Graduate Essay Writers
Only the most qualified writers are selected to be a part of our research and editorial team, with each possessing specialized knowledge in specific subjects and a background in academic writing.
Order for this Custom Paper or similar Assignment Help Services
Fill the order form details in 3 easy steps - Instructions Guide .
Posted: April 24th, 2023
Business Law essay
HA2022 Business Law – Tutorial Questions Assignment 1
Assessment Task – Tutorial Questions Assignment
Unit Code: HA2022
Unit Name: Business Law
Assignment: Tutorial Questions Assignment (Individual)
Due: Week 13 – Friday 26th of February, 2021
Weighting: 50%
Purpose:
This assignment is designed to assess your level of knowledge of the key topics covered in
this unit.
Unit Learning Outcomes Assessed:
• Explain the various elements of the Australian legal system, such as the
sources of Australian law, the jurisdiction of Federal and State Courts
and the doctrine of precedent.
• Possess a working knowledge of the tort of negligence, contract,
consumer protection, insurance and employment law. Prepare, analyse,
and interpret transaction data and financial statements for data-driven
decision- making;
• Apply the legal knowledge to factual situations, through written and/or
oral communication, to achieve a reasoned conclusion.
• Develop the ability to identify the relevant legal issues from a factual
situation and the application of statute and case law involves the use of
problem solving and decision-making skills.
Description:
Each week students were provided with three tutorial questions of varying degrees of
difficulty. The tutorial questions are available in the Tutorial Folder, for each week, on
Blackboard. The Interactive Tutorials are designed to Help students with the process, skills
and knowledge to answer the provided tutorial questions. Your task is to answer a selection
of tutorial questions from weeks 3 to 11 inclusive and submit these answers in a single
document.
HA2022 Business Law – Tutorial Questions Assignment 2
The questions to be answered are:
Question 1 (7 marks)
(Note this question is from the Week 3 Tutorial)
Required:
In assessing whether a breach of duty of care has occurred, reference is made to the
standard of the “reasonable person”. Discuss how the reasonable person standard is
regarded in law and the factors the courts take into consideration when judging the
standard of care under both common law and in the civil liability reforms.
(Word Limit: Maximum 250 words)
Question 2 (11 marks)
(Note this question is from the Week 5 Tutorial)
The case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co Court of Appeal [1893] 1 QB 256; [1892] EWCA
Civ 1 was a landmark case from the Nineteenth Century (C19th). A link to information on
this case is provided below:
https://www.australiancontractlaw.com/cases/carlill.html
Refer to this case when answering the four (4) questions below, which are based on the
following scenario:
It is March 2019. Tasmin who is very health conscious is shopping one day and sees in the
local chemist a product called ‘Flu Stop’, manufactured by a company called ‘Sydney Flu
Shop’. The advertisement for ‘Flu Stop’ states:
“Flu Stop is a healthy alternative to the flu injection without needing to go to the doctor for
a needle. We offer a money back guarantee and $5,000 to any person who contracts the flu
within a reasonable time, after having used the Flu Stop every day for two months according
to the printed directions supplied with each bottle. Proof of receipt of purchase is also
required. $5,000 has been deposited at the National Australia Bank, Sydney for this purpose,
showing our sincerity in this matter.”
Tasmin doesn’t believe in vaccinations and doesn’t want to have a flu injection. The ‘Flu
Stop’ costs $70.00. Tasmin buys the product. She follows the instructions for 2 months. In
June 2019, after swimming at Icebergs in Bondi, Tasmin succumbs to a cold and then
HA2022 Business Law – Tutorial Questions Assignment 3
pneumonia. She was very ill and was hospitalised for several weeks. Tasmin contacts Sydney
Flu Shop in September to claim her refund and the $5,000. Sydney Flu Shop refuses to pay.
Required:
Answer the following four (4) questions in relation to the case study outlined above. Base
your answers on the Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. case, as noted above. Provide
appropriate explanations in your answers.
