Posted: February 17th, 2022

Week 5 Final Assignment

Is to morally justified for authorized marriage to be obtainable to couples of the identical intercourse?  
Moral Reasoning
[WLO: 3] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4]
Please learn these task directions earlier than writing your paper as they comprise very exact and particular directions on each the content material and format necessities. You need to obtain the offered define and use that to construction your paper, and seek the advice of the task steerage and modeled instance for extra Help. Lastly, earlier than submitting your task please use the guidelines to make sure that you’ve gotten accomplished the entire necessities.
Overview
This course has three written assignments that construct upon each other and are designed to take you step-by-step by way of a technique of writing a paper that identifies an moral Question Assignment, examines the context, points, and arguments surrounding the Question Assignment, and makes an attempt to defend a solution to that Question Assignment utilizing sturdy ethical reasoning.
Within the Week 1 task, “Moral Question Assignment,” you selected an moral Question Assignment, offered an introduction, a place assertion and supporting motive, and an opposing place assertion and supporting motive.
Within the Week three task, “Making use of an Moral Concept,” you defined utilitarianism, deontology, or advantage ethics, together with its core ethical precept or splendid, and utilized that idea to the subject by demonstrating how its ideas would help a selected place in your moral Question Assignment.
On this last written task, you’ll mix what you’ve gotten achieved in these two workouts by inspecting an moral problem and defending your individual place on an moral Question Assignment relating to that problem.
This last written task ought to be written in essay type with the next clearly labeled sections:

Introduction
Moral Argument
Clarification and Protection
Objection and Response
Conclusion

The paper ought to be between 1,300 and 1,500 phrases, make the most of three scholarly sources, and embrace a title web page and reference web page.
Half 1: Introduction
On this part of the paper, you’ll start together with your moral Question Assignment, introduce the subject and paper, and shut with a thesis assertion.

The moral Question Assignment would be the identical as your Week three written task (“Making use of an Moral Concept”) or a revised model of it.
The introduction ought to be revised in a method that displays your further considering on the difficulty and Question Assignment.
Finish this part with a thesis assertion that states your place on the difficulty (the reply to the moral Question Assignment you consider is strongest) and gives a short abstract of the primary concepts you can be presenting within the paper. Please see the task steerage for examples of thesis statements.

Place the introduction underneath the Half 1: Introduction heading.
Half 2: Moral Argument
On this part of the paper, you’ll current the strongest argument you may in help of the place you’ve gotten acknowledged in your introduction.

This shall be much like the “supporting causes” you provided within the first task; nonetheless, this argument ought to replicate your analysis into the important thing moral points that should be recognized and addressed, the arguments on totally different sides of this downside, and the theories of ethical reasoning we have now studied within the class (you’ll talk about the precise particulars and implications of the ethical theories within the subsequent two sections).
You’ll be able to consider this as a abstract of the primary argument you’ll give for those who have been an legal professional attempting to persuade a jury of your place.

Place this info underneath the Half 2: Moral Argument heading.
Half three: Clarification and Protection
On this part, you’ll clarify and defend your argument by drawing on the ethical idea that aligns most carefully with the argument you introduced in Half 2. This can be the identical idea you mentioned in your second task, however it could even be a unique idea.

You will need to first clarify the speculation on the whole phrases much like the way you defined a idea in your second task, together with a short account of the historic background of the speculation and the thinker(s) related to it and normal overview of the core ethical splendid or precept of the speculation, together with the way in which it guides and constrains ethical reasoning.
You need to then clearly present how your argument represents an utility of that type of ethical reasoning.
In different phrases, if the argument you current in Half 2 is utilitarian, deontological, or virtue-based (teleological), it would be best to clarify utilitarianism, deontology, or advantage ethics on the whole phrases, then clarify how your argument from Half 2 displays or attracts upon the core ideas and values of that idea. Please seek advice from the Week three task directions for instructions on the right way to clarify and apply the ethical idea.

Place this part underneath the Half three: Clarification and Protection heading.
Half four: Objection and Response
On this part of the paper, you’ll current the strongest objection you may to your argument, and briefly defend that objection by interesting to a unique moral idea than the one you centered on in Half three.

Briefly clarify the core ethical splendid or precept of the speculation and the way that might be the idea of an objection to your argument. As an illustration, for those who defined and defended your individual argument by making use of the ideas of advantage ethics, you may elevate an objection from the attitude of utilitarianism by briefly explaining the core utilitarian precept and the way making use of that precept may lead somebody to a unique conclusion than the one you’re defending.
Subsequent, you must reply to the objection by explaining why it isn’t sturdy sufficient to undermine the primary argument in protection of your place.
See the task steerage for options on the right way to successfully reply to the objection.

Place this part underneath the Half four: Objection and Response heading.
Half 5: Conclusion
On this part of the paper, present a abstract of what you’ve gotten achieved within the paper by briefly describing what you achieved in every of the above sections.
Place this part underneath the Half 5: Conclusion heading.
Useful resource Requirement
You will need to use a minimum of three scholarly sources, solely considered one of which would be the textbook. In different phrases, you will need to use a minimum of two scholarly sources along with the textbook.
Acceptable methods of utilizing a supply embrace offering a citation, abstract, or paraphrase; merely offering a quotation, particularly when it’s unclear how or the place the textual content helps your declare, just isn’t ample.
In the event you need Helpance with discovering further sources or are not sure about whether or not a selected useful resource will depend towards the requirement, please contact your teacher.
For sources to depend towards the sources requirement, they have to be cited inside the textual content of your paper and on the reference web page. Sources which can be listed on the references web page however not cited inside the paper don’t depend towards fulfilling the sources requirement.
In your paper,

Introduce the subject and paper.
Present a thesis assertion.
Current an argument in help of the place.
Defend the argument by explaining and making use of the moral idea that the majority carefully aligns with the argument.
Current an objection to the argument by interesting to a unique moral idea.
Reply to the objection.
Present a conclusion that describes what was achieved in every of the sections of the paper.

The Moral Reasoning Final Paper

Should be 1,300 to 1,500 phrases in size (not together with title and references pages) and formatted in keeping with APA fashion as outlined within the Ashford Writing Heart’s APA Model  (Hyperlinks to an exterior website.)Hyperlinks to an exterior website.useful resource.
Should embrace a separate title web page with the next: 

Title of paper
Scholar’s title
Course title and quantity
Teacher’s title
Date submitted

For additional help with the formatting and the title web page, seek advice from APA Formatting for Phrase 2013 (Hyperlinks to an exterior website.)Hyperlinks to an exterior website..

Should make the most of educational voice. See the Educational Voice (Hyperlinks to an exterior website.)Hyperlinks to an exterior website. useful resource for extra steerage.
Should use a minimum of two scholarly sources along with the course textual content. 

The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Different Credible Sources (Hyperlinks to an exterior website.)Hyperlinks to an exterior website. desk gives further steerage on applicable supply sorts. When you’ve got questions on whether or not a particular supply is suitable for this task, please contact your teacher. Your teacher has the ultimate say in regards to the appropriateness of a particular supply for a selected task.

Should doc any info used from sources in APA fashion as outlined within the Ashford Writing Heart’s Citing Inside Your Paper (Hyperlinks to an exterior website.)Hyperlinks to an exterior website. information.
(Hyperlinks to an exterior website.)Hyperlinks to an exterior website.Should embrace a separate references web page that’s formatted in keeping with APA fashion as outlined within the Ashford Writing Heart.

Order | Check Discount