Posted: April 20th, 2022

“1% Feminism” by Linda Burnham

“1% Feminism” by Linda Burnham
“1% Feminism” by Linda Burnham
Linda Burnham’s essay critiques Sheryl Sandberg’s lean-in feminism (consult with Sandberg’s TED Speak for a
abstract of the principle concepts of lean-in feminism) as a corporatist feminism for the privileged prime 1% of
ladies, and takes specific concern with Sandberg’s declare that lean-in feminism is a motion for all
ladies, no matter what sort of employment they’ve or their class place:
“1% feminism is all in regards to the glass ceiling, by no means in regards to the ground. It addresses the issues, anxieties
and prerogatives of the 1%, ladies who’re at or close to the highest ranges of their professions, the company
world or authorities. Sadly, blind to its personal restricted visual view, it tends to talk within the identify of
all ladies, universalizing that which is profoundly specific.”
Burnham describes lean-in feminism as a conservative “trickle-down” kind of feminism, which goals to
obtain broader gender fairness by way of the benevolence and empathy of ladies who make it to prime
management positions. The success of those ladies leaders will inevitably, in response to Sandberg, increase
alternatives for all ladies, even these in low-paid service sector jobs. Actually, ladies typically shared
comparable experiences of gender oppression and inequity and might empathize with one another’s struggles, however
Burnham will not be so positive that the pursuits of ladies on the prime of the financial ladder align with these of
ladies on the backside. As she states, “definitely we ought to think about whether or not ladies within the C-suites – the
CEO’s, CFO’s and COO’s – are those finest suited to craft coverage for these working the aisles at House
Depot.” As an example, if House Depot had a feminine CEO, does that imply that she is going to essentially make
working circumstances and compensation higher for the low-waged ladies employees at House Depot retail
shops? (Sandberg herself is the COO or Chief Working Officer of Fb.)
Burnham additionally calls lean-in feminism a “dream-crushing feminism.” She notes that Sandberg desires
ladies to dream large, however lean-in feminism basically asks ladies to adapt to the corporatist ethos of
getting forward as a substitute of envisioning bolder modifications like mandating paid parental go away insurance policies to ease
the childcare burdens of all working mother and father. “Each progressive social motion worthy of the identify,”
Burnham exhorts, “is finally a couple of liberatory venture that extends outward, past these most
affected by a selected type of inequity. It calls on every of us to mix with others and to commit our
higher, extra selfless, justice-loving selves to constructing a society that lifts up the total humanity of all who
have suffered discrimination, indignities, oppression, exploitation, abuse.” Decreasing the broad social
justice imaginative and prescient of feminism to ” tips about profession development will not be a solution to jump-start a motion, however
as a substitute cuts away at its coronary heart.”
“Feminism’s Tipping Level: Who Wins from Leaning In?” by Kate Losse
“Feminism’s Tipping Level: Who Wins from Leaning In?” by Kate Losse
Kate Losse, the writer of the article “Feminism’s Tipping Level: Who Wins from Leaning In?” used to work
at Fb, and her time there overlapped with Sheryl Sandberg, who continues to be Fb’s Chief
Working Officer (COO) to this present day. Ultimately, Losse climbed to the higher ranks of the Fb
company hierarchy the place she acquired to take a seat subsequent to Sandberg and Mark Zuckerberg (co-founder and CEO) at
the “privileged middle of Fb’s operations.” But, surprisingly, as a substitute of constant to reap the
substantial compensation and advantages of her excessive place at Fb, Losse determined to stop. As she
places it, “I made a decision to go away Fb as a result of I noticed forward of me, by Zuckerberg’s and Sandberg’s personal
fingers, an never-ending race of pure ambition, the place no sum of money or energy is sufficient and work is
eternally.”
Losse additionally recounts giant inequities in pay between female and male staff at Fb, which she
skilled herself whereas working there. On the time, Sandberg additionally labored there in a prime place, however did
not problem the wage inequities between women and men at her personal firm. In line with Sandberg
in her guide Lean In: Girls, Work, and the Will to Lead, “Extra feminine management will result in fairer
remedy for all ladies.” If we’re to take Sandberg at her phrase right here, then the gendered pay inequity
skilled by Losse and different ladies at Fb wouldn’t have even existed. The truth that
gendered pay inequities did certainly exist beneath Sandberg’s watch, in response to Losse, exhibits that Lean In
would fairly deal with altering ladies’s presumed inner obstacles to profession success than firms’
committing to extra equitable pay buildings for all staff. Actually, as a number one feminine govt
herself, Sandberg appears to be extra invested in instructing ladies easy methods to “lean in” and work even
tougher—which finally advantages their employers greater than enhancing the lot of ladies employees.
Losse does acknowledge that Sandberg’s Lean In “offers some useful recommendation for younger ladies in how
to observe her.” However she is definite that it’s not a feminist motion aimed toward attaining fairer remedy for
all ladies. In the end, as Losse concludes in regards to the guide, “as a handbook for navigating the office, it
