Posted: October 4th, 2022

A REFLECTION FROM WITHIN

A REFLECTION FROM WITHIN (15% of Ultimate Grade) Class four
College students will work independently to finish “A Reflection from Inside” to critically have interaction with the course
readings from Week 2 that discover privilege and net of oppression.
College students will have interaction in reflexive apply and full the next expectation:
a) Wholeheartedly and completely establish privileges and/or net of oppressions skilled in a single’s
private life-space. College students are free to decide on any constructs most related to them, nevertheless a complete of
three have to be explored (min. of 750 phrases)
b) An exploration into how these privileges and/or net of oppressions will form their skilled lifearea as a CYC Practitioner working with younger individuals and their households (min. 600 phrases)
Headings must be utilized to prepare the paper integrating APA referencing pointers. Particular
references from a minimal of three extra exterior tutorial sources (not gray literature) have to be
appropriately built-in to reinforce understanding of the constructs. This submission have to be uploaded as a
PDF doc.
“A Reflection from Inside” Rubric – Whole of 30 Marks
Poor Wants
Enchancment
Passable Good Wonderful
Introduction
(2.5)
No description of
what shall be
carried out within the
introduction
Restricted
description of the
introduction about
what shall be carried out
Mullaly, Robert P.. (2010). Chapter 10: Unpacking Our Knapsack of Invisible . In (Eds.), Difficult oppression and
confronting privilege : a important social work strategy (pp. 287-320). Oxford College Press.
This work is protected by copyright and the making of this copy by Toronto Metropolitan College was licensed
by Oxford College Press.
This copy could also be used solely by college students registered in CYC406 zero11 – Therapeutic Life-House – F2022 at Toronto
Metropolitan College, and is probably not distributed to any individual exterior the aforementioned class, whether or not by
copying or by transmission, and whether or not electronically or in paper kind.
C h apter 10
Unpacking Our Knapsacks of
Invisible Privilege
Privilege ;s lIot somethillg 1 take axe which r subsequently havt the op/ro’l of ‘lOt tllkillg.
It’s one thing tllll! society provides me, mzd ullleH I dumgr the institutiollS which giw it
10 me, they are going to con/llliu to gh’e it, mid, will (OlltiIll4( to haw it, howtl’e r lIobie (lid
egalit(ln’an my i ‘lfe,llio7lS.
– Harry Brod, A1f11 ~ Uves
Introduction
The flip aspect of the coin of oppression is privilege. Nonetheless, in comparison with oppression
generally and anti-oppressive SOci,l] work particularly, not a lot has been written
on prhilege within the social work literature. That is most unlucky, bec.l.l1se the principle
cause we’ve got oppression is as a result of we’ve got privilege. It’s just like the connection
between pOH’rty and w(“,lth wc haw poverty bee,’lI:;c w(‘ have wealth. If we would like
to actually perceive poverty, we should perceive wealth. If we need to do one thing
severe about poverty, we should do one thing severe about we.llth. And if “,-e need to
really perceive oppression, we mu.t underst,md priv leg~’. Oppr(‘”ssion and privilege
go hand in hand. Simply as prhikg(‘” opens doorways of alternative, oppression slams them
shut (Johnson 2006). Simply as poverty wi!! all the time be with us till we do one thing
about wealth, we’ll all the time have oppression till we do one thing ahout privilege.
As articuiat(‘”d by Harry Brod within the quote above, privilege isn’t one thing we take;
it’s given to us by society if we possess the traits that society values, corresponding to
b(‘”ing male, white, heterosexual, afilL!ent, and non-disabled .
Ferber (2003) affords two main the reason why we’ve got t(‘”nded to disregard the problem of
prh-ilege. First, it implicates these with energy, and second, it’s far (‘”asi(‘”r to explor(‘” the
issues confronted by oppressed teams than it’s to discover our personal roles in p(‘”rpetuating
in(‘”high quality. That is unlucky, as a result of we’re all implicated in syst(,”llls of oppression.
‘Though as individu.lls we could not imagine that we’re oppressive individuals, we nonetheless
particip,llC in relations of oppression and acquire numerous privileges from that relationship’
