Posted: March 2nd, 2022

Sess01

1. 21 yr previous Filipino school scholar dwelling in a dorm eager to know what contraception is

• How would your communication and interview methods for constructing a well being historical past differ with every affected person?
• How may you goal your questions for constructing a well being historical past based mostly on the affected person’s social determinants of well being?

• What threat Assessment devices can be acceptable to make use of with every affected person, or what questions would you ask every affected person to evaluate his or her well being dangers?

• Establish any potential health-related dangers based mostly upon the affected person’s age, gender, ethnicity, or environmental setting that must be considered.

• Choose one of many threat Assessment devices introduced in Chapter 1 or Chapter 5 of the Seidel’s Information to Bodily Examination textual content, or one other software with which you’re acquainted, associated to your chosen affected person.

• Develop at the very least 5 focused questions you’d ask your chosen affected person to evaluate his or her well being dangers and start constructing a well being historical past.

Rubric:
45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
“Solutions all components of the Dialogue Question Assignment(s) with reflective vital Assessment and synthesis of information gained from the course readings for the module and present credible sources. Supported by at the very least three present, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and totally adheres to present APA guide writing guidelines and elegance. 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
“Responds to the Dialogue Question Assignment(s) and is reflective with vital Assessment and synthesis of information gained from the course readings for the module. At the least 75% of submit has distinctive depth and breadth. Supported by at the very least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and totally adheres to present APA guide writing guidelines and elegance. 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
“Responds to a few of the Dialogue Question Assignment(s). One or two standards are usually not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is considerably missing reflection and significant Assessment and synthesis. Considerably represents data gained from the course readings for the module. Submit is cited with two credible sources. Written considerably concisely; might include greater than two spelling or grammatical errors. Comprises some APA formatting errors. zero (zero%) – 34 (34%)
“Doesn’t reply to the Dialogue Question Assignment(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses standards. Lacks reflection and significant Assessment and synthesis. Doesn’t characterize data gained from the course readings for the module. Comprises just one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Comprises greater than two spelling or grammatical errors. Doesn’t adhere to present APA guide writing guidelines and elegance.
Important Submit: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts major submit by Day three. zero (zero%) – zero (zero%)
N/A zero (zero%) – zero (zero%)
N/A zero (zero%) – zero (zero%)
Doesn’t submit major submit by Day three.
First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
“Response displays synthesis, vital considering, and utility to follow settings. Gives clear, concise opinions and concepts which can be supported by at the very least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Studying Targets. Communication is skilled and respectful to colleagues. Responses to college questions are totally answered, if posed. Response is successfully written in commonplace, edited English. 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
“Response displays vital considering and utility to follow settings. Communication is skilled and respectful to colleagues. Responses to college questions are answered, if posed. Gives clear, concise opinions and concepts which can be supported by two or extra credible sources. Response is successfully written in commonplace, edited English. 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
“Response is on subject and will have some depth. Responses posted within the Dialogue might lack efficient skilled communication. Responses to college questions are considerably answered, if posed. Response might lack clear, concise opinions and concepts, and some or no credible sources are cited. zero (zero%) – 12 (12%)
“Response is probably not on subject and lacks depth. Responses posted within the Dialogue lack efficient skilled communication. Responses to college questions are lacking. No credible sources are cited.
Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
“Response displays synthesis, vital considering, and utility to follow settings. Gives clear, concise opinions and concepts which can be supported by at the very least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Studying Targets. Communication is skilled and respectful to colleagues. Responses to college questions are totally answered, if posed. Response is successfully written in commonplace, edited English. 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
“Response displays vital considering and utility to follow settings. Communication is skilled and respectful to colleagues. Responses to college questions are answered, if posed. Gives clear, concise opinions and concepts which can be supported by two or extra credible sources. Response is successfully written in commonplace, edited English. 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
“Response is on subject and will have some depth. Responses posted within the Dialogue might lack efficient skilled communication. Responses to college questions are considerably answered, if posed. Response might lack clear, concise opinions and concepts, and some or no credible sources are cited. zero (zero%) – 11 (11%)
“Response is probably not on subject and lacks depth. Responses posted within the Dialogue lack efficient skilled communication. Responses to college questions are lacking. No credible sources are cited.
Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets necessities for participation by posting on three completely different days. zero (zero%) – zero (zero%)
N/A zero (zero%) – zero (zero%)
N/A zero (zero%) – zero (zero%)
Doesn’t meet necessities for participation by posting on three completely different days.
Complete Factors: 100
Identify: NURS_6512_Week_1_Discussion_Rubric

3APA References

Order | Check Discount

Tags: 2803NRS, ACC 502 GCU, ACCCN, ACCT 553 DeVry, ACCT20071