teaches ladies extra about easy methods to serve their firms than it teaches firms about easy methods to be
fairer locations for ladies to work.”
“The ‘Girlboss’ and the Fantasy of Company Feminine Empowerment” by Amanda Mull
“The ‘Girlboss’ and the Fantasy of Company Feminine Empowerment” by Amanda Mull
In 2014 the time period “girlboss” was launched to the American public as a means of celebrating ladies in
management and administration positions and pushing again in opposition to derogatory labels of “bossiness” that
have been leveled at highly effective ladies. Males in positions of energy usually will not be denigrated for being
“bossy,” whereas ladies with energy over others are extra regularly criticized for performing like her male
counterparts. Nevertheless, because the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic and the protests in opposition to racism of the
previous yr, there was a backlash in opposition to the celebratory tradition of girlbosses and what Amanda Mull
calls the “fantasy of company feminine empowerment.” Excessive-profile feminine company leaders and
entrepreneurs–formerly a lot lauded for heading or beginning their very own companies–were more and more
being taken to activity for abuses of energy, together with racist discrimination in opposition to staff of shade. Some
of those feminine company leaders, most of whom have been white and college-educated, have been compelled to
step down and apologize for his or her abusive administration practices.
As Mull writes, the widespread struggling and large-scale social issues delivered to mild by the pandemic
hastened the tip of the girlboss period. “For most individuals, an equal-opportunity reckoning for these in energy
presents a glimmer of hope. America’s office issues don’t start and finish with the identities of these
atop company hierarchies—they’re embedded within the hierarchies themselves. Making ladies the brand new
males inside companies was by no means going to be sufficient to deal with systemic racism and sexism, the
erosion of labor rights, or the buildup of wealth in just some of the nation’s thousands and thousands of fingers—the
broad abuses of energy that afflict the each day lives of most individuals.”
QUESTIONS
1
DISCUSSION PROMPT 1: 1% Feminism – Linda Burnham
Linda Burnham’s essay critiques Sheryl Sandberg’s lean-in feminism (consult with Sandberg’s TED Speak for a
abstract of the principle concepts of lean-in feminism) as a corporatist feminism for the privileged prime 1% of
ladies, and takes specific concern with Sandberg’s declare that lean-in feminism is a motion for all
ladies, no matter what sort of employment they’ve or their class place:
“1% feminism is all in regards to the glass ceiling, by no means in regards to the ground. It addresses the issues, anxieties and
prerogatives of the 1%, ladies who’re at or close to the highest ranges of their professions, the company world
or authorities. Sadly, blind to its personal restricted visual view, it tends to talk within the identify of all
ladies, universalizing that which is profoundly specific.”
Burnham describes lean-in feminism as a conservative “trickle-down” kind of feminism, which goals to
obtain broader gender fairness by way of the benevolence and empathy of ladies who make it to prime
management positions. The success of those ladies leaders will inevitably, in response to Sandberg, increase
alternatives for all ladies, even these in low-paid service sector jobs. Actually, ladies typically shared
comparable experiences of gender oppression and inequity and might empathize with one another’s struggles, however
Burnham will not be so positive that the pursuits of ladies on the prime of the financial ladder align with these of
ladies on the backside. As she states, “definitely we ought to think about whether or not ladies within the C-suites – the
CEO’s, CFO’s and COO’s – are those finest suited to craft coverage for these working the aisles at House
Depot.” As an example, if House Depot had a feminine CEO, does that imply that she is going to essentially make
working circumstances and compensation higher for the low-waged ladies employees at House Depot retail
shops? (Sandberg herself is the COO or Chief Working Officer of Fb.)
Burnham additionally calls lean-in feminism a “dream-crushing feminism.” She notes that Sandberg desires
ladies to dream large, however lean-in feminism basically asks ladies to adapt to the corporatist ethos of
getting forward as a substitute of envisioning bolder modifications like mandating paid parental go away insurance policies to ease
the childcare burdens of all working mother and father. “Each progressive social motion worthy of the identify,”
Burnham exhorts, “is finally a couple of liberatory venture that extends outward, past these most
affected by a selected type of inequity. It calls on every of us to mix with others and to commit our
higher, extra selfless, justice-loving selves to constructing a society that lifts up the total humanity of all who
have suffered discrimination, indignities, oppression, exploitation, abuse.” Decreasing the broad social
justice imaginative and prescient of feminism to ” tips about profession development will not be a solution to jump-start a motion, however
as a substitute cuts away at its coronary heart.”
What are your ideas on Burnham’s critiques of Sandberg’s lean-in feminism?
2
DISCUSSION PROMPT 2: “Feminism’s Tipping Level: Who Wins from Leaning In?” – Kate
Losse
Kate Losse, the writer of the article “Feminism’s Tipping Level: Who Wins from Leaning In?” used to work
