Posted: March 16th, 2022

HS 4353 Grant Writing in Health Education Paper

HS 4353 Grant Writing in Health Education Paper
HS 4353 Grant Writing in Health Education Paper

HS 4353 Grant Writing in Health Education

Grant Proposal Guidelines & Rubric

Proposal Drafts (3 @ 25 points each) = 75 points

Final Grant Proposal = 100 points

Students will work in groups of four to write a mock grant proposal. The grant proposal represents the Health Studies capstone project in which students apply what they have learned about needs assessment, program planning and implementation, and program Assessment to write a grant proposal targeting a key health issue affecting a priority population. HS 4353 Grant Writing in Health Education

ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
Be a Positive Team Player!

I expect each student to function as a strong and collegial team player and complete a fair share of the workload. Act in such a way as you want your other group members to act with you. Failure to be a positive, contributing group member reflects a lack of professionalism and integrity and can result in a lower grade or removal from the group. If you encounter a problem with your group, notify me immediately. I prefer that you work out differences within the group. As a last resort, I am prepared to split a group that is not functioning effectively as long as it is not too far into the semester. I am also prepared to have someone work solo if the rest of the group agrees the person is not pulling their weight.

The Final Grant Proposal will reflect Draft corrections and include the following components:

Cover Page Include students’ names, date, course no. & title, & proposal title.
Table of Contents Prepare this page last, and list major sections.
Abstract Clearly and concisely summarize the total proposal, including total cost. The abstract should not exceed one double-spaced page.
Introduction Describe the applicant organization’s background/history and capacity to get the job done (e.g., qualifications and credibility).
Problem Statement/ Needs Assessment Document the health needs or problems that the proposed health education/promotion program will address. HS 4353 Grant Writing in Health Education
Program Goal & Objectives Clearly delineate the expected outcomes of the project in specific and measurable terms. Identify one primary goal and three SMART objectives (process, impact, and outcome).
Program Methods Describe the planned program activities (from start to finish). The program activities and strategies must link to the goal and objectives and include one strategy from the literature (correctly cited).
Program Assessment Present a realistic plan Assessment plan to assess program objectives. The Assessment plan must clearly connect to program objectives.
Sustainability Describe a realistic plan for continuing the program beyond the grant period. This plan should clearly reflect at least one strong community partnership that links with previous proposal sections.
Budget Clearly delineate the program costs, including costs covered by the funding source & those that the applicant organization or other parties will meet. If relevant, include income (e.g., participant fees). The total program budget should not exceed $25,000. (Appendices)
References Include a reference page with correct APA 7 formatting. All reference entries should align with citations within the proposal narrative.
Appendices Include all supplemental material to enhance the proposal (e.g., letters of support or commitment, project work plan, sample marketing materials, sample activity plans, staff résumés, Assessment instruments, budget, etc.). Refer to all appendices within the proposal narrative.
Formatting for Drafts and Final Grant Proposal

Writing matters! Review the writing tips in the text and APA 7 manual; also review Writing Tools within Canvas. All papers should reflect APA 7 format and clear writing (i.e., sound logic, organization, and flow; logical transitions; and no grammatical, punctuation, or spelling errors). If you plan to seek Helpance from the TWU Write Site or another writing resource, plan ahead so you have time to make necessary corrections before internal group deadlines and the final submission date. Academic honesty is required, so pay attention. I recommend that groups submit their papers through Turnitin as a self-check for plagiarism.

Formatting Guidelines (REQUIRED)

Use 12-point Times New Roman font and double spacing. Set margins at one inch on all sides (normal setting).
Number all pages (upper righthand corner); the title page is page no. 1.
Do not include a header as it is not required on student papers (APA 7). Retype the title of the paper at the top of the first page of the narrative (centered). On drafts, this will be the first page following the title page. On the Final Grant Proposal, the first page of the narrative will follow the Abstract.
Use a title page for each submitted paper – Student Names, Course No. & Title, Date, and Title of Proposal (e.g., Draft 1, Draft 2, Draft 3, Final Grant Proposal).
Use correct headings and subheadings to clearly delineate sections and sub-topics; see APA 7 manual for formatting guidelines.
The Final Grant Proposal should also include a Table of Contents and Abstract. (These pages are not included with the drafts.)
Include a reference page for every paper (including drafts). All in-text citations should align with the reference list; double-check your work.
Compile all references in alphabetical order for the reference page of the Final Grant Proposal.
Include all supporting material in the Appendices section (placed after References). Refer to each appendix in the narrative, and format all appendices in accordance with APA 7.
Submit the drafts and the Final Grant Proposal as Word documents, and name each file in accordance with instructions in the syllabus. HS 4353 Grant Writing in Health Education
Grant Proposal Drafts

