Posted: August 5th, 2022

OPM61 TASK 1: International Logistics

OPM61 TASK 1: International Logistics – Referral Project 2021-22 Submission Date: 10am on 12th August 2022
Introduction
This task requires you to organize a 2000-word report on a selected commerce route (lane). You’ll analysis the event of a selected commerce lane and related infrastructure. You’ll find key info sources and look at key financial forces which have formed, and proceed to form, the event of your chosen commerce route (lane).
The duty
1. Introduction – establish the commerce route which would be the focus of your research, explaining the explanations on your selection.
2. Methodology:
• Determine sources of detailed statistics on volumes and kinds of cargo transported.
• Determine info sources on current bodily and technological infrastructure and future developments.
three. An outline of the geography of your chosen commerce route and the financial areas that it connects, together with the primary ports and airports.
four. An Assessment of the composition and quantity of commerce alongside the route, assembled from secondary sources, e.g. port/airport web sites, financial statistics (imports and exports).
5. The macro forces which have formed the event of the commerce route, and the forces which can form its future improvement.
6. An outline of essential infrastructure that facilitates the commerce route, together with any present or deliberate infrastructure (bodily and technological) tasks.
7. A short forecast of how the commerce route might develop sooner or later.
Presentation and submission
Your report will likely be structured with a canopy sheet, contents web page, web page numbers and part headings. You’ll use enterprise language and embrace maps, charts and diagrams as acceptable.
Your analysis and Assessment of the commerce route will depend on proof from secondary sources recognized in your methodology. All info sources have to be cited by writer (date) within the report, with full references offered on the finish of the report utilizing the Harvard referencing system, as detailed within the Faculty Referencing Handbook.
Data sources
Module studying checklist and the web library.
Video from Kogan Web page on “Globalisation and its affect on provide chains” [accessed
5/10/18]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-R5SAPyMZY
Please see studying checklist and sources cited in lectures, e.g. Manners-Bell on the event of commerce in rising markets, and Johnson, Scholes and Whittington on macro environmental Assessment and situation planning.
Project Particular Assessment standards
• Protection of the duty, as specified above (60% of marks).
• The presentation of your report together with construction, acceptable use of diagrams and charts, enterprise language, citations and references (20% of marks).
• The credibility of your forecast (activity 7 above), which will depend on the vary of data sources consulted and the standard of your Assessment (20% of marks).
Please additionally see the Normal Masters Assessment Standards connected.
Weighting
Job 1 is weighted at 40% of the marks for the module. The finance case research (Job 2) is weighted at 60%.

