Posted: September 8th, 2022

Assessment Task 1 – Literature Review

Assessment Task 1 – Literature Review
Due on fifth of September 1300 hrs
On this Assessment process college students are required to conduct a evaluate of the present literature utilizing a scientific method. There might be a number of key sections to this Assessment process, together with creation of a move chart that represents how the literature search was performed together with the inclusion / exclusion standards, the ultimate chosen papers (10-12) represented in a desk format highlighting the next points; creator/12 months/nation, methodology, members, key findings, and an in depth description of the important thing findings of the chosen papers.
Objective: To develop and reveal expertise associated to reviewing literature utilizing a scientific method.
RESEARCH TOPIC: Does the prevalence of marijuana use amongst youngsters improve their threat of creating melancholy and different psychological sicknesses?
Description: College students might be required to decide on a analysis matter of curiosity and conduct a evaluate of the literature. College students are required to finish a written piece of labor with the next headings:
1. Introduction or Background: 1-2 paragraphs that introduces the reader to the subject of curiosity. Older references could also be used right here to offer context to the subject.
2. Purpose or Objective: 1-2 sentences that succinctly provides the purpose or function of the literature evaluate.
three. Technique: 2-three paragraphs that features a abstract of the Search Technique, high quality appraisal device used and a Movement chart of the literature search.
four. Outcomes: Abstract Desk of Chosen literature (10-12 articles), High quality appraisal scores and 1-2 paragraphs summarising the Key findings. This may increasingly embrace the demographics/qualities of the chosen articles.
5. Dialogue: three-four paragraphs discussing the findings of the articles and any commonalities or themes recognized between them. This might additionally embrace any limitations of the evaluate and/or any suggestions for future work within the space.
6. Conclusion: 1 brief paragraph that summarises the findings of the evaluate.
7. Reference checklist: Following appropriate formatting and citations all through the evaluate.
Phrase restrict: 2000 phrases. Be aware: Tables, figures and references won’t rely in the direction of this phrase rely restrict.
Marking Standards: Confer with marking rubric.
Weighting: 50%.
Time Allocation: Roughly 40 hours.
Looking out the Literature:
• Some factors to recollect:
• Add in CINHAL and Medline collectively to do the search
• Mesh phrases / key phrases
• Use of AND / OR
• Maintain document of the search numbers – which is able to go into their move chart
• Inclusion / exclusion standards (Years 10 years / English / Peer reviewed journal articles / full textual content accessible / worldwide or multi-centred research, ordinal articles that consists of knowledge)
Please don’t embrace any literature Assessments, theoretical paper, dialogue paper, private opinions
• Approx 15 papers apply modified CASP device
• Purpose remaining knowledge set – 10 papers
Task zero factors 1 level 2 factors three factors four factors 5 factors
PRESENTATION
Construction Presentation displayed no clear construction and sequence. Didn’t observe the Assessment tips. Reasonable construction and/or sequence of presentation. Poorly adopted the Assessment tips. Presentation required a clearer construction/ sequence, and/or higher linking dialogue between info. Presentation displayed a transparent construction and sequence – introduction, physique, and conclusion, references Linking dialogue offered. Presentation displayed a superb construction and sequence –introduction, physique, and conclusion, references Linking dialogue offered. Presentation displayed glorious construction and sequence –introduction, physique, and conclusion, references Linking dialogue offered.
PRESENTATION
Fluency Format of presentation was poor with no fluency between, themes or info, no matter sentences, and transitions between paragraphs. Movement of data was poor with vague concepts per paragraph, lacking matter sentence and restricted connections between paragraphs used. Many concepts per paragraph,
lacking matter sentences,
abrupt transition, and/or
lacking or tough
connections between
paragraphs Format of presentation flowed at occasions, one concept or level per paragraph, some transitions, largely clear matter sentences, some connections made between paragraphs. Format of presentation flowed more often than not, applicable themes and largely related info was included. Format of presentation all the time flowed, with sound themes and related info. Clear matter sentences and clean connections between paragraphs.
CONTENT
Introduction or Background Failure to reveal an understanding of the background of the subject and fails to introduce the subject/argument. Current however lacks element or is simply too brief to introduce the subject. Minimal rationalization of background or introduction to the subject. Passable background or introduction to the subject, some or no sources of background literature cited all through. Good introduction or background. Gives enough info and background sources of literature cited all through. Wonderful background or introduction to the evaluate and related sources cited all through.
CONTENT