at Fb, and her time there overlapped with Sheryl Sandberg, who continues to be Fb’s Chief
Working Officer (COO) to this present day. Ultimately, Losse climbed to the higher ranks of the Fb
company hierarchy the place she acquired to take a seat subsequent to Sandberg and Mark Zuckerberg (co-founder and CEO) at
the “privileged middle of Fb’s operations.” But, surprisingly, as a substitute of constant to reap the
substantial compensation and advantages of her excessive place at Fb, Losse determined to stop. As she
places it, “I made a decision to go away Fb as a result of I noticed forward of me, by Zuckerberg’s and Sandberg’s personal
fingers, an never-ending race of pure ambition, the place no sum of money or energy is sufficient and work is
eternally.”
Losse additionally recounts giant inequities in pay between female and male staff at Fb, which she
skilled herself whereas working there. On the time, Sandberg additionally labored there in a prime place, however did
not problem the wage inequities between women and men at her personal firm. In line with Sandberg
in her guide Lean In: Girls, Work, and the Will to Lead, “Extra feminine management will result in fairer
remedy for all ladies.” If we’re to take Sandberg at her phrase right here, then the gendered pay inequity
skilled by Losse and different ladies at Fb wouldn’t have even existed. The truth that
gendered pay inequities did certainly exist beneath Sandberg’s watch, in response to Losse, exhibits that Lean In
would fairly deal with altering ladies’s presumed inner obstacles to profession success than firms’
committing to extra equitable pay buildings for all staff. Actually, as a number one feminine govt
herself, Sandberg appears to be extra invested in instructing ladies easy methods to “lean in” and work even
tougher—which finally advantages their employers greater than enhancing the lot of ladies employees.
Losse does acknowledge that Sandberg’s Lean In “offers some useful recommendation for younger ladies in how
to observe her.” However she is definite that it’s not a feminist motion aimed toward attaining fairer remedy for
all ladies. In the end, as Losse concludes in regards to the guide, “as a handbook for navigating the office, it
teaches ladies extra about easy methods to serve their firms than it teaches firms about easy methods to be
fairer locations for ladies to work.”
What do you consider Losse’s article and points it discusses?
three
The ‘Girlboss’ and the Fantasy of Company Feminine Empowerment” – Amanda Mull
COLLAPSE
In 2014 the time period “girlboss” was launched to the American public as a means of celebrating ladies in
management and administration positions and pushing again in opposition to derogatory labels of “bossiness” that
have been leveled at highly effective ladies. Males in positions of energy usually will not be denigrated for being
“bossy,” whereas ladies with energy over others are extra regularly criticized for performing like her male
counterparts.
Nevertheless, because the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic and the protests in opposition to racism of the previous yr,
there was a backlash in opposition to the celebratory tradition of girlbosses and what Amanda Mull calls the
“fantasy of company feminine empowerment.” Excessive-profile feminine company leaders and
entrepreneurs–formerly a lot lauded for heading or beginning their very own companies–were more and more
being taken to activity for abuses of energy, together with racist discrimination in opposition to staff of shade. Some
of those feminine company leaders, most of whom have been white and college-educated, have been compelled to
step down and apologize for his or her abusive administration practices.
As Mull writes, the widespread struggling and large-scale social issues delivered to mild by the pandemic
hastened the tip of the girlboss period. “For most individuals, an equal-opportunity reckoning for these in energy
presents a glimmer of hope. America’s office issues don’t start and finish with the identities of these
atop company hierarchies—they’re embedded within the hierarchies themselves. Making ladies the brand new
males inside companies was by no means going to be sufficient to deal with systemic racism and sexism, the
erosion of labor rights, or the buildup of wealth in just some of the nation’s thousands and thousands of fingers—the
broad abuses of energy that afflict the each day lives of most individuals.”
Do you agree with Mull that the demise of the girlboss period is a welcome one?

——

Linda Burnham’s “1 P.c Feminism”
Linda Burnham’s “1 P.c Feminism”

Critiques of Linda Burnham’s essays Sheryl Sandberg’s lean-in feminism (for an in depth rationalization, see Sandberg’s TED Speak).

abstract of key concepts in lean-in feminism) as a corporatist feminism for the privileged prime 1% of the inhabitants

ladies, and takes concern with Sandberg’s declare that lean-in feminism is a motion for everybody.

Girls, no matter their occupation or social standing:

“1% feminism is all in regards to the glass ceiling, by no means the ground.” It addresses the fears and anxieties.

and the prerogatives of the one %, ladies at or close to the highest of their professions, the company elite

Authorities or the world? Sadly, as a result of it’s oblivious to its personal restricted visual view, it tends to talk in

Order | Check Discount

Tags: Write my dissertation in a week, Write my dissertation Ireland, Write my dissertation literature review, Write my dissertation proposal, Write my essay 4 me