Posted: August 31st, 2022

The impact of brexit on UK Employment Laws; A systematic Literature Review

The impact of brexit on UK Employment Legal guidelines; A systematic Literature Review
Dissertation Module
Structured Literature Review (SLR)

Deciding on this feature entails an in-depth essential Assessment and synthesis of present revealed main analysis research, which is being undertaken to reply a extremely centered analysis Question Assignment you may have devised. Utilizing established methodological methods, you’ll critically consider main analysis research and synthesise the findings.

Finishing a Structured Literature Review will allow you to show your analysis expertise in essential appraisal, high quality Assessment of analysis, information extraction, Assessment and synthesis. Endeavor a SLR entails growing a extremely centered and acceptable analysis Question Assignment that’s related to your self-discipline/skilled background. This may usually be related to a devising a Question Assignment which:

• Evaluates the effectiveness of an intervention (i.e. utilizing research which have a
Quantitative method/design and synthesising the quantitative findings)

OR

• Explores and generates new insights and understanding of a phenomenon (i.e. utilizing research which have a Qualitative method /design and synthesising the qualitative findings).

To make this sort of examine possible within the context of a grasp’s dissertation, this could lead to you choosing a small quantity of very particular main analysis research both qualitative OR quantitative, usually between Four-6 in complete. Moral approval isn’t usually required to undertake a structured Assessment.

NB A SLR is an umbrella is time period so there may be various terminology related to ‘reviewing literature’, and so it is best to keep away from enterprise and/or complicated this with:

• An ‘integrative Assessment’ i.e. a mixture of each qualitative and quantitative research

• A Assessment of revealed ‘systematic Assessments’

• A ‘scoping examine’ i.e. wide selection of differing kinds of research that are mapped, characterised and categorised in time period of their outcomes and options

• A ‘systematic Assessment’ – this sort of Assessment entails a couple of researcher

These varieties of Assessments are extremely complicated, demanding and infrequently require a staff of researchers and subsequently could be extraordinarily tough to finish as half of an ‘particular person’ mission with a specified time-frame and phrase depend.

1 Module Studying Outcomes

A quantity of studying outcomes are related to enterprise the dissertation mission. These are outlined within the following extract from the accepted module descriptor:

On completion of this module the coed ought to be capable of:

• Critically utilise a spread of search methods to determine literature associated to the world of curiosity

• Critically consider associated literature associated to the world of curiosity

• Present a systematic essential account of
structured literature Assessment

• Synthesise information and idea from a spread of sources

• Replicate and critically remark on any procedural points/issues which can have arisen
• Consider the importance of the findings related to enterprise a structured literature Assessment

• Critically and creatively remark on the findings potential to contribute to the related areas of skilled observe

• Produce, in a typical format, a complete centered analysis report, which meets the intention and goal of having undertaken a Structured Literature Review.
2 Presenting the Dissertation

The Dissertation requires to be submitted in accordance with the next:

Format: word-processed in A4

Font: Arial: Font Dimension 12.

Line spacing: 1.5 or 2

Phrase depend: 12000 phrases

o The phrase depend refers to all phrases used inside the Summary and Chapters so consists of all in-text references; tables and any figures made within the textual content inside
the chapters of the dissertation. College students shouldn’t tally up and deduct ‘in textual content’ references.

o The following don’t contribute to the phrase depend: Entrance Cowl, Contents Pages, Listing of Tables/Figures, Phrases of Reference, Acknowledgements Reference Listing/Bibliography and Appendices.

o The complete phrase depend have to be displayed on the Entrance web page of the dissertation.

three Referencing

Cite Them Proper

Cite Them Proper will provide help to to reference nearly any supply you would possibly want to make use of and perceive the best way to keep away from plagiarism. It additionally features a useful Referencing tutorial that will help you develop your expertise.

Cite them Proper consists of in depth steerage in addition to examples of the Harvard, APA seventh version, IEEE, OSCOLA, Vancouver and Chicago referencing kinds. To see

the right format, simply choose the kind of supply you need to reference after which filter the outcomes by referencing fashion.