There are supporting materials located in Canvas (including at least one student example). In addition, refer to the Grant Proposal Guideline & Rubric for more specific detail about the content of each section. Failure to include required components will result in point deduction. Stay with the page number guidelines as listed for each section. If you are slightly over the page limit, there will be no deduction; however, I want you to learn how to write efficiently with no extra “fluff.”

NOTE: Each group will make necessary corrections to each draft before submitting the Final Grant Proposal. Failure to make corrections will result in a point deduction on the final proposal.

ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

Draft 1 (25 pts)

Title Page (Draft 1)
Foundation – After the title page of Draft 1, include a page that provides a brief overview of the foundation your group believes is a good fit for your project. Include the name of the foundation, funding priority areas, and a URL to the foundation’s webpage that clearly depicts a logical connection with your grant proposal focus. Note: This page is not part of the Final Grant Proposal; it is additional information that only accompanies Draft 1.
Introduction (1-1.5 p.) – Start strong by providing background information about applicant organization and the capacity to get the job done. Include at least one community partnership that is a logical fit with your project focus. This partner should be located within the local community where your target population resides.
Problem Statement/Needs Assessment (2-2.5 p.) – Clearly present a need for the proposed program. Do not cut and paste from the HS 3053 Needs Assessment paper. This section should reflect a “new look” at the key health issue and how it affects the target population. Pay attention to the guidelines outlined in the Final Grant Proposal Rubric.
Reference Page (APA 7) – The in-text citations and reference list should align, so double-check.
Appendices (if relevant)
Group Member Contributions – This should be the last page of the paper. Provide a brief summary of the contributions each individual made to the paper. If a group member did not contribute or only contributed in a minor way, that member will not receive the same points as the other members who did more of the work. Therefore, it is in your best interest to do the work.
Draft 2 (25 pts)

Title Page (Draft 2)
Goal and Objectives (1 p.) – Identify one primary program goal along with three program objectives – one process, one impact, and one outcome objective. Write objectives in SMART This section should reflect correctly written objectives, so apply what you have learned about SMART objectives (see resources).
Program Methods (3 p.)– This section includes a clear description of program activities and strategies from start to finish. Include a project work plan, a description of key personnel & other resources, a description of logical and relevant program activities that will lead to the achievement of program objectives, and at least one activity or strategy supported in recent peer-reviewed literature (correctly cited in APA 7 format).
Reference Page (APA 7) – The in-text citations and reference list should align, so double-check.
Appendices (supporting material)
Group Member Contributions – This should be the last page of the paper. Provide a brief summary of the contributions each individual made to the paper. If a group member did not contribute or only contributed in a minor way, that member will not receive the same points as the other members who did more of the work. Therefore, it is in your best interest to do the work.
Draft 3 (25 pts)

Title Page (Draft 3)
Program Assessment (1 p.) – Develop an Assessment plan that clearly connects to the program goal and objectives. This section refers to specific instruments (e.g., questionnaires or surveys, interview questions) and a plan for reporting results. Instruments are to be placed in the appendix section.
Sustainability (1 p.) – The sustainability plan should be comprehensive and realistic, and reflect at one strong community partnership that links back to previous sections (Introduction and Methods).
Budget – Develop a realistic budget that logically connects to the other sections of the proposal. Address the budget in the narrative, and place it in the Appendices section. $25,000 000 Limit
Reference Page (APA 7) – The in-text citations and reference list should align, so double-check.
Appendices – all supporting material, such as work plan (or timeline), sample program flyer, sample program activity, Assessment instruments, etc.
Group Member Contributions: This should be the last page of the paper. Provide a brief summary of the contributions each individual made to the paper. If a group member did not contribute or only contributed in a minor way, that member will not receive the same points as the other members who did more of the work. Therefore, it is in your best interest to do the work.
Please post questions to the Q&A so everyone can read the exchange.