1. Was there a valid offer? (3 marks)
2. Was there valid acceptance? (3 marks)
3. What was the consideration? (3 marks)
4. Was there an intention to form legal relations? (2 marks)
(Word Limit: Maximum 500 words)
Question 3 (7 marks)
(Note this question is from the Week 7 Tutorial)
Required:
In order for a party to rely on an exclusion clause, what must they show?
(Word Limit: Maximum 250 words)
Question 4 (7 marks)
(Note this question is from the Week 9 Tutorial)
Required:
Discuss what is meant by the term ‘supplier of a service’? Name and briefly explain an
example of a guarantee relating to services.
(Word Limit: Maximum 250 words)
HA2022 Business Law – Tutorial Questions Assignment 4
Question 5 (7 marks)
(Note this question is from the Week 10 Tutorial)
Required:
When taking out general insurance coverage, the insured party can choose between:
market value, warranty of value, subject to average, or reinstatement or replacement.
Explain the difference between each option noted above.
(Word Limit: Maximum 250 words)
Question 6 (11 marks)
(Note this question is from the Week 11 Tutorial)
Required:
Explain how a valid contract of employment may be created according to both common law
and statutory principles governing contract law.
(Word Limit: Maximum 500 words)
Submission Directions:
The assignment will be submitted via Blackboard. Each student will be permitted only ONE
submission to Blackboard. You need to ensure that the document submitted is the correct
one.
Academic Integrity
Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding Academic Integrity, as Academic
Integrity is integral to maintaining academic quality and the reputation of Holmes’
graduates. Accordingly, all assessment tasks need to comply with academic integrity
guidelines. Table 1 identifies the six categories of Academic Integrity breaches. If you have
any questions about Academic Integrity issues related to your assessment tasks, please
consult your lecturer or tutor for relevant referencing guidelines and support resources.
Many of these resources can also be found through the Study Skills link on Blackboard.
Academic Integrity breaches are a serious offence punishable by penalties that may range
from deduction of marks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of
course enrolment, or cancellation of course enrolment.
HA2022 Business Law – Tutorial Questions Assignment 5
Table 1: Six Categories of Academic Integrity Breaches
Plagiarism Reproducing the work of someone else without attribution. When
a student submits their own work on multiple occasions this is
known as self-plagiarism.
Collusion Working with one or more other individuals to complete an
assignment, in a way that is not authorised.
Copying Reproducing and submitting the work of another student, with or
without their knowledge. If a student fails to take reasonable
precautions to prevent their own original work from being copied,
this may also be considered an offence.
Impersonation Falsely presenting oneself, or engaging someone else to present as
oneself, in an in-person examination.
Contract cheating Contracting a third party to complete an assessment task,
generally in exchange for money or other manner of payment.
Data fabrication and
falsification
Manipulating or inventing data with the intent of supporting false
conclusions, including manipulating images.
Source: INQAAHE, 2020
If any words or ideas used the assignment submission do not represent your original words
or ideas, you must cite all relevant sources and make clear the extent to which such sources
were used.
In addition, written assignments that are similar or identical to those of another student is
also a violation of the Holmes Institute’s Academic Conduct and Integrity policy. The
consequence for a violation of this policy can incur a range of penalties varying from a 50%
penalty through suspension of enrolment. The penalty would be dependent on the extent
of academic misconduct and your history of academic misconduct issues. All assessments
will be automatically submitted to Safe – Assign to assess their originality.
Further Information:
For further information and additional learning resources please refer to your Discussion
Board for the unit.
Why Seek Our Custom Writing Services
Every Student Wants Quality and That’s What We Deliver
Affordable Prices
Our prices strike the perfect balance between affordability and quality. We offer student-friendly rates that are competitive within the industry, without compromising on our high writing service standards.
100% Plagiarism-Free
No AI/chatgpt use. We write all our papers from scratch thus 0% similarity index. We scan every final draft before submitting it to a customer.
How it works
When you opt to place an order with Nursing Study Bay, here is what happens:
Expert paper writers are just a few clicks away
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.