Order for this Paper or similar Assignment Help Service

Fill the order form in 3 easy steps - Less than 5 mins.

Posted: January 2nd, 2023

INTERVIEW PRESENTATION

WEEK6 ASSIGNMENT

INTERVIEW PRESENTATION
How you present yourself to others is an important part of being a social worker. Being able to present yourself in an open, caring, and professional manner helps with building rapport and influences your clients’ willingness to share their experiences. You also must be skilled at interacting with clients who are different from you.
Interviewing skills are also very important, as you have seen, and social workers must be mindful of how to conduct an interview in a culturally competent and culturally sensitive manner.
In this Assignment, you have an opportunity to practice your engagement and assessment skills. You conduct an interview with an individual from a different culture than your own to learn their perspective about culture and gender. The goal is for you to explore the cultural norms within that ethnic or cultural group.
RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
TO PREPARE
• Identify an interview subject.
• Download the Interview Presentation: Questions handout from the Learning Resources.
• Ask your interview to subject the questions found in the Interview Presentation handout. Be sure to record the interview (with participant’s permission) and/or take good notes.
• You will not submit the interview itself. You create a presentation about the interview.
• Record a PowerPoint presentation. Your video should be 4–5 minutes but no more than 6 minutes.
BY DAY 7
Submit a recorded PowerPoint (PPT) presentation about your interview with a person from a different culture than your own. Your PowerPoint presentation should include 8–10 slides and should be 4–5 minutes in recorded length.
In the PowerPoint presentation, address the following:
• Identify basic background information of the interviewee.
• Provide a summary of what you learned about the individual when conducting this interview.
• Identify the skills you used to address the differences between you and the interview subject.
• Describe your reaction to this activity.
• Reflect on these reactions, and explain why you believe you may have experienced these thoughts and feelings.
• Describe what you learned, and explain which additional social work skills you could apply or could have applied when working with this individual.
Please remain mindful of confidentiality and privacy of the interviewee when presenting information in the educational environment.
SUBMISSION AND GRADING INFORMATION
For guidance on posting a video into the Discussion Forum, please refer to the steps below or to the Kaltura section of the Classroom Support Center, accessed via the Help button (the i icon) on the left-hand global navigation menu.
• Click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
• Next, click Text Entry and then click the Embed Kaltura Media button.
• Select your recorded video under My Media.
• Check the box for the End-User License Agreement and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric
SOCW_6101_Week6_Assignment_Rubric
SOCW_6101_Week6_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary 15 to >13.35 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Student presentation of interviewee provides all of the following while providing in-depth detail and specific examples:… 1) Basic background information of the interviewee… 2) Summary of what student learned about the interviewee when conducting this interview 13.35 to >11.85 pts
Meets Expectations
Student presentation of the interviewee provides all of the following:… 1) Basic background information of the interviewee… 2) A good summary of what student learned about the interviewee when conducting this interview 11.85 to >10.35 pts
Fair
Student presentation of the interviewee provides at least one of the following in sufficient detail and does the other superficially: … 1) Basic background information of the interviewee… 2) Summary of what student learned about the interviewee when conducting this interview 10.35 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Student presentation of the interviewee provides only one of the following or does both superficially:… 1) Basic background information of the interviewee… 2) Summary of what student learned about the interviewee when conducting this interview
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSkills to Address Difference 15 to >13.35 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Presentation identifies three or more skills used to address difference and provides specific examples of these skills. 13.35 to >11.85 pts
Meets Expectations
Presentation identifies two skills used to address difference and provides at least on general example of these skills. 11.85 to >10.35 pts
Fair
Presentation identifies at least one skill used to address difference with an example and/or identifies a list of skills with no explanation. 10.35 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation either does not list skills or identifies one or more skills that do not have clear connection with the difference identified.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection on Reactions 15 to >13.35 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Student presentation provides all of the following:… 1) Description of three or more reactions to the activity; provides specific examples to demonstrate each reaction… 2) Reflection of one each reaction and explanation of why student experienced these reactions (Presentation supports reflection with examples from course learning resources and/or specific personal experiences.) 13.35 to >11.85 pts
Meets Expectations
Student presentation provides all of the following:… 1) Description of two reactions to the activity… 2) Reflection on most reactions identified and explaination of why student experienced these reactions (Presentation supports reflection with general examples.) 11.85 to >10.35 pts
Fair
Student presentation provides all the following:… 1) Describes one reaction to the activity or superficial description of more than one reaction… 2) Reflects on briefly reaction (Explanation of why they experienced these reactions may be superficial or lack detail.) 10.35 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Student presentation provides only one of the following or does both superficially:… 1) Describes student’s reaction to the activity… 2) Reflects on these reactions and explains why they experienced these reactions
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLearning and Application of Skills 15 to >13.35 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Student presentation provides a detailed and in-depth explanation of:… 1) What student has learned (Explanation of learning provides specific examples and explains about how their knowledge changed.)… 2) Additional social work skills student could apply or could have applied when working with this individual (Explanation identifies three or more skills, explains why the skills where chosen, and provides a specific example of skill application.) 13.35 to >11.85 pts
Meets Expectations
Student presentation provides a good explanation of:… 1) What student has learned (Explanation of learning provides general examples.)… 2) Additional social work skills student could apply or could have applied when working with this individual (Explanation identifies two skills and either explains why the skills where chosen or provides an example of skill application.) 11.85 to >10.35 pts
Fair
Student presentation provides at least one of the following in detail and does the other superficially:… 1) What student has learned (Explanation does not provide examples or needed details.)… 2) Additional social work skills student could apply or could have applied when working with this individual (Explanation identifies at least one skill.) 10.35 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Student presentation provides only one of the following or does both superficially:… 1) What student has learned … 2) Additional social work skills student could apply or could have applied when working with this individual
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Presentation 15 to >13.35 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Presentation is 4–5 minutes. … The presentation is exceptionally professional and coherent. The student appears practiced and professional. The presentation displays effective organization and focus to communicate ideas. Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective. … The slides are well organized and generally error free (two or fewer). Slides use best presentation practices in use of bullet, brief text, and use of color and font to enhance presentation. 13.35 to >11.85 pts
Meets Expectations
Presentation is 4–5 minutes. … The presentation is clear and coherent. The student appears practiced and professional. Tone and presentation of ideas are free from bias and objective, unless otherwise directed in the prompt. … The slides are well organized. Errors in grammar or spelling are minor, minimal (three to five), and do not interfere with the scholarly message. Slides conform to generally to presentation best practices. 11.85 to >10.35 pts
Fair
Presentation is between 3:30–4 minutes or between 5–6 minutes. … The presentation is generally coherent but sometimes unfocused. The student appears professional and organized, but there is little evidence of practice. … The slides might be slightly unorganized. Errors in grammar or spelling are minor but frequent (five to 10) and occasionally interfere with the message. Use of color and font maybe inconsistent. 10.35 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation is less than 3:30 minutes or more than 6 minutes. … The presentation is generally unfocused and lacks professionalism, with little evidence of practice or preparation. Tone and presentation of ideas reveal bias and subjectivity. … Errors in grammar or spelling are major, pervasive (11+), and interfere with the message. The slide deck is not organized or color/font is distracting and inconsistent with presentation best practices.
15 pts
Total Points: 75
PreviousNext

