Posted: September 12th, 2022

LLAW2215 Human Service Law & Practice

LLAW2215 Case Research #1

• Covers materials in Modules 1, 2 and three
• Learn Matter Information fastidiously for necessities re:
o Formatting – see Matter Information web page 18 o Referencing – see Matter information web page 15 o Phrase Restrict – see Matter Information web page 15
 If utilizing AGLC: 1350 phrases, no reference checklist
 If utilizing APA seventh: 1350+135 = 1485 phrases (in textual content citations) plus reference checklist at finish
 If utilizing Harvard AGPS sixth: 1350+135 = 1485 phrases (in textual content citations) plus reference checklist at finish

Context
• The Social Employees Registration Act 2021 (SA) has been handed by Parliament however has not but come into operation.
• Skim learn the entire Act.
• Re-read Elements Three,Four,5,6 fastidiously.

Select ONE ONLY of Choice 1 or Choice 2 or Choice Three
• Submit ONLY ONE report
• You select whether or not you want to put together a report addressing ONE ONLY of Choice 1 or Choice 2 or Choice Three.
• You do NOT want to organize a report for every possibility

Phrase Limits and Size Penalties

Phrase limits are sometimes crucial in authorized writing, particularly for stories which might be submitted to or requested by courts or senior administration.
Penalties will probably be imposed if Case Research #1 or #2 exceeds the phrase restrict said for the project.
5% of the whole mark potential for a bit of labor will probably be deducted for each 10% of the whole phrase restrict or half thereof by which the Case Research exceeds that restrict.
This implies the penalty is imposed as quickly because the variety of phrases passes the restrict by one phrase. Case Research #1 has a phrase restrict of 1350 phrases, so a penalty of 5% will probably be imposed if it comprises 1351 phrases, and a penalty of 10% will probably be imposed if it comprises 1486 phrases.
Headings are included in your phrase rely and we encourage you to make use of them, as they often enhance readability and Help good construction.
For college kids utilizing AGLC4, references contained in footnotes will not be a part of the phrase rely, however any dialogue in your footnotes is included.
Misstating the variety of phrases utilized in your Case Research will probably be handled as an instructional integrity problem.
OPTION 1

Search on-line to determine a human service organisation in South Australia that will make use of social employees

Your position: Assume you’re employed for that organisation as both a authorized or human service employee.

Your process: Put together a report back to the Board of that organisation outlining the implications of the brand new Act for that organisation.

Your report ought to:
• Clearly determine the organisation you might be reporting to (and embrace a hyperlink to its web site)
• Be addressed to the Board
• Begin with an government abstract (roughly 200 phrases) of what the Act will imply for o The organisation
o The organisation’s workers who’re social employees
• Tackle in additional element a very powerful implications of the Act to your organisation. These might embrace (however will not be restricted to) o How your organisation can know is its workers are assembly acceptable requirements
o What types of labor your organisation does presently that could be more likely to be restricted to be carried out solely by registered social employees as soon as the Act comes into drive.
o How your organisation can guarantee any current employees assembly the ‘match and correct particular person’ requirement to be registered
o How your organisation can be sure that it isn’t in breach of sections 36,37 or 38

OPTION 2

Your position: Assume you’ve been appointed Registrar of the Social Employees Registration Board of South Australia [SWRBSA] pursuant to s 13 of the Act.

Your process: Put together a report back to the SWRBSA to help them to hold out their duties underneath s 19 and s 20 of the Act and specify the that means of the time period social work providers pursuant to s 19 of the Act.

Your report ought to:
• Be addressed to the Members of the Social Employees Registration Board of South Australia
• Begin with an government abstract (roughly 200 phrases) of what the SWRBSA is required to do pursuant to Half Three of the Act
• Set out suggestions to the Board for his or her resolution on the subsequent assembly.
• Clarify your suggestions in additional element together with o why you counsel together with some providers and never others within the definition of social work providers pursuant to s 19
o one advised draft definition for example
o why you counsel creating numerous scopes of follow pursuant to s 20
o how you’ve had regard to the supplies referred to in s 19(Three)
20(Three) o how your suggestions are guided by the ideas in s21(2)

OPTION Three

Search on-line to determine a human service organisation in South Australia that will make use of social employees

Your position: Assume you’re employed for that organisation as both a authorized or human service employee.
Your process: Put together a report to your organisation that explains how the brand new
Act would possibly work together with or influence
• your organisation’s insurance policies and procedures
• any related exterior codes of conduct
• different private and non-private legislation duties

Your report ought to:
• Clearly determine the organisation you might be reporting to (and embrace a hyperlink to its web site)
• Be addressed to your organisation’s Chief Govt
• Begin with an government abstract (roughly 200 phrases) of the foremost implications of the brand new Act for o the organisation
o the organisation’s workers who’re social employees o different workers of the organisation
• Tackle in additional element o whether or not the Act particularly modifications any current duties of your organisation or its worker social employees
o how the brand new Act interacts with any related exterior codes of conduct
o how the brand new Act interacts with another related private and non-private legislation duties o how the brand new Act impacts on giving proof in courtroom