Harvard Referencing Information

Our Harvard Referencing Information offers complete steerage and examples for the important thing varieties of scholarly and digital data sources you’re prone to cite. Our information relies on the present British Normal (BS ISO 690:2010).

Four Instructed Structural Outlines of Chapters

Instructed examples of ‘content material’ of substantive chapters and ‘typical’ construction for the totally different examine choices inside the dissertation are outlined within the under(Empirical) and (Structured Literature Review).

NB These examples usually are not supposed to be prescriptive, however ought to present prompt steerage, which will be mentioned together with your supervisor.

18.1.1 Instance of prompt content material and structural define for A Structured Literature Review

Cowl web page – together with phrase depend and declaration
Summary (300 phrases approx.) A succinct synopsis of your examine, which particulars:
• Intention
• Background
• Strategies
• Outcomes
• Conclusion Acknowledgments Contents Web page
As relevant:
Listing of tables Listing of figures
Listing of appendices

Listing of abbreviations/Phrases of reference

Chapter 1: Introduction (2400phrases approx.)
Contextual background for the examine; a essential a Assessment of present the literature, evidencing up to date information base and present debates; Examine’s rationale to conduct the re SLR; resulting in establishing the Analysis Question Assignment/Intention and Targets, Concluding with the relevancy of the Assessment.
• Important exploration and analysis of key literature
• Identification of key themes inside the present information base
• Identification of gaps in information present
• Justification for examine
• Brief Conclusion

Chapter 2 Methodology (1600 phrases approx.)
Important dialogue on the systematic processes deployed related to varieties of research, contributors, interventions and outcomes. Key subsection ought to embody:
• Rationale and analysis Question Assignment
o Analysis Question Assignment
o Analysis perspective (qual/quant)
o Analysis examine design
• Search technique
o Databases
o Key phrases/Boolean operators/ topic headings (e.g. MeSH)
o Different search instruments (e.g. truncation)
o Delimiters e.g. English language; foreign money of time interval
o Inclusion and exclusion standards (this could replicate PICO or different framework)
o Figuring out eligible research i.e. screening processes (PRISMA flowchart)
o Knowledge administration/storage (e.g. Refworks)
o Hyperlink to Appendix the place one full search is replicated (e.g. screenshot)

• Knowledge assortment and Assessment
o Knowledge Extraction – Use of acceptable instruments to do that e.g. review-specific information extraction type
o Methodological high quality Assessment – use of acceptable software, rating and the way will probably be used (i.e. exclusion of research or simply reporting, justify with rationale)

o Knowledge Synthesis – QUALITATIVE SLR ought to embody identification of a framework for thematic synthesis.

Chapter three Outcomes (4000phrases approx.)
Particulars outcomes in phrases of:
• PRISMA movement chart –choice of included research from database search;

• Traits of Included research (transient); cross- reference to a desk/Appendix
o 0ne or extra tables with particulars of contributors, intervention/themes, final result measures and another vital data.
o Tables must be described within the textual content in addition to proven in tabular type
• Consequence of methodological high quality Assessment –
o discus the generic critique e.g. lacks of element about blinding;
o cross reference to a desk or appendix the place full element is displayed

• Narrative synthesis of outcomes: synthesising the outcomes of final result measures/themes
o The place attainable the outcomes must be mentioned collectively i.e. 4 out of the 6 research had a big pattern dimension starting from 50-100 contributors, quite than writing about particular person papers. It is best to attempt to help all of your outcomes with essential appraisal. i.e. Massive pattern sizes are wanted for quantitative research, energy calculations must be used to evaluate the suitable pattern dimension.

Chapter Four: Dialogue (3000 phrases approx.)
A essential dialogue of the SLR reflecting findings, their implications and the Assessment course of
o Overview of the SLR findings
o Overview of Methodological high quality /deficits shortcomings
o Strengths and Limitations of SLR
o Comparability of the SLR’s findings with the present information base
o Implications for coverage and observe
o Suggestions for additional analysis

Chapter 5 Conclusion (800 phrases approx.)
A conclusion of the analysis examine as a complete in phrases of assembly the particular goals and targets

References in accordance with referencing tips

Appendices
Supplimentary materials used to supprot content material of substantive chapters. Consideration must be given to the utility provided by appendices and their inventive use in capturing vital data past that which must be included, for instance, from the literature Assessment and/or outcomes chapters.

