Comprehensive examination prep | Psychology homework help

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

1. What is the goal of the nice examination? 

The good examination is designed to guage the diploma to which you’ve got received met your program targets and learner outcomes.

2. What property could be discovered to help me put collectively for my full examination?

• Full examination data
• Program outcomes
• Course provides

three. What can I do to prepare for my full examination? 

• Overview the nice examination data.
• Overview program outcomes.
• Overview your course provides.
• Entry the online full examination toolbox.
• Study and consider examples of questions posted on the internet full examination course.

4. When do I take my full examination? 

That you must work collectively along with your division chair or designee to talk  your intention to take the nice examination throughout the time interval in  which you are enrolled throughout the closing course or packages required in your  program of analysis.

5. How do I take the nice examination? 

You will be hooked as much as the online full examination course  all through he time interval whereby you are scheduled to take your full  examination. The examination questions are made accessible to school college students  contained in the on-line full examination course on the day the examination  is scheduled to start out. It is best to have one week to develop your responses  and submit your work to the examination submissions house of the course.

6. What is the easiest method for me to prepare for the nice examination? 

That you must begin preparing for the examination out of your very first course  on this system. Outline vital supplies as you progress by each  course so that it’s attainable so that you can to draw from this when preparing for the  exact examination.

7. How prolonged do most school college students take to Assessment for and put collectively for his or her full examination?

This generally is a value judgment to be chosen by each scholar. Protect in  ideas that you just’re preparing for the examination all through every course you take up  this technique. The examination is run electronically and is open book  and open observe, so retaining your course provides, together with to your  outlines, or retaining a course-by-course journal will expedite the  preparation course of. 

eight. Do I’ve to utilize APA format in my full examination? 

Certain, the expectation is that you will observe APA pointers as you full the nice examination.

9. How essential are proper grammar and spelling in my full examination? 

Proper spelling and grammar are anticipated at all times from all school college students.

10.  Are the readers of my full examination anticipating me to know the whole theories associated to my focus? 

The readers anticipate you to exhibit a radical data of all associated theories as studied all via your packages.

11. If English is not my fundamental language, may I’ve an editor consider my responses and make choices? 

Graduate school college students are anticipated to complete the nice  examination with out the help of an editor or completely different individuals.  Neutral work is anticipated of all school college students in ending the  full examination.

12. Will there be anyone accessible whereas I am taking my full examination to answer questions that I might have?

Likelihood is you may deal with questions related to accessing the nice examination toolbox to your program chair or designee.

13. How are my responses assessed? 

Two college members will be taught and assess your work.  Your responses  shall be scored in opposition to program-specific finding out outcomes and in  accordance with graduate diploma expectations of effectivity.

14. How am I notified of the outcomes?

Your division chair or designee will publish your examination ends within the  course and/or e-mail the outcomes to you by the final word day of the time interval.

15. How prolonged do I’ve to attend for the outcomes? 

You will be notified of your outcomes earlier to the highest of the session whereby you take the nice examination.

16. What happens if I do not transfer? 

You’ll have two additional options to effectively full the  examination should you do not transfer the first time.  See the Full  Examination Data for added particulars.

SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Please observe that the following vignettes characterize  samples of the types of questions it’s possible you’ll be requested to reply on the  full examination. You will NOT acquire these questions on the  full examination; they’re for analysis features solely.

Please compose a well-written and organized essay in response to each  of the following questions. When writing your essays, please

1. Use APA (sixth model) Kind, with 1-inch margins, double-spaced, 12 font, .
2. Write clearly and concisely.
3. Cite relevant, and notably current, literature (empirical and/or theoretical).
4. Avoid all sexist idioms and allusions.
5. Be mindful to exhibit your multicultural competence the place relevant.

Vignette: Benefit from this state of affairs to your whole responses

A 42-year-old African American girl was dropped on the emergency  room by regulation enforcement officers for Assessment earlier to going to jail to await  disposition. She reported that she had been procuring when “one factor  occurred.” She acknowledged that she had no recollection of events between the  time she entered the store and an hour later, when she was arrested for  shoplifting in a close-by division retailer with a considerable amount of  stolen property on her specific individual. She protested her innocence and have turn out to be so  agitated, belligerent, and profane that the arresting officers took her  to the hospital for Assessment. On the hospital she reported that two  years beforehand she had been arrested for shoplifting and had had  amnesia for the act. 

