Question 28 | Psychology homework help

It is extremely essential understand the affect an educated testimony may have throughout the last dedication made by a court docket docket. In addition to, it is helpful for practitioners of forensic psychology to have the power to be taught and understand approved circumstances.

Duties:

Click on on to overview the case Commonwealth of Virginia v. Allen (2005).

The case describes an appellate approved opinion or court docket docket dedication involving educated witness testimony. When a case is appealed, it goes to an appellate or to the following court docket docket. The appellate court docket docket then opinions the findings of the lower court docket docket, which on this case was the trial court docket docket. The appellate court docket docket supplied the following two opinions:

• The first opinion (Commonwealth of Virginia v. Allen, 2005, pp. 1–24) is nearly all opinion and is the one which counts.
• The second opinion (Commonwealth of Virginia v. Allen, 2005, pp. 24–31) is an opinion filed by a minority of judges who concurred (agreed) partly and dissented (disagreed) partly with the overwhelming majority of the judges who dominated.

After learning the appellate approved opinion, write a 2- to Three-page paper addressing the following:

• Speak about whether or not or not each of the educated witnesses on this case acted unethically. Help your opinion with the associated APA or specialty ethical pointers.
• Level out whether or not or not you agree with the majority dedication or the minority concurring or dissenting opinion. Make clear why.

The paper must be in APA mannequin.

Reference:

Commonwealth of Virginia v. Allen, 609 S.E.second 4 (Va. 2005).