Graduate Essay Writers
Only the most qualified writers are selected to be a part of our research and editorial team, with each possessing specialized knowledge in specific subjects and a background in academic writing.
Order For Custom Writing, Similar Answers & Assignment Help Services
Fill the order form details in 3 easy steps - paper's instructions guide.
Posted: March 2nd, 2022
Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis
Predominant Posting:
Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis consultant of information gained from the course readings for the module and present credible sources. 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Completely responds to the Discussion question(s)
Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis consultant of information gained from the course readings for the module and present credible sources
A minimum of 75% of submit has distinctive depth and breadth
Supported by at the least three present credible sources 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the Discussion question(s)
Is considerably reflective with critical analysis and synthesis consultant of information gained from the course readings for the module
50% of the submit has distinctive depth and breadth
Supported by at the least three credible references 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to a few of the Discussion question(s)
One to two standards should not addressed or are superficially addressed
Is considerably missing reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
Considerably represents data gained from the course readings for the module
Publish is supported by fewer than two credible references zero (zero%) – 30 (30%)
Doesn’t reply to the Discussion question(s)
Lacks depth or superficially addresses standards
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
Doesn’t symbolize data gained from the course readings for the module
Accommodates just one or no credible references
Predominant Posting:
Writing 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely
Accommodates no grammatical or spelling errors
Adheres to present APA guide writing guidelines and model 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely
Might include one to two grammatical or spelling errors
Adheres to present APA guide writing guidelines and model with minor errors four (four%) – four (four%)
Written considerably concisely
Might include greater than two spelling or grammatical errors
Accommodates some APA formatting errors zero (zero%) – three (three%)
Not written clearly or concisely
Accommodates greater than two spelling or grammatical errors
Doesn’t adhere to present APA guide writing guidelines and model
Predominant Posting:
Well timed and full participation 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Meets necessities for well timed, full, and lively participation
Posts foremost Discussion by due date eight (eight%) – eight (eight%)
Posts foremost Discussion by due date
Meets necessities for full participation 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Posts foremost Discussion by due date zero (zero%) – 6 (6%)
Doesn’t meet necessities for full participation
Doesn’t submit foremost Discussion by due date
First Response:
Publish to colleague’s foremost submit that is reflective and justified with credible sources 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response reveals critical pondering and software to follow settings
Responds to questions posed by school
The usage of scholarly sources to Help concepts demonstrates synthesis and understanding of studying aims. eight (eight%) – eight (eight%)
Response has some depth and might exhibit critical pondering or software to follow setting. 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on matter, might have some depth. zero (zero%) – 6 (6%)
Response is probably not on matter, lacks depth.
First Response:
Writing 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is skilled and respectful to colleagues.
Response to school questions are absolutely answered, if posed.
Gives clear, concise opinions and concepts which might be supported by two or extra credible sources
Response is successfully written in commonplace, edited English. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is principally skilled and respectful to colleagues.
Response to school questions are principally answered, if posed.
Gives opinions and concepts which might be supported by few credible sources
Response is written in commonplace, edited English. four (four%) – four (four%)
Response posted in the Discussion might lack efficient skilled communication.
Response to school questions are considerably answered, if posed.
Few or no credible sources are cited. zero (zero%) – three (three%)
Responses posted in the Discussion lack efficient communication.
Responses to school questions are lacking.
No credible sources are cited.
First Response:
Well timed and full participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets necessities for well timed, full, and lively participation
Posts by due date four (four%) – four (four%)
Meets necessities for full participation
Posts by due date
three (three%) – three (three%)
Posts by due date zero (zero%) – 2 (2%)
Doesn’t meet necessities for full participation
Doesn’t submit by due date
Second Response:
Publish to colleague’s foremost submit that is reflective and justified with credible sources 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response reveals critical pondering and software to follow settings.
Responds to questions posed by school
The usage of scholarly sources to Help concepts demonstrates synthesis and understanding of studying aims. eight (eight%) – eight (eight%)
Response has some depth and might exhibit critical pondering or software to follow setting. 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on matter, might have some depth. zero (zero%) – 6 (6%)
Response is probably not on matter, lacks depth.
Second Response:
Writing 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is skilled and respectful to colleagues.
Response to school questions are absolutely answered, if posed.
Gives clear, concise opinions and concepts which might be supported by two or extra credible sources
Response is successfully written in commonplace, edited English. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is principally skilled and respectful to colleagues.
Response to school questions are principally answered, if posed.
Gives opinions and concepts which might be supported by few credible sources
Response is written in commonplace, edited English. four (four%) – four (four%)
Response posed in the Discussion might lack efficient skilled communication.
Response to school questions are considerably answered, if posed.
Few or no credible sources are cited. zero (zero%) – three (three%)
Responses posted in the Discussion lack efficient communication.
Responses to school questions are lacking.
No credible sources are cited.
Second Response:
Well timed and full participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets necessities for well timed, full, and lively participation
Posts by due date four (four%) – four (four%)
Meets necessities for full participation
Posts by due date three (three%) – three (three%)
Posts by due date zero (zero%) – 2 (2%)
Doesn’t meet necessities for full participation
Doesn’t submit by due date
Complete Factors: 100
Symptom Media. (2014). Psychological standing examination B-6. [Video]. https://go.openathens.internet/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://video.alexanderstreet.com/watch/mental-status-exam-b-6/cite?context=channel:volume-2-new-releases-assessment-tools-mental-status-exam-series
Western Australian Scientific Coaching Community. (2016, August four). Simulation scenario-adolescent danger Assessment [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNF1FIKHKEU
YMH Boston. (2013, Might 22). Vignette 5 – Assessing for despair in a psychological well being appointment [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gm3FLGxb2ZU
Really helpful Studying (click on to increase/scale back)
Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2015). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
To Put together
Evaluate the Studying Assets and think about the insights they supply on complete, built-in psychiatric Assessment. Watch the Psychological Standing Examination B-6 and Simulation Situation-Adolescent Threat Assessment movies.
Watch the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video and take notes; you’ll use this video as the foundation to your Discussion submit.
Primarily based on the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video, submit solutions to the following questions:
What did the practitioner do nicely? In what areas can the practitioner enhance?
At this level in the scientific interview, do you’ve got any compelling issues? If that’s the case, what are they?
What could be your subsequent question, and why?
Then, tackle the following. Your solutions to these prompts would not have to be tailor-made to the affected person in the YMH Boston video.
Clarify why a radical psychiatric Assessment of a kid/adolescent is vital.
Describe two totally different symptom score scales that might be applicable to use throughout the psychiatric Assessment of a kid/adolescent.
Describe two psychiatric therapy choices for kids and adolescents that is probably not used when treating adults.
Clarify the function mother and father/guardians play in Assessment.
Help your response with at the least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources and clarify why every of your supporting sources is thought-about scholarly. Connect the PDFs of your sources.
Why Seek Our Custom Writing Services
Every Student Wants Quality and That’s What We Deliver
Affordable Prices
Our prices strike the perfect balance between affordability and quality. We offer student-friendly rates that are competitive within the industry, without compromising on our high writing service standards.
100% Plagiarism-Free
No AI/chatgpt use. We write all our papers from scratch thus 0% similarity index. We scan every final draft before submitting it to a customer.
How it works
When you decide to place an order with Nursing.StudyBay, here is what happens:
Expert paper writers are just a few clicks away
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.