The charges in opposition to her have been then dropped because of  she outlined that every the shoplifting and the amnesia resulted from  her forgetting to eat after taking her insulin. Of observe, her blood-sugar  diploma on testing throughout the emergency room was elevated.

The affected individual calmed down displaying asymptomatic after the Assessment  and was transferred to jail pending a preliminary listening to. 

When she  found that her launch was deliberate for the next day and that the  charges in opposition to her would not be dropped, she grew to turn out to be terribly agitated,  indignant, and abusive to the officers. Shortly thereafter, she complained  of a headache and acknowledged she had no recollection of her abusive conduct.  Later that night time she accosted an officer angrily. When the officer  responded and addressed the affected individual by title, “Naomi,” the affected individual acknowledged  that her title was “Oprah” and that she would not allow herself to be  often called “Naomi,” whom she described as a “wimp and a loser.”

“Oprah’s” voice and movement have been significantly completely completely different from these of  “Naomi.” She claimed that she had achieved the shoplifting and stepped once more  so that “Naomi” may presumably be caught and humiliated, and that if she had  wished to, she could have evaded detection merely. She was returned to  the ER and subsequently admitted to the inpatient psychiatric unit for  commentary. 

For the next two days, the affected individual had many apparent  switches of character, accompanied by conspicuous changes in costume,  make-up, and demeanor. On quite a lot of occasions “Oprah” was disruptive, and  twice “Naomi” reported to nurses that she had found points belonging to  completely different victims in her possession.

There have been no fixed variations in blood-sugar ranges throughout the  completely completely different personalities or changes on the time of the shifts. A  neurological workup with intensive electroencephalographic analysis  proved unremarkable. The affected individual began to complain that her conduct was  out of her administration and that she could not be held accountable for it.  On daily basis’s progress notes revealed further particulars of the variations  between “Oprah” and “Naomi.”

A counselor was requested to see the affected individual. He observed the presence of  every “Oprah” and “Naomi” and documented their polarized and clear-cut  variations. The personalities have been detailed and elaborate as they  talked about factors relating to the affected individual’s current approved difficulties.  He found that the affected individual had an in depth historic previous of discrepant  behaviors that she had “forgotten,” to which many witnesses would  attest, and that her family usually remarked that she was “like two  completely completely different of us.”

 He found that these episodes had typically occurred  when the affected individual had engaged in conduct that launched adversarial personal  penalties upon her. He well-known that the affected individual was on a unit that, by  coincidence, had three completely different victims with comparable symptomology and  that, beginning the day the affected individual found that the prices in opposition to her  would not be dropped, she had begun to affiliate additional constantly with  these victims.

An in depth historic previous, taken over quite a lot of days, and ancillary sources  didn’t reveal any historic previous of childhood abuse and there was no  indication that the affected individual had expert each different overwhelming  traumatic events. 

Furthermore, the historic previous indicated that the affected individual,  whatever the apparently fundamental nature of her two personalities, had  under no circumstances confirmed or complained of each different important psychological  symptomology. Her historic previous incorporates having been raised as an solely child  in a middle-class metropolis environment by her mother and grandmother. 

She  opinions that she has a wonderful relationship with all members of her family  although she has a additional distant relationship alongside together with her father, who works  prolonged hours as an engineer. His mother and grandmother work as lecturers  in shut by private schools. Every her mom and father are of Haitian descent  though the affected individual was born and has lived her whole life throughout the United  States.

The affected individual’s developmental historic previous incorporates having met all bodily  and cognitive developmental milestones on time, with light difficulties  in finding out and peer relationships. In early elementary school she was  reported to have had some ‘showing out’ points along with hitting  one different child, and talking once more to adults, nonetheless, these behaviors have been  not excessive or long-term ample to warrant suspension or ongoing  concern. In highschool, no conduct points have been well-known, and he or she was  described as socially significantly reclusive, having only one or two shut  buddies.

Prior hospital knowledge have been found for “Naomi” indicating an prolonged  historic previous of alcohol, heroin, and cocaine use, nevertheless upon confrontation  about this historic previous she claimed to have been clear for three weeks prior  to her arrest. Her preliminary blood work was constructive for every opiods and  cannabis.