LLAW2215 Human Service Law & Practice

LLAW2215 Assessment Rubric: Case Research #1
Scholar Title OPTION 1 2 Three Marker
Phrase rely
[Limit 1350 words] Size Penalty Days
Late Late
Penalty Whole Penalty Whole Marks for Standards 1-5 Much less complete penalty Remaining Mark out of 30
Remaining Mark as proportion of 100 Remaining Grade

Criterion 1 Zero-6 marks: Authorized & moral points arising
Zero-1 marks
Doesn’t determine main or minor points; doesn’t determine related sections/codes/and so on 2 marks
Identifies minor points solely; identification unclear; minimal reference to related sections/codes/and so on Three marks
Identifies some main however no minor points; addresses related
sections/codes/and so on usually
Four marks
Identifies some main and a few minor points; restricted particular reference to related sections/codes/and so on 5 marks
Identifies most main and most minor points; makes particular reference to related sections/codes/and so on 6 marks
Thorough and expansive identification of main and minor points; makes particular and
efficient reference to related sections/codes/and so on
Criterion 2 Zero-7 marks: Authorized guidelines & moral obligations
Zero-1 marks
Doesn’t state related authorized guidelines or moral obligations; all guidelines & obligations said incorrectly 2-Three marks
No main guidelines or obligations said, some minor guidelines & obligations said, critical inaccuracies Four marks
Some main guidelines and obligations said, no minor or obligations guidelines said, some inaccuracies 5 marks
Most main guidelines and obligations said, some minor guidelines and obligations said, some inaccuracies
6 marks
Most related authorized guidelines and moral obligations said clearly, precisely, and appropriately
7 marks
All related authorized guidelines and moral obligations said clearly, precisely and appropriately

Criterion Three Zero-12 marks: Addressing process directions
Zero-2 marks
No/ineffective government abstract; report doesn’t deal with implications as requested in process directions, or addresses them in ineffective approach Three-Four marks
Govt abstract ineffective/too lengthy/too brief; report addresses implications as requested in process directions in minimal approach solely 5-6 marks
Govt abstract minimally efficient and meets advised phrase restrict; report addresses some implications as requested in process directions usually approach solely 7-Eight marks
Govt abstract usually efficient and meets advised phrase restrict; report addresses most implications as requested in process directions; consists of particular Assessment 9-10 marks
Govt abstract efficient and meets advised phrase restrict; report addresses most implications as requested in process directions; consists of particular Assessment; anticipates points and proposes options 11-12 marks
Govt abstract is extremely efficient and meets advised phrase restrict; report addresses all implications as requested in process directions; consists of concise & exact particular Assessment; anticipates points and proposes options; offers clear suggestions for future motion
Criterion Four Zero-Three marks: Writing and Construction
Zero-Zero.5 marks
Phrases constantly used inappropriately or inaccurately; spelling and grammar constantly inaccurate; lacks coherent organisation or construction; that means considerably compromised when studying; no efficient use of headings or subheadings; paragraph breaks inappropriate; formatting necessities from Matter Information not adopted
1 mark
Restricted use of Plain English; some phrases used inappropriately or inaccurately; spelling and grammar comprises inaccuracies; restricted organisation round points and sub-issues; comprises many pointless phrases; imprecise; tough to learn; minimal efficient use of headings or subheadings; paragraph breaks principally
inappropriate; formatting necessities from Matter
Information adopted minimally solely
1.5 marks
Some use of Plain English; most spelling and grammar appropriate; some organisation round points and sub-issues; comprises some extra phrases; some lack of precision; some phrase alternative, problem, location in paragraph and transition between concepts imply studying lacks effectivity and fluidity in locations; principally clear and acceptable use of headings to boost and signpost arguments; some paragraph breaks inappropriate; formatting necessities from Matter Information adopted generally
2-2.5 marks
Principally makes use of skilled Plain English; most spelling and grammar appropriate; usually organises round points and sub-issues; persuasive; principally concise and exact; phrase alternative, problem, location in paragraph and transition between concepts imply studying is usually environment friendly and fluid; principally clear and acceptable use of headings to boost and signpost arguments; most paragraph breaks seem in acceptable place; formatting necessities from Matter Information adopted principally Three marks:
Makes use of skilled Plain English all through; all spelling and grammar appropriate; organises round points and sub-issues; extremely persuasive; concise and exact; phrase alternative, problem, location in paragraph and transition between concepts all imply that studying is environment friendly and fluid- writing is a pleasure to learn; clear and acceptable use of headings to boost and signpost arguments; paragraph breaks seem in acceptable locations; formatting necessities from Matter Information adopted successfully all through
Criterion 5 Zero-2 marks: Educational Integrity
Zero-Zero.5 marks
Sources not acknowledged; citation marks not used when required; comprises direct quotes not clearly recognized or footnoted; proof of collusion, fabrication, misrepresentation, or false declaration; citations and footnotes don’t adjust to quotation fashion adopted.
1-1.5 marks
Some sources are clearly acknowledged; citation marks generally not used when required; comprises shut paraphrasing not clearly recognized or footnoted; makes use of prolonged quotes; some authors of different sources named incorrectly; some citations and footnotes don’t adjust to quotation fashion adopted.
2 marks:
All sources are clearly acknowledged; citation marks at all times used appropriately; all paraphrasing clearly recognized and footnoted; minimal and acceptable use of prolonged quotes; all authors of different sources named accurately; all citations and footnotes adjust to quotation fashion adopted.

Order | Check Discount