HEALTH Its Dimensions Models And Theories Essay

Health ; It? s Dimensions, Models And Theories. Essay, Research Paper

The World Health Organisation defines? wellness?

as: – ? ? . A complete provinces of physical, mental and societal well

being? non simply the absence of disease. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? WHO ( 1946 ) Constitution, Geneva. If we were all to be in conformity with this

definition, there would be really few people who would be classed as being with

their? wellness? . This definition has been described by some societal scientists as

? Utopian? how wellness would be in an ideal universe. With understanding I am traveling to explicate what I

believe to be my position of wellness from a laymans? position, and so, utilizing

late used cognition explain what my construct of? ? wellness? is from theoretical positions. I will so look at

the two contrasting theoretical accounts of wellness and discourse how these fulfil the WHO

definition.There are many different positions in the manner which we

position the term? wellness? .

Everyone is alone so wellness is something that varies from

individual to individual ; we all have our ain positions on what is meant by being in good

wellness, a batch of people take their wellness for granted, and wellness is frequently

something that can be neglected without idea. Many look upon wellness as being

the absence of disease, unwellness, achings and strivings. ? Your all right every bit long as

you have got your wellness? , this is something we frequently here, but does it mention

to being wholly without unwellness, no worse than can be expected or allow

with one? s fortunes. To depict my ain position of? ? what? wellness is from a laymans? position, I would hold to

say that it would be to be without hurting and disease, to hold mental and

physical stableness and to hold the freedom and independency to do my ain life

picks. I feel that person? s wellness can frequently be affected by his or her

quality of life, to experience good about one? s ego you besides need to experience dignified. Everyone? s wellness is alone to them, we are all unique in

our organic structures and mind? s, and people react in different ways to different

state of affairss. To demo this I am utilizing an illustration of a adult female, whom I know, who

describes herself as being in good wellness. I am besides traveling to give a brief

description of another friend who suffers with the same status. Yet the

sentiment of a trefoil or dreamer, sing the first illustration, would be that she

was without her wellness, this would be the position from the biomedical attack to

wellness. The societal scientist would question whether or non she had the ability to

map in a normal societal function. Where as the humanist would see that she has

adapted positively to the jobs that she faces in life, this would be seen

as the holistic theoretical account of health.Karen is a 36-year-old

female who surveies full clip at college ; she is a diabetic. Karen is insulin

dependant, on assorted medicines ; she has besides gone blind and suffers with

peripheral neuropathy. Yet this adult female still classes herself as being healthy.

She has learnt to understand and pull off her status, to understate its effects

on her life. She is developing to be a counselor so that she can Help other

people who find themselves in her state of affairs. Karen is thankful for the wellness

that she has, although she suffers many unwellnesss she sees these as new

challenges non as sick wellness. Karen was foremost diagnosed 12 old ages ago.Bob is a 44-year-old? male,

he does non work and is a diabetic. Bob is insulin dependant, receives other

medicines and he besides suffers with peripheral neuropathy. Bob? s intervention is

overlooked by the territory nurses he classes himself as being housebound ;

relations and carers support him in his day-to-day demands. Bob classes him self as

handicapped yet he still has his sight, so his physical wellness is really better

than Karen? s is. He has been ill for about 6 old ages. Everyone will portion different positions on the wellness of these

two people, that is because wellness agencies different things to each of usThrough cognition I have

late learned I am traveling to look at what my construct of? wellness? is now from

theoretical positions. Health is portion of a dynamic procedure ; it has assorted

influences such as age, gender and our societal categorization. To accurately

name person? s wellness, the organic structure must be viewed as a whole, with all countries

looked at together as one. There are many different

dimensions of wellness. We can look at how our wellness affe

Nutmeg States us in many

different ways. The organic structure reacts as a whole so hence must be treated as a

whole. It is possible for us to be unhealthy with a psychological complaint that

can take to societal jobs, or even be caused by them without demoing any

physical injury. There are besides the mental, emotional and religious dimensions

to look at when specifying wellness. These are all things that need to be taken

into history when looking for and accurate diagnosing. How is it possible for an

unemployed individual female parent to experience healthy in a on the job category society that has

household values, when she is on her ain and life in poorness? She may non be

? ill? but her organic structure is non working in harmoniousness and balance. Different professions have

different theories on wellness. A trefoil would state it is the absence of disease or

hurt that signify wellness in a individual. A societal scientist would state that it is

the ability to map in a normal societal function. The dreamer would back up the

WHO definition, where as a humanist would state that it is the ability to accommodate

positively to the jobs of life, which makes us healthy. ? All of these professions have different

sentiments, yet they are of import in the bringing of our attention when we are ill. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? The organic structure is born as one, reacts as one

and dies as one. It is a integrity, when affected by illness, it reacts as a

whole? . ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Sankaran,

1992.Whichever theoretical account of wellness we

agree with it must be seen to be equal for the intent it sets out to

fulfil. Whether this be nursing the sick, the attention of the aged, both

physically and mentally, and the bar of sick wellness through the society

in which we live. Holistic is a word derived

from the Grecian word? Holos? intending whole. ?

The holistic theoretical account of wellness is one that fulfils the WHO definition in

the sense that non merely on the absence of disease and unwellness but besides on the

absence of physical, psychological and societal complaints, will at that place be harmoniousness

and balance. Both of which are needed to interact to organize complete homeostasis.

Holistic theoretical accounts say that to see the organic structure without taking into history the

societal and psychological facets, would give a deceptive diagnosing of the

wellness of that organic structure. Over the last century the

most influencing theoretical account in wellness has been the traditional biomedical theoretical account. It

began in the Renaissance, when the major division between faith and scientific discipline

occurred. Rene Descartes, a philosopher of the Renaissance, put frontward the

construct of dualism, a head free from external forces and able to believe logically

and independently. With this the organic structure and the head could be viewed individually,

the organic structure was seen as a machine. If there were a job the organic structure was broken

down into constituents, the job would be found and rectified. Biomedical

theoretical accounts of wellness see the organic structure as a biological machine made up of many parts.

Cells which make tissues, which so make variety meats and so eventually systems.

These systems so interact and communicate to make harmoniousness and balance, a

province called biological homeostasis. This is seen as wellness. This attack is

known as the reductionist attack, when merely a little portion and non the

whole individual is taken into history. It has been priceless in deriving

scientific cognition about the organic structure but ruled out the head. This attack did

non take into history what affects could be had upon the organic structure by psychological,

societal and physical dimensions. Although it is seen to be of great importance

that we are physically good, there is now more credence that these other

dimensions influence our wellness, so when this is taken into history the

biomedical theoretical account of wellness slightly fulfils the WHO definition. Both of the theoretical accounts of wellness

that we have looked at position the organic structure as being full and understand that one

portion will non work right without the other. Yet the biomedical theoretical account,

which is the orthodox, traditional theoretical account treats the parts that cause the

job, without farther analyzing psychological or societal upsets which may

besides be present. To accomplish complete harmoniousness and balance, we need to firstly

accomplish a complete province of physical, mental and societal wellbeing, this can

merely be done by sing the organic structure as a whole in its entireness.