Posted: October 20th, 2022

fid.a vr t T4 -dSno.’ TR!-STATE drff*:,ll:T;’J,h’.’:T;;yT’"H?llg I trr FLETV?

fid.a vr t T4 -dSno.’ TR!-STATE drff*:,ll:T;’J,h’.’:T;;yT’"H?llg I trr FLETV?

“First, provide a SUMMARY section heading in which you objectively summarize the text of the case, nothing all major ideas/events, significant support, telling examples, and specific details to inform your reader of the most important, yet essential, aspects of the case regarding who, what, where, when, and how.

secondly,provide a SUMMARY section for the 1997 UPDATE.

Thirdly, provide a COMMEMTARY section heading in which you subjectively provide a critical analysis and assessment of both the case study as performed and as a written technical document. Address its initial goals/objectives, the role of its “players”, the decisions/processes/procedures carried out, and its initial resulting,eventual outcome as well as its further development in 1997-today.consider all rhetorical questions to determine if and how the study might have been improved as it relates to the process of the study itself and its quality as a written technical document.Support your opinion and suggestions with evidence from your text reading, personal/professional experience, and attention to both written and visual messages.”

No word limit. attach the doc.

ATTACHMENT PREVIEW

Download attachment

fid.a
vr
t
T4
tl
tAlcs*-r
-dSno.’
TR!-STATE
drff*:,ll:T;’J,h’.’:T;;yT'”H?llg
I trr FLETV?
r
Frr&T
r
*
ru
lrui’ffi’ft,’TililT
:*l;ffi:xTll
and Pend Oreille Lake through a
nutrient
allocati6ffiffi-
f
the introduction of alternative waste-
water treatment at the municipal facili-
ties
in Butte,
Deer Lodge, and
Missoula:
–
il
the development ofa coordinated ap-
proach for wastewater management in
the Pend Oreille watershed;
U the design and implementation of
a
nonpoint pollution control strategy be-
ginning with the Pen{OreilLe River
and Lake and the Bitterroot river
rr%
vailev:
n
th6 establishment of a coordinated
water monitoring network; and
I
the promotion of citizen education
programs to educate them about their
role in protecting the
watershed.
lntegrated
planning
During the first
18
months of its existence,
the Council has worked
to make the most effi-
cient use of its members
and resources to col-
laborate with other orga-
nizations, primarily at
the grassroots level, in
an integrated process.
It
began to address the
most pressing needs
first as initially defined.
I
lVutrienf f
The first meetinsbf this
committee was held
early 1994 to review
current data and reports
and to develop consensus among
dischargers and agencies on nutrient
target levels. The committee held a
briefing workshop to better understand
target levels and how they might be in-
corporated into a lake nutrient alloca-
tion strategy for the rivers and the Lake.
Strategies are currently- being devel-
.-ap{for
state and federalgpproval.
E
Ul/asterruate
r treatment{1-,-
5$rdge”a-flil8t$le
jointly
agreed
to obtain a declaratory ruling on water
rights issues as they relate to the pro-
posed application of wastewater on
land. For Milsqula the committee re-
searched
and compiled alternative
wastewater treatrnent options and is
participating in a facilities planning
effiort with the cify.
ri
l
I
‘r
‘*
A
.:1
K,
(S
tzttv
26’000 square miles in northern
‘-/
rc
C*UNCIL
Sandpoint, Idaho
^(‘
^”St
The Tri-State Implementation Council
r,l
came into being
in 1993 to
oversee,
review and educate the public about the
three-state water quality management plan
developed
for
the Clark Fork-Pend
Oreille watershed which encompasses
headquarters in Sandpoint, Idaho. Itmeets
biannually at different locations through-
out the three states.
The Council consists of 28 individuals
who represent major stakeholder groups
such as industry municipalities, counties,
businesses, utilities, Native American
tribes, timber, agriculture, and environ-
mental groups. The members, all volun-
teers, take an active role in building sup-
poft for implementation activities through
both the forrnal work of the Council as
well as its subcommittees which work 1o-
cally. Each Council member sits on one
;+

‘,,
tl
-.i
,
{r”
*
Sixth grade
students perform
a dance, which
they created
about the Clark
Fork River at
the Clark Fork
Water Festival.
tt.l
!Lv
^gi
Iauno, westefir Montana and northeastern of the local subcommittees which meet
*1*1
Washington.
atdifferenttimesandfrequencies depend-
This plan was the outcome of a
series ing on
the needs of their local projects.
ofsteps that grew out ofcitizen conc€rns They are each responsible for raising
over the increasing amount of algae
and
funding to support these activities.
aquaticweedsintheClarkForkRiveran{
1q
The Council helps
coordinate
Pend Oreille Lake in the late t980s. In$nolicymakingandtheworkoflocalcom-

response, additional languagewasaddedY mittees.
It provides
Helpance to those
J
,*to
the 1987 Clean WaterAct directing
the
working on specific aspects of the man-
lf.l.
.$’Environmental
Protection Agency
(EPA)
agementplan. Information andupdates on
‘””tr
to conduct a three-year study of
pollution
committee activities are compiled and cir-
$j
in the basin. The result of this study
was
culated by the Project Coordinator. After
the development of the tri-state manage- five years the Council
will review
and
ment plan. Seventy different
control
evaluate the progress made on the plan.
measures were identifi ed and categorized,
{ *
Pollution control and prevention
resulting in a condensed list of the top.
.fvr Initially, the Council listed the follow-
priorities.
{{
i”g
as its most immediate goals:
TheTri-StatelmplementationCouncil,
”
F
the reduction of phosphorous and ni-
a citizen-led group, was formed by
the
-. trogenpollutionintheClarkForkRiver
Su$TATNABTLTTY rrI ACTTON
3
3

