Posted: May 11th, 2022

NR449 Evidence Based Practice: : Analyzing Published Research

NR449 Proof Based totally Observe
Required Uniform Activity: Analyzing Printed Assessment
Goal
The intention of this paper is to interpret the two articles acknowledged as most crucial to the group topic.
COURSE OUTCOMES
This mission permits the scholar to meet the subsequent course outcomes:
CO 2: Apply Assessment concepts to the interpretation of the content material materials of revealed Assessment analysis. (POs #4
and #eight)
CO 4: Think about revealed nursing Assessment for credibility and medical significance related to evidence- based
apply. (POs #4 and #eight)
DUE DATE
Search recommendation from the course calendar for due date knowledge. The college’s Late Activity protection applies to this
train.
TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 200 POINTS REQUIREMENTS
The paper will embody the subsequent.
1. Medical question
a. Description of disadvantage
b. Significance of disadvantage
c. Goal of paper
2. Description of findings
a. Summarize fundamentals inside the Matrix Desk as current in Activity Paperwork in e-College.
b. Describe
i. Concepts
ii. Methods used
iii. People
iv. Gadgets along with reliability and validity
v. Reply to “Goal” question vi. Decide subsequent step for group
three. Conclusion of paper
4. Format
a. Applicable grammar and spelling
b. Use of headings for each half
NR449 Proof Based totally Observe
c. Use of APA format (sixth model)
d. Internet web page dimension: three pages
PREPARING THE PAPER
1. Please remember to do not duplicate articles inside your group.
2. Paper should embody a title internet web page and a reference internet web page.
DIRECTIONS AND ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA
Activity
Requirements
Elements % Description
Medical Question 30
15%
1. Disadvantage is described: What is the focus of your group’s work?
2. Significance of the problem is described: What effectively being outcomes consequence
out of your disadvantage? Or what statistics doc this could be a disadvantage? You
may uncover Helpance on web pages for presidency or expert
organizations.
three. Goal of your paper: What is going on to your paper do or describe? “The intention
of this paper is to . . .”
**Please discover that although most of these questions are the similar as
you addressed in paper 1, the intention of this paper is totally totally different. You
can use your work from paper 1 for devices 1 and a pair of above, along with
any suggestions for enchancment supplied as strategies. Merchandise three above
should be specific to this paper.
Description of
Findings: Summary
60 30%
Summarize the basics of each article in a matrix desk that appears inside the
appendix.
Description of
Findings:
Description
60 30%
Describe inside the physique of the paper the subsequent.
• What concepts have been studied?
• What methods have been used?
• Who’re the people or members of the samples?
• What units have been used? Did the authors describe the
reliability and validity?
• How do you reply your distinctive “perform of this paper” question?
Do the findings of the articles current proof in your options? If
so, how? If not, what stays to be needed to have the flexibility to answer your
question?
• What’s required for the next step? Decide two questions which will
help data the group’s work.
Description of
Findings: Conclusion 20 10%
Conclusion: Analysis major findings in your paper in a summary paragraph.
Format 30 15%
1. Applicable grammar and spelling
2. Use headings for each half: Disadvantage, Synthesis of the Literature
(Concepts, Methods, People, Gadgets, Implications for Future
Work), Conclusion.
three. APA format (sixth ed.): Appendices adjust to references.
4. Paper dimension: Three pages
Complete 200 100%
NR449 RUA Analyzing Printed Assessment.docx Revised 07/25/2016 2
NR449 Proof Based totally Observe
NR449 RUA Analyzing Printed Assessment.docx Revised 07/25/2016 4
GRADING RUBRIC
Activity
Requirements
Wonderful or Highest
Diploma of Effectivity

EVIDENCE MATRIX TABLE

Article
Reference Goal
Hypothesis
Research Question Variables
Neutral(I)
Dependent(D) Research Design Sample
Measurement and Alternative Information Assortment
Methods
Major Findings
1
(sample not an precise article) Smith, Lewis (2013),
What should I eat? A highlight for these dwelling with diabetes. Journal of Nursing Education, 1 (4) 111-112. How do tutorial Help groups affect dietary modifications in victims with diabetes? D-Dietary modifications
I-Education Qualitative N- 18
Consolation sample-selected from native Help group in Pittsburgh, PA Focus Groups Help and education improved compliance with dietary modifications.
1
2
three
4
5

Order | Check Discount

Tags: best nursing essay writing service, best nursing paper writing service, examples of nursing dissertation essay, medical essay writing service, nursing assignment writing service uk