Posted: September 19th, 2022

CJ 4960 Senior Capstone: Comparative Criminal Justice Systems

Indiana Tech
School of Skilled Research
CJ 4960 Senior Capstone: Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
On-line Syllabus Course Content material
Teacher Info
Please see the Meet Your Professor space of the Blackboard tutorial website.
Course Schedule
Please see the Course Schedule within the Syllabus & Schedule space of the Blackboard tutorial
website.
On-line Course Insurance policies
Please see the On-line Insurance policies space of the Blackboard tutorial website.
Textbook
Reichel, P. L. (2013). Comparative legal justice programs: A topical method (sixth ed.). Higher
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Corridor.
Grading Occasions & Grading Standards
Until in any other case specified, all assignments should be submitted through Blackboard
Course Preparation Quiz 15 Factors
Dialogue Board (Week 1, 2, four) 100 Factors
Undertaking One (Legislation Enforcement) 150 Factors
Undertaking Two (Criminal Legislation) 150 Factors
Examination One 100 Factors
Examination Two 100 Factors
Tech Reside Weekly Reflections 60 factors
Whole Factors 675 Factors
Class Participation/Dialogue:
College students are anticipated to have learn the assigned supplies previous to the weekly module and give you the chance
to intelligently reply to questions on and focus on the readings. Factors will likely be based mostly on the
following standards:
1. Response to the posted Question Assignment/subject throughout the week of the module protecting in thoughts
that greater than opinion is being solicited. Help your opinions/arguments using
course materials and/or different related and academically oriented sources.
2. Response to at the least two different college students’ posts which is designed to foster interplay as
effectively as designed to problem each other to doubtlessly have a look at matters or arguments from
a differing viewpoint. Be mindful the intent is to not trigger argument however reasonably to
problem pondering.
College students are inspired to lift points and ask questions relating to present or outdoors the
classroom occasions which are associated to the course. A scholar MUST have full participation with
responding to all the posted questions/matters for every module in addition to a minimal of at the least
two responses to different college students’ posts in an effort to attain the total 100 (100) factors for
class participation.
Tasks (2):
College students are required to write down two (2) papers describing (2) main parts of overseas nation
of the scholars selecting (teacher should approve choice). The assignments would require the
scholar to analysis, write a paper, and make a presentation, via growing a
PowerPoint presentation masking the fabric introduced within the formal paper describing (1)
Police/Legislation Enforcement of a overseas nation and (2) The Criminal Legislation Elements of a
overseas nation. The particular matters and grading standards for the written assignments and
presentation observe and are integrated into this syllabus.
Written assignments are to be phrase processed utilizing Microsoft Phrase, dimension 12 New Occasions Roman
font, double spaced with one (1) inch margins across the web page (default), utilizing the American
Psychological Affiliation (APA) quotation technique. Your analysis papers and displays
needs to be thorough and scholarly. Jargon, lingo, and avenue language are to be prevented and their
use will lower your grade. By means of instance, and never limitation, “cop” is usually
unacceptable, “police officer” or “legislation enforcement officers” is most well-liked. An individual could also be
“mentally ailing” or “legally insane” (they aren’t the identical), not “nuts” or “loopy”.
The fabric anticipated to be lined in every written venture is roofed towards the tip of this
syllabus. Be mindful, the paper needs to be written as such. In different phrases, based mostly off the
materials record pertaining to info that needs to be lined, make the knowledge right into a
paper—don’t merely bullet level solutions. Additional, guarantee that you’re crediting the supply(s)
used for the knowledge that you’re referencing by using the correct APA format. The
written paper should be submitted previous to the date/time due, as famous within the course schedule,
and submitted through Blackboard’s SafeAssign characteristic.
The PowerPoint portion of the project should be submitted through an email correspondence (e-mail)
attachment previous to the due date/time or using the submit characteristic throughout the respective module
underneath the project part. If the coed runs into issues submitting the e-mail because of dimension
of the attachment, “notice pages” of the presentation can be completely acceptable. If questions
