Posted: October 2nd, 2022

The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies

Project: Literature Evaluate: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies
New expertise—and the appliance of present expertise—solely seems in healthcare settings after cautious and vital analysis. The stakes are excessive, and new scientific programs want to provide proof of constructive affect on outcomes or efficiencies.

Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate scientific system methods. As these methods are sometimes based mostly on expertise traits, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting present analysis to inform their pondering.

On this Project, you’ll assessment present analysis centered on the appliance of scientific programs. After reviewing, you’ll summarize your findings.

To Put together:
Evaluate the Assets and replicate on the affect of scientific programs on outcomes and efficiencies throughout the context of nursing observe and healthcare supply.
Conduct a seek for latest (throughout the final 5 years) analysis centered on the appliance of scientific programs. The analysis ought to present proof to help the use of one sort of scientific system to enhance outcomes and/or efficiencies, resembling “the use of private well being data or portals to help sufferers newly recognized with diabetes.” Evaluate the Assets and take into consideration how scientific programs have an effect on the outcomes and effectivity of nursing observe and healthcare supply.
Do a seek for analysis on the use of scientific programs that was finished throughout the final 5 years. The analysis ought to discover proof to help the use of one sort of scientific system to enhance outcomes and/or effectivity. For instance, “the use of private well being data or portals to Help sufferers newly recognized with diabetes.”
Determine and choose 5 peer-reviewed articles out of your analysis.
The Project: (Four-5 pages)

In a Four- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed analysis you reviewed. Be certain to tackle the next:

Determine the 5 peer-reviewed articles you reviewed, citing every in APA format.
Summarize every research, explaining the advance to outcomes, efficiencies, and classes discovered from the appliance of the scientific system every peer-reviewed article described. Be particular and present examples.

Studying Assets
Observe: To entry this week’s required library assets, please click on on the hyperlink to the Course Readings Record, discovered within the Course Supplies part of your Syllabus.

Required Readings
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, Ok. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the muse of data (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Studying.

Chapter 14, “The Digital Well being Document and Clinical Informatics” (pp. 267–287)
Chapter 15, “Informatics Instruments to Promote Affected person Security and High quality Outcomes” (pp. 293–317)
Chapter 16, “Affected person Engagement and Related Well being” (pp. 323–338)
Chapter 17, “Utilizing Informatics to Promote Neighborhood/Inhabitants Well being” (pp. 341–355)
Chapter 18, “Telenursing and Distant Entry Telehealth” (pp. 359–388)
Dykes, P. C., Rozenblum, R., Dalal, A., Massaro, A., Chang, F., Clements, M., Collins, S. …Bates, D. W. (2017). Potential analysis of a multifaceted intervention to enhance outcomes in intensive care: The Selling Respect and Ongoing Security By Affected person Engagement Communication and Expertise Examine. Vital Care Drugs, 45(eight), e806–e813. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002449

HealthIT.gov. (2018c). What’s an digital well being file (EHR)? Retrieved from https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-health-record-ehr

Healthcare Info Administration and Systems Society. (2018). Digital well being data. Retrieved from https://www.himss.org/library/ehr/

Rao-Gupta, S., Kruger, D. Leak, L. D., Tieman, L. A., & Manworren, R. C. B. (2018). Leveraging interactive affected person care expertise to Improve ache administration engagement. Ache Administration Nursing, 19(Three), 212–221. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2017.11.002

Observe: You’ll entry this text from the Walden Library databases.

Skiba, D. (2017). Analysis instruments to appraise social media and cellular purposes. Informatics, Four(Three), 32–40. doi:10.3390/informatics4030032

Observe: You’ll entry this text from the Walden Library databases.

Required Media
Laureate Training (Producer). (2018). Public Well being Informatics [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Writer.

Accessible participant
Laureate Training (Producer). (2018). Digital Information and Managing IT Change [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Writer.

Rubric Element

Choose Grid View or Record View to change the rubric’s structure.

Identify: NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric
Grid View
Record View
Glorious Good Truthful Poor
In a Four- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed analysis you reviewed. Be certain to tackle the next:

• Correctly establish 5 peer-reviewed articles chosen.
• Summarize every research, explaining the advance to outcomes, efficiencies, and classes discovered from the appliance of the scientific system every peer-reviewed article described. Be particular and present examples.
77 (77%) – 85 (85%)
The responses precisely and clearly establish 5 peer-reviewed analysis articles for the Project.

The responses precisely and completely summarize intimately every research reviewed, explaining intimately the advance to outcomes, efficiencies, and classes discovered from the appliance of the scientific system every peer-reviewed article described.

Particular, correct, and detailed examples are offered which absolutely help the responses.
68 (68%) – 76 (76%)
The responses establish 5 peer-reviewed analysis articles for the Project.

The responses summarize every research reviewed, explaining the advance to outcomes, efficiencies, and classes discovered from the appliance of the scientific system every peer-reviewed article described.

Correct examples are offered which help the responses offered.
60 (60%) – 67 (67%)
The responses vaguely or inaccurately establish 5 or much less peer-reviewed articles for the Project.

The responses summarize every research reviewed, explaining the advance to outcomes, efficiencies, and classes discovered from the appliance of the scientific system every peer-reviewed article described that’s imprecise or inaccurate.

Examples offered to help the responses are imprecise or inaccurate.
zero (zero%) – 59 (59%)
The responses vaguely and inaccurately establish lower than 5 peer-reviewed articles for the Project, or are lacking.

The responses vaguely and inaccurately summarize every research reviewed, explaining the advance to outcomes, efficiencies, and classes discovered from the appliance of the scientific system every peer-reviewed article described, or are lacking.

Examples offered to help the responses are imprecise and inaccurate, or are lacking.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Improvement and Group:

Paragraphs clarify factors that help nicely developed concepts, circulate logically, and reveal continuity of concepts. Sentences are fastidiously focused–neither lengthy and rambling nor quick and missing substance.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences observe writing requirements for circulate, continuity, and readability.
Four (Four%) – Four (Four%)
Paragraphs and sentences observe writing requirements for circulate, continuity, and readability 80% of the time.
Three.5 (Three.5%) – Three.5 (Three.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences observe writing requirements for circulate, continuity, and readability 60%- 79% of the time.
zero (zero%) – Three (Three%)
Paragraphs and sentences observe writing requirements for circulate, continuity, and readability < 60% of the time.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing requirements:

Right grammar, mechanics, and correct punctuation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Makes use of right grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Four (Four%) – Four (Four%)
Accommodates a number of (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Three.5 (Three.5%) – Three.5 (Three.5%)
Accommodates a number of (Three-Four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
zero (zero%) – Three (Three%)
Accommodates many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that intrude with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows right APA format for title web page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, web page numbers, working head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference listing.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Makes use of right APA format with no errors.
Four (Four%) – Four (Four%)
Accommodates a number of (1-2) APA format errors.
Three.5 (Three.5%) – Three.5 (Three.5%)
Accommodates a number of (Three-Four) APA format errors.
zero (zero%) – Three (Three%)
Accommodates many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Complete Factors: 100
Identify: NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

Order | Check Discount

Tags: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies