Posted: October 5th, 2022

(NGR6616 & NGR6638)

Description
Over the period of your Practicum Courses (NGR6616 & NGR6638), you’ll write a (Capstone Case Examine) scholarly paper addressing the prevailing information and administration associated to a major care observe downside (situation) that you’ll choose from Appendix A

Choose one.
For this part, you’ll submit your proposal and PICOT Question Assignment, detailing a well being downside that’s prevalent inside your group and demonstrating your analysis of evidence-based well being promotion methods and illness prevention for addressing this particular well being downside. The proposal should display Graduate Faculty stage writing and demanding Assessment. For this part, you’ll ship in your proposal and PICOT Question Assignment, which can describe a well being downside that’s widespread in your group and present that you’ve got executed analysis on evidence-based well being promotion and illness prevention methods for coping with this specific well being downside. The proposal should present that you may write and assume critically at a graduate college stage.

The PICOT Question Assignment is due on week 5; please carry it to class for Assessment and approval.

PICOT Question Assignment
The phrase PICOT is a mnemonic derived from the weather of a medical analysis Question Assignment – affected person, intervention, comparability, end result, and (generally) time. The PICOT course of begins with a case state of affairs, and the Question Assignment is phrased to elicit a solution.

P – Affected person/Drawback I – Intervention

C – Comparability O – End result

T – Timeframe

P Affected person with anemia

I Iron complement

C No Iron complement

O Enhance anemia

T 15 weeks

Part I

For this part of your task, embrace the next parts: (due on week 13)

1. Title web page.

2. Introduction (minimal two paragraphs).
■ Introduce the subject of the paper.
■ Describe the well being downside. Do not sort “Introduction.”
■ Utilizing information and statistics, Help your declare that your chosen concern is an issue.
■ Embrace your function assertion and what particularly you’ll deal with in your proposed program.
■ Be certain your proposed end result is lifelike and measurable.

Three. PICOT (minimal one paragraph).
■ This part ought to embrace your PICOT in a Question Assignment format, adopted by thorough descriptions of your inhabitants, intervention, comparability intervention, end result, and timing (if applicable to your Question Assignment).

Four. Describe the susceptible inhabitants (minimal two paragraphs).
■ Focus on the affect of social determinants on well being on your chosen inhabitants.
■ What are the chance components that make this a susceptible inhabitants?
■ Use proof to Help the chance components you’ve got recognized.

5. Present a Assessment of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that deal with the issue (minimal six paragraphs). Use the “Literature Assessment Template” as a tenet that can Help you type by means of your ideas, observe vital factors and assume by means of the similarities and variations: Appendix B
■ Embrace a minimal of at the least six scholarly, peer-reviewed analysis articles not older than 5 years (1 paragraph for every article).
■ After finishing a literature search on interventions addressing your chosen well being downside, write a Assessment that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all of the sources you’ve got discovered. (minimal one paragraph).

6. Proposal (minimal two paragraphs. You could use bullets if applicable)
■ Suggest addressing the chosen well being downside utilizing an evidence-based intervention in your literature search to handle the issue within the chosen inhabitants/setting.
■ Embrace a radical dialogue of the specifics of this intervention which embrace sources obligatory, these concerned, and feasibility for a nurse in a sophisticated function.
■ Make sure to embrace a timeline for the intervention proposed.

Paper Necessities:
■ Comply with APA seventh Version format tips.
■ Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and analysis articles cited needs to be inside the final 5 years.
■ This part needs to be 5-6 pages lengthy (not together with the title and reference web page).
■ Use correct in-text citations with a correctly formatted reference listing.
■ All papers should be written within the third particular person.

Readability of Writing:
a. Use normal English grammar and sentence construction.
b. There needs to be no spelling errors or typographical errors.
c. The paper needs to be organized across the required parts utilizing applicable headers.