The counselor moreover well-known that the “Naomi” he was interviewing was  significantly completely completely different from the “Naomi” with whom her family and buddies  have been acquainted. The identical outdated “Naomi” was good and mild-mannered besides  “crossed,” at which events she grew to turn out to be indignant and belligerent. He moreover  found that the affected individual was not very hypnotizable. 

He undertook a  prolonged interview whereby he lined a wide range of topics over  quite a lot of hours. As a result of the interview proceeded, “Oprah,” who was absolutely  fixed in her presentation all through her dialogue of points related  to the shoplifting and disruptive events on the ward, began to show into  inconsistent in her voice and technique. She complained that the information  disbelieved her and was attempting to “trick” her. 

As “Oprah” appeared unable  to maintain her presentation, “Namoi” vehemently reproached the  information for doubting the account offered by “Oprah,” for whose earlier  behaviors and current interactions with the information she had  continually maintained she had amnesia. At these indignant moments, her  conduct was indistinguishable from “Oprah’s.” After one different hour’s  interviewing, all through which the affected individual made quite a lot of efforts to steer  the information that she had amnesia in the midst of the shop lifting episode, she  ceased to indicate the amnesiac behaviors.

When she was launched to her public defender who knowledgeable her she would  be arraigned the following day, she flew proper right into a rage and threatened  that she would slash her wrists with the first sharp object she could  uncover. She moreover claimed that she was listening to voices in her head telling  her to kill herself.

Based on the vignette provided, please compose a well-written  and organized response to each of the following questions.  When  writing your responses, please:

• Use APA (sixth model) Kind, with 1-inch margins, double-spaced, 12 font, with a reference document on the end.
• Write clearly and concisely.
• Cite relevant, and notably current, literature (empirical and/or theoretical).
• Avoid all sexist idioms and allusions.
• Be mindful to exhibit your multicultural competence the place relevant. 

Psychological Precept and Observe

1. What assessments would you conduct to bolster your understanding of  the problems of the actual individual throughout the vignette and the way in which would your different of  analysis(s) inform your diagnostic formation and remedy planning?  Assessments may embody structured or unstructured interviews, reputable and  reliable analysis measures, and/or formalized analysis procedures  that could possibly be carried out by your self or by one other individual referred by you. 
2. Current your diagnostic impressions (based on the DSM-5) for this  specific individual. In narrative kind, please describe how the individual meets  the diagnostic requirements for the dysfunction(s) chosen together with the  differential diagnostic thought course of that you just simply used to achieve your  hypotheses. Ensure you embody any additional (missing) knowledge that  is required to each rule out or affirm your differential diagnoses  impressions.

Licensed Precept and Utility

1.  Make clear the background, current presentation, and conduct of the  specific individual throughout the vignette utilizing natural, finding out, and social  theories on offenders to help your house. Do not merely restate  the background knowledge from the vignette. Instead, current a  theoretically-based dialogue to know the jail behaviors of  the actual individual throughout the vignette.
2. Have in mind the form of crime throughout the vignette and give attention to how that kind  of crime normally impacts a sufferer of it.  Do not prohibit your self to  discussing merely the sufferer on this vignette.  Instead obtain scholarly  sources for knowledge on how one in every of these crime can impact any sufferer,  their family members, and completely different members of society. 
3. Describe the psycholegal necessities and/or definitions for each of  the following: competence to face trial, accountability to warn, and insanity.  Set up and describe quite a lot of landmark case(s) for each regular (at  least three circumstances complete). Describe the climate or factors psychological  properly being expert typically focuses on when assessing a person’s  adjudicative competence, hazard and insanity, and any additional objects  that could be notably essential to focus on throughout the provided vignette.

Analysis, Assessment and Assessment

1. Describe checks or analysis procedures you may make use of to cope with  the psycholegal issues with (competence to face trial, hazard of  dangerousness, and insanity). Likelihood is you may confer with these from the  Psychological Precept and Analysis Half “A” within the occasion you already lined  them there.  Speak about what the anticipated conclusions could possibly be based  upon knowledge provided throughout the vignette.
2. Develop a Assessment question and a testable Assessment hypothesis  regarding offenders or the form of crime that is talked about throughout the  vignette (resembling, behavior, recidivism, jail conduct, and so forth.).   Make clear the variables in your question and the form of Assessment analysis  which may reply your question along with why that Assessment would make a  contribution to the sphere of forensic psychology.

