Posted: September 14th, 2022

Business Decision Making Assignment Brief

Assignment Brief
Course/Programme: BA (Hons) Business Research with Basis
Stage:
Basis 12 months zero (Stage zero)
12 months 2 Stage four
12 months three Stage 5
12 months four Stage 6
12 months 2 Stage four
Module Title: Business Decision Making
Weighting: Particular person Assignment – 25%
Date given out: 1st August 2022
Submission date: 15th September 2022
For late submission, please test CCCU Taught regulation (web page 28 on late submission) and Extenuating Coverage: CCCU Taught regulation

CCCU Extenuating Circumstances Coverage

Technique of submission:  On-line solely On-line and paper copy
Particular directions for submission (if any):
Date for outcomes and suggestions
(please observe the ultimate grade is topic to the principle CCCU Assessment Board) ???????
Studying outcomes assessed: • LO1: Show data and understanding on key resolution theories and ideas and interpret totally different method to enterprise resolution making processes.

• LO2: Perceive key sampling strategies and fundamental statistical methods in enterprise contexts.

• LO3: Consider and interpret outcomes generated by knowledge modelling and forecasting methods, together with these offered by specialised statistical laptop software program.

• LO4: Perceive and justify the adoption of applicable knowledge modelling and forecasting methods in enterprise contexts and make knowledgeable and efficient selections.

The penalty to be utilized to late course work, which is able to embrace course work the place the work is graded on a move/fail foundation and it’s doable to provide a numerical mark, can be 5 per cent (of the eligible marks) per day, for as much as seven days, after which a mark of zero can be recorded.

TASK DESCRIPTION: Assignment (Particular person Essay) 25%

TASK

S&P plc is a bag manufacturing firm, working within the UK and a few components of the Europe. At the moment, a few of their productions comparable to artificial leather-based luggage and garments luggage have been outsourced as a result of lack of accessible sources. Nevertheless, strategic managers of S&P plc need to spend money on a undertaking producing artificial leather-based luggage or garments luggage. They’ve known as new enterprise proposals and have lastly, chosen two tasks utilizing managers’ discretion to make remaining resolution. Preliminary funding required for undertaking A (artificial leather-based luggage) is £185,000 and for undertaking B (garments luggage) is £182,000. The low cost price required is at 11%. The online money flows for 2 tasks might be summarized as beneath:

12 months Venture A – Artificial Leather-based Baggage
Internet cashflow £ Venture B –Garments Baggage
Internet cashflow £
1 60,000 65,000
2 68,000 69,000
three 82,000 77,000
four 109,000 105,000
5 155,000 145,000

You might be required to jot down an essay on enterprise resolution making, evaluating the important thing features of the payback interval and NPV, and monetary and non-financial elements used to help resolution making.

MARKING CRITERIA AND STUDENT FEEDBACK – ASSIGNMENT
This part particulars the Assessment standards. The extent to which these are demonstrated by you determines your mark. The marks out there for every criterion are proven. Lecturers will use the house offered to touch upon the achievement of the duty(s), together with these areas through which you have got carried out effectively and areas that might profit from growth/enchancment.

Widespread Assessment Standards Marks out there
1. Calculation of the payback interval 10
Calculation of the payback interval (years and months) in undertaking A and B.
2. Calculation of NPV 20
Calculation of the NPV in undertaking A and B.
three. Assessment and Dialogue: 60
• The power to guage and Assessment the calculated outcomes and make the ultimate resolution by evaluating two primary monetary methods used to guage tasks.
• Taking monetary and non-financial elements and their implication on funding resolution making course of into the account.

5. General presentation together with right referencing: 10
Use of Harvard referencing and general presentation.
TOTAL 100

Size Required
Roughly 1000 phrases
Formatting and Structure

Please observe the next when finishing your written project:
1. Writing: Written in English utilizing applicable enterprise/tutorial fashion
2. Focus: Focus solely on the duties set within the project.
three. Size: Roughly 1000 phrases
four. Doc format: Essay

I. Cowl web page – Guarantee a transparent title, course, title and pupil ID quantity is on the quilt sheet.
II. Introduction
III. Essential Physique
IV. Conclusion
V. Reference record utilizing Harvard Referencing Fashion.

5. Analysis: Analysis ought to use dependable and related sources of knowledge e.g. tutorial books and journals which have been peer reviewed. The analysis needs to be in depth.

MAXIMUM LENGTH
Assessment 1: 1000 phrases (+/- 10%).