(Ferber 2003, 320). No matt(‘”r how a lot I write or what number of courses I Ie’ach about
inequality, oppression, racism, .lnd sexism, I proceed to reap the privikge’s of being
288 (IIALLE.”JG1XG OpPllEssJO …..
a whitt.’ malc. And though I don’t really feel ashamed of or responsible about my racc or my
gender (in any case, I’ve no management over them), I wrestle with the information that I’m
given sure privileges by society becausc I used to be born with explicit traits
that society valucs. I wouldn’t have privilege due to who I’m as an individual or as a result of
of what I haw carried out. Slightly, I’ve privilege due to the social classes th;;!t, for
probably the most half, I used to be born into. As acknowledged by Alison Bailey (2004, 307), ‘privilege is
granted and delivery is the best manner of being granted privilege.’
If we focus solely on oppression, thc structured invisibility of privilege is strengthened.
I agree with Alison B,tiley (2004, 302) when she says that ‘any undcrstanding of
oppression is incomplete with out recognition of the position privilege performs in sustaining
methods of domination: This chapter will discover the idea and thc structural nature
of privilege, a few of its main traits (together with its invisibility to privilegcd
individuals), the dynamics of privilege or how methods of prh’ilege work, the reason why
privileged individuals turn out to be dcfensivc and uncomfortable in speaking about it, and why
dominant teams don’t see privilege as an issue. We …. sick additionally talk about the parable of
meritocracy, and among the specihc pnvilcges which might be hooked up to numerous poSitions
of domination shall be outlincd. Finall)’, wc will discover what all this has to do with
us as people and as social staff, together with what we are able to do about prhilege to
make a distinction.
The Nature of Privilege
In Chapter 2, it “”‘as talked about that every one of us endure from some form of frustration, damage,
and restriction sooner or later in our lives, however this docs not imply that we’re oppressed.
What determines oppression is when an individual is blocked [rom opportunities to self·
development or is excluded from full participation in society or is assigned :l second·
class citizenship not because of a lack of individual talent or merit but because of
his or her membership in a particular group or category of peoplc. Similarly, what
determines privilege is not any particular advantagcs a person might han’ but whNher
these a1.ivantages were e.uned or conferred system,ltically by society on the basis of
his or her membership in a particular soci,ll group (Hcldke and O’Connor 2004;
Mcintosh 2003). Just as ,Ill oppression counts as harm but not all harms count as
oppression, all privilege is advantageous, but not all advantages count as privilege
(e.g., having a driver’s licence, holding politic,11 office, becoming a !l.ltur,wzed citizen,
which are all filmed advantJges). What determines oppr~’ss on and privilege is the
s}”stematically confe rred naturc of harms in tIll’ fomler and (unfarlled) advantagcs
in the latter (Ibiley 2004). In her classic article on oppression, Marilyn Frye (1983)
argues that if we want to delcrmine whether ,I p,lrticuJar harm or restriction qualifies
as oppreSSion, we have to look at that harm in context to see whether or not it plays a
role in maint,lining a structure that is oppressive. Similarly, Bailey (2004) argues that if
we want to decrtl1l!1t! whether or not a particular advant,lge qualifies as a privilege, we
need to look ,It the advantage in context to see whether or not it plays a role in keeping
complex systems of privilege in place. Sisneros el al. (2008) point out that pri’ileged
U” ‘PA.CJ(ING OUR /G’IA.PSA.C;J(~ Of’ ISnSlllLE PRn’1U:G£ 289
people may experience hardship but unless these hardships are grounded in structural
barriers that affect people in vital and limiting ways, they cannot be considered as
forms of oppression.
Thus, there are 1″0 kinds of advantages- earned and une.uned- and those that
are unearned are considered to be privileges. The corollary is that advantages that are
earned (e.g., a quality educatioll, skills, a good reputation) are not considered privileges
(although one could argue that some ad

Order | Check Discount

Tags: A REFLECTION FROM WITHIN