Administration, Session, and Ethics

1. What are the ethical and approved dilemmas this vignette launched?  What could possibly be your speedy steps and why? Please be specific and make  sure that you just simply describe your technique of ethical alternative making and the  choices/penalties to which this course of may lead. Your dialogue  must be educated by the American Psychological Affiliation’s Ethics  Code along with the Specialty Ideas for Forensic Psychologists.

Interpersonal Effectiveness

1. What selection elements, cultural considerations, or completely different  demographic variables pertaining to the actual individual throughout the vignette would you  pay attention to in rendering diagnoses, deciding on analysis measures,  forming case conceptualizations, and designing the remedy plan?  Be  sure to debate cultural/selection elements which may apply even after they  normally usually are not explicitly talked about throughout the vignette.
2. Your writing, use of citations, potential to kind a logical argument,  and proper APA Kind, along with the utilization of paraphrasing, shall be  evaluated as a measure of your interpersonal effectiveness. No response  is required for “B”.

APA Format

Written Venture Necessities

All written assignments submitted are anticipated to be of the perfect  caliber and in step with prime quality expert necessities and should  exhibit mastery of regular American English. The  university-approved model of the Publication Information of the American  Psychological Affiliation should be adopted. The information provides specific  instructions on tips about the best way to development work, assemble references, create  headings, present ideas, generate tables, report numbers and statistics  appropriately, and further. The information organizes all written work merchandise and  all school college students ought to strictly adhere to APA mannequin, format, and  group.

APA Belongings

The following reference provides on mannequin and format are revealed by the American Psychology Affiliation ( http://www.apastyle.org/):

APA Publications Web Web site

http://www.apa.org/pubs/index.aspx

APA Information & Related Belongings

http://www.apastyle.org/pubmanual.html

APA Kind Helper (Digital)

http://www.apastyle.org/elecref.html

 ( if listed below are the Instructors closing scores, suggestions from the first examination taken by the sooner tutor)!!!

MA FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY COMPREHENSIVE EXAM 

STUDENT ID:  Pupil A 

Fall A 2017 

PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY AND PRACTICE:  ASSESSMENT (A) 

Grade:  Unacceptable (1) 

The  scholar demonstrates insufficient data of how the analysis  course of could also be utilized to bolster understanding of the consumer’s  presenting points, along with aiding in formulating diagnostic  impressions and a remedy plan.  The scholar states that he/she would  conduct “character analysis, family relationship analysis and  psychological properly being analysis to analyze the problems of the Abby” nevertheless does  not ingredient any specific analysis units that could be actually useful  (except for a structured interview).  There could also be moreover no level out of  specific psychological properly being factors that could be addressed in analysis  (e.g. psychological functioning, suicidality, homicidality, psychosis,  sociopathy).  There are statements on this half that replicate an absence  of familiarity with and accuracy of understanding the analysis  course of, e.g. dialogue of psychiatrists moderately than psychologists  conducting diagnostic testing and the assertion that analysis outcomes  enhance affected individual confidence and make them additional acutely aware of their very personal  functionality.  Lastly, this half is poorly written grammatically, making  it significantly powerful to watch the student’s communications.   

PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY AND PRACTICE:  DIAGNOSTIC IMPRESSIONS (B) 

Grade:  Rising (2) 

The  scholar lists Obsessive Compulsive Dysfunction and Schizophrenia Spectrum  Dysfunction as doable diagnoses, nevertheless the scholar’s provided document of  diagnostic requirements is not matched to these diagnoses.  Considered one of many  requirements listed throughout the DSM-5 for a Assessment of OCD is that the  disturbance is not larger outlined by the indicators of 1 different psychological  dysfunction.  On this case, Trichotillomania (Hair Pulling Dysfunction) would  additional precisely describe the consumer’s presenting indicators.  The scholar  identifies some specific points contained in the broad class of  Schizophrenia Spectrum Issues (e.g. Delusional Dysfunction,  Schizoaffective Dysfunction, “Character Dysfunction”, and Schizophrenia),  nevertheless does not level out why one in all these diagnoses may larger match the  presenting data than one different.          

