Posted: July 26th, 2022

Criteria EBP Final Paper (Draft CSP)

Criteria EBP Final Paper (Draft CSP)

READ CAREFULLY!!!

Move or Fail

All starred standards have to be passable. Most passable rating: 23. Minimal passable rating for “cross”: 17. If a “fail” grade, the scholar should meet revise and resubmit inside 48-hours.

Please add a phrase doc (not a pdf) of your remaining paper (draft CSP introduction and literature evaluate) right here. Your paper will mechanically be routed to the plagiarism software program: Turnitin. The similarity index have to be 25% or much less. Do NOT use direct quotes as this may considerably enhance your similarity index. Revise and resubmit as wanted however the remaining paper have to be submitted by the due date.

Title Web page*

Have to be passable.
In APA format.
Embody a:
Operating head,
Web page quantity could or might not be included on first web page,
Use graduate college format for the title web page

Description of the Downside

Begin with background data: set the stage for why this can be a drawback, then embrace the issue assertion

Significance of the Downside

Describe why this can be a drawback.

Goal of the Undertaking*

Have to be passable.
States the aim of the mission.

EBP Framework or Mannequin Recognized*
Have to be passable. Identifies the EBP framework or mannequin for use.
EBP Framework : John Hopkins mannequin (Want to explain HOW the mannequin is guiding the mission.)

AIM(s)*
Have to be passable. States the goal(s).

End result Measures*
Have to be passable. States major and secondary final result measures (if any secondary final result measures)

Examine Question Assignment(s)*
Have to be passable. States the examine Question Assignment (in PICOT format).

Search Engines*

Have to be passable. States the various search engines used.

Key Search Phrases*

Have to be passable. States the preliminary key search phrases and phrases used (together with Boolean operators).

Variety of Preliminary Publications

States the variety of publications initially retrieved.

Inclusion Criteria*

Have to be passable. States the inclusion standards to refine the search (not inclusion standards for the examine).

Exclusion Criteria*

Have to be passable. Must cite the exclusion standards for the refined search (not for exclusion standards for the examine).

Variety of Publications After Refined Search

States variety of publications retrieved after a refined search.

Different Search Strategies (if indicated)

States different search strategies if used (e.g., ancestory method).

Final Variety of Publications Chosen for Evaluate*

Have to be passable. States remaining variety of publications chosen for the literature evaluate.

Key Ideas, Themes, Similarities, Variations, Strengths, and Weaknesses*

Have to be passable. States key ideas, themes, similarities, variations, strengths and weaknesses. Not an annotated bibliography.

EBP Framework or Mannequin Defined

Defined how the EBP framework guides the mission.
John Hopkins mannequin (Want to explain HOW the mannequin is guiding the mission.)

Abstract of the Evaluate
Highlighted what is understood about the issue, recognized any gaps within the literature, and reiterated the EBP framework used to information the mission.

References*

Have to be passable. Minimal of 10 references. In APA format.

Common Paper Formatting

Not more than three errors for a passable rating

In-Textual content Quotation
Not more than three errors for a passable rating

Reference Record Quotation
Not more than three errors for a passable rating

Move or Fail

All starred standards have to be passable. Most passable rating: 23. Minimal passable rating for “cross”: 17. If a “fail” grade, the scholar should meet revise and resubmit inside 48-hours.

CSP Undertaking Subject

Breaking cultural stigma related to despair amongst immigrant inhabitants residing in city Midwestern neighborhood.

Downside or Difficulty
Cultural stigma and discrimination are main points for psychological well being sufferers and households.

Goal of the Undertaking
To guage the influence of cultural stigma related to despair and psychological well being amongst African immigrant inhabitants and confirm the prevailing methods to handle the stigma to enhance psychological well being consciousness and care amongst African immigrant inhabitants residing in St Louis.

Total AIM
To Implement coaching program and training for African immigrant inhabitants, age 20 -65 years, by 60 % over 6 months

End result Measures

major final result measure: The variety of immigrants recognized with despair.

