Posted: February 23rd, 2022

Psychopathology

• Grid View
• List View

	Glorious	Good	Truthful	Poor
Most important Posting: Response to the dialogue Question Assignment is reflective with vital Assessment and synthesis consultant of information gained from the course readings for the module and present credible sources.	40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Completely responds to the dialogue Question Assignment(s). Is reflective with vital Assessment and synthesis consultant of information gained from the course readings for the module and present credible sources.  A minimum of 75% of publish has distinctive depth and breadth.  Supported by at the very least three present credible sources.	35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Responds to a lot of the dialogue Question Assignment(s).  Is considerably reflective with vital Assessment and synthesis consultant of information gained from the course readings for the module.  50% of the publish has distinctive depth and breadth.  Supported by at the very least three credible references.	31 (31%) – 34 (34%) Responds to a few of the dialogue Question Assignment(s).  One to 2 standards usually are not addressed or are superficially addressed.  Is considerably missing reflection and important Assessment and synthesis.  Considerably represents information gained from the course readings for the module.  Put up is cited with fewer than 2 credible references.	zero (zero%) – 30 (30%) Doesn’t reply to the dialogue Question Assignment(s).  Lacks depth or superficially addresses standards.  Lacks reflection and important Assessment and synthesis.  Doesn’t signify information gained from the course readings for the module.  Comprises just one or no credible references.
Most important Posting: Writing	6 (6%) – 6 (6%) Written clearly and concisely.  Comprises no grammatical or spelling errors.  Additional adheres to present APA handbook writing guidelines and magnificence.	5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Written concisely.  Could comprise one to 2 grammatical or spelling errors.  Adheres to present APA handbook writing guidelines and magnificence.	four (four%) – four (four%) Written considerably concisely.  Could comprise greater than two spelling or grammatical errors.  Comprises some APA formatting errors.	zero (zero%) – three (three%) Not written clearly or concisely.  Comprises greater than two spelling or grammatical errors.  Doesn’t adhere to present APA handbook writing guidelines and magnificence.
Most important Posting: Well timed and full participation	9 (9%) – 10 (10%) Meets necessities for well timed, full, and energetic participation.  Posts major dialogue by due date.	eight (eight%) – eight (eight%) Posts major dialogue by due date.  Meets necessities for full participation.	7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Posts major dialogue by due date.	zero (zero%) – 6 (6%) Doesn’t meet necessities for full participation.  Doesn’t publish major dialogue by due date.
First Response: Put up to colleague’s major publish that’s reflective and justified with credible sources.	9 (9%) – 9 (9%) Response displays vital considering and software to apply settings.  Responds to questions posed by school.  The usage of scholarly sources to help concepts demonstrates synthesis and understanding of studying targets.	eight (eight%) – eight (eight%) Response has some depth and should exhibit vital considering or software to apply setting.	7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Response is on subject, might have some depth.	zero (zero%) – 6 (6%) Response will not be on subject, lacks depth.
First Response: Writing	6 (6%) – 6 (6%) Communication is skilled and respectful to colleagues.  Response to school questions are absolutely answered, if posed.  Offers clear, concise opinions and concepts which might be supported by two or extra credible sources.  Response is successfully written in Commonplace, Edited English.	5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Communication is usually skilled and respectful to colleagues.  Response to school questions are principally answered, if posed.  Offers opinions and concepts which might be supported by few credible sources.  Response is written in Commonplace, Edited English.	four (four%) – four (four%) Response posed within the dialogue might lack efficient skilled communication.  Response to school questions are considerably answered, if posed.  Few or no credible sources are cited.	zero (zero%) – three (three%) Responses posted within the dialogue lack efficient communication.  Response to school questions are lacking.  No credible sources are cited.
First Response: Well timed and full participation	5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets necessities for well timed, full, and energetic participation.  Posts by due date.	four (four%) – four (four%) Meets necessities for full participation.  Posts by due date.	three (three%) – three (three%) Posts by due date.	zero (zero%) – 2 (2%) Doesn’t meet necessities for full participation.  Doesn’t publish by due date.
Second Response: Put up to colleague’s major publish that’s reflective and justified with credible sources.	9 (9%) – 9 (9%) Response displays vital considering and software to apply settings.  Responds to questions posed by school.  The usage of scholarly sources to help concepts demonstrates synthesis and understanding of studying targets.	eight (eight%) – eight (eight%) Response has some depth and should exhibit vital considering or software to apply setting.	7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Response is on subject, might have some depth.	zero (zero%) – 6 (6%) Response will not be on subject, lacks depth.
Second Response: Writing	6 (6%) – 6 (6%) Communication is skilled and respectful to colleagues.  Response to school questions are absolutely answered, if posed.  Offers clear, concise opinions and concepts which might be supported by two or extra credible sources.  Response is successfully written in Commonplace, Edited English.	5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Communication is usually skilled and respectful to colleagues.  Response to school questions are principally answered, if posed.  Offers opinions and concepts which might be supported by few credible sources.  Response is written in Commonplace, Edited English.	four (four%) – four (four%) Response posed within the dialogue might lack efficient skilled communication.  Response to school questions are considerably answered, if posed.  Few or no credible sources are cited.	zero (zero%) – three (three%) Responses posted within the dialogue lack efficient communication.  Response to school questions are lacking.  No credible sources are cited.
Second Response: Well timed and full participation	5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets necessities for well timed, full, and energetic participation.  Posts by due date.	four (four%) – four (four%) Meets necessities for full participation.  Posts by due date.	three (three%) – three (three%) Posts by due date.	zero (zero%) – 2 (2%) Doesn’t meet necessities for full participation.  Doesn’t publish by due date.
Complete Factors: 100

Title: NRNP_6635_Week1_Discussion_Rubric

Order | Check Discount

Tags: best essay writing service, best nursing essay writing service, best nursing essay writing services, biology essay writing service, business essay writing service, Expert Nursing Assignment Help Online