Posted: August 19th, 2022

Introduction
Mary Masters, an worker of Comfortable Housing Pty Ltd, is a resident of Australia for tax functions. Mary is just not registered or required to be registered for GST. Throughout the 12 months of earnings 2017/2018 Mary was concerned in plenty of occasions. The purpose of this tax analysis report is to find out and clarify the tax implications for Mary arising from every of the occasions. The tax report attracts authority from Commonwealth laws together with Earnings Tax Assessment Act 1936, Earnings Tax Assessment Act 1997, and Fringe Advantages Tax Assessment Act 1986. The report additionally attracts authority from the state and laws from the State of Victoria, contemplating that Mary resided in Melbourne, therefore topic the state taxes. Lastly, the report attracts authority from case legislation, primarily judicial precedents from Australia.
Half A- Non-commercial Losses Necessities
On 1 July 2017 Mary started a enterprise to complement her employment earnings. Each weekend she took vacationers on a guided tour of essentially the most historic buildings in Melbourne. Within the 12 months of earnings ended 30 June 2018 her outgoings from the enterprise exceeded the charges which she acquired. The problem arising from this occasion is whether or not Mary can offset the loss from the enterprise towards her different earnings within the 12 months of earnings ended 30 June 2018.
The legislation requires that solely sole trades or particular person companions in a partnership who meet the non-commercial losses necessities can offset enterprise losses towards different earnings in the identical 12 months. Beneath the non-commercial enterprise loss necessities, the enterprise have to be a major manufacturing enterprise or knowledgeable arts enterprise and the taxpayer makes lower than $40,000 in an earnings 12 months from different sources of earnings. The earnings for non-commercial enterprise loss should lower than $250,000 and if this requirement is met, there are 4 checks to run. The primary check requires the assessable enterprise earnings to be at the least $20,000. The second check requires that the enterprise made a revenue in three out of the previous 5 years. Thirdly, the enterprise ought to have curiosity in actual property price at the least $500,000 and lastly the property utilized by the enterprise must be price at the least $100,000.
The tax payer should considers the place the occasion meets the non-commercial losses necessities as to be allowed to offset the enterprise losses towards her employment earnings and different earnings in the identical 12 months. If not, she might be allowed to defer the losses to the following earnings 12 months when she is going to offset the losses of the enterprise towards any enterprise revenue that might be made within the coming 12 months.
Details of the case point out that Mary was a sole proprietor. Nonetheless, it was not clear whether or not she met all the opposite non-commercial losses necessities as defined above. Consequently, Mary is suggested to think about the checks defined above to find out whether or not she might be allowed to offset the enterprise losses towards her earnings within the present 12 months or whether or not she might want to defer the losses till her enterprise returns a revenue. To make the choice, the legislation permits Mary to write down a letter to the Commissioner making use of for discretion in offsetting the industrial losses towards the present 12 months’s different earnings. Notably, there isn’t a assurance that Mary can be allowed to offset the enterprise losses towards her different earnings. Nonetheless, the consideration of case legislation would Help in pointing as to whether Mary has an opportunity to get the Commissioner’s discretion.
Case legislation helps within the willpower of the success charges in purposes for the Commissioner’s discretion. The ruling in Esso Australia Sources Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation thought of that proof was the important thing to getting the deductions allowed by the Commissioner’s discretion. The implications are that when making use of for the Commissioner’s discretion, Mary should present proof of the revenues earned, bills incurred within the enterprise, and the resultant losses that Mary want to offset towards the present 12 months’s different earnings. Apart from, Mary should present proof that the endeavor is more likely to lead to income sooner or later and that it might not be merely particular function car for getting deductions towards her different earnings. Ultimately, the success would rely on whether or not Mary is ready to persuade the Commissioner of Taxation that there’s a course for offsetting the losses towards her different earnings and the quantity of proof availed can be the primary determinant for the applying’s success. Mary may have to hunt the companies of a tax marketing consultant in order to get steering on the preparation of the proof in addition to the doable contribution of a tax lawyer to find out the probabilities of success in such an software.
Half B
On 1 January 2018 Mary offered a portray she owned for $2,000. She had purchased the portray for her private enjoyment on 1 January 1995 for $600. The problem on this occasion is whether or not the realized capital acquire can be exempt for tax functions, beneath sections 118-5, 118-10, and 118-12 of the Earnings Tax Assessment Act 1997. The Assessment can also be thought of beneath the Question Assignment of whether or not the capital acquire on the portray would comprise assessable earnings beneath the provisions of part 35-30 of the Earnings Assessment Tax Act 1997.
