Posted: February 26th, 2022

© 2021 Post University, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

© 2021 Post College, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

CRJ402 – Comparative Prison Justice

Unit 7 Ultimate Mission: Comparative Prison Justice

Due Dates:

• Half I – Written Report: 11:59 p.m. EST, Sunday of Unit 7 • Half II – Presentation: 11:59 p.m. EST, Wednesday of Unit Eight, with one response due by Friday

of Unit Eight. Whole Factors: 200 State of affairs Overview: Congratulations! Your experience in comparative felony justice has gotten you promoted to the Head of Public Relations for the Police Division! That is an thrilling time so that you can put your data to work and hit the bottom working. You could have simply obtained an electronic mail out of your boss with the main points of your first challenge:

Good morning! We’re thrilled to have you ever take the lead as Head of Public Relations. The primary challenge now we have for you has two elements: The primary half is to finish a written report that gives a standardized comparability of the US towards three different international locations in policing. The second half is to create a summed-up presentation of the data in your report in your new workers and colleagues. There may be extra details about what’s required under. Your written report might be due on the finish of Unit 7, and your presentation might be due by Wednesday of Unit Eight. Thanks, and sustain the superb work!

PART I: The Written Report Directions: On your written report, embody the next parts:

• An introduction expressing the worth in understanding worldwide justice techniques.

• Select three (three) international locations lined on this course and full a basic Assessment and comparability of their felony justice techniques.

© 2021 Post College, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

• Briefly focus on the historical past of every nation and the way it has influenced its felony justice system.

• Evaluate the roles of law enforcement officials in these international locations.

• Focus on crucial points that these international locations are confronting.

• Share your ideas on how the techniques of those international locations examine to the felony justice techniques of the US.

• A conclusion that expresses your remaining ideas on what you’ve mentioned.

Necessities:

• Your paper ought to be a minimum of 5 (5) pages in size utilizing APA model formatting, with extra title and reference pages.

• Use a minimum of three (three) scholarly assets and embody reference citations in appropriate APA formatting.

Remember to learn the factors under by which your work might be evaluated earlier than you write and once more after you write.

© 2021 Post College, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Analysis Rubric for PART I: The Written Report

CRITERIA Poor Wants Enchancment Proficient Exemplary

(Zero-Eight Factors) (9-11 Factors) (12-13 Factors) (14-15 Factors) Basic Assessment and Comparability of three Prison Justice Programs

Part is minimally or not addressed.

Part is considerably addressed.

Part is pretty nicely addressed.

Part is totally addressed.

Roles of Police Officers Part is minimally or not addressed.

Part is considerably addressed.

Part is pretty nicely addressed.

Part is totally addressed.

Vital Points Part is minimally or not addressed.

Part is considerably addressed.

Part is pretty nicely addressed.

Part is totally addressed.

Comparability to the Prison Justice Programs of the US

Part is minimally or not addressed.

Part is considerably addressed.

Part is pretty nicely addressed.

Part is totally addressed.

(Zero-5 factors) (6-7 factors) (Eight factors) (9-10 factors) Temporary Historical past of Every Nation and its Affect

Part is minimally or not addressed.

Part is considerably addressed.

Part is pretty nicely addressed.

Part is totally addressed.

Introduction and Conclusion

Elements are minimally or not addressed.

Elements are considerably addressed.

Elements are pretty nicely addressed.

Elements are totally addressed.

Clear and Skilled Writing and APA Format

Vital errors impede skilled presentation; APA tips aren’t adopted.

Some errors in writing and/or APA formatting are starting to impede skilled presentation.

Few errors in writing and/or APA formatting that don’t impede skilled presentation.

Writing and format are clear, skilled, APA compliant, and error-free.

(Zero factors) (5 factors) Report Size Requirement not

met. n/a n/a Requirement

met.

Assets Requirement not met.

n/a n/a Requirement met.

