Posted: March 2nd, 2022

© 2021 Post University, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

© 2021 Post College, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

CRJ402 – Comparative Legal Justice

Unit 7 Remaining Venture: Comparative Legal Justice

Due Dates:

• Half I – Written Report: 11:59 p.m. EST, Sunday of Unit 7 • Half II – Presentation: 11:59 p.m. EST, Wednesday of Unit Eight, with one response due by Friday

of Unit Eight. Whole Factors: 200 Situation Overview: Congratulations! Your experience in comparative legal justice has gotten you promoted to the Head of Public Relations for the Police Division! That is an thrilling time so that you can put your information to work and hit the bottom operating. You could have simply obtained an e-mail out of your boss with the main points of your first challenge:

Good morning! We’re thrilled to have you ever take the lead as Head of Public Relations. The primary challenge we’ve for you has two elements: The primary half is to finish a written report that gives a standardized comparability of the US in opposition to three different international locations in policing. The second half is to create a summed-up presentation of the data in your report on your new workers and colleagues. There’s extra details about what’s required beneath. Your written report shall be due on the finish of Unit 7, and your presentation shall be due by Wednesday of Unit Eight. Thanks, and sustain the superb work!

PART I: The Written Report Directions: In your written report, embrace the next parts:

• An introduction expressing the worth in understanding worldwide justice programs.

• Select three (three) international locations coated on this course and full a elementary Assessment and comparability of their legal justice programs.

© 2021 Post College, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

• Briefly talk about the historical past of every nation and the way it has influenced its legal justice system.

• Examine the roles of law enforcement officials in these international locations.

• Focus on crucial points that these international locations are confronting.

• Share your ideas on how the programs of those international locations evaluate to the legal justice programs of the US.

• A conclusion that expresses your remaining ideas on what you’ve got mentioned.

Necessities:

• Your paper needs to be a minimum of 5 (5) pages in size utilizing APA fashion formatting, with extra title and reference pages.

• Use a minimum of three (three) scholarly sources and embrace reference citations in appropriate APA formatting.

Be sure you learn the factors beneath by which your work shall be evaluated earlier than you write and once more after you write.

© 2021 Post College, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Analysis Rubric for PART I: The Written Report

CRITERIA Poor Wants Enchancment Proficient Exemplary

(Zero-Eight Factors) (9-11 Factors) (12-13 Factors) (14-15 Factors) Elementary Assessment and Comparability of three Legal Justice Methods

Part is minimally or not addressed.

Part is considerably addressed.

Part is pretty effectively addressed.

Part is completely addressed.

Roles of Police Officers Part is minimally or not addressed.

Part is considerably addressed.

Part is pretty effectively addressed.

Part is completely addressed.

Essential Points Part is minimally or not addressed.

Part is considerably addressed.

Part is pretty effectively addressed.

Part is completely addressed.

Comparability to the Legal Justice Methods of the US

Part is minimally or not addressed.

Part is considerably addressed.

Part is pretty effectively addressed.

Part is completely addressed.

(Zero-5 factors) (6-7 factors) (Eight factors) (9-10 factors) Temporary Historical past of Every Nation and its Affect

Part is minimally or not addressed.

Part is considerably addressed.

Part is pretty effectively addressed.

Part is completely addressed.

Introduction and Conclusion

Elements are minimally or not addressed.

Elements are considerably addressed.

Elements are pretty effectively addressed.

Elements are completely addressed.

Clear and Skilled Writing and APA Format

Important errors impede skilled presentation; APA pointers aren’t adopted.

Some errors in writing and/or APA formatting are starting to impede skilled presentation.

Few errors in writing and/or APA formatting that don’t impede skilled presentation.

Writing and format are clear, skilled, APA compliant, and error-free.

(Zero factors) (5 factors) Report Size Requirement not

met. n/a n/a Requirement

met.

Assets Requirement not met.

n/a n/a Requirement met.