come up in regard to how to take action, upfront, make sure that you get with the trainer to work
via PowerPoint to “print” the notice pages if vital.
Info to Cowl for Tasks:
PROJECT ONE: POLICE/LAW ENFORCEMENT
CLASSIFICATION OR TYPE OF STRUCTURE
NUMBER OF AGENCIES IN THE COUNTRY
OFFICERS PER 1000 POPULATION
ARMED OR UNARMED
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
Centralized or decentralized
Nationwide
State or provincial
Native
JURISDICTIONAL STRUCTURE
Overlapping
Coordinated
Uncoordinated
OPERATIONS/DUTIES
Proactive
Reactive
Investigative
CRIME RATE
CORRUPTION AND MISCONDUCT ISSUES
LEVEL OF COOPERATION WITH FOREIGN AGENICES
PROCEDURES, POLICIES, METHODS OR IDEAS THE U.S. SHOULD ADOPT: At
least one (1) process, coverage, or thought should be described that you simply really feel the U.S. ought to undertake and
clarify why.
PROCEDURES, POLICIES, METHODS OR IDEAS THE U.S. COULD NOT OR
SHOULD NOT ADOPT: At the very least one (1) process, coverage, or thought should be described that the
U.S shouldn’t or couldn’t undertake and clarify why.
PROJECT TWO: CRIMINAL LAW
BACKGROUND OF COUNTRY
Location on map
Demographics
Inhabitants
Racial, ethnic, and/or spiritual inhabitants percentages
Methodology by which sovereignty was attained
ECONOMIC STRUCTURE
Centralized
Socialist
Capitalist
Blended
GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE
Sort of presidency
Monarchy
Dictatorship
Republic
Democratic
Structure
Frequent Legislation
Written
Different
Branches
Government
Legislative
Judicial
Methodology of choosing officers in branches
LEGAL TRADITION
Frequent
Civil
Islamic
Japanese Asia
Mixture
SOURCE OF:
Substantive Criminal Legislation
Procedural Criminal Legislation
DESCRIBE PROCEDURAL PROTECTIONS
PROJECT GRADING CRITERIA
150 factors doable per venture
Grading areas
for Paper
Portion
Size/Grammar
20 factors
doable
Theoretical
Sourcework
15 factors doable
Essential Thought
50 factors doable
Matches
Parameters
of
Project
15 factors
doable
Paper Portion:
100 Factors
Potential
-Lower than 700
phrases, poor
grammatical
utilization, poor
doc
development Zero-11
factors
-700+ phrases,
many
grammatical
issues,
reasonable
development 12-
17 factors
-700+ phrases, few
grammatical
issues, good
development 18-
20 factors
-No theoretical
part,
inadequate cites, no
bibliography/refere
nce record, makes use of identical
quotation repeatedly
Zero-5 factors
-Theoretical
substance missing,
info
referenced however not
defined, errors
with citations,
references not
clearly marked,
some overlap of
citations used 6-10
factors
-Effectively cited,
thorough
utility of
course
content material/theoretical
parts, effectively
documented
bibliography 11-15
factors
-No growth of
materials/perception, doesn’t
relate personal
observations/expertise to
paper Zero-15 factors
-Some growth of
materials/perception, exhibits
some understanding and
utility in fact
materials, relates some
expertise/observations to
paper 16-30 factors
-Expands materials/perception
to personal experiences and
observations, exhibits full
understanding and
utility in fact
materials, questions and
confirms course materials
with personal perception and
help of different
documentation 31-50
factors
-Project
not
adopted/doe
s not handle
matters as
famous Zero-5
factors
-Follows
some points
of
project
however doesn’t
absolutely handle
all matters 6-
10 factors
-Addresses
all points of
project
and absolutely
covers all
matters 11-15
factors
PowerPoint
Presentation
50 Factors
Potential
-Scholar’s
presentation is
inconsistent,
unclear or not
cohesive failing
to completely
cowl/handle
areas listed in
necessities
and doesn’t
match materials in
paper Zero-15 factors
-Presentation is
pretty clear and
cohesive whereas
masking most however
not all the areas
listed in
necessities and
considerably matches
materials lined in
paper 16-34 factors
-Presentation is effectively
organized and absolutely covers
all areas listed in
necessities and matches
materials introduced in paper
35-50 factors
Examinations:
Examinations will encompass fifty (50) questions in a a number of alternative, true/false, and fill-in the
clean format. Every response has a worth of two (2) factors in the direction of a scholar’s grade.
Examinations should be accomplished by the date/time listed within the course syllabus and should have
time restrictions.
Grading Scale
The next grading scale will likely be used to assign a grade on the finish of the course:
Late Assignments
Please see the On-line Insurance policies space of the Blackboard tutorial website.
Incompletes
Please see the On-line Insurance policies space of the Blackboard tutorial website.
Course Associated Communication
Please see the On-line Insurance policies space of the Blackboard tutorial website.
A 90-100%
B 80-89.99%
C 70-79.99%
D 60-69.99%
F 59.99% or under

Order | Check Discount

Tags: CJ4960