© 2021 Post College, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

PART II: The Presentation Overview: On this project discussion board, you’ll share a presentation that displays the data you’ve offered in your written report and share it with the category. Directions: Utilizing no matter instrument you’d like (PowerPoint, Phrase, Prezi, video, and so on.), design a presentation protecting your written report’s details and comparisons. Be happy to incorporate photos and be artistic! Embrace the next parts:

• The worth in understanding worldwide justice techniques.

• Comparability of three (three) international locations’ felony justice techniques.

• A short historical past of every nation and its affect on its felony justice system.

• The roles of law enforcement officials in these international locations.

• Vital points that these international locations are confronting.

• Comparability of those felony justice techniques to techniques of the US.

• Your remaining ideas on what you shared in your presentation.

Necessities:

• Use a minimal of three (three) references formatted in APA – these can come from course assets.

• Remember to use course ideas in your work and manage your info in a transparent and structured manner.

• Post the project and your response to the Shared Task Discussion board by the due dates listed above.

• Reply to a minimum of one (1) classmate’s project with the next:

o Focus on one thing new you’ve realized from their presentation.

o Remember to elaborate in your classmate’s concepts with additional remark or remark, current a related new thought or viewpoint for consideration, and lift a Question Assignment or politely provide another perspective.

© 2021 Post College, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Analysis Rubric for PART II: The Presentation

CRITERIA Poor Growth Wanted Passable Proficient

(Zero-23 Factors) (24-31 Factors) (32-35 Factors) (36-40 Factors)

Required Parts

A number of main parts are lacking or are troublesome to guage.

A few of the required parts are included; directions aren’t utterly adopted.

A lot of the required parts and directions are included and full.

All required parts are included and absolutely full, and all directions adopted.

(Zero-11 Factors) (12-15 Factors) (16-17 Factors) (18-20 Factors)

Course Ideas

Work doesn’t replicate the content material of the course.

Course ideas are considerably evident.

Course ideas are usually obvious however might present inconsistencies or minor gaps in understanding.

Course ideas are totally mirrored in work.

(Zero-Eight Factors) (9-11 Factors) (12-13 Factors) (14-15 Factors)

Group Work is disorganized or unclear.

Work exhibits some makes an attempt at group.

Work is organized to Help understanding.

Work is clearly structured, displays planning, and ordered thought.

(Zero-2 Factors) (three Factors) (four Factors) (5 Factors)

References and APA Formatting

Reference citations aren’t current, or APA model formatting has important errors.

Some citations are lacking, and/or citations have some points with APA model formatting.

All references are cited, however citations have minor errors in APA model formatting.

Reference citations are included and accurately formatted in APA model.

(Zero Factors) (5 Factors) (Eight Factors) (10 Factors)

Peer Response

No response put up made to a classmate’s presentation.

Peer response offered although minimal and missing depth by restating or summarizing what was already expressed; particulars and new concepts lacking or missing.

Peer response elaborates on classmate’s concepts with additional remark, together with dialogue of the matters however doesn’t elevate a Question Assignment or provide another perspective.

Peer response elaborates on classmate’s concepts with additional remark together with dialogue of the matters; presents a related new thought or viewpoint for consideration; raises a Question Assignment or politely presents another perspective.

© 2021 Post College, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

CRITERIA Poor Growth Wanted Passable Proficient

(Zero Factors) (5 Factors) (10 Factors)

Posting Due Dates

The project and response weren’t posted by the due dates of the unit.

Both the project or the response was not posted by the due date of the unit.

Each the project and response had been posted by the due dates of the unit.

State of affairs Overview:
PART I: The Written Report
Directions:
Necessities:
Analysis Rubric for PART I: The Written Report
PART II: The Presentation
Overview:
Directions:
Necessities:

Order | Check Discount

Tags: best assignment help websites in canada, best nursing paper writing service, buy psychology essay, Cheap Psychology Essay Writing Service, dissertation assignment help, History Dissertation Writing Services by UK Writers