The scholar does  not embody any dialogue of whether or not or not the consumer’s indicators may profit a  Assessment inside the category of Disruptive, Impulse Administration and  Conduct Issues.  Furthermore, there’s no level out of whether or not or not Bulemia  Nervosa and Pyromania could also be listed as provisional (rule out)  diagnoses meriting further investigation, alongside 

with  consideration of doable pure elements, publicity to trauma and  doable psychological disabilities.  Lastly, the student mentions that  the consumer’s diploma of openness must be considered in formulating a  Assessment, nevertheless does not elaborate on this degree or provide completely different  specific individual/cultural elements which can be considered.    

Complete, this half does not characterize a proficient understanding of the diagnostic course of.    

LEGAL THEORY AND APPLICATION:  THEORETICAL FORMULATION 

Grade:  Rising (2) 

The  key course of on this half is to conceptualize the consumer utilizing a  specific theoretical framework.  The scholar provides a top level view of  social, natural and finding out theories, nevertheless does not seem to  understand the which suggests of these theories and does not hyperlink them the least bit  to specific events throughout the shopper’s historic previous/presentation which may make clear  her indicators, resembling being pregnant and begin points, developmental  delay, sexual trauma by father and brothers, and so forth.  Extra, the student  does not sufficiently deal with the topic of sufferer/offender psychology,  as there could also be so much on this shopper’s historic previous which signifies that her  historic previous of trauma (natural and psychological) may have contributed to  her forensic presentation. In conclusion, the student does not  sufficiently grasp the goal of a theoretical formulation as a approach  of understanding the consumer’s conduct and their alleged crime.     

LEGAL THEORY:  DESCRIPTION OF CRIME 

Grade:  Unacceptable (1) 

The  scholar describes the crime throughout the present case as arson.  Whereas this  is a ingredient of the crime, it could possibly be essential to note that the  shopper was charged with tried murder of her brother by arson.   Furthermore, life imprisonment is not primarily the penalty for arson.  Furthermore, if convicted, this shopper could possibly be convicted of tried  murder, not merely of arson.  The scholar provides one scholarly citation  discussing the ultimate affect of arson on its victims.   

LEGAL THEORY AND APPLICATION:  LEGAL IMPLICATIONS 

Grade:  Unacceptable (1) 

The  scholar provides a enough description of the approved definition of  Competency to Stand Trial, nevertheless does not current a particular approved  regular/landmark case precedent associated to this regular, focusing  incorrectly as an alternative on the forensic psychologist’s Assessment of the  affected individual going via trial.   

The scholar’s description of the  concept of Accountability to Warn is poorly written, with confusion about  references to therapist, shopper, and sufferer.  It is not appropriate that  clinicians fail to warn out of concern of being found liable beneath Accountability to  Warn; truly, obligation would additional attainable come up out of a failure to  warn an identifiable sufferer.  As soon as extra, the student provides no landmark  circumstances on this house, misunderstanding the thought of a landmark case  precedent.   

The scholar’s description of the thought of  Insanity could be poorly written, with references to “irregular”  conduct…violation of neighborhood norms, …and dangerousness.”  This  definition is not appropriate and likewise does not reference the required  degree that the insanity safety pertains to the defendant’s psychological state  on the time of the charge of the crime.  The scholar cites a case  the place a defendant was found to have feigned insanity, moderately than a case  the place a defendant was found to be criminally insane on the time of the  charge of the crime.    

This half is poorly written and demonstrates an unacceptable diploma of understanding of the three key approved concepts. 

RESEARCH AND Assessment:  FORENSIC Assessment   

Grade:  Unacceptable (1) 

The  scholar talked about no specific units which can be used to  deal with the forensic questions on this case.  In fact, the student seems  to not understand the idea of how specific analysis units may  be used to seek out out the consumer’s psycho-legal standing.  The scholar  mentions seeking a affected individual historic previous, which is reputable, nevertheless focuses on  potential data resembling interviewing regulation enforcement officers and people who’ve  interacted socially alongside together with her, moderately than exact police/courtroom knowledge  and knowledge from her extended psychological properly being settings and corporations.  

Whereas  evaluating context is always useful, and analysis of the affected individual’s  current state of arousal may provide clues, there’s no level out of  standardized measures to guage the consumer’s doable insanity on the  time of the crime, hazard of hazard to self/others and competency to face  trial. 

Lastly, moderately than rendering a judgment as to  whether or not or not the consumer meets the three psycho-legal necessities, the student  states that the consumer is also affected by a “character and psychological  properly being dysfunction” resembling OCD, which the student provides as an proof  for the conduct which led to the alleged crime of tried murder by  arson.       