HS 4353 Final Grant Proposal Rubric – HS 4353 Grant Writing in Health Education
Total Possible Points = 100

Proposal Criteria
Composition

Total Points: 25

Excellent

Above Average

Average

Below Average

Logic, Flow, and Organization
(10 points )

Score:

The paper includes all of the required components (including front & back matter). The paper is logical & seamlessly flows from beginning to end. All sentences are clear, direct, and logical with sound transitions between paragraphs and sections. The proposal connects from beginning to end.

10-9

The paper includes all of the required components (including front & back matter). Most of the paper is logical and seamlessly flows from beginning to end. Transitions may need a little work, and some sentences may need clarification. The proposal mostly connects from beginning to end.

8

The paper may not include all of the required components (including front & back matter). Some of the paper is logical with adequate flow. Concepts and ideas need better connections, and some sentences need clarification. There is average connection from beginning to end.

7

The paper may not include all of the required components (including front & back matter). The paper reflects inadequate focus, logic, flow, and organization. The paper is disjointed and needs overall improvement.

6 & below

Clear Writing (e.g., spelling, punctuation, sentence structure, and word choice)

(10 points)

Score:

The paper, with no or few exceptions, reflects clear writing (e.g., correct spelling, punctuation, sentence structure, and word choice). HS 4353 Grant Writing in Health Education

10-9

Most of the paper reflects clear writing (e.g., correct spelling, punctuation, sentence structure, and word choice).

8

Some of the paper reflects clear writing (e.g, correct spelling, punctuation, sentence structure, and word choice).

7

There are too many writing errors (e.g., spelling, punctuation, sentence structure, and word choice).

6 & below

APA Format (7th ed.)

(5 points)

Score:

The paper, with no or few exceptions, reflects proper APA formatting. All in-text citations align with the reference list, and all in-text citations, reference list entries, and appendices are in correct APA format.

5

Most of the paper reflects proper APA formatting. All or most in-text citations align with the reference list, and most in-text citations, reference list entries, and appendices are in correct APA format.

4

Some of the paper reflects proper APA formatting. In-text citations may not align with the reference list, and some of the in-text citations, reference list entries, and appendices
may not be in correct APA format.

3

The paper is inadequate in terms of correct APA formatting. There are too many errors with regard to in-text citations, reference list entries, and appendices.

2 & below

Proposal Criteria
Content

Total Points: 75

Excellent

Above Average

Average

Below Average

Abstract

(5 points)

Score:

The abstract is well-written and represents an excellent executive summary of the grant proposal. Abstract does not exceed one page & clearly addresses all of the following:
1. introduction of the applicant (your organization)

2. the health problem or need you plan to address

3. target population affected by the problem

4. program objectives

5. brief summary of the methods

6. total program costs

5

The abstract is mostly well-written and represents an above-average executive summary of the grant proposal. Abstract does not exceed one page & addresses all of the following:
1. introduction of the applicant (your organization)

2. the health problem or need you plan to address

3. target population affected by the problem

4. program objectives

5. brief summary of the methods

6. total program costs

4

The abstract is somewhat clear and concise and is an average executive summary of the grant proposal. The abstract may exceed 1 page & may be missing at least 1 of the following:
1. introduction of the applicant (your organization)

2. the health problem or need you plan to address

3. target population affected by the problem

4. program objectives

5. brief summary of the methods

6. total program costs

3

The abstract is not clear and concise, nor does it represent a quality executive summary of the grant proposal. The abstract may exceed 1 page & is missing 2 or more of the following:
1. introduction of the applicant (your organization)

2. the health problem or need you plan to address

3. target population affected by the problem

4. program objectives

5. brief summary of the methods

6. total program costs

2 & below

Introduction

(10 points)

Score:

Introduction is clearly written & relevant and clearly establishes all of the following:
1. Concise and clear history/background of applicant organization (your organization)

2. Applicant organization’s mission & goals

3. Brief description of applicant’s relevant programs/activities

4. Applicant’s commitment to target population

5. One strong community partnership

6. Applicant organization’s capacity to get the job done

10

Introduction is mostly well written & relevant, and establishes all of the following:
1. Concise and clear history/background of applicant organization (your organization)

