Posted: October 1st, 2022

IFN561: Enterprise Systems Lifecycle Management

IFN561: Enterprise Systems Lifecycle Management
Assessment Process 2
Assessment Process 2
Process overview
Assessment identify: Request for Proposal (RFP)
Process description: The target for this task is to construct in your earlier group task (Assessment Process 1). For Assessment Process 2, you’ll put together a request for proposal (RFP) for the knowledge system you may have proposed within the earlier task.
This RFP will present a complete description of the proposed data system and the method to be taken to develop the brand new system.
Studying outcomes measured: ULO2: Advocate and justify a spread of IT methods to handle the constraints and boundaries of an organisation enterprise system.
ULO3: Talk successfully in skilled and scholarly contexts to quite a lot of stakeholders in written codecs.
ULO6: Collaborate with others in a workforce atmosphere to ship an consequence for a consumer.
Remaining report due: Wednesday, 12 October 2022
Weighting: 30 %
Particular person/Group: Group
How will I be assessed: 7-point grading scale utilizing a rubric
Process particulars
What that you must do: 1. Learn the Criterion-Referenced Assessment Rubric.
2. Learn the task description and background.
Three. Observe the step-by-step information of the task.
four. Full the group declaration and standards sheet.
Presentation necessities: This Assessment process should be accomplished for submission on Blackboard beneath Assessment Duties Assessment Process 2 by utilizing the Assessment Process 2 Group Template.
Sources wanted to finish process:
• IFN561 Blackboard web site
• QUT Cite|Write APA information.
Submission Data
What that you must submit: You’ll want to submit the next merchandise:
1. Accomplished IFN561_Assessment_Task_2_Group_Template.docx
Find out how to submit: 1. Entry “Written Task Submission Space: Assessment Process 2”
2. Connect file by searching your pc.
Three. Choose the proper file.
four. Click on Submit.
5. To test profitable submission, you’ll obtain a textual content match % (if that is an possibility), and you’ll be able to resubmit, view or obtain your paper.
6. ALWAYS test your scholar e-mail for the submission receipt.
Moderation: All workers who’re assessing your work meet to debate and evaluate their judgements earlier than marks or grades are finalised.
Educational Integrity
As a scholar of the QUT educational group, you’re requested to work to uphold the rules of educational integrity throughout your course of research. QUT units expectations and duties of scholars, extra particularly it states that college students “undertake an moral method to educational work and Assessment in accordance with this coverage and the Scholar Code of Conduct. E/2.1 (MOPP C/5.Three Educational Integrity).
At college, college students are anticipated to show their very own understanding and pondering utilizing the concepts supplied by ‘others’ to Help and inform their work, all the time making due acknowledgement to the supply. Whereas we encourage peer studying, it’s not applicable to share assignments with different college students until your Assessment piece has been acknowledged as being a gaggle task. If you happen to do share your task with one other scholar, they usually copy a part of or your whole task for his or her submission, that is thought of collusion and you might also be reported for tutorial misconduct. If you’re not sure and wish additional data you’ll find this at: http://www.mopp.qut.edu.au/C/C_05_03.jsp#C_05_03.03.mdoc.

