interprofessional Collaboration
Report
Date for Submission: Please refer to the timetable on ilearn
(The submission portal on ilearn will close at 14:00 UK time
on the date of submission)
Page 2 of 7
[2330]
Arden University © reserves all rights of copyright and all other intellectual property rights in the learning materials and this publication. No part of any of the learning
materials or this publication may be reproduced, shared (including in private social media groups), stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or means,
including without limitation electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of Arden University. To find out more about
the use and distribution of programme materials please see the Arden Student Terms and Conditions.
Assignment Brief
As part of the formal assessment for the programme you are required to submit a
Analysis of Communication Report assignment. Please refer to your Student
Handbook for full details of the programme assessment scheme and general
information on preparing and submitting assignments.
Learning Outcomes:
After completing the module, you should be able to:
1. Evaluate and apply appropriate communication skills with team members,
patients and other stakeholders involved in person-centred care.
2. Appraise the different types of communication and their impact on the
professional work environment during multi-disciplinary teamworking.
3. Discuss conflict management frameworks and their use in resolving issues
that arise during team negotiations.
4. Recognise the value of shared leadership skills and team spirit when
collaborating with others during interprofessional working.
5. Graduate Attribute: Professional Skills
Perform effectively within the professional environment. Work within a team,
demonstrating interpersonal skills such as effective listening, negotiating,
persuading and presentation. Be flexible and adaptable to changes within the
professional environment
Page 3 of 7
[2330]
Arden University © reserves all rights of copyright and all other intellectual property rights in the learning materials and this publication. No part of any of the learning
materials or this publication may be reproduced, shared (including in private social media groups), stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or means,
including without limitation electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of Arden University. To find out more about
the use and distribution of programme materials please see the Arden Student Terms and Conditions.
Guidance
Your assignment should include: a title page containing your student number, the
module name, the submission deadline and the exact word count of your submitted
document; the appendices if relevant; and a reference list in AU Harvard system.
You should address all the elements of the assignment task listed below. Please
note that tutors will use the assessment criteria set out below in assessing your work.
You must not include your name in your submission because Arden University
operates anonymous marking, which means that markers should not be aware of the
identity of the student. However, please do not forget to include your STU number.
Maximum word count: 2000 words
Please refer to the full word count policy which can be found in the Student Policies
section here: Arden University | Regulatory Framework
Please note the following:
Students are required to indicate the exact word count on the title page of the
assessment.
The word count includes everything in the main body of the assessment (including in
text citations and references). The word count excludes numerical data in tables,
figures, diagrams, footnotes, reference list and appendices. ALL other printed
words ARE included in the word count.
Please note that exceeding the word count by over 10% will result in a 10-percentage
point deduction.
Page 4 of 7
[2330]
Arden University © reserves all rights of copyright and all other intellectual property rights in the learning materials and this publication. No part of any of the learning
materials or this publication may be reproduced, shared (including in private social media groups), stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or means,
including without limitation electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of Arden University. To find out more about
the use and distribution of programme materials please see the Arden Student Terms and Conditions.
Assignment Task
Video/ Case study Analysis Report:
From the list provided, select one short documentary and analyse the
communication and collaboration involved and the importance of interprofessional
collaboration and cooperation in tackling the discussed issue.
Each video demonstrates one or more major concepts discussed in this module.
You must link as many concepts from the lessons as possible to scenes from the
video that is chosen.
(2000 words)
(100 marks)
(LOs: 1,2,3,4, & 5)
End of questions
Page 5 of 7
[2330]
Arden University © reserves all rights of copyright and all other intellectual property rights in the learning materials and this publication. No part of any of the learning
materials or this publication may be reproduced, shared (including in private social media groups), stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or means,
including without limitation electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of Arden University. To find out more about
the use and distribution of programme materials please see the Arden Student Terms and Conditions.
Formative Feedback
You have the opportunity to submit a draft to receive formative feedback.
The feedback is designed to help you develop areas of your work and it helps you
develop your skills as an independent learner.
If you are a distance learning student, you should submit your work, by email, to your
tutor, no later than 2 weeks before the actual submission deadline. If you are a blended
learning student, your tutor will give you a deadline for formative feedback and further
details.
Formative feedback will not be given to work submitted after the above date or the date
specified by your tutor – if a blended learning student.
Referencing Guidance
You MUST underpin your analysis and evaluation of the key issues with appropriate
and wide ranging academic research and ensure this is referenced using the AU