Grading Standards (I) Rankings Pts

Introduction
25 pts (Glorious)
The introduction describes the well being downside and aligns information and statistics supporting the issue with a sensible and measurable end result proposal. 20 pts (Good)
The introduction aligns with the knowledge requested and exhibits good mastery of the content material. Offers ample data however could have missed some particulars or examples.
15 pts (Acceptable)
The introduction aligns partially with the knowledge requested and exhibits partial mastery of the content material. It Offers ample data however lacks particulars and/or examples. 10 pts (Wants work)
The data content material doesn’t align with the knowledge requested. Doesn’t present mastery of the ideas and lacks data, particulars and/or examples.

zero pts
Not submitted

25 pts

PICOT Question Assignment 15 pts (Glorious)
The PICOT Question Assignment aligns with the core parts and tasks particulars of the inhabitants description, intervention, comparability intervention, end result, and timing. 10 pts (Good)
The PICOT Question Assignment aligns with the core parts and tasks particulars of the inhabitants description, intervention, comparability intervention, and end result however lacks lifelike timing utility. 5 pts (Wants work)
The PICOT Question Assignment aligns with the core parts and tasks however lacks particulars of the inhabitants description, intervention, comparability intervention, end result, and timing Three pts (Poor)
The PICOT lacks a number of core parts. Doesn’t align with inhabitants particulars, description, intervention, comparability, end result, and timing.

zero pts
Not submitted

15 pts

Description of the inhabitants 15 pts (Glorious)
Completely recognized or described inhabitants supported by proof. 12 pts (Good)
Briefly recognized or described inhabitants supported by proof. 9 pts (Wants work)
Vaguely recognized or described inhabitants supported by proof. Three pts (Poor)
Poorly recognized or described inhabitants supported by proof. zero pts
Didn’t determine the inhabitants supported by proof.

15 pts

Info Literacy Supporting Info
15 pts (Glorious)
Supporting data is pertinent to the dialogue, updated, and from educational and trusted sources. 12 pts (Good)
Supporting data is pertinent to the dialogue subject. Sources should not the latest however are from educational and trusted sources. 9 pts (Restricted)
Supporting data is pertinent to the dialogue subject however not all sources are from educational and trusted sources; could or might not be the latest. Three pts (Wants work)
Supporting data just isn’t pertinent to the dialogue and/or not one of the sources are from educational or trusted sources. zero pts Unacceptable No supporting data

15 pts

Proposal
10 pts (Glorious)
Completely offered an summary of the implementation plan with a abstract of the communication concepts and a timeline.
eight pts (Good)
Briefly offered an summary of your implementation plan with a abstract of communication concepts and a timeline
6 pts (Wants work)
Vaguely offered an summary of your implementation plan and a abstract of communication concepts and a timeline.
Four pts (Poor)
Poorly offered an summary of your implementation plan and a abstract of the communication concepts and a timeline.
zero pts
Didn’t present an summary of the proposed plan.

10 pts

Writing Mechanics 10 pts (Glorious)
Writing is totally freed from typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. eight pts (Good)
Minimal (1-Three) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 5 pts (Wants work)
A number of (Four-9) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 2 pts (Problematic)
10 or extra typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
zero pts
Not submitted
10 pts

Info Literacy Appropriate utility of APA seventh Version 10 pts (Glorious)
Flawless execution of APA. Appropriate formatting, setup, title web page, and excellent citations and references. eight pts (Good)
Appropriate formatting, setup, title web page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the citations or references. 6 pts (Wants work)
Appropriate formatting, setup, title web page, however vital errors with citations and references. 2 pts (Problematic) Incorrect formatting, setup or lacking title web page, and/or
problematic citations and references. zero pts Not used
APA model not used.
10 pts

THE MAXIMUM SCORE FOR THIS ACTIVITY IS 100 POINTS, ACCOUNTING FOR A TOTAL OF 15 PERCENT OF THE STUDENT’S FINAL GRADE. SCORE (POINTS):
GRADE (PERCENT):