Description
The target for this task is to construct in your earlier group task (Assessment Process 1). For Assessment Process 2, in your group of Three-5 individuals, you’ll put together a request for proposal (RFP) for the knowledge system you may have proposed within the earlier task. This RFP will present a complete description of the proposed data system and the method to be taken to develop the brand new system. Please maintain the teams of Assessment Process 1 for Assessment Process 2, which can present consistency as a result of the assignments construct on one another.
Particularly, you’ll develop an RFP to ask distributors to develop an data system to handle the issue or alternative you may have recognized in your earlier task (Assessment Process 1). You can be required to elucidate the necessities and particulars of the knowledge system that might tackle the issue/alternative you may have recognized. Use the suggestions in your earlier task that can Help you enhance your general RFP for an relevant data system.
Background
Within the earlier task, your group has chosen an organisation and you’ve got developed an concept for an data system to handle issues or alternatives inside that firm. Within the earlier task, you may have developed an understanding of how the organisation you may have chosen ought to design methods and plan for enterprise methods to handle issues/alternatives that exist in that organisation. On this task, you’ll develop an RFP to ask distributors to develop an data system following your technique map to handle the issue/alternative you may have recognized within the chosen firm.
Step-by-step information
Assessment Process 1 and a couple of on this unit are associated. Constructing in your proposed concept to resolve an issue or pursue alternatives utilizing an enterprise system from Assessment Process 1, you’ll put together and develop an RFP doc to ask exterior distributors to develop such an enterprise system in Assessment Process 2. This can will let you get hold of suggestions in your concept after the primary task, so you’ll be able to enhance it earlier than submitting your second task.
The encircling concept of this task is to develop an RFP for an data system that may remedy an issue or Help an organisation overcome its weaknesses.
The format of your task is a request for proposal. Your request for proposal must be clearly structured and current data as clearly and succinctly as doable. In terms of writing a request for proposal, you must have the next sections:
A. Accomplished declaration and standards sheet by group members. Discovered within the Assessment Process 2 Group Template.
B. Introduction & Targets: The introduction ought to present a helpful background data of the corporate, contact data, what services and products the corporate is providing, and an outline of the technique, imaginative and prescient, mission, targets and worth of the corporate. This part must also present the principle capabilities of the corporate, and distinctive aggressive benefits of the corporate. Additional, you must define the mission particulars, scope, and targets, by explaining the mission, and describing the system the corporate is searching for. This part must also present specifics in regards to the proposed system, the goals of the system, the outcomes you anticipate from the system, and specify the duties which can be essential to efficiently full the system. It is best to clearly specify the record of the goals the system ought to obtain.
C. Undertaking Specification: This part ought to present a listing of practical and non-functional necessities. You must also clarify the precedence of the necessities utilizing the MoSCoW method. This part must also define the capability planning technique of the corporate. If any vendor is severe about working with you, they are going to wish to know the workload you anticipate the system to deal with whereas preserving the efficiency on the identical degree of the efficiency chances are you’ll specified by way of non-functional necessities. What assets can be found in your organisation? Do you want any further IT infrastructure? How will the system be built-in with the prevailing methods? You additionally want to permit distributors to suggest their concepts and processes, then you can also make extra knowledgeable selections on the most effective method to realize the goals of the mission.
D. Collaboration Particulars & Finances: This part ought to clarify the popular collaboration arranging (e.g., hybrid, outsourcing, and so forth.). You’ll want to specify if there are any stakeholders employed by the corporate who shall be concerned within the mission, clarify their roles and clearly define the duties of any stakeholders together with the seller. This part additionally ought to define the detailed schedule, so distributors know if they’ll meet your deadlines. You additionally want to incorporate finances data, if the corporate has a strict finances for the mission. In any other case, chances are you’ll have to ask vendor to element how a lot they are going to cost you for the mission and ask them to breakdown their cost necessities and procedures.
E. Analysis & Submission: On this part, that you must clarify the analysis standards and break it right down to specify how you’ll choose a profitable vendor. When you’re selecting a vendor to work along with your firm, you must choose the most effective vendor who meets your wants and is effectively certified to work on the mission. If there are circumstances that may result in instant disqualification, then you must embody these as effectively. This part must also specify the path for submitting the proposal and the deadline for the submission.
F. References: The references should include all the fabric cited within the report. It should be correct and in keeping with APA type. Discuss with www.citewrite.qut.edu.au.
G. Appendix. The appendix could include further supporting data (if any) that’s included on the finish of the report in order to not distract the reader from the principle elements of the report. The appendix incorporates detailed data, akin to supporting questionnaires, tables, graphs, and diagrams. The fabric used within the appendix must be numbered within the order they’re talked about within the textual content.

