Criminal justice agencies sometimes rely on private funds. These funds come from charitable giving, foundations, businesses, private individuals, and community groups. For example, some agencies may accept funds to offset the cost of mounted patrol units that would otherwise be the victim of budget cuts.
For this article review, you are required to locate an article in the CSU Online Library about a city, county, or state agency that accepted private funding. The article you review should be at least two pages in length. Explain the circumstances surrounding this article. Also, be sure to address these questions in your response.
Do you agree or disagree with accepting private funds for the agency and program in the article you chose? Why, or why not?
Describe how environmental factors may play a role in criminal justice agencies needing funding.
Were there any outside factors that played a role in the agency needing and accepting this funding?
Can you think of any other ways that funding could have been secured other than private funds? Did the agency attempt to secure any other sources of funding prior to accepting private funds?
Do you feel the organization donating funds has any influence on policy? Why, or why not?
Your response must be at least two pages in length and include at least one source. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying APA citations.
The CSU Writing Center has a tutorial with great tips for completing an article review. Click here to view the tutorial. The transcript for this resource can be found within the “Notes” tab to the right of the presentation.
The following resource(s) may help you with this assignment
The police’s policing duties are to protect both life and property owned by citizens by enforcing regulations and laws and patrolling premeditated regions. Others include conducting criminal investigations, maintaining traffic regulations, among other duties, as stated by statutes and the police act. However, this could be jeopardized by accepting funds in terms of donations from private entities. For purposes of this discussion, this essay will examine the policy and private funding of the New York Police Department.
According to the 2012 tax record of the United States of America, it has been stated that the New York Police Foundation receives funding from United Emirates of Arab, JP Morgan Chase, and Barclays Capital, among other undisclosed funding . The donations were intended to significantly boost the general fund to enhance criminal investigations around New York (Wood, 2017). The organization could have opted for grants and loans from government organizations or the government itself. However, it is a sad realization that none of these efforts were made, and the organization seems to be enjoying free donations, which would jeopardize its policy and duty.
I do not support the criminal justice systems accepting funds from private entities for several reasons. The first is it creates a notion of privatization of criminal justice systems and serving the wealthy or privileged members of the society instead of the public at large and upholding justice. The donors will influence the prosecution, and crimes would be prosecuted or not prosecuted to favor the donors’ interests.
Thus, the police are under the control of few individuals just because the money donated has been used to upgrade equipment or add a few coins to their paycheck since it is widely believed that the police donor gets adequate or rather satisfactory salaries to cater to all their needs. The latter will; force the police departments to act in a way that will not offend the frequent donors to continue receiving generous donations. The use of private funds in criminal prosecution by personal donations will unjustifiably affect public prosecutor implementation of their general discretion towards favoring persons who donate (Jain, 2017).
The public prosecuting attorney application of discretion in making a particular charging decision might, therefore, be defined as the authority to balance the communal welfares of following on a specific case in contradiction of the feasible expenses. Additionally, typically, the discretion of the prosecution incorporates the policy-making power of distribution of set assets according to the public interest valuation . Preference and Impact of Private fiscal influences on prosecutorial freedom of discretion should not be corrupting.
The dubious lure of institutional gain generated by private sponsoring would undoubtedly not persuade many DAs to deliberately contempt their public duty. Nonetheless, private funding could disserve the public interest even without creating a substantial threat of deliberate inappropriate conduct (Martin, 2018).
The prosecutor’s responsibility to serve the interests of “the public” usually involves the prosecutor to consider private interests since the public comprises private persons and parties contending needs and partialities. Furthermore, the office of the prosecution should create significant pressure to serve the individual interests of two publics in precise crime victims and police department
It is undoubtedly clear that aid from the public and private funding reduces the public treasury load. Conversely, the policy analysis needs to consider the public’s interest that definitely cannot be accessed in pecuniary terms. The judicial system and critics should organize a public interest in ensuring that government officers perform their obligations in an unbiased or neutral way.
Wood, S. E. (2017). Police body cameras and professional responsibility: Public records and private evidence. Preservation, Digital Technology & Culture, 46(1), 41.
Jain, E. (2017). Capitalizing on Criminal Justice. Duke LJ, 67, 1381.
Martin, D. (2018). The Duty to Appropriate: Why Congress Has a Constitutional Obligation to Fund Criminal Law Enforcement. Calif. L. Rev., 106, 511.