* Please focus on the construction/movement of your dissertation together with your supervisor, these templates are solely a suggestion and it’s possible you’ll resolve to organise your dissertation otherwise however this must be agreed together with your supervisor
Define of Analysis

Dissertation Title:………………………………… ………………………………..

Examine Design*

Inhabitants/pattern*

Knowledge assortment instrument- please embody a replica with this request

Sort of information that can require Assessment*

*Please give as a lot element as attainable.

Undergo your module chief as early as attainable.
help

19.1.1 Assessment Suggestions Sheets

Structured Literature Review
Pupil title and ID
Programme
1st Marker mark and date:
2nd Marker mark and date:
Demonstrates inner consistency and originality [learning outcomes: 1, 2, 3, 4 – Identifies the area of interest and justifies the study; demonstrates a critical approach to in presenting background literature; demonstrates clarity in presenting a highly focused research questions/aim/objectives; demonstrates logical progression of study from research question to conclusion].
/20
Add feedback right here and enter in rubric field ‘Intro (20) SLR’
Justifies methodological method and appropriateness of strategies [learning outcomes: 1, 3, 4, 5
– Defends the type of approach adopted to underpin the review; critically discusses the methods/techniques deployed to identify eligible studies, their appraisal and analysis].
/15
Add feedback right here and enter in rubric field ‘Strategies (15) SLR’
Demonstrates acceptable information presentation Assessment and dialogue of findings, together with suggestions/implications [learning outcomes: 1, 3, 5, 6, 8 – Demonstrates an effective search strategy in relation to presenting findings; presents and defends inclusion of relevant studies, proficient in quality appraisal, data extraction, analysis and synthesis
/35
Add comments here and enter in rubric box ‘Results (35) SLR’
Discusses findings in the context of a Structured Literature Review and draws appropriate conclusions from findings to offer appropriate recommendations [Learning outcomes 5, 6, 7- Provides a global overview of the SLR outcomes; comments on methodological issues, implications, strengths and limitations. Concludes with a critical summary of key findings]
/20
Add feedback right here and enter in rubric field ‘Dialogue (20) SLR’
Presents masters analysis dissertation in an acceptable format [Learning outcome 8 – Presents the research dissertation in a coherent and concise; conforms to presentation guidelines; grammatically error free; adheres to referencing guidelines; complies with academic convention]

/10
Add feedback right here and enter in rubric field ‘Formatting (10) SLR’
Add in marker field:
First marker *add title* second marker *add title* *add date*. Markers’ feedback and
award provisional till ratified by the Masters Framework Assessment Board.

19.1.2 Part Components of the Dissertation

Whether or not enterprise a structured literature Assessment, the most important element components of the dissertation will probably be comparable in that it ought to include discrete sections and chapters, which replicate the next:

Entrance Cowl Web page – particulars examine title, pupil’s title, Diploma Programme, Matriculation Quantity, date/month/yr offered, phrase depend (see Appendix Four)

Summary – orientates reader, a succinct define of the examine method and findings

Acknowledgements

Desk of Contents Web page – by quantity, lists main sections and sub-divisions and signifies web page numbers

Listing of tables/Figures/illustrations/record of appendices Listing of Abbreviations/Glossary
Substantive Chapters References Appendices

19.1.three Dissertation Specimen Title Web page

19.1.9 Assessment Matrix – SHEM/SCQF 11
Masters Normal Grade: 70%+ Grade: 60-69% Grade: 50-59% Grade: <50% Refer/Fail

Demonstrates engagement with methods which underpin pursuit of personal analysis/ superior scholarship Distinctive capacity to grasp and have interaction with the complexity of the duty to current a structured, fluent and coherent piece of work

Glorious demonstration of initiative, decision-making and drawback fixing expertise exhibited as an unbiased learner pursuing superior degree examine

Excellent capacity to systematically assimilate, handle and synthesise data to tell personal analysis/superior scholarship Extremely competent in comprehending and have interaction the complexity of the duty to current a structured, fluent and coherent piece of work

