Posted: December 7th, 2022

instructions:
Healthcare organizations are constantly striving to improve healthcare performance. For many years, this approach was known as the Triple Aim, with efforts focusing on improved population health, improved patient experience, and lower healthcare costs.
More recently, this approach has evolved to a Quadruple Aim by including a focus on improving the work life of healthcare providers. Each of these measures are impacted by decisions made at the organizational level, and organizations have increasingly turned to EBP to inform and justify these decisions.

To Prepare:
Read the articles by Sikka, Morath, & Leape (2015); Crabtree, Brennan, Davis, & Coyle (2016); and Kim et al. (2016) provided in the Resources.
Reflect on how EBP might impact (or not impact) the Quadruple Aim in healthcare.
Consider the impact that EBP may have on factors impacting these quadruple aim elements, such as preventable medical errors or healthcare delivery.

To Complete:
Write a brief analysis (no longer than 2 pages) of the connection between EBP and the Quadruple Aim.
Your analysis should address how EBP might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of:
Patient experience
Population health
Costs
Work life of healthcare providers
—
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Write a brief analysis of the
connection between evidencebased practice and the
Quadruple Aim. Your analysis
should address how evidencebased practice might (or might
not) help reach the Quadruple
Aim, including each of the four
measures of:
· Patient experience
· Population health
· Costs
· Work life of healthcare
providers
77 (77%) – 85 (85%)
The analysis clearly and
accurately addresses in detail
how evidence-based practice
either supports or does not
support the Quadruple Aim.
The analysis accurately and
thoroughly explains in detail
how the four measures of
patient experience, population
health, costs, and work-life of
healthcare providers either
supports or does not support
the Quadruple Aim.
The analysis provides a
complete, detailed, and speci!c
synthesis of two outside
resources reviewed on the four
measures supporting or not
supporting the Quadruple Aim.
The response fully integrates at
least two outside resources and
two or three course-speci!c
resources that fully support the
analysis provided with credible
and detailed examples.
68 (68%) – 76 (76%)
The analysis accurately
addresses how evidence-based
practice either supports or does
not support the Quadruple Aim.
The analysis accurately explains
how the four measures of
patient experience, population
health, and work life of
healthcare providers either
supports or does not support
the Quadruple Aim.
The analysis provides an
accurate synthesis of at least
one outside resource reviewed
on the four measures
supporting or not supporting the
Quadruple Aim. The response
integrates at least 1 outside
resource and two or three
course-speci!c resources that
may support the analysis
provided and may include some
detailed examples.
60 (60%) – 67 (67%)
The analysis inaccurately or
vaguely addresses how
evidence-based practice either
supports or does not support
the Quadruple Aim.
The analysis inaccurately or
vaguely explains how the four
measures of patient experience,
population health, and work life
of healthcare providers either
supports or does not support
the Quadruple Aim.
The analysis provides an
inaccurate or vague analysis of
the four measures supporting or
not supporting the Quadruple
Aim with a vague or inaccurate
analysis of outside resources.
The response minimally
integrates resources that may
support the analysis provided
and may include vague or
inaccurate examples.
0 (0%) – 59 (59%)
The analysis inaccurately and
vaguely addresses how
evidence-based practice either
supports or does not support
the Quadruple Aim or is missing.
The analysis inaccurately and
vaguely explains how the four
measures of patient experience,
population health, and work life
of healthcare providers either
supports or does not support
the Quadruple Aim or is missing.
The analysis provides a vague
and inaccurate analysis of the
four measures supporting or not
supporting the Quadruple Aim
with a vague and inaccurate
analysis of outside resources.
The response fails to integrate
any resources to support the
analysis provided or is missing.
Written Expression and
Formatting—Paragraph
Development and
Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points
that support well-developed
ideas, !ow logically, and
demonstrate continuity of
ideas. Sentences are carefully
focused—neither long and
rambling nor short and lacking
substance. A clear and
comprehensive purpose
statement and introduction is
provided which delineates all
required criteria.

Correct grammar, mechanics,
and proper punctuation.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling,
and punctuation with no errors.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (one or two)
grammar, spelling, and
punctuation errors.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (three or four)
grammar, spelling, and
punctuation errors.
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (!ve or more)
grammar, spelling, and
punctuation errors that interfere
with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and
Formatting—The paper follows
correct APA format for title
page, headings, font, spacing,
margins, indentations, page
numbers, running head,
parenthetical/in-text citations,
and reference list.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no
errors.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (one or two) APA
format errors.

