Posted: April 14th, 2022

Community Partner And Resources

Directions

Collaborate with group members, group liaisons, and/or members of well being care crew concerning your undertaking. Determine these group companions and accumulate data concerning the property and assets of your chosen group, and the way. Relate how they are going to be useful in implementing your undertaking. (These do not need to be massive organizations, however may be individuals instrumental to your undertaking.)

This project will embrace:

1. Introduction

2. Record at the least 2 Community Companions and a pair of group assets

three. Describe their roles in your undertaking.

four. Conclusion

Extra Directions:

· References (minimal of two references cited within the content material)

· Minimal of two pages (not together with title and reference web page)

· Your project needs to be typed right into a phrase doc and formatted in APA fashion. The project should embrace:

· A title web page and a reference web page

NSG323 Unit 5 Paper Rubric

NSG323 Unit 5 Paper Rubric

Standards

Rankings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeTopic

10 pts

Stage 5

Identifies a inventive, centered, and manageable matter clearly addressing vital factors.

9 pts

Stage four

Identifies a manageable matter that addresses vital factors.

eight pts

Stage three

Identifies a centered matter that addresses vital factors.

7 pts

Stage 2

Identifies a subject that whereas doable, is just too narrowly centered.

6 pts

Stage 1

Identifies a subject that’s far too basic and wide-ranging as to be doable.

zero pts

Stage zero

Doesn’t clearly establish a subject or identifies a subject that isn’t related to the project.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeExisting Information, Analysis, and/or Views

20 pts

Stage 5

Makes use of in-depth data from related sources representing a number of factors of views (three or extra) or analysis points (three or extra).

18 pts

Stage four

Describes in-depth data from related sources representing at the least two factors of view or analysis points.

16 pts

Stage three

Explains data from related sources representing at the least two factors of view or analysis points.

14 pts

Stage 2

Relates data from related and irrelevant sources. No clear perspective(s) of method(es) are recognized.

12 pts

Stage 1

Tells data from irrelevant sources representing a single perspective or doesn’t establish factors of view or approaches.

zero pts

Stage zero

Info is irrelevant to the subject. No clear perspective/approaches.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeContent

20 pts

Stage 5

Demonstrates the flexibility to assemble a transparent and insightful downside assertion/thesis assertion/matter assertion with proof of all related contextual components.

18 pts

Stage four

Demonstrates the flexibility to assemble an issue assertion, thesis assertion/matter assertion with proof of most related contextual components, and downside assertion is satisfactorily detailed.

16 pts

Stage three

Begins to reveal the flexibility to assemble an issue assertion/thesis assertion/matter assertion with proof of most related contextual components, however downside assertion is superficial.

14 pts

Stage 2

Demonstrates a restricted potential in figuring out an issue assertion/thesis assertion/matter assertion or associated contextual components.

12 pts

Stage 1

Demonstrates the flexibility to elucidate contextual components however doesn’t present an outlined assertion.

zero pts

Stage zero

There is no such thing as a proof of an outlined assertion.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeAnalysis

20 pts

Stage 5

Organizes and compares proof to disclose insightful patterns, variations, or similarities associated to focus.

18 pts

Stage four

Organizes and interprets proof to disclose patterns, variations, or similarities associated to focus.

16 pts

Stage three

Organizes and describes proof in line with patterns, variations, or similarities associated to focus.

14 pts

Stage 2

Organizes proof, however the group shouldn’t be efficient in revealing patterns, variations, or similarities.

12 pts

Stage 1

Describes proof, however it’s not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

zero pts

Stage zero

Lists proof, however it’s not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeConclusion

10 pts

Stage 5

Assembles a conclusion that could be a logical interpretation from findings.

9 pts

Stage four

Constructs a conclusion that’s logical from inquiry findings.

eight pts

Stage three

Identifies a conclusion particularly from and responds particularly to the findings.

7 pts

Stage 2

Produces a basic conclusion that, as a result of it’s so basic, additionally applies past the scope of the inquiry findings.

6 pts

Stage 1

States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from findings.

zero pts

Stage zero

States an illogical conclusion from findings.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeLimitations and Implications

5 pts

Stage 5

Insightfully discusses intimately related and supported limitations and implications.

four.5 pts

Stage four

Examines related and supported limitations and implications.

four pts

Stage three

Discusses related and supported limitations and implications.

three.5 pts

Stage 2

Presents related and supported limitations and implications.

three pts

Stage 1

Presents limitations and implications, however they’re unsupported.

zero pts

Stage zero

Presents limitations and implications, however they’re irrelevant.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeWriting

three pts

Stage 5

The paper displays a wonderful command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

2.7 pts

Stage four

The paper displays a superb command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the circulate of communication.

2.four pts

Stage three

The paper displays a fundamental command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impression the circulate of communication.

2.1 pts

Stage 2

The paper displays a restricted command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the circulate of communication.

1.eight pts

Stage 1

The paper displays little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that trigger the reader to cease and reread components of the writing to discern which means.

zero pts

Stage zero

The paper doesn’t reveal command of written English language conventions. The paper has a number of errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that trigger the reader issue discerning the which means.

three pts

This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeAPA

2 pts

Stage 5

The required APA parts are all included with appropriate formatting, together with in-text citations and references.

1.eight pts

Stage four

The required APA parts are all included with minor formatting errors, together with in-text citations and references.

1.6 pts

Stage three

The required APA parts are all included with a number of formatting errors, together with in-text citations and references.

1.four pts

Stage 2

The required APA parts are usually not all included and/or there are main formatting errors, together with in-text citations and references.

1.2 pts

Stage 1

A number of APA parts are lacking. The errors in formatting reveal restricted understanding of APA pointers, in-text-citations, and r

Order | Check Discount

Tags: best essay writing service, best nursing essay writing service, best nursing essay writing services, biology essay writing service, business essay writing service, Expert Nursing Assignment Help Online