Harvard system.
Follow this link to find the referencing guides for your subject: Arden Library
Submission Guidance
Assignments submitted late will not be accepted and will be marked as a 0%
fail.
Your assessment can be submitted as a single Word (MS Word) or PDF file, or as
multiple files.
If you chose to submit multiple files, you must name each document as the question/part
you are answering along with your student number ie Q1 Section A STUXXXX. If you
wish to overwrite your submission or one of your submissions, you must ensure
that your new submission is named exactly the same as the previous in order for
the system to overwrite it.
You must ensure that the submitted assignment is all your own work and that all
sources used are correctly attributed. Penalties apply to assignments which show
evidence of academic unfair practice. (See the Student Handbook which is available
on the A-Z key information on iLearn.)
Page 6 of 7
[2330]
Arden University © reserves all rights of copyright and all other intellectual property rights in the learning materials and this publication. No part of any of the learning materials or this publication may be reproduced, shared (including in private social media groups), stored
in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or means, including without limitation electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of Arden University. To find out more about the use and distribution of programme materials
please see the Arden Student Terms and Conditions.
Assessment Criteria (Learning objectives covered – all)
Level 4 is the first stage on the student journey into undergraduate study. At Level 4 students will be developing their knowledge and
understanding of the discipline and will be expected to demonstrate some of those skills and competences. Students are expected to express
their ideas clearly and to structure and develop academic arguments in their work. Students will begin to apply the theory which underpins the
subject and will start to explore how this relates to other areas of their learning and any ethical considerations as appropriate. Students
will begin to develop self-awareness of their own academic and professional development.
Grade Mark
Bands Generic Assessment Criteria
First
(1)
80%+ Outstanding performance which demonstrates the ability to analyse the subject area and to confidently apply theory whilst showing
awareness of any relevant ethical considerations. The work shows an outstanding level of competence and confidence in managing
appropriate sources and materials, initiative and excellent academic writing skills and professional skills (where appropriate).
The work shows originality of thought.
70-
79%
Excellent performance which demonstrates the ability to analyse the subject and apply theory whilst showing some awareness of any
relevant ethical considerations. The work shows a high level of competence in managing sources and materials, initiative and excellent
academic writing skills and professional skills (where appropriate). The work shows originality of thought.
Upper
second
(2:1)
60-
69%
Very good performance which demonstrates the ability to analyse the subject and apply some theory.
The work shows a very good level of competence in managing sources and materials and some initiative.
Academic writing skills are very good and expression remains accurate overall. Very good professional skills (where appropriate).
The work shows some original thought.
Lower
second
(2:2)
50-
59%
A good performance which begins to analyse the subject and apply some underpinning theory.
The work shows a sound level of competence in managing basic sources and materials. Academic writing skills are good and
Expression remains accurate overall although the piece may lack structure. Good professional skills (where appropriate).
The work lacks some original thought.
Third
(3)
40-
49%
Satisfactory level of performance in which there are some omissions in understanding the subject, its underpinning theory
and ethical considerations. The work shows a satisfactory use of sources and materials. Academic writing skills are limited and
there are some errors in expression and the work may lack structure overall.
There are some difficulties in developing professional skills (where appropriate). The work lacks original thought and is largely imitative.
Page 7 of 7
[2330]
Arden University © reserves all rights of copyright and all other intellectual property rights in the learning materials and this publication. No part of any of the learning materials or this publication may be reproduced, shared (including in private social media groups), stored
in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or means, including without limitation electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of Arden University. To find out more about the use and distribution of programme materials
please see the Arden Student Terms and Conditions.
Marginal
Fail
30-
39%
Limited performance in which there are omissions in understanding the subject, its underpinning theory and ethical considerations.
The work shows a limited use of sources and materials. Academic writing skills are weak and there are errors in expression and the
work may lack structure overall. There are difficulties in developing professional skills (where appropriate). The work lacks original
thought and is largely imitative.
29%
and
below
A poor performance in which there are substantial gaps in knowledge and understanding, underpinning theory and ethical considerations.
The work shows little evidence in the use of appropriate sources and materials. Academic writing skills are very weak and there are
numerous errors in expression.
From YouTube
4. https:I/www.youtube.com/watch?,-7bsioBAsCDk&list=PLKX-YBD4n1PfPAX1PIqEeuna9vLw4pu-t&index=2&t=59s 5. https://www youtube.com/watch?v=7bsioBAsCDk&list=PLKX-YBD4n1PfPAX1PTqEeuna9vLw4ou-t&index=2&t=106s
From Netflix

6. https://www.youtube.corntwatch?v=kRrYo9pG PY&Iist=PLvahciwMqN4MOGRkZY8WkLZMb 6Z-W7abLA
7. httos:/Neww.youtube.comlwatch?v=AynwysiihuCl&list=PLvahciwMqN4MOGRkZY8WkLZMb6 Z-VV7abLA&Index=2
8. https://mwi.youtube.com/watch?v=Xa4x84xUdoci&list=PLvahawMqN4MOGRIcZY8WkLZMb6 Z-W7abLMinde x=3

Order | Check Discount

Tags: HCM4003, HCM4003 Communication and Interprofessional Collaboration Report, Write a paper