Posted: March 5th, 2022

Art History

AR300 Art History

Instructions: Be sure you make an digital copy of your reply earlier than submitting it to Ashworth School for grading. Except in any other case acknowledged, reply in full sentences, and make sure to use appropriate English spelling and grammar. Sources have to be cited in APA format. Your response needs to be 4 (Four) pages in size; discuss with the “Task Format” web page for particular format necessities.

Half A Briefly outline artwork historical past as a tutorial discipline based mostly in your understanding of the readings within the textbook Introduction. Subsequent, talk about two of the pure and human threats to artworks that concern modern artwork historians. Present particular examples of threats, the artworks concerned, and the way these threats have an effect on the interpretation of the works by artwork historians. Your dialogue needs to be based mostly on the knowledge within the textbook Introduction and all through the textbook and lecture readings of the primary 4 (Four) classes.

Half B Clarify the development of megalithic structure and dome constructing, tracing its historical past from pre-historic artwork to the Renaissance. Start your dialogue describing the architectural improvements of the tomb in Newgrange, Eire and join these improvements with subsequent examples of the tholos tombs in Greece, to the Pantheon in Rome and conclude with the Florence Cathedral. Your dialogue ought to embody a definition of phrases you employ as outlined within the textbook readings and reveal an understanding of the connections these buildings have in frequent.

Works of structure to incorporate in your Half B dialogue:

1. Tomb, Newgrange, Eire. c. 3000-2500 BCE. Situated on web page 29 within the textbook.

2. Inside of tholos tomb, Mycenae, Greece. c. 1300-1200 BCE. Situated on web page 100 within the textbook.

Three. Pantheon, Rome. 110-128 CE. Situated on web page 148 and 149 within the textbook.

Four. Filippo Brunelleschi, Dome of Florence Cathedral. 1420-1436 CE. Situated on web page 307 of the textbook.

Grading Rubric

Please discuss with the rubric on the subsequent web page for the grading standards for this project.

CATEGORYExemplarySatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryUnacceptable

25 Factors20 Factors15 Factors10 Factors

Pupil offers a transparent,

logical definition of artwork

historical past and identifies

two or extra pure and

human threats to

artworks, offers

paintings examples and

the implications of those

threats to artwork historians.

Pupil offers a

largely clear, logical

definition of artwork historical past

and identifies two

pure and human

threats to artworks,

offers paintings

examples and the

implications of those

threats to artwork historians,

although could not absolutely

develop all ideas.

Pupil offers a

weak or unclear

definition of artwork historical past

and/or identifies solely

one pure and human

menace to artworks,

overlooks paintings

examples and/or the

implications of those

threats to artwork historians,

thus doesn’t embody

full growth

of all ideas.

Pupil offers a

poor dialogue or no

inclusion of any of

these components of the

project: defintion

of artwork historical past;

dialogue of the

human threats to

artworks; offers no

examples of artworks;

or the implications of

the threats to artwork

historians.

25 Factors20 Factors15 Factors10 Factors

Pupil offers a transparent

and logical dialogue of

the 2 tomb

architectural artworks

together with a definition of

phrases as discovered within the

textbook and

demonstrates an

glorious understanding

of the architectural

improvements mentioned by

the scholar.

Pupil offers a

largely clear and logical

dialogue of the 2

tomb architectural

artworks together with a

definition of phrases as

discovered within the textbook.

Pupil demonstrates

some understanding of

the architectural

improvements described

and outlined, however does

not absolutely develop all

ideas of the

improvements.

Pupil offers a

weak or unclear

understanding of the

architectural

improvements resulting in

the creation of the

dome as mentioned in

the textbook referring to

the 2 tomb artworks.

Pupil demonstrates

some understanding,

however total doesn’t

present proof of a

good understanding of

the ideas of the

improvements.

Pupil offers a

poor dialogue of the

architectural

improvements of the 2

artworks. This will likely

embody not defining

the phrases or

demonstrating a poor

understanding of the

phrases and architectural

improvements resulting in

the creation of the

dome.

25 Factors20 Factors15 Factors10 Factors

Pupil offers a transparent

and logical dialogue of

the 2 dome artworks

together with a definition of

phrases as discovered within the

textbook and

demonstrates an

glorious understanding

of the architectural

improvements mentioned by

the scholar.

Pupil offers a

largely clear and logical

dialogue of the 2

dome artworks together with

a definition of phrases as

discovered within the textbook.

Pupil demonstrates

some understanding of

the architectural

improvements described

and outlined, however does

not absolutely develop all

ideas of the

improvements.

Pupil offers a

weak or unclear

understanding of the

architectural

improvements of the

dome as mentioned in

the textbook referring to

the 2 dome artworks.

Pupil demonstrates

some understanding,

however total doesn’t

present proof of a

good understanding of

the ideas of the

improvements.

Pupil offers a

poor dialogue of the

architectural

improvements of the 2

dome artworks. This

could embody not

defining the phrases or

demonstrating a poor

understanding of the

phrases and architectural

improvements of the

dome.

10 factors eight factors 5 factors 2 factors

Pupil doesn’t make

any errors in grammar or

spelling, particularly these

that distract the reader

from the content material.

Pupil makes 1-2 errors

in grammar or spelling

that distract the reader

from the content material.

Pupil makes Three-Four

errors in grammar or

spelling that distract the

reader from the

content material.

Pupil makes extra

than Four errors in

grammar or spelling

that distract the reader

from the content material.

15 factors 12 factors eight factors 5 factors

The paper is written in

correct APA and

organizational format.

Pupil makes use of the

textbook and/or lecture

notes as sources. All

quotes and info are cited

appropriately. Wonderful

group, together with a

number of considerate

transitions.

The paper is written in

correct format with solely

1-2 errors. Pupil makes use of

the textbook and/or

lecture notes as

sources. All quotes

and info are cited

appropriately. Sufficient

group features a

number of acceptable

transitions.

The paper is written in

correct format with solely

Three-5 errors. Exterior

sources are used for

quotes and info and are

credible and cited

appropriately. Essay is poorly

organized, however could

embody a number of efficient

transitions.

The paper will not be

written in correct

format. Many sources

used for quotes and

info are lower than

credible (suspect)

and/or usually are not cited

appropriately. Essay is

disorganized and does

not embody efficient

transitions.

Format – APA

Format,

Citations,

Group,

Transitions (15

Factors)

Half A (25

Factors): Analyzes

artwork historical past as an

tutorial

self-discipline and

pure and

human threats to

artworks

Half B (25

Factors): Outline

and summarize

the architectural

improvements that

result in the

creation of the

dome within the

Newgrange

tombs and tholos

tombs.

Half B (25

Factors): Outline

and summarize

the architectural

improvements

particular to the

dome as seen in

the Pantheon in

Rome and the

Florence

Cathedral.

Mechanics (10

Factors)

Order | Check Discount

Tags: ace homework tutors, ace my homework, coca cola company analysis essay, Coca Cola Essay Example, Coca Cola Marketing Concepts, Coca Cola Topic Ideas to Write about & Essay Samples