REFERENCES

• Kirst-Ashman, K. K., & Hull, G. H., Jr. (2018). Empowerment series: Understanding generalist practice (8th ed.). CENGAGE Learning.
o Chapter 12, “Culturally Competent Social Work Practice” (pp. 466–498)
o Chapter 13, “Gender-Sensitive Social Work Practice” (pp. 499–543)
• Azzopardi, C., McNeill, T. (2016). From cultural competence to cultural consciousness: Transitioning to a critical approach to working across differences in social work. Links to an external site.Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 25(4), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2016.1206494
• Fisher-Borne, M., Cain, J. M., Martin, S. L. (2015). From mastery to accountability: Cultural humility as an alternative to cultural competence Links to an external site.Social Work Education, 34(2), 165–181. doi:10.1080/02615479.2014.977244
• Hook, J. N., Farrell, J. E., Davis, D. E., DeBlaere, C., Van Tongeren, D. R., & Utsey, S. O. (2016). Cultural humility and racial microaggressions in counseling Links to an external site.. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(3), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000114
• Walden University Writing Center. (2020). Walden templates: General templates: PowerPoint presentation. Links to an external site.http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-2774360
• Document: Interview Presentation: Questions Download Interview Presentation: Questions(Word document)

Order | Check Discount

Tags: INTERVIEW PRESENTATION

Assignment Help For You!

Special Offer! Get 20-30% Off on Every Order!

Why Seek Our Custom Writing Services

Every Student Wants Quality and That’s What We Deliver

Graduate Essay Writers

Only the finest writers are selected to be a part of our team, with each possessing specialized knowledge in specific subjects and a background in academic writing..

Affordable Prices

We balance affordability with exceptional writing standards by offering student-friendly prices that are competitive and reasonable compared to other writing services.

100% Plagiarism-Free

We write all our papers from scratch thus 0% similarity index. We scan every final draft before submitting it to a customer.

How it works

When you opt to place an order with Nursing StudyBay, here is what happens:

Fill the Order Form

You will complete our order form, filling in all of the fields and giving us as much instructions detail as possible.

Assignment of Writer

We assess your order and pair it with a custom writer who possesses the specific qualifications for that subject. They then start the research/write from scratch.

Order in Progress and Delivery

You and the assigned writer have direct communication throughout the process. Upon receiving the final draft, you can either approve it or request revisions.

Giving us Feedback (and other options)

We seek to understand your experience. You can also peruse testimonials from other clients. From several options, you can select your preferred writer.

Expert paper writers are just a few clicks away

Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00