Posted: August 27th, 2022

Week 1 Interactive Case Study Journal

Week 1 Interactive Case Study Journal

After you view the case research, replicate upon what you’ve got realized and the way it’s associated to the educational supplies. Examine the case research to your nursing apply and provides an identical instance out of your expertise through which you might need run into an moral state of affairs.
Submit your entry by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time). Your reflection content material must be a minimal of 500 phrases, equal to 5 to 6 paragraphs, and is value 50 factors.
Rubric

NURS_440_OL – Case Study Rubric (2)
NURS_440_OL – Case Study Rubric (2)
Standards Scores Pts
20 to >17.eight pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Presents an exemplary articulation and insightful Assessment of great ideas and/or theories introduced within the case. Presents detailed and particular examples for all questions. Makes eager observations, making notice of important info supplied within the case. Concepts are professionally sound and inventive; they’re supported by scientific proof that’s credible and well timed. Attracts insightful and complete conclusions and options. 17.eight to >15.zero pts
Largely Meets Expectations
Presents an correct Assessment of great ideas and/or theories introduced within the case. Presents some element and a few examples for many questions. Makes occasional notice of important info supplied within the case. Concepts are largely supported by scientific proof that’s credible and well timed. Makes some try to attract conclusions and options. 15 to >11.eight pts
Under Expectations
Supplies inadequate explanations of great ideas. Presents little or insignificant element and no examples for many questions. Fails to deal with important info supplied within the case. Concepts are typically unsupported by scientific proof, however some try has been made. Fails to attract conclusion. 11.eight to >zero pts
Not Assembly Expectations
Doesn’t, or incorrectly, solutions with inadequate explanations. Data just isn’t scientifically sound.
This criterion is linked to a Studying Final result Vital Assessment 20 pts
15 to >13.35 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Makes insightful, clear and correct connections to key ideas and related theories. Response signifies a complete, high-level understanding of the ideas introduced within the case. 13.35 to >11.25 pts
Largely Meets Expectations
Makes largely correct connections to key ideas and related theories. Response signifies a common understanding of the ideas introduced within the case. 11.25 to >eight.85 pts
Under Expectations
Supplies a number of inadequate or inaccurate explanations, though makes an attempt are made to deal with some key ideas. Response signifies an introductory understanding of the ideas introduced within the case. eight.85 to >zero pts
Not Assembly Expectations
Data is inaccurate or insufficient. Response signifies little or no understanding of the ideas introduced within the case.
This criterion is linked to a Studying Final result Content material 15 pts
10 to >eight.9 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Solutions are properly written all through. Data is properly organized and clearly communicated. Task is freed from spelling and grammatical errors. eight.9 to >7.5 pts
Largely Meets Expectations
Solutions are properly written all through and the data in all fairness organized and communicated. Task is usually freed from spelling and grammatical errors. 7.5 to >5.9 pts
Under Expectations
Solutions are considerably organized and lacks some readability. Comprises some spelling and grammatical errors. 5.9 to >zero pts
Not Assembly Expectations
Solutions usually are not properly written and lack readability. Data is poorly organized. Task accommodates many spelling and grammatical errors.
This criterion is linked to a Studying Final result Mechanics 10 pts
5 to >four.45 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Follows all the necessities associated to format, size, supply citations, and format. four.45 to >three.75 pts
Largely Meets Expectations
Follows size requirement and many of the necessities associated to format, supply citations, and format. three.75 to >2.95 pts
Under Expectations
Follows many of the necessities associated to format, size, supply citations, and format. 2.95 to >zero pts
Not Assembly Expectations
Doesn’t comply with format, size, supply citations, and format necessities.
This criterion is linked to a Studying Final result APA Format 5 pts
Whole Factors: 50

Order | Check Discount

Tags: Week 1 Interactive Case Study Journal