Posted: September 10th, 2022

“Why alternative energy and fuels?”

Reply the next questions and restrict your response to 500 phrases per Question Assignment.
1. Present three examples answering the chapter’s Question Assignment “Why alternative energy and fuels?” You need to embody a rationale for every instance explaining why it solutions the Question Assignment.
2. In your individual phrases describe 1) potential energy 2) kinetic energy three) whole energy? How are they associated to one another?
Rubric
Project Rubric
Project Rubric
Standards Scores Pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeContent 5 pts
EXCELLENT: Excels in responding to project. Fascinating, demonstrates sophistication of thought. Central thought/thesis is clearly communicated, price growing; restricted sufficient to be manageable. Paper acknowledges some complexity of its thesis: could acknowledge its contradictions, qualifications, or limits and comply with out their logical implications. Understands and critically evaluates its sources, appropriately limits and defines phrases. four pts
ABOVE AVERAGE: A strong paper, responding appropriately to project. Clearly states a thesis/central thought, however could have minor lapses in growth. Begins to acknowledge the complexity of central thought and the potential of different factors of view. Reveals cautious studying of sources, however could not consider them critically. Makes an attempt to outline phrases, not at all times efficiently. three pts
AVERAGE: Sufficient however weaker and much less efficient, probably responding much less effectively to project. Presents central thought generally phrases, usually relying on platitudes or cliches. Often doesn’t acknowledge different views. Reveals fundamental comprehension of sources, maybe with lapses in understanding. If it defines phrases, usually will depend on dictionary definitions. 2 pts
BELOW AVERAGE: Doesn’t reply to the project, lacks a thesis or central thought, and could neglect to make use of sources the place vital. zero pts
FAILING: Doesn’t reply to the project, lacks a thesis or central thought, and could neglect to make use of sources the place vital.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeOrganization & Coherence 5 pts
EXCELLENT: Makes use of a logical construction applicable to paper’s topic, function, viewers, thesis, and disciplinary discipline. Refined transitional sentences usually develop one thought from the earlier one or determine their logical relations. It guides the reader by the chain of reasoning or development of concepts. four pts
ABOVE AVERAGE: Reveals a logical development of concepts and makes use of pretty refined transitional gadgets; e.g., could transfer from least to extra vital thought. Some logical hyperlinks could also be defective, however every paragraph clearly pertains to paper’s central thought. three pts
AVERAGE: Might listing concepts or organize them randomly relatively than utilizing any evident logical construction. Might use transitions, however they’re more likely to be sequential (first, second, third) relatively than logic-based. Whereas every paragraph could relate to central thought, logic just isn’t at all times clear. Paragraphs have matter sentences however could also be overly common, and association of sentences inside paragraphs could lack coherence. 2 pts
BELOW AVERAGE: Might have random group, missing inner paragraph coherence and utilizing few or inappropriate transitions. Paragraphs could lack matter sentences or predominant concepts, or could also be too common or too particular to be efficient. Paragraphs could not all relate to paper’s thesis. zero pts
FAILING: No considerable group; lacks transitions and coherence.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeSupport 5 pts
EXCELLENT: Makes use of proof appropriately and successfully, offering enough proof and rationalization to persuade. four pts
ABOVE AVERAGE: Begins to supply causes to Help its factors, maybe utilizing assorted sorts of proof. begins to interpret the proof and clarify connections between proof and predominant concepts. Its examples bear some relevance. three pts
AVERAGE: Typically makes use of generalizations to Help its factors. Might use examples, however they might be apparent or not related. Typically will depend on unsupported opinion or private expertise, or assumes that proof speaks for itself and wants no utility to the purpose being mentioned. Typically has lapses in logic. 2 pts
BELOW AVERAGE: Is dependent upon cliches or overgeneralizations for Help, or presents little proof of any sort. Could also be private narrative relatively than essay, or abstract relatively than Assessment. zero pts
FAILING: Makes use of irrelevant particulars or lacks supporting proof completely. Could also be unduly transient.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeStyle 5 pts
EXCELLENT: Chooses phrases for his or her exact which means and makes use of an applicable stage of specificity. Sentence fashion suits paper’s viewers and function. Sentences are assorted, but clearly structured and fastidiously targeted, not lengthy and rambling. four pts
ABOVE AVERAGE: Typically makes use of phrases precisely and successfully, however could generally be too common. Sentences typically clear, effectively structured, and targeted, although some could also be awkward or ineffective. three pts
AVERAGE: Makes use of comparatively obscure and common phrases, could use some inappropriate language. Sentence construction typically appropriate, however sentences could also be wordy, unfocused, repetitive, or complicated. 2 pts
BELOW AVERAGE: Could also be too obscure and summary, or very private and particular. Often accommodates a number of awkward or ungrammatical sentences; sentence construction is straightforward or monotonous. zero pts
FAILING: Often accommodates many awkward sentences, misuses phrases, employs inappropriate language.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeMechanics 5 pts
EXCELLENT: Nearly completely freed from spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors. four pts
ABOVE AVERAGE: Might comprise a couple of errors, which can annoy the reader however not impede understanding. three pts
AVERAGE: Accommodates a number of mechanical errors, which can quickly confuse the reader however not impede the general understanding. 2 pts
BELOW AVERAGE: Accommodates both many mechanical errors or a couple of vital errors that block the reader’s understanding and capacity to see connections between ideas. zero pts
FAILING: Accommodates so many mechanical errors that it’s inconceivable for the reader to comply with the pondering from sentence to condemn.
5 pts
Complete Factors: 25

Order | Check Discount

Tags: “Why alternative energy and fuels?”