View the Answer

rncorporated
as a nonprofit
organization.
lt
has f’ound
that it can carry out its
mis_
sion by-working
with and
devetoping
partnerships
with local
organizations
ani
by complementing
the work
of public
agencies.
The Council is
plalng
a key coordi_
natrng and educational
role in this water_
shed and has been effective
in gaining
widespread
support for its protection.
_CONCERN,Inc.
Ilttlttr
UPDATT
December
1gg7
The Council continues
to work toward
several goals,
including
organizational
stability, pollution
control,
and public
education.
The attainme”r
“i;;o;;il
/
fu,
fstatus
enabled the Council to
appiv fo, I
/
$
f
and win an Environmenral
pr;;e;donllf
P
f
Agency grant that
will partly
fund a
ool_[l
.
iq
I
lution reduction program
alone the
ci*r.
f*(l
IFork
River in
Montana.
Th-e
Councit/
d
)t
passed a major milestone
*t.n
tn”lrQ’
/’
cllverse stakeholders
on the Clark
Forkl

River committee,
including
the four larg_
y
Quatity
fistedthe
services
ofa
consultingfirm
–
to help with its design and
evahiation. ,-veroped
by rhe
=*6fr66is
effort
pubric
educarion
:::H111:t^*r
lorcal volunteeS
who had
:”:T:”:’:l’:f,?g”iliJi,,o”:.o-.
ffiy:r’::”,1′”i’i”‘
H1#:
:i T: f””:tpublic
outreach
to alr
ages.
ffi,;00 ;;. rh”l,’3,
orer
est dischargers
(the communities
of
Missoula, Deer Lodge,
and Butte, and the
Stone_Container
Company),
agreed on
target levels
ofnitrogen
and phosphorous
for the river.
All towns
and industries
along the river are devising innovative
and long-term
strategies
to meet the new
targets.
The tri-state water monitoring plan has
been completed
and should
U”,ina.
.*uf
in early 1998, pending
fundine from the
various
stakeholdErfrfiffi
of the
Miss ould-W.all-di-Festival
has spawned
lh1″‘”‘f.:Jtt;rH:S#iil.’ffi
:*:,:*lir*T”ffi;,.#:ffi
f
I
center for
a new counrv
l:brr’.r
@;;
Jign.o for
eremenrary
schoors.
wherr
f
monitorine
program
on the Pack
River .onrpl”t”a
the
paddle
to
pend
oreilte
I
featuring
an intergenerationar
(student
an
a
iotirslr”a
rrurt ii,lilonlin
puppets
and

‘1
|
landowner)
monitoring/streamwark
em-
other entertaining
educationar presenta-
|
*
liffmd
a primer
r;;;;;;;;;’;;
iin,.
rn order to’introduce
the generar
/
l,{$ water;r;ii-
rrrurvr rur
‘swuurncrs
on
fions’ In order to introduce
the general
^nt
tl
;iliiiui,.
“,or.s
orevents and
edu- H’Jf
,:,ffifi:l:t’,?lT,x:;ifi.?n
^$
:1r,’.*J
“.uytiif.n:-,g”*””;;”-;;ft”
,o r.pon
on,r,” irl’ur”rn”ntplan
and es-
lf
”
word abour individuals
and their
impact
tablish a
..r.nr.
oiptuce,,
for watershed
F
on the watersr,”a.
L
i*.,
,rr”
na”‘r.j”r”
residents.
.
ryAtrf;,Fesfival
fuas held to celebrate
th.
,…lff
Challenges
Clark Fork. In parrnership
rvuit*r
the Motr_
f8*.or
tfnu
oliF*s
..hallenges.is
ob_
tana Naturar
History
center, one
of the
altaining
the funding needed
tb staff the
members
of the council’s
subcommitt”e
ticounc]r
ria t”‘””r&
out the
work of the
worJqed’with
‘si{&’e’raf1,t3phers
b*lan
,^,strbcommitt””r.
so-.
supporr has come
twqday.sofedueationarandenteitainient
from local ,o*””r,”urrrinesses
and gov_
programsincrpdinghands”onprojectsde-
ernment grants.
The council is not
sc
and are now
revlS
cerns of citizens
who value the health
of
their local watershed.
_CONCERN.Inc.
How
To Get
in Touch
with
Tri-State
Council
Contact:
Ruth Watkins
Project Coordinator
f1r;lqate
Implementation
Council
206 No.4thAvenue,
Suite l52
Sandpoinr,
ID 83964
Tel.: (208)
Z6s-90s2
tax:
same
Emait: N/A
Web: N/A
‘: j”
Scope: Regional
lnception
Date; 1993
Participants:
Federal
and state
agencie-s;
represeniaiivi;-
i;;;
rlg.rl9trrg_s,
municipalities,
counties.
l|{ne,r:
NahveAmerican
tribes, timber,
lgri
culfure,’
and environmenri’
gr*p;’
199″t
type: Regionat
watErshiO
T1I199*
niitTi:nl
rcls used: Public outreacl
rpatlon,
coordination
Lessons learned:
Importance
of broad
representation
of dtakeholders
in
glgnning
and
p;ri;t;;;
tslle.cttveness
of collaboration
w
llcll,and
state agfncies.
Necessity
ongoing public
eluCation.
.5Eu-_trylrn-levefoplng
a ffi_state
itoring plan,
the subcommittee
en_
The,P/addle
to
pend
Oreille
education
kits, renamed
‘ork-Pend
Oreille Watershed
Kits,
:en distributed
in pilot form
to
t4
susrAtNABtLtTY
tN ACTTON

Order | Check Discount

Tags: AI Plagiarism free essay writing tool, Australian best tutors, best trans tutors, buy essay uk, cheap dissertation writer