Normal Grasp’s Degree Assessment Standards
Module Assessment Masters’ stage programs use a numerical marking scheme underneath which the next grades will be achieved inside a module:
– Excessive Distinction (80-100%)
– Distinction – (70 – 79%)
– Advantage – (60 – 69%)
– Go – (50 – 59%)
– Fail and Refer – (40 – 49%) this can be a provisional failure which will be overturned for those who present extra passable proof of accomplishment of the module studying outcomes required to be able to obtain a move normal. – Fail and no Referral – (Beneath 39%)
Grading standards
The next grading standards, primarily based on the College’s postgraduate marking/ grading descriptors, point out the marks and classifications to be awarded for numerous requirements of written work. Your work will likely be marked in percentages, excluding these few modules that simply want Go/fail As every topic has its personal emphases and as assignments might fluctuate of their method (e.g. essays, stories, tasks and so forth.) so descriptions provided listed below are inevitably generalised and can must be interpreted and tailored to the specifics of every task. Typically you’ll be issued with supplementary grading standards that are particular to the actual activity you’ve got been set.
Excessive Distinction (80-100%)
An excellent response to the duty: all studying outcomes/Assessment standards have been achieved to an exceptionally excessive stage. The work demonstrates most or all the following traits past that anticipated for work on the given stage of research inside the self-discipline:
• Distinctive show of understanding, exploration, perception and/or analysis
• Potential for publication/exhibition and/or skill to undertake additional analysis
• All specs for the Assessment activity, together with phrase restrict the place acceptable, have been strictly adhered to
• The organisation, construction and normal of presentation of the work, together with any subject-specific conventions2 the place acceptable, are exemplary all through
• Proof of efficient communication of labor to specialist and non-specialist audiences
• Stimulating and rigorous arguments which can be prone to be on the limits of what could also be anticipated at this stage
• The work has been approached and/or executed/carried out in an unique method
• Inspirational, modern and authoritative – proof of mental rigour, independence of judgement and insightful contextualisation, together with related principle/literature/artefacts/efficiency
• Clear proof of intensive research and demonstration of skill to succeed in acceptable selections primarily based on incomplete or complicated proof
• Proof of very prime quality Assessment, synthesis, analysis and significant appraisal
• Excellent drawback fixing expertise – suggests various approaches
• Potential to deal with complicated points each systematically and creatively – challenges established information
Distinction (70-79%)
A wonderful response to the duty: all studying outcomes/Assessment standards have been achieved to a excessive normal and lots of at an exceptionally excessive stage. The work demonstrates most or all the following traits in relation to these anticipated on the given stage of research inside the self-discipline:
• In-depth understanding, exploration, perception and/or analysis
• Potential for publication/exhibition and/or skill to undertake additional analysis
• All specs for the Assessment activity, together with phrase restrict the place acceptable, have been adhered to
• The organisation, construction and normal of presentation of the work, together with any subject-specific conventions4 the place acceptable, are wonderful all through
• Proof of efficient communication of labor to specialist and non-specialist audiences
• Convincing arguments which can be prone to be on the limits of what could also be anticipated at this stage
• The work has been approached and/or executed/ carried out in an unique method
• Insightful contextualisation, together with related principle/literature/artefacts/ efficiency
• Clear proof of intensive research and demonstration of skill to succeed in acceptable selections primarily based on incomplete or complicated proof
• Proof of excessive to very prime quality Assessment, synthesis, analysis and significant appraisal
• Glorious drawback fixing expertise – suggests various approaches
• Potential to deal with complicated points successfully – challenges established information
Advantage (60-69%)
A superb to superb response to the duty: all studying outcomes/Assessment standards have been met absolutely at or superb normal. The work demonstrates most or all the following traits in relation to these anticipated on the given stage of research inside the self-discipline:
• Good to superb understanding and exploration, some perception and/or thorough analysis
• Some capability to undertake additional analysis
• No vital inaccuracies, misunderstandings or errors
• The specs for the Assessment activity, together with phrase restrict the place acceptable, have been adhered to
• The work is effectively organised, coherent and the usual of presentation together with any subject-specific conventions the place acceptable, is not less than good
• Proof of efficient communication of labor
• Potential to current structured, clear and concise arguments
• The work has been approached and/or executed/carried out in a complete method with a point of originality
• Acceptable contextualisation, together with related principle/literature/artefacts/efficiency
• Proof of intensive research and demonstration of skill to succeed in acceptable selections primarily based on incomplete or complicated proof
• Proof of top of the range Assessment, synthesis, analysis and significant appraisal
• Good or not less than competent drawback fixing expertise – suggests various approaches
• Potential to deal with complicated points competently – explores established information
Go (50-59%)
An sufficient to sound response to the duty: all studying outcomes/ Assessment standards have been met. The work demonstrates most or all the following traits in relation to these anticipated on the given stage of research inside the self-discipline:
• Sound understanding and exploration, some perception and/or acceptable analysis
• Some minor inaccuracies and/or misunderstandings – small however not vital errors
• Some minor aberrations from the specs for the Assessment activity, together with phrase restrict the place acceptable
• The work is suitably organised and the usual of presentation, together with any subject-specific conventions the place acceptable, is not less than sound
• Potential to develop an argument however can lack fluency
• The work has been approached and/or executed/carried out in an ordinary method with restricted proof of originality
• Some contextualisation however with a heavy reliance on a restricted variety of sources and, normally, the breadth and depth of sources and analysis are missing
• Proof of research and demonstration of skill to succeed in acceptable selections primarily based on incomplete or complicated proof
• Some, however restricted proof of research, synthesis, analysis and significant appraisal
• Some proof of drawback fixing expertise
• Some proof of skill to deal with complicated points adequately
Fail (40-49%)
An unsatisfactory response to the duty: a number of of the training outcomes/ Assessment standards haven’t been met. The work might show some power however these are outweighed by a number of weak options in relation to these anticipated on the given stage of research inside the self-discipline, corresponding to:
• Restricted understanding and/or exploration of main concepts with little or no perception and/or minimal analysis
• Some vital inaccuracies and/or misunderstandings – gaps in understanding and/or information
• Inadequate consideration paid to a few of the Assessment standards and a few vital aberrations from the specs for the Assessment activity
• The work is simply too descriptive, considerably disorganised and unclear and the usual of presentation, together with any subject-specific conventions9 the place acceptable, is poor
• Improvement of an argument is proscribed and infrequently flawed
• The work has been approached and/or executed/carried out in poor method
• The context offered takes the type of description missing any breadth, depth and accuracy
• Restricted or inappropriate analysis and demonstrated skill to succeed in selections
• Inadequate proof of research, synthesis, analysis and significant appraisal
• Little proof of drawback fixing expertise
• A battle to deal with complicated points
Fail (Zero-39%)
An unsatisfactory response to the duty: a lot of the studying outcomes/ Assessment standards haven’t been met. The work fails to satisfy the necessities in relation to these anticipated on the given stage of research inside the self-discipline, exemplified by:
• Very restricted understanding and/or exploration of main concepts with little or no perception and/or minimal analysis
• A number of vital inaccuracies and/or misunderstandings – minimal or no proof of information and understanding of the topic
• Inadequate consideration paid to a number of of the Assessment standards and a few severe deviations from the specs for the Assessment activity
• The work is principally descriptive, poorly structured and the usual of presentation, together with any subject-specific conventions11 the place acceptable, is poor
• The work lacks supporting proof or argument
• The work has been approached and/or executed/carried out in a really poor method
• Failure to contextualise from sources
• Little or no proof of research, synthesis, analysis and significant appraisal
• Little or no proof of drawback fixing expertise
• Failure to deal with complicated points

Order | Check Discount

Tags: OPM61 TASK 1: International Logistics