Posted: February 17th, 2022

Teenagers: A Despairing Glimpse At Future Generations

My piece is an argumentative article, supposed for publication in a broadsheet newspaper equivalent to The Day by day Telegraph. The first objective is to argue a fairly controversial thought based mostly upon the semantic area of teenage tradition and behavior; nevertheless, the piece additionally goals to entertain with frequent use of humour via hyperbole and sarcasm, equivalent to “Oh, how mature”. The textual content is geared toward an viewers of educated adults, therefore the formal and considerably superior lexis perpetuated all through.
My piece is predicated on an article by Quentin Letts, from which I adopted such linguistic options as repetitive itemizing, comedic imagery, satirical imitation and inclusive mode of deal with. I realised that Letts’ type was usually overly pretentious, and that he usually presents views which might be seen as controversial or belligerent by most, as displayed by the declarative “Many people are bog-standard class”. His altercations usually goal sure teams of individuals, and this was utilised in my very own piece by attacking an entire technology, a lot to the amusement of the given viewers.
Each mine and Letts’ articles are comparable within the sense that they’re each self-deprecating: Letts, attacking the British while being a Briton himself, and me, attacking youngsters while acknowledging that I’m an adolescent myself. The usage of mode of deal with helps to punctuate the self-inclusive nature, with the first-person plural pronoun “we” used to bridge a connection between me and youngsters, and to determine an undesirable widespread floor.

Though I’m wholly included throughout the recipients of my very own blame, I make it apparent that I want to be distanced from youngsters as I’m writing from a viewpoint which doesn’t need to be associated with youngsters. I utilise varied strategies which Help emphasise my stance. A methodology of intimidation which Letts makes use of is imitation as demonstrated with the declarative “e do not love me!”, which is thus emulated in my piece with: “ME MAM BURNT ME CHIKEN NUGETS!” which additionally makes use of satiric misspelling to hyperbolise the comment, and preserve the humour of the piece in an effort to conform to the aim. The usage of such imitation makes clear the dissonance between me and youngsters because it immediately parodies them in a considerably demeaning manner.
Letts helps to convey his argument by use of metaphors equivalent to “climbing down into the gutter is a harmful tactic”. This was mirrored in my piece with the metaphor “we speedily climb the ladder of maturity, while our mother and father wait on the prime” which not solely presents intelligent imagery to affirm the purpose for the reader, but in addition offers humour in a extra refined manner; use of such humour is used to regulate extra with the viewers of the piece.
When writing the piece, I aimed to argue my level in a succinct and structured manner, which might concurrently permeate an air of humour and pretension which Letts so adequately upholds. The viewers is into account all through, with clear makes an attempt to keep up formal lexis and thus appease these of upper training and sophistication, as proven with such phrases because the concrete noun “cacophony” and the descriptive adjective “gargantuan”. But this successfully contrasts with the satiric use of casual lexis equivalent to colloquial adjective “plastered”, and the ironic use of such textual content abbreviations as “TBH” and “IDK”.

Order | Check Discount