2. Applicant organization’s mission & goals

3. Brief description of applicant’s relevant programs/activities

4. Applicant’s commitment to target population

5. One strong community partnership

6. Applicant organization’s capacity to get the job done

9-8

Introduction is fairly well written & relevant. It is missing at least one of the following:
1. Concise and clear history/background of applicant organization (your organization)

2. Applicant organization’s mission & goals

3. Brief description of applicant’s relevant programs/activities

4. Applicant’s commitment to target population

5. One strong community partnership

6. Applicant organization’s capacity to get the job done

7

Introduction is below average & lacking relevance. It is missing two or more of the following:

1. Concise and clear history/background of applicant organization (your organization)

2. Applicant organization’s mission & goals

3.Brief description of applicant’s programs/activities

4. Applicant’s commitment to target population

5. One strong community partnership

6. Applicant agency’s capacity to get the job done

6 & below

Problem Statement/ Needs Assessment

(15 points)

Score:

Content is accurate, timely, & relevant, and clearly establishes a need for the proposed program. This section is well written and includes all of the following information with current and correct citations to support the information:

1. Current and relevant data supporting the health problem or need

2. Clear picture of the health problem/need at all three levels—national, state, & local

3. Description of the target population;

4. Clear picture regarding how the health issue affects the target population

5. Clear depiction of why the funder should care

15-14

For the most part, the content is accurate, timely, & relevant, and establishes a need for the proposed program. This section is mostly well written includes all of the following information with current and correct citations to support the information: HS 4353 Grant Writing in Health Education

1. Current and relevant data supporting the health problem or need

2. A clear context for the health problem/need (national, state, & local trends)

3. Description of the target population

4. Clear picture regarding how the health issue affects the target population

5. Clear depiction of why the funder should care

13-12

Content is somewhat accurate, timely, & relevant, and somewhat establishes a need for the proposed program. This section needs to be stronger, and writing or citations may need improvement. This section is missing one of the following components:

1. Current and relevant data supporting the health problem or need

2. A clear context for the health problem/need (national, state, & local trends)

3. Description of the target population

4. Clear picture regarding how the health issue affects the target population

5. Clear depiction of why the funder should care

11

Content and writing style need to be improved in order to establish a clear need for the proposed program. Citations need improvement. This section is missing two or more elements from the following:

1. Current and relevant data supporting the health problem or need

2. A clear context for the health problem/need (national, state, & local trends)

3. Description of the target population

4. Clear picture regarding how the health issue affects the target population

5. Clear depiction of why the funder should care

10 & below

Program Goal and SMART Objectives (Process, Impact, and Outcome)

(10 points)

Score:

Well written section that clearly addresses a primary goal and three SMART objectives (process, impact, & outcome) for the proposed program. All objectives reflect correct SMART format.

10-9

Mostly well written & clearly addresses a primary goal and three SMART objectives (process, impact, & outcome) for the proposed program. Objectives mostly reflect correct SMART format.

8

This section is average and somewhat addresses a primary goal and three SMART objectives (process, impact, & outcome) for the proposed program. At least one objective is missing or mislabeled, and two of the objectives may not reflect correct SMART format.

7

This section is below average & does not clearly address a primary goal and three SMART objectives (process, impact, & outcome) for the proposed program. Two or more objectives may be missing or mislabeled, and objectives do not reflect correct SMART format.

6 & below

Program Methods

(15 points)

Score:

The section is excellent and creative. Students clearly describe the proposed program from start to finish. All of the following components are included:
1. Personnel & other resources (internal/external)

2. Participant recruitment & program kickoff

3. Clear description of logical & relevant program strategies from start to finish

4. Clear description re. how community partner is involved

5. At least 1 strategy is linked to the literature (& properly cited)

6. Project work plan (or timeline) is addressed & placed in the appendices

15-14

The section is mostly well written & creative. Students clearly describe the program from start to finish but may need to write more clearly in a few places. All of the following components are included:
1. Personnel & other resources (internal/external)

