Posted: August 4th, 2022

Decision making in criminal justice

Decision making in criminal justice
There are mainly 2 factors of view on errors in the criminal justice system: That no errors are acceptable, and that errors are inevitable. With that in thoughts, reply the next Question Assignment: Is it higher for 10,000 responsible males to stroll free than to have one harmless man convicted? If not, what quantity, if any, is appropriate to you?

Use any framework we have now mentioned in class (e.g. deontological, utilitarianism, and so on.) to in your opinion. Use examples as an instance your reply: That is an ESSAY Question Assignment, and needs to be written as such.

Decision making in criminal justice
Decision making in criminal justice facets ensures that choices are made to realize the best ranges of justice, fairness, and equality, and thus adequate legal guidelines, theories, and laws have to be integrated in choice making. The choices made in the criminal justice system want to make sure that regulation and order in the society and issues are determined for the frequent good. The responsible individuals should be successfully dealt with by the criminal justice system to make sure that regulation and order are maintained in the society in the curiosity of the vast majority of the law-abiding residents (Clair and Winter, 2016). On this case, the proposition that it could be higher for 10,000 responsible males to stroll free than to have one harmless man convicted is mistaken and unacceptable. On this case, solely the individuals discovered responsible should be convicted whereas these discovered harmless needs to be let out. The 10,000 responsible males ought to, subsequently, be jailed whereas the harmless man needs to be let free. The choice making in the criminal justice system might be made based mostly on moral and ethical theories akin to deontological theories for the frequent good.
The deontological idea must be integrated into criminal justice to find out whether or not issues are proper or mistaken. Deontological idea ensures that the willpower on whether or not issues are proper or mistaken based mostly on the rightness or wrongness of the actions themselves (Lee, 2010). In deontological moral idea, the morality of an motion relies on whether or not the motion is correct or mistaken in comparability to set guidelines, insurance policies, and legal guidelines versus the implications of an motion. On this case, the motion of letting free 10,000 responsible males in the place of jailing one harmless man is mistaken by all requirements and legal guidelines. The motion of letting free 10,000 responsible males is mistaken based mostly on the legal guidelines prescribed beneath completely different constitutions or insurance policies. Below the regulation, the individuals discovered in contravention of the regulation are responsible, and they need to be jailed or fined appropriately. However, the individuals discovered harmless needs to be let free. Due to this fact, it could be mistaken to jail one harmless individual on the expense of 10,000 responsible folks.
Setting free 10,000 responsible individuals will obtain the best pleasure as in the case of the utilitarianism moral idea. The utilitarianism moral idea evaluates the rightness or wrongness based mostly on the end result versus the motion itself (Gao and Tang, 2013). The truth that the criminal justice system choices are guided by the legal guidelines, then the choices made needs to be based mostly on the deontological moral idea because it evaluates the actions themselves versus the end result. If the actions are inconsistent with the regulation, then the motion is mistaken, and it’s in contravention of the regulation. However, if the actions are aligned to the structure, then the actions are proper, and they aren’t in violation of any regulation. The truth that the 10,000 males are responsible signifies that their authentic actions are in contravention of the regulation and that their motion is mistaken. The harmless man’s motion is correct and in line with the regulation.
In conclusion, the choices on whether or not an motion is correct or mistaken aren’t depending on the variety of folks it impacts however on whether or not the motion is inline or contravention with the regulation. The actions themselves are evaluated to find out whether or not they’re proper or mistaken based mostly on the legal guidelines, insurance policies, and laws. Due to this fact, the proposition that the 10,000 responsible folks needs to be let free whereas jailing one harmless man is mistaken.

References
Clair, M., & Winter, A. S. (2016). How judges take into consideration racial disparities: Situational choice‐making in the criminal justice system. Criminology, 54(2), 332-359.
Gao, Y., & Tang, S. (2013). Psychopathic persona and utilitarian ethical judgment in faculty college students. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(5), 342-349.
Lee, Y. (2010). Deontology, political morality, and the state. Ohio St. J. Crim. L., eight, 385.

Order | Check Discount

Tags: Decision making in criminal justice