© 2021 Post College, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

PART II: The Presentation Overview: On this project discussion board, you’ll share a presentation that displays the data you’ve got supplied in your written report and share it with the category. Directions: Utilizing no matter device you’d like (PowerPoint, Phrase, Prezi, video, and so on.), design a presentation protecting your written report’s details and comparisons. Be at liberty to incorporate photographs and be inventive! Embody the next parts:

• The worth in understanding worldwide justice programs.

• Comparability of three (three) international locations’ legal justice programs.

• A short historical past of every nation and its affect on its legal justice system.

• The roles of law enforcement officials in these international locations.

• Essential points that these international locations are confronting.

• Comparability of those legal justice programs to programs of the US.

• Your remaining ideas on what you shared in your presentation.

Necessities:

• Use a minimal of three (three) references formatted in APA – these can come from course sources.

• Be sure you use course ideas in your work and manage your info in a transparent and structured means.

• Post the project and your response to the Shared Project Discussion board by the due dates listed above.

• Reply to a minimum of one (1) classmate’s project with the next:

o Focus on one thing new you’ve got realized from their presentation.

o Be sure you elaborate in your classmate’s concepts with additional remark or commentary, current a related new thought or viewpoint for consideration, and lift a Question Assignment or politely provide another perspective.

© 2021 Post College, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Analysis Rubric for PART II: The Presentation

CRITERIA Poor Improvement Wanted Passable Proficient

(Zero-23 Factors) (24-31 Factors) (32-35 Factors) (36-40 Factors)

Required Parts

A number of main parts are lacking or are tough to guage.

A number of the required parts are included; directions aren’t fully adopted.

A lot of the required parts and directions are included and full.

All required parts are included and absolutely full, and all directions adopted.

(Zero-11 Factors) (12-15 Factors) (16-17 Factors) (18-20 Factors)

Course Ideas

Work doesn’t mirror the content material of the course.

Course ideas are considerably evident.

Course ideas are typically obvious however could present inconsistencies or minor gaps in understanding.

Course ideas are completely mirrored in work.

(Zero-Eight Factors) (9-11 Factors) (12-13 Factors) (14-15 Factors)

Group Work is disorganized or unclear.

Work reveals some makes an attempt at group.

Work is organized to help understanding.

Work is clearly structured, displays planning, and ordered thought.

(Zero-2 Factors) (three Factors) (four Factors) (5 Factors)

References and APA Formatting

Reference citations aren’t current, or APA fashion formatting has vital errors.

Some citations are lacking, and/or citations have some points with APA fashion formatting.

All references are cited, however citations have minor errors in APA fashion formatting.

Reference citations are included and appropriately formatted in APA fashion.

(Zero Factors) (5 Factors) (Eight Factors) (10 Factors)

Peer Response

No response put up made to a classmate’s presentation.

Peer response supplied although minimal and missing depth by restating or summarizing what was already expressed; particulars and new concepts lacking or missing.

Peer response elaborates on classmate’s concepts with additional remark, together with dialogue of the matters however doesn’t elevate a Question Assignment or provide another perspective.

Peer response elaborates on classmate’s concepts with additional remark together with dialogue of the matters; presents a related new thought or viewpoint for consideration; raises a Question Assignment or politely presents another perspective.

© 2021 Post College, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

CRITERIA Poor Improvement Wanted Passable Proficient

(Zero Factors) (5 Factors) (10 Factors)

Posting Due Dates

The project and response weren’t posted by the due dates of the unit.

Both the project or the response was not posted by the due date of the unit.

Each the project and response have been posted by the due dates of the unit.

Situation Overview:
PART I: The Written Report
Directions:
Necessities:
Analysis Rubric for PART I: The Written Report
PART II: The Presentation
Overview:
Directions:
Necessities:

Order | Check Discount

Tags: 2803NRS, ACC 502 GCU, ACCCN, ACCT 553 DeVry, ACCT20071, ACCT6003