Grading Standards (I) Rankings Pts

Introduction
25 pts (Glorious)
The introduction describes the well being downside and aligns information and statistics supporting the issue with a sensible and measurable end result proposal. 20 pts (Good)
The introduction aligns with the knowledge requested and exhibits good mastery of the content material. Offers ample data however could have missed some particulars or examples.
15 pts (Acceptable)
The introduction aligns partially with the knowledge requested and exhibits partial mastery of the content material. It Offers ample data however lacks particulars and/or examples. 10 pts (Wants work)
The data content material doesn’t align with the knowledge requested. Doesn’t present mastery of the ideas and lacks data, particulars and/or examples.

zero pts
Not submitted

25 pts

PICOT Question Assignment 15 pts (Glorious)
The PICOT Question Assignment aligns with the core parts and tasks particulars of the inhabitants description, intervention, comparability intervention, end result, and timing. 10 pts (Good)
The PICOT Question Assignment aligns with the core parts and tasks particulars of the inhabitants description, intervention, comparability intervention, and end result however lacks lifelike timing utility. 5 pts (Wants work)
The PICOT Question Assignment aligns with the core parts and tasks however lacks particulars of the inhabitants description, intervention, comparability intervention, end result, and timing Three pts (Poor)
The PICOT lacks a number of core parts. Doesn’t align with inhabitants particulars, description, intervention, comparability, end result, and timing.

zero pts
Not submitted

15 pts

Description of the inhabitants 15 pts (Glorious)
Completely recognized or described inhabitants supported by proof. 12 pts (Good)
Briefly recognized or described inhabitants supported by proof. 9 pts (Wants work)
Vaguely recognized or described inhabitants supported by proof. Three pts (Poor)
Poorly recognized or described inhabitants supported by proof. zero pts
Didn’t determine the inhabitants supported by proof.

15 pts

Info Literacy Supporting Info
15 pts (Glorious)
Supporting data is pertinent to the dialogue, updated, and from educational and trusted sources. 12 pts (Good)
Supporting data is pertinent to the dialogue subject. Sources should not the latest however are from educational and trusted sources. 9 pts (Restricted)
Supporting data is pertinent to the dialogue subject however not all sources are from educational and trusted sources; could or might not be the latest. Three pts (Wants work)
Supporting data just isn’t pertinent to the dialogue and/or not one of the sources are from educational or trusted sources. zero pts Unacceptable No supporting data

15 pts

Proposal
10 pts (Glorious)
Completely offered an summary of the implementation plan with a abstract of the communication concepts and a timeline.
eight pts (Good)
Briefly offered an summary of your implementation plan with a abstract of communication concepts and a timeline
6 pts (Wants work)
Vaguely offered an summary of your implementation plan and a abstract of communication concepts and a timeline.
Four pts (Poor)
Poorly offered an summary of your implementation plan and a abstract of the communication concepts and a timeline.
zero pts
Didn’t present an summary of the proposed plan.

10 pts

Writing Mechanics 10 pts (Glorious)
Writing is totally freed from typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. eight pts (Good)
Minimal (1-Three) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 5 pts (Wants work)
A number of (Four-9) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 2 pts (Problematic)
10 or extra typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
zero pts
Not submitted
10 pts

Info Literacy Appropriate utility of APA seventh Version 10 pts (Glorious)
Flawless execution of APA. Appropriate formatting, setup, title web page, and excellent citations and references. eight pts (Good)
Appropriate formatting, setup, title web page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the citations or references. 6 pts (Wants work)
Appropriate formatting, setup, title web page, however vital errors with citations and references. 2 pts (Problematic) Incorrect formatting, setup or lacking title web page, and/or
problematic citations and references. zero pts Not used
APA model not used.
10 pts

THE MAXIMUM SCORE FOR THIS ACTIVITY IS 100 POINTS, ACCOUNTING FOR A TOTAL OF 15 PERCENT OF THE STUDENT’S FINAL GRADE. SCORE (POINTS):
GRADE (PERCENT):

Order | Check Discount

Tags: (NGR6616 & NGR6638)