IFN561 Enterprise Systems Lifecycle Management | Assessment Process 2 Rubric
Standards Excessive Distinction (7) Distinction (6) Credit score (5) Cross (four) Fail (1-Three)
Introduction & Targets
(four marks) The introduction clearly and succinctly outlines particulars in regards to the firm, in addition to the technique, imaginative and prescient, mission, values and targets, and scope. An applicable background and key capabilities are supplied. The RFP clearly and concisely states the goals of the system and the anticipated outcomes. The system’s goals are clearly linked to the goals of the organisation.
Mark indication: four The introduction clearly outlines particulars in regards to the firm, in addition to the technique, imaginative and prescient, mission, values and targets, and scope. An applicable background and key capabilities are supplied. The RFP clearly states the goals of the system and the anticipated outcomes. The system’s goals are clearly linked to the goals of the organisation.
Mark indication: Three The introduction/background outlines particulars in regards to the firm, in addition to the technique, imaginative and prescient, mission, values and targets. An applicable background and key capabilities of the corporate are supplied. The RFP clearly states the goals of the system and the anticipated outcomes, that are linked to the technique.
Mark indication: 2.5 The introduction/background outlines particulars in regards to the firm, in addition to the technique, imaginative and prescient, mission, values and targets. The background covers most vital areas however lacks element. The RFP clearly states the goals of the system and the anticipated outcomes, that are linked to the technique.
Mark indication: 2 The introduction/background doesn’t present sufficient particulars in regards to the firm. The imaginative and prescient, mission, targets, and values of the corporate shouldn’t be clear for a vendor. The mission particulars, goals, and anticipated outcomes aren’t effectively outlined.
Mark indication: Zero-1
Undertaking Specification
(eight marks) Practical and non-functional necessities are clearly, exactly, and utterly talked about. The RFP signifies the precedence of the necessities with no errors or unreasonable assumptions. The entire doable calls for and necessities to handle capability and combine methods are applicable and clearly defined.
Mark indication: eight Practical and non-functional necessities are clearly and utterly talked about. The RFP signifies the precedence of the necessities with just a few errors however no unreasonable assumptions. The entire doable calls for to handle capability and combine methods are applicable and clearly defined.
Mark indication: 6.5 Many of the practical and non-functional necessities are talked about. The RFP signifies the precedence of the necessities with some errors however no unreasonable assumptions. The calls for to handle capability and combine methods are applicable and clearly defined.
Mark indication: 5 A number of the practical and non-functional necessities are talked about. The RFP signifies the precedence of the necessities with some errors and/or unreasonable assumptions. The calls for to handle capability and combine methods are mentioned.
Mark indication: four Both practical or non-functional necessities are incomplete, unclear, or lacking; or capability planning is incomplete, unclear, or not talked about; or how the brand new system shall be built-in is incomplete, not clear, or lacking.
Mark indication: Zero-Three
Collaboration Particulars & Finances
(eight marks) The collaboration method is clearly and exactly talked about. Particulars of the collaboration are effectively defined. The duties of stakeholders are talked about with no errors or unreasonable assumptions. Schedule and finances data is supplied.
Mark indication: eight The collaboration method is clearly talked about. Particulars of the collaboration are defined. The duties of stakeholders are talked about with just a few errors however no unreasonable assumptions. Schedule and finances data is supplied.
Mark indication: 6.5 The collaboration method is talked about. The duties of stakeholders are talked about with some errors however no unreasonable assumptions. Schedule and finances data is supplied.
Mark indication: 5 The collaboration method is talked about however some particulars are lacking. The duties of stakeholders are talked about with some errors and/or unreasonable assumptions. Schedule and finances data is supplied.
Mark indication: four Both the collaboration method is incomplete, unclear, or lacking; or the schedule and finances data is incomplete, unclear, or lacking.
Mark indication: Zero-Three
Analysis & Submission
(eight marks) Complete analysis standards are supplied, that are exact, full, clear, sensible, and rational. The submission path is talked about and clear.
Mark indication: eight Analysis standards are supplied, that are full, clear, sensible, and rational. The submission path is talked about and clear.
Mark indication: 6.5 Analysis standards are supplied.
Few standards aren’t sensible, or they aren’t possible/rational. The submission path is talked about.
Mark indication: 5 Analysis standards are supplied however missing some vital elements. Some standards aren’t sensible, or they aren’t possible/rational. The submission path is talked about.
Mark indication: four Both the analysis standards are incomplete, lacking, or incorrect, missing vital standards, and/or poorly defined, or submission path shouldn’t be talked about or lacks vital particulars.
Mark indication: Zero-Three
Written Presentation & Teamwork
(2 marks) Task is cohesively written in a really clear format. Only a few grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. Your in-text citations and reference record are all current and accurately formatted in APA type. Wonderful means to work as a workforce in an excellent method.
Mark indication: 2 Superb means to arrange duties evident within the workforce work assembly agenda and assembly minutes, which displays the workforce’s means to work successfully as a gaggle to achieve attention-grabbing outcomes. Superb means to work very effectively as a workforce.
Mark indication: 1.5 Task is generally in a transparent format. Some grammatical, spelling and/or punctuation errors, however they don’t intervene with the general which means. Your in-text citations and reference record are all current and formatted in APA type, with few minor errors. Good means to work effectively as a workforce.
Mark indication: 1.5 Task is considerably clear. There are some grammatical, spelling and/or punctuation errors that considerably intervene with the general which means. Your in-text citations and reference record are all current and formatted in APA type, with some errors. The power to work as a workforce is suitable.
Mark indication: 1 Task is unclear. There are quite a few errors in grammar, spelling and/or punctuation that intervene with the general which means. Your in-text citations and reference record is lacking some entries and/or has some vital errors. The power to work as a workforce is inadequate.
Mark indication: Zero-Zero.5

Order | Check Discount

Tags: IFN561: Enterprise Systems Lifecycle Management