Posted: December 17th, 2022

Health Care Culture

Health Care Culture

Rubric
View Rubric
Assessment Traits
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to discuss health care culture and describe how CWV can be used to improve ethical practices. In a 1,000-1,250-word essay, discuss the important factors associated with health care culture. Include the following in your essay:
1. A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and safety.
2. Two or three examples of principles for building a culture of excellence and safety.
3. An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture.
4. An explanation of how Christian worldview (CWV) principles might be used by health care organizations to improve ethical practices, whether the organizations are Christian or not.
5. Two or three examples of how the integration of faith learning and work at GCU can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture.

This assignment requires a minimum of three peer-reviewed scholarly sources. iyeoche2022@gmail.com
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need Helpance.
—
Health Care Culture – Rubric
Definition of Health Care Culture 11 points
Criteria Description
Definition of Health Care Culture
5. Target 11 points
A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of
safety, is present and thorough.
4. Acceptable 10.12 points
A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of
safety, is present and detailed.
3. Approaching 9.68 points
A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of
safety, is present.
2. Insufficient 8.8 points
A definition of health care culture, including culture of excellence and culture of
safety is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Examples of How to Build a Culture of Excellence and Culture of Safety 12 points
Criteria Description
Examples of How to Build a Culture of Excellence and Culture of Safety
5. Target 12 points
Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of
safety are present and thorough. All examples are appropriate.
4. Acceptable 11.04 points
Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of
safety are present and detailed. Most examples are appropriate.
Collapse All
3. Approaching 10.56 points
Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of
safety are present. Some examples are appropriate.
2. Insufficient 9.6 points
Two or three examples of how to build a culture of excellence and a culture of
safety are present, but lack details or are incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Role of Various Stakeholders in Improving Health Care Culture 12 points
Criteria Description
Role of Various Stakeholders in Improving Health Care Culture
5. Target 12 points
An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture
is present and thorough.
4. Acceptable 11.04 points
An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture
is present and detailed.
3. Approaching 10.56 points
An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture
is present.
2. Insufficient 9.6 points
An explanation of the role of various stakeholders in improving health care culture
is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.
Explanation of How CWV Principles Might Be Used 12 points
Criteria Description
Explanation of How CWV Principles Might Be Used by Health Care Organizations to
Improve Their Ethical Practices
5. Target 12 points
An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations
to improve ethical practices is present and thorough.
4. Acceptable 11.04 points
An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations
to improve ethical practices is present and detailed.
3. Approaching 10.56 points
An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations
to improve ethical practices is present.
2. Insufficient 9.6 points
An explanation of how CWV principles might be used by health care organizations
to improve ethical practices is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Examples of How the Integration of Faith, Learning, and Work 12 points
Criteria Description
Examples of How the Integration of Faith, Learning, and Work at GCU Can Be
Implemented by Individuals to Improve Health Care Culture
5. Target 12 points
Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU
can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present and
thorough.
4. Acceptable 11.04 points
Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU
can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present and
detailed.
3. Approaching 10.56 points
Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU
can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present.
2. Insufficient 9.6 points
Two or three examples of how the integration of faith, learning, and work at GCU
can be implemented by individuals to improve health care culture are present, but
lack details or are incomplete.
Scholarly Sources 11 points
Criteria Description
Scholarly Sources
5. Target 11 points
A minimum of three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present. Sources are
distinctive and address all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
4. Acceptable 10.12 points
A minimum of three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present. Sources address
all of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.
3. Approaching 9.68 points
A minimum of three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are present.
2. Insufficient 8.8 points
Two or three peer-reviewed, sources are present, but are not scholarly. Limited
research is present.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Peer-reviewed, scholarly sources are not present.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose 7 points
Criteria Description
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
5. Target 7 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully
directed to a specific audience.
4. Acceptable 6.44 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly
directed to a specific audience.
3. Approaching 6.16 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the
appropriate audience is demonstrated.
2. Insufficient 5.6 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally
weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion 8 points
Criteria Description
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves
from development.
5. Target 8 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout.
The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous
conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
4. Acceptable 7.36 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression
of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the
development of the purpose.
3. Approaching 7.04 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on
each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
2. Insufficient 6.4 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are
inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic
and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Evidence 5 points
Criteria Description
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers
other perspectives.
5. Target 5 points
Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives
are integrated effectively.
4. Acceptable 4.6 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.
3. Approaching 4.4 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
2. Insufficient 4 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or
integration of other perspectives is present.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Mechanics of Writing 5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target 5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 4.6 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 4.4 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient 4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
Format/Documentation 5 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
5. Target 5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of
direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
4. Acceptable 4.6 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching 4.4 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious
errors.
2. Insufficient 4 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors
in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Total 100 points

Order | Check Discount

Tags: Health Care Culture