Posted: August 9th, 2022

Ethics of Sentencing

Ethics of Sentencing

Dialogue Board #1 Immediate

Learn the passage beneath and tackle the factors outlined beneath the dilemma.

Two people are being sentenced for the very same crime of housebreaking. You’re the choose. One the people is a 22-year-old single mom of two youngsters who has one arrest on her file for marijuana possession and two shoplifting convictions. She is the only caretaker for her two children and was lately laid off her minimal wage job, however is actively in search of employment. The second particular person is a 27-year-old male with a historical past of nonviolent offending together with drug crimes, theft, and housebreaking. He seems to be a repeat offender and has a historical past of drug use.

How would you sentence these offenders?
You should describe the sentence you’d impose for every offender – would it not be the identical for every particular person or totally different?
What’s the moral system underlying your resolution? You will want to clarify the moral system and the way your resolution in #1 is in keeping with that system.
Do you assume your sentencing resolution would lead to “justice” on this particular case? What about within the long-run, would your resolution lead to “justice”? Clarify.
Reminders for Grading (confer with syllabus and dialogue board rubric for full particulars):

You should make at the very least two contributions every week to the dialogue board. This consists of: your individual response to the dialogue Question Assignment(s) AND at the very least one response to different posts within the dialogue space. You should ANSWER ALL PARTS OF THE QUESTION(S).
Feedback to different college students’ dialogue posts can’t be “I agree/disagree.” You should present substantive suggestions in responses to different college students’ submit. This implies it’s essential to present a proof for why you agree or disagree, and/or increase potential issues/questions you will have relating to the arguments set forth within the submit.
You should cite any supply(s) you utilize to help your statements/arguments. All citations ought to be in APA format. DO NOT COPY AND PASTE INFORMATION from sources – that is plagiarism! For those who copy and paste info in your dialogue submit, then you can be given a zero for the task.
Every dialogue submit is value 6% of your last grade. Half of your grade is predicated in your unique response to the dialogue Question Assignment(s) and the rest is predicated in your response to different posts within the dialogue board. To obtain full credit score for the task, it’s essential to reply/tackle all components of the dialogue immediate.
Incorporate course readings into your posts (unique and response). See syllabus and rubric for particulars

***USE THIS BOOK PLEASE AS A SOURCE: Pollock, J. M. (2019). Moral dilemmas and choices in felony
justice, 10th version. Boston, MA: Cengage

Ethics of Sentencing
Judges normally do have unimaginable powers and discretion. Pollock (2019) define that the make use of these powers in resolution to just accept or deny plea bargains, choices pertaining guidelines of proof and extra importantly choices about sentencing. Within the case of housebreaking by a 22-year outdated single mom with two youngsters and a file of marijuana possession in addition to shoplifting, and that of housebreaking by a 27 year-old male with historical past of nonviolent offending, drug crimes, theft and housebreaking, the choose can have larger discretion in his sentencing as allowed by the regulation (Pollock, 2019). Nonetheless, the judges motion might be led by the likelihood of the offenders to commit the crime sooner or later (recidivism) and their previous.
It’s extra seemingly that the choose will provide a harsher sentence to the 27 yr outdated male, as he’s a repeat offender who has been convicted earlier than, and after serving his time he once more reoffended. Pollock (2019) speaks of corrective justice and stress that it goals to supply treatments and compensation to injured events in addition to present simply allocation of society’s good. The choose could present extra leniency to the one mom on the account that she has two youngsters and set her to pay a superb relative to the features stolen, or serve the neighborhood. It’s because she has not been sentenced earlier than.
The precept of veil of ignorance could fail to materialize inside the choose since, whereas the crimes look like comparable, one tends to reoffend. The feminine might be handled extra lenient as such. Sentencing her may also result in her youngsters being taken away from her, and as such create a harsher actuality for her. Pollock (2019) identifies that with larger judges discretion, sentencing pointers throughout the board have grow to be extra unfair for comparable crime; and this was depending on probability for a person to reoffend, their background, and nature of the crime commit.
Base on the felony justice system file of rehabilitation, and social inequality points in America, within the brief run, the victims of crime could discover justice in each sentencing. Quite the opposite, analysis signifies that usually American felony justice system fails to offer ample rehabilitation, however seeks to punish the person and never the crime, in addition to criminalize poverty (Pollock, 2019). As such, there’s a greater probability that the 27 year-old convicted is prone to reoffend, and on this case recommit to a life of crime after being launched simply as he was. This additionally implies that he’s prone to be incarcerated longer or reappear in court docket for a second time after launch.

References
Pollock, J. M. (2019). “Moral Dilemmas And Selections In Felony Justice.” 10th version.
Boston, MA: Cengage

Order | Check Discount

Tags: Ethics of Sentencing