Assessment Standards:
An excellent Distinction 90 – 100 Work which fulfils all the standards of the grade beneath, however at an distinctive normal.
A really robust distinction 80 – 89 Work of distinguished high quality which relies on a rigorous and broad data base, and demonstrating sustained capability to analyse, synthesise, consider and interpret ideas, ideas and knowledge inside subject of research, utilizing outlined ideas, methods and/or normal codecs and purposes. It will type the premise for the event of sound arguments and judgements applicable to the sphere of research/ Assessment activity. There can be robust proof of competence throughout a spread of specialized abilities, utilizing them to plan, develop and consider drawback fixing methods, and of the potential to function autonomously and self-evaluate with steering in assorted structured contexts. Outputs can be communicated successfully, precisely and reliably.
A transparent Distinction 71 – 79 Work of excellent high quality which shows most however not the entire standards for the grade above.
A Distinction 70 Work of extremely commendable high quality which clearly fulfils the standards for the grade beneath, however reveals a better diploma of functionality in related mental/topic/key abilities.
A really robust Benefit 67 – 69 Work of commendable high quality based mostly on a robust factual/conceptual data base for the sphere of research, together with an assured grasp of ideas and ideas, along with efficient deployment of abilities related to the self-discipline and Assessment activity. There can be clear proof of research, synthesis, analysis and utility, and the power to work successfully inside outlined pointers to satisfy outlined targets. There can be constant proof of functionality in all related topic based mostly and key abilities, together with the power to self-evaluate and work autonomously below steering and to make use of successfully specified normal methods in applicable contexts.
A robust benefit 64 – 66 Work of fine high quality which incorporates most, however not the entire traits of the grade above.
A transparent Benefit 61 – 63 Work which clearly fulfils all the standards of the grade beneath, however reveals a better diploma of functionality in related mental/topic/key abilities.
Benefit 60 Work of sound high quality based mostly on a agency factual/ conceptual data base for the sphere of research, demonstrating a great grasp of related ideas/ideas, along with the power to organise and talk successfully. The work could also be fairly normal, however can be largely correct and supply some proof of the power to analyse, synthesise, consider and apply normal strategies/methods, below steering. There can be no severe omissions or inaccuracies. There can be good proof of capability to take accountability for personal studying, to function with restricted autonomy in predictable outlined contexts, deciding on and utilizing related methods, and to show competence in related key abilities.
A really robust Cross 55 – 59 Work of succesful high quality which incorporates a few of the traits of grade above.
A robust Cross 50 – 54 Work of passable high quality demonstrating a dependable data base and proof of developed key abilities and/or topic based mostly abilities, however containing restricted proof of research, synthesis, analysis or utility.
A Cross 41 – 49 Work of broadly passable high quality protecting adequately the factual and/or conceptual data base of the sphere of research and appropriately introduced and organised, however is primarily descriptive or by-product, with solely occasional proof of research, synthesis, analysis or utility. There could also be some misunderstanding of key ideas/ideas and limitations within the capability to pick related materials or methods and/or in communication or different related abilities, in order that the work could embrace some errors, omissions or irrelevancies. There can be proof of capability to function with restricted autonomy in predictable outlined contexts, utilizing normal methods, and to satisfy threshold requirements in related key abilities.
A naked Cross 40 Work of naked move normal demonstrating some familiarity with and grasp of a factual/conceptual data base for the sphere of research, along with proof of some capability to make use of specialist abilities to resolve issues inside space of research, however solely simply assembly threshold requirements in e.g. analysis and interpretation of information and data, reasoning and soundness of judgment, communication, utility, or high quality of outputs. Work could also be characterised by some vital errors, omissions or issues, however there can be adequate proof of growth and competence to function in specified contexts taking accountability for the character and high quality of outputs.
A marginal Fail 30 – 39 Work which signifies some proof of engagement with space of research in relation to acquisition of data and understanding of ideas and ideas, and of specialist abilities, however which is basically misinterpreted, and misapplied and/or incorporates some vital omission or misunderstanding, or in any other case simply fails to satisfy threshold requirements in e.g. communication, utility or high quality of outputs.
A Fail 20 – 29 Work that falls effectively wanting the edge requirements in relation to a number of space of data, mental, topic based mostly or key abilities. It might deal with the Assessment activity to some extent, or embrace proof of profitable engagement with a few of the material, however such passable traits can be clearly outweighed by main deficiencies throughout remaining areas.
A complete Fail zero – 19 Work of poor high quality which relies on solely minimal understanding, utility or effort. It should supply solely very restricted proof of familiarity with data or abilities applicable to the sphere of research or activity and/or show insufficient functionality in key abilities important to the duty involved.
Non-submission/Nil try zero Nothing, or nothing of benefit, introduced.

Order | Check Discount

Tags: Assignment Brief