Posted: September 1st, 2022

Internet-Sovereignty Model

Computer Sciences and Information Technology
Complete Case Study #2, China’s Great Firewall located at the end of Chapter 5 in the book page number 215, then answer the following questions:

Describe an internet-sovereignty model that may be acceptable to countries controlling internet flow yet allow freedom of expression.

What ethical and economic factors should a technology company consider regarding entering in the Chinese market?

Identify two barriers to freedom of expression that are acceptable and implementable.

Requirements:
The report should be 4-5 pages in length, not including the title and reference pages.
Use Help write my thesis – APA style guidelines, citing at least three references in support of your work.
Use in text citation in Help write my thesis – APA style.
Put the reference of the book in references.

Internet-Sovereignty Model
An internet-sovereignty model is technically possible. A country allows universal access and communication for citizens while extricating content that is declared harmful. The model enables aspects of an open and democratic society while searching, filtering, and applying legislation. The balance of the model should be adequate to allow the universal medium that sustains global commerce while enabling them to interact with and learn from each other. The model becomes more difficult to manage as the traffic flow increases and becomes gigantic and porous. The internet-sovereignty model is governed by the government, which proposes to have complete censorship techniques that restrict the access and production of legally prohibited content. Sovereignty in the model would be achieved by censoring the internet and social media to keep dissent under control.
For the internet-sovereignty model to be practical and acceptable, the government should censor the internet to start with healthy controls that should slowly lessen the significant difference in liberty and relieve pressures on internet users. The gradual lifting of the extreme controls would permit a more controlled change towards freedom of expression, which would obviate the usage of strong censorship. The Great Firewall of China is an excellent example of internet sovereignty that creates a virtual world through surveillance and online censorship. The model inspects and blocks anything undesirable. An internet-sovereignty has the purpose of aligning cyberspace with the national border through cyber sovereignty.
Like in China, an internet-sovereignty creates digital authoritarianism that inhibits internet freedom and freedom of expression. The internet is regulated to operate within the social and political mores of a country. The internet-sovereignty model ensures that the internet directly reflects society than a disruptive force that can be used to destabilize political regimes and create societal harm. The internet-sovereignty approach makes a territory to individual nation-states where the state has the right to control activities on its territory independently. The internet governance model in a country must involve infrastructure, control access, and maintaining the internet borders, which entails checking the credentials of each person activity passing through the country gateway routers.
The generally, an internet-sovereignty model that allows the control of the internet while allowing the exercises of freedom of expression should address internet allocation and global domain name system and the entire system infrastructure under local control. For the freedom of expression, internet sovereignty should control the content of the internet through banning content, establishing laws, and filtering that provide favorable conditions for sovereignty.
The principles of a free-market economy, which are guarded by capitalist ideology, have a significant influence on the business and technology companies in China. The technology company will experience competition for employees, which requires them to reward their employees’ better performance and higher skills. The ethical and social concept of profiting for personal gain and getting is the root of the country, which is meant to promote market activity. The ethical principles of the technology company must adhere to the Guanxi philosophy, which leads to the formation of relation-based network groups.
The technology company must be get involved in the right guanxi that will potentially influence the decision making and the business social status. Guanxi is vital for the technology company. It is a social concept adopted in Chinese business, an inherent part of the work ethic and ethics to act accordingly. Guanxi gives business companies favoritism and personal gain in china. Simultaneously, it discriminates against the members outside, and it is widely accepted as a social norm. The discrimination poses a challenge which leads to impartial decision making as the guanxi favors in-group members. Chinese auditors are known to loosen auditing standards for some members. The technology company must be socially and actively involved in guanxi faces, less inhibiting their operations in the China markets.
Economic factors in China that affect the establishment of a technology company include Internet infrastructure, access to the global domain, and influence on the socio-cultural ideology in china. The entire Internet infrastructure in china is inspected and monitored for irregularities as prescribed by the government, which requires the technology company to operate within and perform tasks that are within the acceptable requirements. The internet-sovereignty model in china is keen on offering global domain access while at the same time filtering any harmful content to the social principles set by the government.
Expert technological skills and labor are abundant in China, as most of the population is working. Most of the population working increases the purchasing power of the consumers in the country. A technology company will enjoy the low cost of labor from the skilled and unskilled available workers. China has unfavorable factors that involve high inflation rates and high property prices. The bank of China has increased interest, which is required to be nine times higher than the commercial banks. The central bank influences and requires the bank to limit their lending and imposes limits on the purchases of homes.
Freedom of expression gives the right to impart and share information and ideas of all kinds as well as seek and received data. The freedom of expression involves the exchange of information and articulation of ideas and opinions. Freedom of expression has barriers that restrict the exchange of ideas and information that is harmful to others. Freedom of expression has two barriers that apply when the expression incites people towards hatred against others, and when the expression makes false claims that can harm the reputation of another person. These are the two barriers to freedom of expression that are acceptable and implementable by the government. The government should punish and restrict any form of expression that seeks to incite people towards hatred from the country, government, and other people. The government is also entitled to punish any expression that is declared false claims that are meant to destroy the reputation of a company and individual.
In conclusion, the establishment of an internet-sovereignty model in a country and also allows the freedom of expression when ethically and socially controlled to permit acceptable content. Technology companies would be affected by the internet-sovereignty model when establishing a business, especially in countries like China, where the company must adhere to the social and ethical provisions to survive and penetrate the market. Economic factors also affect the establishment and growth of a technology company in China, in consideration of the high-interest rate and high property prices. These considerations affect the establishment of a technology company in a country like China. The two barriers of freedom of expression, which include restriction expression that makes false claims and expressions that incite hatred among the people against others, are acceptable and implementable.

References
Cohen-Almagor, R. (2017). Balancing freedom of expression and social responsibility on the internet. Philosophia, 45(3), 973-985.
Sanjay, G. (2017, March 4). Internet sovereignty. Digital Report. Retrieved from https://digital.report/internet-sovereignty/
Zeng, J., Stevens, T., & Chen, Y. (2017). China’s Solution to Global Cyber Governance: Unpacking the Domestic Discourse of “Internet Sovereignty”. Politics & Policy, 45(3), 432-464.

Order | Check Discount

Tags: Internet-Sovereignty Model