Posted: August 28th, 2022

This week’s task is to study to study the worth of working with main sources. In our case, put your self into the place of the interviewees within the audio recording transcripts above (Mr. Hughes and your second interviewee).

How does listening to/studying first-person takes on slavery affect your perspective on the “crimes” (i.e., Underground Railroad, riot/revolt, and so on.) dedicated below the Fugitive Slave Legislation ? How would being a former slave affect your views on crime, legislation, and justice (i.e., pay attention fastidiously to Mr. Hughes’ account of the Yankee troopers)? Cite examples drawn from the transcripts.

The principles for the textual content reflection task are as follows:

No-more-than 400 phrases.
Comply with instructions and reply Question Assignment totally and immediately.
Cite your references as ([insert source], [insert page number]): For instance (Mann, 39)
Proofread. Keep away from run-on sentences and paragraphs.
It’s due no later than Sunday at 11:59 pm PST.
No plagiarism
Late submissions will neither be accepted nor accepted in the direction of your grade.
Papers should be uploaded and submitted as .doc, .docx, or .pdf recordsdata.
You may be graded on three standards:

high quality of writing (grammar, fashion, and construction; ensure that to proofread!);
substance of reply (answering Question Assignment utterly and precisely/persuasively);
demonstrating direct ties (reference) to the Roth studying to help your argument.
Interview with Fountain Hughes, Baltimore, Maryland, June 11, 1949
How listening to/studying first-person does takes on slavery affect your perspective on the “crimes” (i.e., Underground Railroad, riot/revolt, and so on.) dedicated below the Fugitive Slave Legislation?
The listening to and studying on the precise accounts Fountain Hughes experiences throughout slavery create a perspective that the legislation is developed and enacted to serve the bulk’s pursuits regardless of its affect on the minority group. This means that the legislation is relative, that means a side of life thought of against the law might be thought of authorized at another time. Underneath the Fugitive Slave Legislation, acts of revolt, riot and Underground Railroad operations had been thought of crimes (Campbell, 185). The legislation required that any slave discovered escaping can be returned to their homeowners. Consequently, within the dialog, Fountain Hughes argues that folks had been offered the identical means as horses. On this, the latest time promoting of individuals can be thought of unlawful because it quantities to human trafficking (Hughes and Norwood, 5). Due to this fact, the legislation is relative, and it’s meant to serve the curiosity of the bulk. Moreover, the criminality of a social or authorized facet relies on the prevailing legal guidelines. In the course of the slavery days, slavery was in violation of human rights, however the Fugitive slave legal guidelines upheld it and ensured that it was practiced within the curiosity of the white majority. Due to this fact, the criminality societal and authorized points change with time and circumstances.
How would being a former slave affect your views on crime, legislation, and justice (i.e., pay attention fastidiously to Mr. Hughes’ account of the Yankee troopers)?
The operations and acts of the slave point out that the legislation and justices function selectively in addressing legal points in society. Fountain Hughes creates the image of Yankees to be brutal, damaging and ruthless at law-abiding residents. The Yankee troopers had been ignorantly concerned in a violation of the legislation whereas the legislation ignored their crimes. On this regard, when the Yankee troopers visited the villages, the destroyed and threw meat 4 sugar to make sure that folks didn’t have something to reside on. Moreover, within the case they discovered cooked meals, they ate it and drunk all of the milk. Fountain Hughes had extra hatred on the Yankee Troopers as in comparison with the slave homeowners (Hughes and Norwood, 7). The Yankees had been inhuman, and so they disregarded human rights and different legal guidelines via the destruction of meals on the expense of the slaves and their masters. The Yankees’ actions in regards to the folks present a disregard of the legal guidelines akin to property legal guidelines and Human rights legislation. There was no justice for the reason that legal justice system ignored the Yankees’ crimes by not bringing them to justice (De Oliveira, 139). On this case, the slaves are concerned in the identical actions because the Yankees; they’d be judged harshly by the society and legal justice system. Due to this fact, a formers slave would view that the legislation and justice system are utilized selectively, thus negating the legislation’s objective.

Works Cited
Hughes F and Norwood Hermond. Interview with Fountain Hughes, Baltimore, Maryland, June 11, 1949 AFS t9990A. Library of the Congress (1949): 1-10. Retrieved from https://cdn.loc.gov/service/afc/afc1950037/afc1950037_afs09990/afc1950037_afs09990a.pdf
de Oliveira, Luís R. Cardoso. “Equality, dignity and equity: Brazilian citizenship in comparative perspective.” Critique of Anthropology 33.2 (2013): 131-145.
Campbell, Stanley W. The Slave Catchers: Enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Legislation, 1850-1860. UNC Press Books, 2012.

Order | Check Discount