Demonstrates clear initiative, decision-making and drawback fixing expertise as an unbiased learner pursuing superior degree examine

Sound capacity in systematically assimilating, managing and synthesising data to tell personal analysis/superior scholarship Competent in approaching the character and complexity of the duty to current a structured, fluent and coherent piece of work

Competent in decision-making and drawback fixing in pursuing superior degree examine

Adequately manages the sourcing and retrieval of data to tell personal analysis/superior scholarship Unable to show competence in addressing the complexity of the duty failing to current a structured, fluent and coherent piece of work
Unable to show decision-making and drawback fixing expertise in context of superior degree examine

Incapability to systematically assimilate, handle and synthesise data to tell personal analysis/superior scholarship
Demonstrates a systematic understanding and demanding consciousness of up to date Utilised an in depth vary of related sources, present and seminal, to comprehensively interrogate main points inside discipline of inquiry Good use of a broad vary of related sources, present and seminal, to comprehensively interrogate main points inside discipline of inquiry Passable incorporation of related sources to analyze key areas inside discipline of inquiry Apparent omissions in sourcing related literature essential to comprehensively discover discipline of inquiry

Masters Normal Grade: 70%+ Grade: 60-69% Grade: 50-59% Grade: <50% Refer/Fail
information associated to the sphere of inquiry Glorious utilization of acceptable literature to ascertain readability, focus and skilfully talk a line of reasoning

Depth of understanding exemplary, excellent capacity to synthesis information and current perception on the forefront of inquiry

Sustains a coherent and effectively develop argument by means of utilization of related literature which establishes readability, focus

Sound understanding demonstrated which evidences the flexibility to synthesis information and current perception on the forefront of inquiry
Evidences a essential argument to current a reputable line of reasoning utilizing related literature

Passable degree of understanding offered based mostly on exploration of key ideas inside discipline of inquiry Unable to current and set up readability, focus and talk a line of reasoning

Partial consciousness however total fails to show comprehension and perception inside discipline of inquiry
Demonstrates conceptual understanding which evidences essential analysis based mostly on command of subject/ discipline of inquiry Excellent capacity to

Interrogate and objectively look at the relative value of differing views

Extremely developed analytical and evaluative expertise leading to refined reasoning which is exceptionally cogent Skilfully interrogates and critically examines the relative value of differing views

Evidences well-developed analytical and evaluative expertise to current, debate, and refine a cogent argument Establishes the flexibility to current a spread of differing views

Acceptable analytical and evaluative expertise deployed current a cogent argument Incapability to supply analysis resulting from poor grasp of different/totally different views

Poor evaluative expertise which has leading to recapitulating materials and thus compromised capacity to current cogent argument

Unable to articulate personal positionality to supply private

Masters Normal Grade: 70%+ Grade: 60-69% Grade: 50-59% Grade: <50% Refer/Fail
Eloquently justifies personal positionality presenting private judgment based mostly on analysis appraisal and superior scholarship Clear capacity to justify personal positionality by presenting private judgments based mostly on analysis appraisal and superior scholarship Can show and current private judgments based mostly on analysis utilisation and superior scholarship judgment based mostly on analysis and superior scholarship
Demonstrates originality within the inventive and contextual utility of information Distinctive perception and independence of thought which is creatively utilized inside discipline of examine

Extremely inventive in contextualising and justifying the significant utility of idea to observe

Excellent demonstration of information development skilfully utilized as assured and unbiased learner Insightful unbiased thought which is creatively utilized inside discipline of examine

Clear capacity to contextualize and justify the significant utility of idea to observe

Convincingly demonstrates information development and is expert in its utility as assured unbiased learner Some indication of unbiased thought utilized inside discipline of examine

In a position to justify the appliance of idea to observe

Demonstrates information development and its utility as an unbiased learner Lack of unbiased thought utilized inside discipline of examine

Incapability to articulate the appliance of idea to observe

Poor in demonstrating information development and its utility as an unbiased learner

Order | Check Discount

Tags: The impact of brexit on UK Employment Laws; A systematic Literature Review