Prof script-socw-wk5 discussions | Psychology homework help

Dialogue 1: Using the DSM-5 and the Z Codes (ICD-10-CM)

The DSM-5 consists of specific Z Codes (ICD-10-CM) to help the clinician in determining circumstances which is likely to be relational in nature. In making a correct DSM-5 prognosis, the scientific social worker must always decide from these codes each different scenario which can be of concern and embody the associated Z Codes (pp. 715-727).

For this Dialogue, be taught the case analysis “Working with Folks: The Case of Sam.” (attached). Then, using the DSM-5 requirements, resolve a whole scientific prognosis for Sam.

Submit your prognosis of Sam in DSM-5 format (pp. 21–23), along with the components you utilized in determining this prognosis.

· Be certain you embody any medical information that is launched inside the case.

· Moreover, overview the Totally different Circumstances which can be a Focus of Scientific Consideration Z codes (ICD-10-CM) and embody this in your prognosis.

· Think about the extent of usefulness of the analysis measures (pp. 733-748) inside the DSM-5 and make clear whether or not or not these measures are helpful in treating Sam.

Help your publish with specific references to the belongings. Be certain you current full APA citations in your reference

References (use three or additional)

American Psychiatric Affiliation. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical information of psychological points (fifth ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

“Depressive Points” (pp. 155–188)

“Analysis Measures” (pp. 733–748)

Campbell, P. (2006). Beating the blues: New approaches to overcoming dysthymia and continuous delicate despair. Psychological Nicely being Observe, 10(three), 25–26.

American Psychiatric Affiliation. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical information of psychological points (fifth ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

“Bipolar and Related Points” (pp. 123–154)

Balázs, J., Benazzi, B., Rihmer, Z., & Rihmer, A. (2006). The shut hyperlink between suicide makes an try and mixed (bipolar) despair: Implications for suicide prevention. Journal of Affective Points, 91, 133–138.

Kessler, R. C., Merikangas, K. R., & Wang, P. S. (2006). Prevalence, comorbidity, and service utilization for mood disorders in the United States at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 3, 137–158.

Rusner, M., Carlsson, G., & Brunt, D. (2009). Further dimensions in all aspects of life: The which implies of life with bipolar dysfunction. Worldwide Journal of Qualitative Analysis on Nicely being and Correctly-Being, 4, 159–169.

Dialogue 2: Responding to Suicidal Ideations in Mood Points

Suicidality is widespread amongst folks with principal depressive and bipolar points. It’s vitally most likely that, as a social worker, you will work with a client who research suicidal ideations and may even present with a plan.

For this Dialogue, Assessment suicidality and decide an evidence-based plan of movement for a client who research these feelings. Then take into consideration the subsequent:

· How would you reply professionally?

· What protocol would have to be in place at your organization?

· What non-public emotional responses you may have to this revelation?

· Submit a fast description of the article you selected that addresses social work movement planning for working with purchasers who particular suicidal ideations. 

· Then, make clear the way in which you, as a social work expert, might reply to a client who expresses suicidal ideations and what firm protocols might have to be in place to most interesting serve the consumer. 

· Lastly, make clear any emotional responses you may want in case your shopper reported energetic suicidal ideations in a social work session.

Help your publish with specific references to the belongings. Be certain you current full APA citations in your references.

References (use three or additional)

American Psychiatric Affiliation. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical information of psychological points (fifth ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

“Depressive Points” (pp. 155–188)

“Analysis Measures” (pp. 733–748)

Campbell, P. (2006). Beating the blues: New approaches to overcoming dysthymia and continuous delicate despair. Psychological Nicely being Observe, 10(three), 25–26.

American Psychiatric Affiliation. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical information of psychological points (fifth ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

“Bipolar and Related Points” (pp. 123–154)

Balázs, J., Benazzi, B., Rihmer, Z., & Rihmer, A. (2006). The shut hyperlink between suicide makes an try and mixed (bipolar) despair: Implications for suicide prevention. Journal of Affective Points, 91, 133–138.

Kessler, R. C., Merikangas, K. R., & Wang, P. S. (2006). Prevalence, comorbidity, and service utilization for mood disorders in the United States at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 3, 137–158.

Rusner, M., Carlsson, G., & Brunt, D. (2009). Further dimensions in all aspects of life: The which implies of life with bipolar dysfunction. Worldwide Journal of Qualitative Analysis on Nicely being and Correctly-Being, 4, 159–169.

There are challenges to agenda establishing that if not dealt with rigorously and assuredly can adversely affect an issue or a proposal that you just’re making an attempt to place in entrance of a name maker. Nonetheless, regardless of how expertly you assemble an agenda in your problem or proposal, some factors are going to simply be prevented or not chosen for consideration. Why is that this so?

On this Small Group Dialogue, you uncover challenges surrounding protection agendas and the the rationale why some proposals on no account make it to the selection maker.

Submit your responses to the subsequent questions launched for Small Group Dialogue:

· Many social factors do not get hold of the necessary consideration from selection makers. Why might these factors be cast aside?

· Some factors lack sufficient help to make it possible for they’re added to decision-makers’ agendas. Why might this be?

· Some factors get hold of important consideration from selection makers. Why might these factors merely uncover their technique onto selection makers’ agendas?

References (use 2 or additional)

Jansson, B. S. (2018). Turning into an environment friendly protection advocate: From protection observe to social justice. (eighth ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning Assortment.

· Chapter 6, “Committing to an State of affairs: Setting up Agendas” (pp. 176-203)

Edwards, H. R., & Hoefer, R. (2010). Are social work advocacy groups using Web 2.zero efficiently? Journal of Protection Observe, 9(three/4), 220–239. Doi:10.1080/15588742.2010.489037.