2. Participant recruitment & program kickoff

3. Clear description of logical & relevant program strategies from start to finish

4. Clear description re. how community partner is involved

5. At least 1 strategy is linked to the literature (& properly cited)

6. Project work plan (or timeline) is addressed & placed in the appendices. HS 4353 Grant Writing in Health Education

13-12

The section is fairly well written & creative. The total program is not entirely clear, and at least one of the following components is missing:
1. Personnel & other resources (internal/external)

2. Participant recruitment & program kickoff

3. Clear description of logical & relevant program strategies from start to finish

4. Clear description re. how community partner is involved

5. At least 1 strategy is linked to the literature (& properly cited)

6. Project work plan (or timeline) is addressed & placed in the appendices

11

The section is below average. The program is not clear, and at least two of the following components are missing:
1. Personnel & other resources (internal/external)

2. Participant recruitment & program kickoff

3. Clear description of logical & relevant program strategies from start to finish

4. Clear description re. how community partner is involved

5. At least 1 strategy is linked to the literature (& properly cited)

6. Project work plan (or timeline) is addressed & placed in the appendices

10 & below

Program Assessment

(10 points)

Score:

Clear & realistic Assessment plan that includes all of the following:
1. Assessment process that aligns with the three program objectives and describes how each objective will be measured

3. Data collection methods, including instruments (appendices)

4. How instruments will be used (e.g., pre- and post-tests or baseline and end-of-program measurements)

5. Plan for reporting the results (including whom will receive the Assessment report

10-9

Mostly clear & realistic Assessment plan that includes all of the following:
1. Assessment process that aligns with the three program objectives and describes how each objective will be measured

3. Data collection methods, including instruments (appendices)

4. How instruments will be used (e.g., pre- and post-tests or baseline and end-of-program measurements)

5. Plan for reporting the results (including whom will receive the Assessment report)

8

Average Assessment plan that is missing at least one of the following:
1 Assessment process that aligns with the three program objectives and describes how each objective will be measured

3. Data collection methods, including instruments to be used

4. How instruments will be used (e.g., pre- and post-tests or baseline and end-of-program measurements)

5. Plan for reporting the results (including whom will receive the Assessment report)

7

Poor Assessment plan that is missing two or more of the following:
1. Assessment process that aligns with the three program objectives and describes how each objective will be measured

3. Data collection methods, including instruments to be used

4. How instruments will be used (e.g., pre- and post-tests or baseline and end-of-program measurements)

5. Plan for reporting the results (including whom will receive the Assessment report)

6 & below

Sustainability ­­
(5 points )

Score:

Section presents a realistic plan for sustainability of the program once the grant period ends. Includes at least one strong community partnership that links to previous proposal sections (Introduction and Methods).

5

Section mostly presents a realistic plan for sustainability of the program once the grant period ends. Includes at least one strong community partnership that links to previous proposal sections (Introduction and Methods).

4

Section presents an average plan for sustainability of the program once the grant period ends. May not include at least one strong community partnership that links to previous proposal sections (e.g., Introduction), or community partner is not a good fit.

3

Section does not present a comprehensive & realistic plan for sustainability of the program once the grant period ends. Community partnership is missing, doesn’t align with other sections, or otherwise is not a good fit.

2 & below

Budget

(5 points)

Score:

Proposal includes a realistic budget that clearly connects to the previous sections. All expenses, donations, and income (if relevant) are noted. Budget does not exceed $25,000.
Budget is addressed in the narrative and placed in Appendices.

5

Proposal includes mostly a realistic budget that mostly connects to the narrative. All expenses, donations, and income (if relevant) are noted. Budget does not exceed $25,000. Budget is addressed in the narrative and placed in Appendices. HS 4353 Grant Writing in Health Education

4

Proposal includes a budget, but a few parts of the budget are inadequate or unrealistic. There may be at least one part of the budget that is missing and/or does not connect with the narrative. Budget may exceed $25,000. Budget may not be addressed in the narrative and placed in Appendices.

3

Budget is inadequate or unrealistic. Parts of the budget are missing and/or do not connect with the narrative. Budget may exceed $25,000. Budget may not be addressed in the narrative and placed in Appendices.

2 & below

ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

Total Score =

Order | Check Discount

Tags: buy psychology essay, nursing assignment writing service uk, nursing essay writing, Nursing Essay Writing Service, nursing essay writing service uk