Part 118-10(1) of the Earnings Assessment Tax Act 1997 states capital acquire or capital loss constituted of a collectable is disregarded if the primary aspect of its price base, or the primary aspect of its price if it’s a depreciating asset, is $500 or much less. This rule applies to all of the collectibles and private use property. Additional, the part explains that the rule applies if curiosity acquired within the collectibles and private use property was acquired earlier than 16 December 1995.
Beneath part 118-10(2) there’s a particular rule affecting art work, amongst different collectibles and private use property whereas beneath part 118-10(three) the legislation states that capital acquire or loss can be disregarded if the fee base is $10,000 or much less.
The implications of the legislation are that beneath the transition provisions for the Earnings Assessment Tax Act of 1997 the capital acquire on Mary’s portray can be taxable as a result of the fee base of $600 was greater than $500 beneath the transitional provision. Nonetheless, this provision was outdated by the provisions beneath part 118-10(three) which raised the fee base to $10,000. The implications are that the capital acquire might be disregarded.
The opposite concern on this even associated to the digital camera which she used as a part of her interest as a nature photographer. She had acquired the digital camera in 2014 and the cash she acquired on the sale meant she made a lack of $1,000 on the sale.
The Assessment considers that the digital camera is a depreciating private asset. Mary would require to find out allotted lifetime of the digital camera to find out the quantity of loss that may be thought of as deductible. Assuming that Mary’s digital camera was set to depreciate by $100 yearly, Mary can be required to find out the acquire or loss after depreciation and if it exceeds $500, then Mary can be allowed to offset the loss from the present’s 12 months’s different earnings. If lower than or equal to $500 then the loss can be disregarded beneath the provisions of the legislation.
You will need to notice herein that since Mary didn’t present particulars of the value of the Digicam when it was first purchases and she or he additionally didn’t present particulars of the anticipated lifetime of the digital camera, then the usual rule is to ignore the loss. Notably, the portray and the digital camera are two separate collectibles and private property and they’d be handled individually for tax functions. Which means that whereas the capital beneficial properties on the portray can be disregarded, the capital loss on the digital camera will not be disregarded. Concerns equivalent to the truth that she offered the digital camera to buy one other collectible and particular person use asset can also be vital in making the willpower of how the collectibles and private use property can be handled for tax functions.
Half (c)
On this occasion there are numerous tax points for consideration. The primary concern is whether or not curiosity bills are deductible and whether or not curiosity earnings related to the power are included within the assessable earnings.
The Assessment of the info of the case concludes that primarily based on the Earnings Tax Assessment Act 1997, curiosity earnings and curiosity bills are tax assessable until the taxpayer borrowed to pay for tax liabilities. On this occasion Mary borrowed $100,000 from the Nationwide Australia Financial institution for a interval of 5 years at an rate of interest of eight% every year with the aim of investing one-half in shares yielding dividends and on-lending the opposite half to her brother at an rate of interest of three% every year. The use to which the funds had been invested had been each earnings producing actions in that the funding in securities had the potential for capital beneficial properties earnings and different types of earnings. Lending to his brother additionally offered a possibility for earnings, despite the fact that the online curiosity on the portion that she lend her brother can be damaging. Apart from the deductibility of the curiosity expense, Mary would even be allowed to deduct the account administration charges and related bills for the funding in securities because the Earnings Tax Assessment Act 1997 permits Mary to make the deductions.
Beneath extraordinary circumstances, curiosity earnings attracts a withholding tax of 10%. This tax can be thought of if Mary’s brother withheld the tax on the three% tax. Nonetheless beneath the circumstances of the occasion it’s extremely doable that Mary would have the opportunity omit the three% curiosity earnings from the assessable earnings. Moreover, the curiosity earnings is decrease than the curiosity bills that Mary incurs and this explains why Mary would more than likely find yourself with not tax legal responsibility ensuing from the curiosity earnings.
The opposite consideration within the Assessment is whether or not the $5,000 in charges to the College of Melbourne the place she commenced a level in arithmetic can be thought of for eligible tax refund. The decision is that this quantity is just not allowable and it isn’t eligible tax refund just because the fee was paid to an establishment aside from major or secondary schooling. Secondly, Mary is previous the age required for the eligibility of schooling tax refund.
The schooling tax refund was changed by the College Children Bonus in 2012 and once more the varsity children bonus was once more stopped in 2018. The commonwealth legislation on earnings taxes doesn’t talk to the varsity children bonus or the schooling tax refund. Extra so the varsity children bonus doesn’t embody funds made to universities and school. These concerns then imply that Mary can’t deduct the $5000 from her assessable earnings.