Purpose or Objective Not current. Current however lacks enough element so purpose or function just isn’t clarified. Objective and purpose are articulated however lacks enough element. Enough with some demonstration of thought when utilizing a PICO method. Current with good demonstration of thought when utilizing a PICO method. Current with glorious demonstration of thought when utilizing a PICO method.
CONTENT
Technique No dialogue of databases searched, technique utilized in search or course of adopted. Current however no detailed dialogue on the tactic used or the method adopted. Current however no detailed dialogue on the databases used or the important thing search phrases used and so forth.
Current however solely barely defined. Good abstract of the strategies with most databases specified in addition to, key search phrases and so forth. Wonderful abstract of the tactic with all databases detailed, key search phrases included and so forth., and course of adopted.
CONTENT
Outcomes: Abstract Desk and use of CASP device No understanding of the duty demonstrated. No hyperlinks or connections made between concepts. Info was irrelevant and poorly expressed. No proof of using the CASP device. Poor understanding of the duty demonstrated. Hyperlinks and connections between concepts unclear. A number of info was irrelevant or poorly expressed. CASP device talked about. Minimal understanding of the duty demonstrated. Quite a few hyperlinks and connections between concepts unclear. Some info was irrelevant or not nicely expressed. CASP device talked about and demonstrated. Reasonable understanding of the subject demonstrated. Some hyperlinks and connections between concepts unclear. Most info was related. CASP device used to critique papers and scores current in desk. Substantial understanding of the duty demonstrated. Hyperlinks and connections between concepts usually clear. Info was related. CASP device critique is demonstrated nicely all through desk. Wonderful understanding of the duty demonstrated. Hyperlinks and connections between concepts made clear. Info was related and nicely expressed. CASP device critique is demonstrated nicely and defined.
CONTENT
Outcomes: Literature search move chart Movement chart was absent, didn’t observe the Assessment tips for this process. The move chart was poorly constructed, with little proof of a logical sequence. The Movement chart confirmed some element and logical sequence. The Movement chart confirmed reasonable element and logical sequence. The Movement chart confirmed good sound element and logical sequence. The Movement chart confirmed glorious element and logical sequence.
CONTENT
Dialogue and Critique
Conclusion Dialogue and/or conclusion part was absent, didn’t observe the Assessment tips for this process No critique of the literature. The dialogue and/or conclusion part was poorly constructed, with little proof of a logical sequence. Literature is poorly critiqued. The dialogue and/or conclusion part confirmed some element and logical sequence. Some try at critique of the literature was made. The dialogue and/or conclusion part confirmed reasonable element and logical sequence. The literature has been critiqued with some try at linking the papers collectively. The dialogue and/or conclusion part confirmed good sound element and logical sequence. Could or might not have included limitations and/or suggestions. The literature has been critiqued nicely with some try at linking analysis papers collectively. The dialogue and conclusion sections confirmed glorious element and logical sequence. Together with limitations and/or suggestions. A superb literature critique with a hyperlink between papers demonstrated. Makes connections specific, discusses implications, relevance, or significance.
STRUCTURE
Skilled Prose Inconsistent ranges of articulation or expression, quite a few spelling and grammatical errors and lack of sentence/paragraph construction makes paper tough to learn/perceive. Poor degree of articulation and expression, with sentence or paragraph construction unclear, and/or in depth spelling or grammatical errors. Minimal degree of articulation and expression, with some sentence or paragraph construction unclear, and/or a substantial variety of spelling or grammatical errors. Reasonable degree of articulation and expression, with some sentence or paragraph construction unclear, and/or plenty of spelling or grammatical errors. Substantial degree of articulation and expression, with clear and concise sentence and paragraph construction, and minimal spelling or grammatical errors. Wonderful degree of articulation and expression, with clear and concise sentence and paragraph construction, and no spelling or grammatical errors. Used advanced and different sentence construction; applicable tone and elegance
REFERENCES
APA Model and credibility No references cited. Incorrect APA referencing model for in-textual content citations quotes and/or references. Quite a few errors famous in APA referencing of in-textual content citations, quotes or references. Some references are NOT respected, present, in depth or related. A few errors famous in APA referencing of in-textual content citations, quotes or references. A variety of references are respected, present, in depth and related. In-textual content citations and quotes and referencing are in APA model of a sound high quality. Most references are respected, present, in depth and related. All in-textual content citations, quotes and references are in APA model of a really top quality. All references are respected, present, in depth and related.

Order | Check Discount

Tags: Assessment Task 1 - Literature Review