Secondary outcomes: Variety of immigrants with despair who attend the tutorial program and quantity who had been handled or referred for companies

Examine Question Assignment(s) (Three factors)
• PICO(T) format

Inside African immigrants aged 20-65 years residing in an city, midwestern neighborhood, what’s the influence of standardized screening and training for despair on their capacity to acquire remedy or sources to reduce the despair?

Final Paper (Draft Scientific Scholarship Undertaking [CSP] Introduction and Literature Evaluate)

Directions
See APA, seventh Ed. (2020) guide for every part required within the paper (sections are bolded and underlined).

Paper formatting must be as really useful within the APA guide (apart from the title web page).

Supply quotation must be in APA format and research revealed throughout the final five-years is really useful (older research are acceptable if they’re a basic reference, which means the publication is the primary or the inspiration for different publications on the identical subject).

Title Web page
See Graduate College advice for learn how to set the title web page for doctoral work

(Appendix A).

No summary wanted right now.
Introduction (2-Three pages)
[See APA (2020) p. 39 in the “format” section for how to start the introduction page.

Do NOT start this section with “Introduction” as the heading.]

• Description of the issue

o Begin with background data: set the stage for why this can be a drawback, then embrace the issue assertion

• Describe the importance of the issue
• Final paragraph of this part ought to embrace:
o Goal of the mission
o EBP framework or mannequin for use to information the examine
o Goal(s) of the mission
o End result measures of curiosity (major and secondary)
o Goals or examine Question Assignment(s)
Literature Evaluate (Needs to be a subheading, centered, 5-6 pages)
Observe: Establish themes from the publications in an effort to prepare the publications right into a logical format. Don’t use
subheadings for the themes, reasonably, introduce the brand new theme within the first sentence of the primary paragraph if you end up
switching themes. Additionally, watch out to not present an annotated bibliography (i.e., every paragraph describes just one
examine). Slightly, evaluating and contrasting publications on the identical theme contributes to a considerate evaluate of the
literature. A minimal of 10 publications must be on this evaluate draft.
• Describe the literature evaluate course of (introductory paragraph for this part)
o Engines like google used (not less than three engines)
o Key search phrases and phrases (together with Boolean operators)
o Variety of preliminary publications generated
o Refined search with inclusion and exclusion standards
o Variety of publications generated after refined search
o Every other search strategies (corresponding to an ancestry methodology) and variety of publications generated
o Final variety of publications chosen for this literature evaluate
• Present an in-depth Assessment of the present literature and evidence-based practices associated to the issue
o Key ideas, themes, similarities, variations, strengths, and weaknesses must be a part of the literature
evaluate
• Clarify the EBP framework or mannequin chosen to information this mission and why this was chosen (second to final
paragraph of this part)
• Summarize and synthesize the evaluate of literature (final paragraph)
o spotlight what is understood about the issue, determine any gaps within the literature, and reiterate the EBP
framework for use to information the mission
2
Appendix A
Dissertation Pattern Title Web page
Data in YELLOW is required, information in BLUE is optionally available, textual content in RED must be deleted from remaining doc.
Title of Dissertation
[Each significant word should be capitalized, titles in ALL CAPS will not be accepted]
Johnny A. Appleseed
M.Ed., Instructional Administration, College of Missouri-St. Louis, 2003
B.S. Human Improvement and Household Research, College of Missouri- Columbia, 1992
A Dissertation Submitted to The Graduate College on the College of Missouri-St. Louis
in partial success of the necessities for the diploma
Physician of Philosophy in Schooling with an emphasis in Counseling
Could/August/December
2019
Month and 12 months of commencement
Advisory Committee
Committee Chairperson, Ph.D.
Chairperson
Committee College Member 2, Ph.D.
Committee College Member Three, Ph.D.
Committee College Member four, Ph.D.
Copyright, Johnny A. Appleseed, 2004

Order | Check Discount

Tags: Criteria EBP Final Paper (Draft CSP)