Name: NURS_6052_Module01_Week01_Assignment_Rubric EXIT
Grid View List View
—
Sample Answer:

Relationship between Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim

Evidence-based practice is a medical approach that entails evidence from research that medical practitioners apply in problem-solving and decision-making concerning a patient’s health care. Evidence-based practice entails gathering, analyzing, and implementing research findings to improve patient’s clinical healthcare (Crabtree, Brennan, Davis & Coyle, 2016). One unique feature of the evidence-based analysis is that health practitioners apply the best evidence in making medical decisions and conclusions. This uniqueness is what differentiates evidence-based practice from any other form of research that develops evidence through scientific inquiry.
On the other hand, Quadruple Aim is a framework that seeks to address four main goals in health practices of improving the: patients’ experience, population health, costs of healthcare, and work-life of healthcare providers (Sikka, Morath & Leape, 2015). Previously, the Quadruple Aim framework existed as a three-aim framework before medical experts developed it into a four-aim framework. The three-aim framework focused on improving the welfare of patients in healthcare facilities. Later, medical practitioners introduced the fourth aim of improving the work-life of healthcare providers.
Since both the Evidence-based practice and Quadruple Aim are both health practices, there is a relationship that exists between the two practices. Health practitioners can apply Evidence-based practice to achieve Quadruple Aim’s effectiveness. However, to achieve Quadruple aim’s effectiveness, the nurses need to conceptualize themselves with Evidence-based practice knowledge (Crabtree, Brennan, Davis & Coyle, 2016). Also, nurses need to have a deeper understanding of the Quadruple aims and how they can relate it to Evidence-based practice. The following discussion is how Evidence-based practice can help achieve the four aspects of Quadruple Aim.
The first aspect of the Quadruple Aim addresses the patient’s experience, which entails all the activities a patient engages in within the health center (Sikka, Morath & Leape, 2015). Health practitioners can therefore apply evidence-based practice skills in improving the activities a patient encounters thereby enhancing the patient’s experience in a healthcare facility. Experiences a patient can benefit from evidence-based practices include improved healthcare plans and accessing standard health care facilities. The second aspect of the Quadruple Aim concerns the population health of public members (Sikka, Morath & Leape, 2015). In this case of population health, medical practitioners can apply research findings from evidence-based practice in improving public population health. A good example through which nurses can improve public population health is using information from evidence-based practice to address risk factors that can lead to contagious infections.
The third aspect of Quadruple Aim is to address the high cost of health care services available to patients. The high price of health care services acts as a hindrance to many people accessing these health services (Sikka, Morath & Leape, 2015). Therefore, medical practitioners can apply evidence-based practices in developing new health strategies with lower costs that regular patients can afford. A good example of a strategy that nurses can apply to ensure patients receive medical services at lower costs is taking medical services closer to the patients.
The fourth aspect of Quadruple Aim is improving the lives of health care workers in health centers. Most of the health care workers providing services to patients in health facilities undergo several challenges (Kim, Stichler, Ecoff, Brown, Gallo & Davidson, 2016). These challenges health care workers face tending to make the life of health workers somehow challenging in return interfering with health workers’ effectiveness. Study findings from evidence-based practice can help provide alternatives to improve the efficiency of the health workers and overcome the challenges they face.
Evidence based-practice may have a positive impact on the factors that influence the Quadruple Aim’s elements. Some of these factors include preventable medical errors and the healthcare delivery system (Kim, Stichler, Ecoff, Brown, Gallo & Davidson, 2016). Addressing the issue of preventable medical error can help improve patient’s experience and also improve public population health. Nurses can address this issue of preventable medical errors by using information from Evidence-based practice on how to minimize medical errors. Concerning the healthcare delivery system, nurses can apply findings from Evidence-based practice on how to deliver effective medical services.

References
Crabtree, E., Brennan, E., Davis, A., & Coyle, A. (2016). Improving Patient Care Through Nursing Engagement in Evidence‐Based Practice. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 13(2), 172-175.
Kim, S. C., Stichler, J. F., Ecoff, L., Brown, C. E., Gallo, A. M., & Davidson, J. E. (2016). Predictors of evidence‐based practice implementation, job satisfaction, and group cohesion among regional fellowship program participants. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 13(5), 340-348.
Sikka, R., Morath, J. M., & Leape, L. (2015). The quadruple aim: care, health, cost, and meaning in work.

Order | Check Discount