Mary has the choice to use to Larger Training Contribution Scheme (HECS) for preparations on find out how to pay the charges for greater schooling. Whereas the Larger Training Contribution Scheme (HECS) would lead to curiosity accrual on any quantity that Mary receives from Larger Training Contribution Scheme (HECS), she would be capable of stagger the funds over a time frame. The insurance policies on the tax standing of charges funds for greater dedication had been made obligatory by the financial situations in Australia pushing the federal government to think about totally different approaches to schooling financing in Australia. Mary can also take into account contacting the State of Victoria for additional info on the financing of schooling and the tax workplace for tax implications of upper schooling funding. The assumptions on this consideration are that tax financial savings are the first causes for Mary to think about the choices by the State of Victoria in addition to the choices that the Australian Tax Workplace could provide on the funding of schooling, therefore the necessity to keenly and intently take into account all choices.
Half D
There are two points on this occasion. The primary regards the therapy of the kid care bills and the reimbursement from the employer and the second concern pertains to the tax therapy for the $1000 that Mary gained for being the perfect gross sales particular person on the firm the place she was employed.
The Earnings Tax Assessment Act 1997 communicates to and units provisions for youngster care tax offset beneath part 61-1. Beneath part 61-10 the act units the necessities for these which can be entitled to the Baby care tax offset. Beneath part 61-10 (1) (iii) Mary must be caring for an individual who’s aged 16 years or over and is her youngster, brother or sister or a brother or sister of the partner as residents domiciled in Australia. There are different necessities equivalent to caring for an individual with incapacity in addition to caring for folks that may make one qualify for the Baby care tax offset.
Beneath part 61-30 the utmost quantity of kid tax offset allowable beneath the legislation is $2,423. Any quantity above $2,423 wouldn’t be permissible for youngster tax offset. Additional, the Assessment considers that different concerns equivalent to shared youngster care are vital for consideration.
Mary’s case additionally entails the consideration of fringe advantages contemplating that the employer refunded Mary of the quantity spent on Baby care. You will need to take into account the tax implications of the refund and in addition how Mary ought to include the kid care bills within the computation of the assessable earnings and the payable taxes.
Beneath the Fringe Advantages Tax Assessment Act 1986, youngster care advantages to an worker can be exempt if the care of youngsters of the worker in a baby care facility and the leisure facility or youngster care facility, because the case could also be, is positioned on the enterprise premises of the employer of if the employer is an organization, the employer or of an organization is said to the employer. The final situation beneath which the residential profit can be tax exempt is the place a residual profit offered in respect of the employment of an worker arose out of precedence of entry, for a kid or kids of the worker, to a spot that’s an eligible youngster care heart for the needs of any provision of the Baby Care Act 1972.
Specializing in the info of the occasion, Mary paid $770 to a baby care supplier for youngster look after her two kids, whose age is just not indicated. If the kids are aged older than 16 years then youngster tax offset can be allowed for an quantity as much as $2,423. As pertains the reimbursement by the employer, Mary can be required to incorporate the residential profit when it comes to youngster care profit within the assessable earnings as a result of she doesn’t meet all the necessities for exemption. The implications are that the assessable earnings of Mary will increase by the quantity refunded by the employer for youngster care. That is vital because it enhance the tax legal responsibility for Mary, therefore the necessity to take into account the way it impacts the taxpayer.
The final consideration on this occasion is the prize of $1,000 that Mary gained for being the perfect gross sales agent at her employer’s enterprise. The prize is tax exempt, as said within the Earnings Tax Assessment Act 1997. Beneath part118-37 that playing, a sport or a contest with prizes are exempt or loss denying transactions that means that if Mary misplaced the prize she wouldn’t declare a loss and now that she gained the prize, the tax authorities don’t demand the inclusion of the prize cash within the assessable earnings.
Half E
The problem on this occasion considerations what are the tax implications of working from dwelling and the way the extra $5000 earnings can be handled for tax functions. The Assessment considers that the extra earnings of $5000 can be included within the taxpayer’s assessable earnings for the 12 months and that for the interval since began working from dwelling, she wouldn’t be allowed to deduct commuter or journey bills.
Beneath part 85-10, the Earnings Tax Assessment Act 1997 offers for deductions for non-employees relating to private companies earnings. Beneath the act, the taxpayer can’t deduct an quantity to the extent that it pertains to gaining or producing a part of the extraordinary earnings or statutory earnings if the earnings is just not payable to you as an worker and if the taxpayer wouldn’t be capable of deduct the quantity beneath the act if the earnings had been payable to the taxpayer as an worker. The Act goes on to provide the instance of an architect who works largely from dwelling however on most days travers from dwelling to her enterprise premises of the agency, contemplating the architect has a house workplace. The act guidelines that the architect can’t deduct the bills of touring between her dwelling and the agency’s premises as a result of she couldn’t deduct them if she had been an worker.