Complete, there’s no important linkage of  scientific data with approved necessities to cope with the associated forensic  questions on this half.  

RESEARCH AND Assessment: RESEARCH PROPOSAL 

Grade:  Rising (2)  

The scholar begins by proposing the following Assessment question:   

“What are the implications of character aspect of Abby to her jail conduct?”   

Not  solely is that this assertion poorly written grammatically, it focuses on  researching the consumer moderately than a broader sample of people charged  with the identical crime.  The scholar appropriately states that character  elements could possibly be the neutral variable on this analysis and jail  conduct could possibly be the dependent variable.  

The scholar states  survey method could possibly be used, nevertheless does not state who could possibly be surveyed,  what units could also be used, what specific components of character  could possibly be addressed, and so forth.  The potential contribution of this proposed  analysis could possibly be very generic, moderately than offering one factor additional specific like  determining predictive elements which will contribute to prevention of  such conduct. 

The scholar does not particular a clear  understanding of the price of research methodology in contributing to an  understanding of jail conduct on this half.  

LEADERSHIP, CONSULTATION AND ETHICS:  ETHICAL ISSUES 

Grade:  Unacceptable (1) 

The  scholar erroneously states that the ethical/approved dilemma is the  present case is whether or not or not the consumer is a candidate for a neighborhood  helpful useful resource program.  That’s the referral question, not an ethical/approved  dilemma. The scholar reveals further confusion about ethical/approved  dilemmas by stating that the consumer’s potential conflicting factors or  expert duties must be explored, moderately than addressing these  factors in regards to the clinician. As the student continues to ingredient a  step-by-step plan, there’s no level out of any exact ethical/approved  dilemmas throughout the present case.  Extra, the student fails to find out  any specific essential ethical considerations, in step with the APA  Ethics Code and SGFP, resembling educated consent, steps to ensure privateness  and confidentiality, avoidance of harm and steps that could be taken if  the consumer reveals current hazard of harm to self or others.  It must  even be well-known that the courtroom is the “shopper” on this case.  Subsequently,  the consumer should be educated that he isn’t entitled to confidentiality  with respect to the courtroom, though his file is in some other case confidential  with respect to open air occasions. It may even be useful to voice  warning about serving in a attainable Quite a lot of Relationship, if serving  concurrently in every an analysis/referral operate to the courtroom and a  remedy operate.  

INTER-PERSONAL EFFECTIVENESS: DIVERSITY AND MULTICULTURAL COMPETENCE 

Grade:  Unacceptable (1) 

The  scholar begins this half by stating that sexual orientation, SES and  bodily incapacity are the associated selection elements that could be a  give attention to this case.  That’s curious as there’s no level out of the  shopper’s sexual orientation or of her being sexually vigorous and there could also be  no level out of the consumer having a bodily incapacity.  The scholar 

in some other case  solely mentions custom and historic context in a traditional strategy as  essential, nevertheless provides no specific components of the consumer’s identification that  is also essential to consider in assessing, diagnosing, conceptualizing  or treating this affected individual.  There is not a degree out of key salient cultural  elements which have been acknowledged on this case resembling  psychological/developmental functioning, family constellation, trauma  historic previous,  

age, weight issues and completely different medical issues and psychiatric standing.    

It  could possibly be very unclear why the student offered the following additional  assertion regarding selection:  “Nonetheless, the aspect of globalization  has facilitated multiculturalism thus making it onerous for the  psychiatrists to seek out out the cultural competence of the victims  (Hays, 2016).”  

Lastly, there was moreover no dialogue  of specific areas of competence which the assessing or treating  clinician must possess in order to work contained in the boundaries of their  competence and to serve the consumer efficiently.  Likewise, areas of  cultural similarity or distinction between therapist and shopper would  even be essential to consider.   

INTER-PERSONAL EFFECTIVENESS:  WRITING IN APA STYLE  

Grade:  Unacceptable (1) 

The  prime quality of the student’s writing and expression of ideas could possibly be very poor  all via the paper and is not the least bit in step with graduate school  scholarship.  There are citations provided throughout the paper and listed in  the reference document, though quotations did not embody net web page numbers in  the citation per APA pointers.   

Complete Elements:   13/40 FAIL