Posted: August 21st, 2022

Case: Terry v. Ohio

Cease and Frisk
Case Temporary Directions

Case: Terry v. Ohio
Element of the Felony Justice System: Legislation enforcement
Subject: Cease and Frisk

1. Moral System Software:
a. Focus on whether or not the bulk opinion displays the appliance of a deontological or teleological/consequentialist moral system and the rationale behind your conclusion.
b. In case you needed to rule on the case, what moral system would you utilize to information your authorized Assessment (teleological/consequentialist or deontological) and why? What are the prices and advantages of counting on the chosen moral system to information your authorized reasoning? The justices’ position is to interpret the regulation in a method that ensures actions are constitutional. How nicely do you imagine your chosen moral system lets you adhere to constitutional necessities? Help your arguments.

Cease and Frisk
John W. Terry, the petitioner, was approached, stopped, and searched by officer McFadden, a Cleveland detective. The officer stopped and searched Terry and the opposite two after suspecting the three have been casing a retailer for a possible theft. Primarily based on the Fourth Modification, a police officer had the mandate to cease and search a suspect with out possible trigger, so long as the officer has affordable believes that the person might armed and harmful and is about or has dedicated against the law. The Subject within the case was to find out whether or not the seek for weapons carried out by officer McFadden with out possible trigger for arrest is an unreasonable search with consideration of america Fourth Modification (Casebriefs, 2020). The bulk held that the police officer fast seizer and seek for weapons with out possible trigger for arrest, however the officer fairly believes the particular person may very well be armed then thought-about an affordable search. The bulk opinion tends to mirror the deontological moral system for the reason that court docket considers the beliefs underlying the choice of seizer and search fairly than the result of the choice, that’s, if the particular person is discovered with a weapon or not.
Essentially the most dependable moral system for ruling the case is the deontological ethics theories. The deontological ethics are non-consequentialist, which emphasis the principals, reasoning, beliefs, and motivation underlying choices or actions with out considerations of the implications or outcomes. Utilizing deontological ethics in deciding the case would base on two forms of non-consequentialist theories as a authorized Assessment information (SOAS, n.d). The primary is the ethic of duties, which holds that every one people have some tasks to different people. The idea of responsibility gives the officer with the rationale to cease and search Terry as a method of fulfilling the duty that he has of defending different people from hurt. One other kind of deontological ethics used within the authorized Assessment of the case is the ethics of rights and justice. The idea of proper is taken into account a justifiable declare in opposition to one other particular person’s conduct. Due to this fact, it turns into the responsibility of the officer to uphold the rights of Terry of unreasonable seizure and search. The advantage of making use of the idea of responsibility and proper included in deontological ethics is that it provides a extra profound authorized Assessment of the case on each views of unreasonable and affordable seizure and search.
Deontological ethics develop a foundation on which the authorized views are thought-about when explaining the officers’ motion of seizure and seek for a weapon with out possible trigger as affordable. The Fourteenth Modification protects people in opposition to unreasonable seizures and searches. Nevertheless, the deontological ethics idea of responsibility provides the officer the appropriate based mostly on the Fourth Modification to cease and search a suspect with out possible explanation for arrest (Casebriefs, 2020).. The cease and frisk procedures must also be adopted by the officer as the appropriate of the suspected particular person. The deontological idea of ethics of rights is to make sure the officer’s responsibility to the suspect consists of following the required procedures of cease and frisk underneath the Fourth Modification. The officer is taken into account to have adopted the cease and frisk procedures and retrieved a weapon from the suspect. The search carried out by the officer is affordable because the officer within the try to analyze the suspect he had causes to imagine that the security of the general public and his have been endangered appearing underneath the responsibility idea of deontological ethics to stop the possible hazard.

References
Casebriefs. (2020). Terry v. Ohio. Retrieved from https://www.casebriefs.com/weblog/regulation/criminal-procedure/criminal-procedure-keyed-to-weinreb/the-fourth-amendment-arrest-and-search-and-seizure/terry-v-ohio-Four/
SOAS. (n.d). Unit One: Introduction to Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.soas.ac.uk/cedep-demos/000_P563_EED_K3736-Demo/module/pdfs/p563_unit_01.pdf

Order | Check Discount

Tags: Case: Terry v. Ohio