Posted: August 19th, 2022

Nursing homes – Inadequate staffing and mandatory overtime

Psychology homework help
Nursing homes have long been criticized for inadequate staffing levels, which can lead to poor care for residents and mandatory overtime for staff. Low staffing levels can result in residents not receiving adequate attention and care, and can also put staff at risk of burnout and injury. Mandatory overtime, in which staff are required to work beyond their scheduled hours, can exacerbate these issues and lead to further burnout and turnover among staff.

It is important for nursing homes to ensure that they have adequate staffing levels in order to provide the best possible care for residents. This can include hiring more staff, adjusting staff schedules to reduce mandatory overtime, and implementing policies and procedures to support staff and prevent burnout. Additionally, increasing funding for nursing homes to improve working conditions and wages may help attract and retain qualified staff.
Subject :
Issues: Nursing homes – Inadequate staffing and mandatory overtime
· 1. Why is nurse’s workload so heavy?
· 2. Are good mandatory nurses after working five days straight?
· 3. Does patients get healthcare, if nurses are mandatory overtime and the lack of adequate nurse staffing can result in longer lengths of stay, patient dissatisfaction, higher readmissions.
I choose these three specific issues regarding nursing homes, Nurses mandatory overtime and under work. These issues need more attention and Patients in understaffed facilities face an increased rate of in-hospital mortality, a higher risk of infection, a rise in postoperative complications, and a greater number of falls. After a long day shift, nurses are lucky to even sit down and eat dinner. Nurses collapse into bed only to wake up a few brief hours later to start the process over.
Examples:
Issue: Legalization of Prostitution
Aspect 1: Safety
Pro: Stern, S. W., (2019). Sex workers of the world unite. The American Scholar, pp. 40-54.
The author presents the case, largely though the words of sex-workers themselves, for de-criminalization and for allowing sex workers to control the conditions of their work—that is, to operate brothels themselves, choose their physicians, provide and receive benefits, and work outside brothels if they so choose – which will make them safer and less apt to be exploited.
Con: Der Spiegel Staff. (2013, May). How legalizing prostitution has failed. Der Spiegel Online. https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/human-trafficking-persists-despite-legality-of-prostitution-in-germany-a-902533.html
Staff writers report that since de-criminalization of prostitution in Germany in 2003, exploitation and human trafficking remain significant problems. According to one German law enforcement officer, Germany is a “center for the sexual exploitation of young women from Eastern Europe, as well as a sphere of activity for organized crime groups from around the world” (Germany’s Human Trafficking Problem section)
Aspect 2: SESTA/FOSTA
Pro: (APA citation to article supporting SESTA legislation; brief description of content)
Con: (APA citation to article against SESTA legislation; brief description of content)
Aspect 3: Economics
Pro: (APA citation to article showing better income/standard of living after de-criminalization; brief description of content)
Con: (APA citation to article showing real economic benefit is to pimps, traffickers brief; description of content)

4-6 pages
—
-Sample Answer Guide-
The Complex Debate on the Legalization of Prostitution: Examining Safety, SESTA/FOSTA, and Economic Implications
Introduction:
Prostitution is a contentious topic that elicits strong opinions and debates worldwide. Advocates for the legalization of prostitution argue that it can enhance the safety and well-being of sex workers, while opponents highlight the persistence of exploitation and human trafficking even in countries where it is legal. This article aims to provide an overview of the ongoing debate surrounding the legalization of prostitution, focusing on three key aspects: safety, the impact of SESTA/FOSTA legislation, and economic implications.
I. Safety: A Double-Edged Sword
Proponents of the legalization of prostitution argue that it can improve the safety and working conditions of sex workers. They contend that by decriminalizing prostitution, sex workers can have greater control over their work, operate in regulated environments, and access essential services such as healthcare. Stern (2019) supports this perspective, emphasizing the importance of allowing sex workers to control the conditions of their work, which can reduce exploitation and increase safety.
However, opponents of legalization, as highlighted in a report by Der Spiegel (2013), argue that the legalization of prostitution does not necessarily lead to improved safety. Despite the legality of prostitution in Germany since 2003, exploitation and human trafficking remain significant problems. The report suggests that Germany has become a hub for the sexual exploitation of young women from Eastern Europe and a target for organized crime groups.
II. SESTA/FOSTA Legislation: Balancing Protection and Freedom of Expression
The passage of the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act (SESTA) and the Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA) in the United States in 2018 has sparked further debate on the legalization of prostitution. Proponents of SESTA/FOSTA argue that these laws are necessary to combat online sex trafficking and protect vulnerable individuals. They contend that these measures hold websites accountable for facilitating sex trafficking and provide justice for victims.
On the other hand, critics argue that SESTA/FOSTA legislation undermines freedom of expression and has unintended consequences for sex workers. They argue that these laws have led to the closure of online platforms where sex workers could screen clients and negotiate safer working conditions. The impact of SESTA/FOSTA on the sex work industry is a topic of ongoing research and debate, with studies examining its effects on the safety and livelihoods of sex workers.
III. Economic Implications: Who Benefits?
The economic implications of legalizing prostitution are complex and multifaceted. Proponents argue that legalization can provide economic opportunities for sex workers, allowing them to earn a living and improve their standard of living. They contend that regulation and taxation can generate revenue for governments and contribute to the overall economy. However, it is crucial to critically examine these claims.
Research supporting the economic benefits of legalization should be considered alongside studies that highlight the economic gains primarily accruing to pimps and traffickers. By examining the economic impact of legalization from multiple perspectives, policymakers can make informed decisions that prioritize the well-being and rights of sex workers.
Conclusion:
The debate surrounding the legalization of prostitution is far from settled. While proponents argue that legalization can enhance the safety and economic well-being of sex workers, opponents emphasize the persistence of exploitation and human trafficking even in countries where it is legal. The impact of SESTA/FOSTA legislation further complicates the discussion, raising questions about the balance between protection and freedom of expression. Ultimately, policymakers must carefully consider the evidence and engage in nuanced discussions to address the complex issues surrounding prostitution.
References:
Stern, S. W. (2019). Sex workers of the world unite. The American Scholar, 40-54.
Der Spiegel Staff. (2013, May). How legalizing prostitution has failed. Der Spiegel Online. Retrieved from https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/human-trafficking-persists-despite-legality-of-prostitution-in-germany-a-902533.html

Order | Check Discount

Tags: Nursing homes - Inadequate staffing and mandatory overtime, Write a paper