Making use of this rule to the case of Mary’s dwelling workplace, she would acquire if she deducted any quantity of travelling and commuter prices from her dwelling to her workplace but she is just not doing that. Secondly, Mary would acquire unfairly if she deducted the $5000 further earnings for tax functions easy as a result of if she had been an worker she wouldn’t be allowed to deduct the quantity for workplace bills. These are the important thing concerns in making a choice on the tax implications of working from dwelling. The decision subsequently is that Mary should embody this quantity within the assessable earnings and that she is not going to be allowed to deduct any commuter bills to the enterprise premises. Consideration into how this impacts the tax liabilities.
Whereas Mary could not deduct the $5000 and she or he wouldn’t be allowed to deduct the commuter bills, the legislation permits her to use to the Fee for the deduction of dwelling workplace bills together with the prices of dwelling gear used for work, prices of repairs to dwelling workplace, furnishings, and gear. If there are any related cleansing bills or every other day after day working bills, then Mary can be allowed to deduct these prices for tax functions. The important thing to deductions is making certain that they’re nicely doc with all supply paperwork for the companies nicely documented. This may enable for Mary to cut back the tax legal responsibility.
Half F
In March 2018 Mary acquired a prize of $1,000 when she appeared on a tv quiz present. The problem on this occasion is on the tax standing of the prize. The prize is tax exempt, as said within the Earnings Tax Assessment Act 1997. Beneath part118-37 the act states that playing, a sport or a contest with prizes are exempt or loss-denying transactions that means that if Mary misplaced the prize she wouldn’t declare a loss and now that she gained the prize, the tax authorities don’t demand the inclusion of the prize cash within the assessable earnings.
Mary acquired from Comfortable Housing a bonus of $500 for glorious companies to the corporate. A bonus or different further fee for glorious service, is an earnings to which the taxpayer was not entitled. The implications are that the bonus might be included within the assessable earnings and taxed as a part of the extraordinary earnings or the statutory earnings of the worker. The implications are that the tax legal responsibility of the taxpayer will increase as a result of quantity offered as a bonus. Nonetheless, the tax enhance implications will not be important.
The final consideration is on the therapy of price re-imbursement at a price of 60 cents per kilometre for utilizing personal automobile on Comfortable Housing enterprise. The reimbursement of prices doesn’t quantity to earnings that’s assessable beneath the Earnings Tax Assessment Act 1997. Consequently, the quantity reimbursed shall not be topic to taxes on Mary’s earnings since it isn’t an extraordinary or statutory earnings beneath the definitions of earnings beneath the Earnings Assessment Act of 1997.
Beneath the legislation the re-imbursement for prices equivalent to gas, put on and tear, and different such prices equivalent to night time outs will not be taxable. The principle requirement is that the reimbursement of those prices is just not re-imbursement for prices incurred for shifting from the home the place the worker resides to the workplace, each day however relatively re-imbursement of price incurred as a result of the worker travelled outdoors the traditional space of every day enterprise. Another allowances can be thought of beneath fringe advantages tax and can be included within the assessable earnings of the taxpayer and have tax implications.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the target of this doc was to current numerous occasions for tax functions. The evaluate of the occasions was to find out their tax implication for the taxpayer for the tax 12 months 2017/2018 ended June 30 2018. The tax report drew authority from Commonwealth laws together with Earnings Tax Assessment Act 1936, Earnings Tax Assessment Act 1997, and Fringe Advantages Tax Assessment Act 1986. The report additionally drew authority from the state and laws from the State of Victoria, contemplating that Mary resided in Melbourne, therefore topic the state legal guidelines and laws within the State of Victoria. Lastly, the report drew authority from case legislation, citing the ruling in Esso Australia Sources Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation. All of the laws and case legislation helped in offering tax recommendation to the consumer who was additionally suggested to offer satisfactory proof for all the problems and occasions reported within the occasions. The consumer also needs to take into account hiring the companies of professional tax consultants and tax lawyer in submitting the taxes and in making purposes to the Commissioner of Taxation. The measures would considerably enhance the success charges for the taxpayer within the purposes and procedures suggested on this report.
References
Earnings Tax Assessment Act 1936
Earnings Tax Assessment Act 1997
Fringe Advantages Tax Assessment Act 1986
Esso Australia Sources Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation

Order | Check Discount