Graduate Essay Writers
Only the most qualified writers are selected to be a part of our research and editorial team, with each possessing specialized knowledge in specific subjects and a background in academic writing.
Get Similar Asssignment Answers & Custom Paper Writing Services
To hire a writer, fill the order form with details from your nursing assessment task brief.
Posted: March 2nd, 2022
Response to the Assignment help – Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis
Main Posting:
Response to the Assignment help – Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the Assignment help – Discussion question(s)
Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources
No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
Supported by at least three current credible sources 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the Assignment help – Discussion question(s)
Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module
50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth
Supported by at least three credible references 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the Assignment help – Discussion question(s)
One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module
Post is supported by fewer than two credible references 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the Assignment help – Discussion question(s)
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module
Contains only one or no credible references
Main Posting:
Writing 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors
Adheres to current Help write my thesis – APA manual writing rules and style 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely
May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors
Adheres to current Help write my thesis – APA manual writing rules and style with minor errors 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Written somewhat concisely
May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors
Contains some Help write my thesis – APA formatting errors 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Not written clearly or concisely
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors
Does not adhere to current Help write my thesis – APA manual writing rules and style
Main Posting:
Timely and full participation 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation
Posts main Assignment help – Discussion by due date 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Posts main Assignment help – Discussion by due date
Meets requirements for full participation 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Posts main Assignment help – Discussion by due date 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation
Does not post main Assignment help – Discussion by due date
First Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
Responds to questions posed by faculty
The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth. 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.
First Response:
Writing 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.
Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources
Response is written in standard, edited English. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posted in the Assignment help – Discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Few or no credible sources are cited. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted in the Assignment help – Discussion lack effective communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.
First Response:
Timely and full participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation
Posts by due date 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation
Posts by due date
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation
Does not post by due date
Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Responds to questions posed by faculty
The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth. 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.
Second Response:
Writing 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.
Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources
Response is written in standard, edited English. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in the Assignment help – Discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Few or no credible sources are cited. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted in the Assignment help – Discussion lack effective communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.
Second Response:
Timely and full participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation
Posts by due date 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation
Posts by due date 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation
Does not post by due date
Total Points: 100
Symptom Media. (2014). Mental status exam B-6. [Video]. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://video.alexanderstreet.com/watch/mental-status-exam-b-6/cite?context=channel:volume-2-new-releases-assessment-tools-mental-status-exam-series
Western Australian Clinical Training Network. (2016, August 4). Simulation scenario-adolescent risk assessment [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNF1FIKHKEU
YMH Boston. (2013, May 22). Vignette 5 – Assessing for depression in a mental health appointment [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gm3FLGxb2ZU
Recommended Reading (click to expand/reduce)
Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2015). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
To Prepare
Review the Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide on comprehensive, integrated psychiatric assessment. Watch the Mental Status Examination B-6 and Simulation Scenario-Adolescent Risk Assessment videos.
Watch the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video and take notes; you will use this video as the basis for your Assignment help – Discussion post.
Based on the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video, post answers to the following questions:
What did the practitioner do well? In what areas can the practitioner improve?
At this point in the clinical interview, do you have any compelling concerns? If so, what are they?
What would be your next question, and why?
Then, address the following. Your answers to these prompts do not have to be tailored to the patient in the YMH Boston video.
Explain why a thorough psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent is important.
Describe two different symptom rating scales that would be appropriate to use during the psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent.
Describe two psychiatric treatment options for children and adolescents that may not be used when treating adults.
Explain the role parents/guardians play in assessment.
Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.
Why Seek Our Custom Writing Services
Every Student Wants Quality and That’s What We Deliver
Affordable Prices
Our prices strike the perfect balance between affordability and quality. We offer student-friendly rates that are competitive within the industry, without compromising on our high writing service standards.
100% Plagiarism-Free
No AI/chatgpt use. We write all our papers from scratch thus 0% similarity index. We scan every final draft before submitting it to a customer.
How it works
When you decide to place an order with Nursing Study Bay, here is what happens:
For Similar Answers, Custom Essay Writing & Assignment Help Services
Find an expert by filling an order form for your nursing paper. We write AI-plagiarism free essays and case study analysis. Anytime!